Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine if the DTS decreases radiation exposure (primary outcome measure), fluoroscopy time (secondary outcome measure), and time to distal screw placement (secondary outcome measure) compared to the freehand "perfect circles" method when used for locking of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of femur fractures METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with hip or femoral shaft fractures that were treated with a long cephalomedullary nail were enrolled in this study. Cohorts were determined based on the method of distal interlocking screw placement into either the "Perfect Circles" or "Distal Targeting" cohort. Time from cephalad screw placement to placement of final distal interlocking screw (seconds), radiation exposure (mGy), and fluoroscopy time (seconds) were compared between groups. Hospital quality measures were compared between cohorts. RESULTS:Use of the DTS resulted in 77% (4.3x) lower radiation exposure (p < 0.001), 64% (2.7x) lower fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), and 60% (1.7x) lower intraoperative time from end of cephalad screw placement to end of distal interlocking screw placement (p < 0.001) compared to the freehand "perfect circles" method. There was no difference in 30-day or 90-day complication rates between cohorts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The Stryker Gamma3® Distal Targeting System is a safe, effective and efficient alternative to the freehand "perfect circles" method.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was twofold: 1. To assess how adaptive modeling, accounting for development of inpatient complications, affects the predictive capacity of the risk tool to predict inpatient mortality for a cohort of geriatric hip fracture patients. 2. To compare how risk triaging of secondary outcomes is affected by adaptive modeling. We hypothesize that adaptive modeling will improve the predictive capacity of the model and improve the ability to risk triage secondary outcomes. METHODS:and comparative analyses were conducted. RESULTS:experienced the highest rate of mortality, readmission, ICU admission, with longer lengths of stay and higher hospital costs. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:can better identify patients at risk for developing complications whose mortality and readmission risk profile increase significantly, allowing their new risk classification to inform higher levels of care. While this may increase length of stay and total costs, it may improve outcomes in both the short and long-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To examine the efficacy of regional anesthesia with sedation only for a variety of hip fractures using the newly described lateral femoral cutaneous with over the hip Block (LOH Block). DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective. SETTING/METHODS:Level-I Trauma CenterPatients/Participants: 40 patients who presented between 11/2021 and 02/2022 for fixation of OTA/AO 31.A1-3 and 31.B1-3 fractures. Matched cohorts of 40 patients who received general anesthesia and 40 patients who received spinal anesthesia for hip fracture fixation were also used. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Operative fixation under LOH block and sedation only. The LOH block is a regional hip analgesic that targets the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, articular branches of femoral nerve (FN) and accessory obturator nerve (AON). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Demographics, intraoperative characteristics, anesthesia-related complications, hospital quality metrics, and short-term mortality and reoperation rates. RESULTS:A total of 120 patients (40 each: general, spinal, LOH block) were compared. The cohorts were similar in age, race, BMI, gender, CCI, trauma risk score, ambulatory status at baseline, fracture type, and surgical fixation technique performed. Physiologic parameters during surgery were more stable in the LOH block group (p<0.05). Total OR time and anesthesia time were shortest for the LOH block cohort (p<0.05). Patients in the LOH block cohort also had lower post-operative pain scores (p<0.05). Length of hospital stay was shortest for patients in the LOH block cohort (p<0.05), and at time of discharge, patients in the LOH block cohort ambulated the furthest (p<0.05). No differences were found in regards to anesthesia-related complications, palliative care consults, major and minor hospital complications, discharge disposition, reoperation and readmission rates, and mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS:The LOH block is safe and effective anesthesia for the treatment of all types of hip fractures in the elderly requiring surgery. In addition, this block may decrease post-operative pain and length of hospital stay, and also allow for greater ambulation in the early post-operative period for hip fracture patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purposes of this study were 1) to assess the outcome of nonoperative management of GT fractures with > 5 mm of displacement and 2) to assess whether there is a correlation between degree of displacement and outcome. METHODS:This study was a retrospective review of consecutive low-energy GT fractures from 2011 to 2020. Radiographs from all visits were reviewed. The direction of maximal displacement was assessed. Subjects were stratified based on the amount of maximal displacement: Group 1: 0-5 mm, Group 2: 5-10 mm, Group 3: > 10 mm. Range of motion (ROM) at the time of final follow-up was assessed. The presence of persistent shoulder pain after healing was noted, as well as whether supplemental subacromial corticosteroid injection was provided as part of long-term treatment. RESULTS:A cohort of 93 fractures comprised the study group. Mean age was 62 years. Mean follow-up was 20 months. All fractures went on to union. Mean displacement was 6.2 mm. There were 43 patients in Group 1, 43 in Group 2, and 7 in Group 3. Maximal displacement was most commonly inferolateral or lateral, accounting for a combined 77% of all patients. There was no difference in final ROM between displacement groups, with at least 155 degrees of forward elevation and 45 degrees of ER in all three groups. There was no difference between Group 1 and Groups 2/3 in frequency of persistent pain or likelihood of receiving a steroid injection. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings do not support a discrete 5 mm displacement threshold for surgical repair of isolated greater tuberosity fractures.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To measure the effect of a novel augmented reality software designed to aid in lag screw placement into the femoral head for cephalomedullary nails. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Single level I trauma center. PATIENTS/METHODS:Between November 2017 and December 2020, 114 consecutive patients with a hip fracture that underwent repair with a cephalomedullary nail by one of two orthopedic trauma surgeons were reviewed. Fracture classifications included OTA/AO 31-A1, 31-A2, 31-A3, and 31-B3. INTERVENTION/METHODS:The first 57 patients underwent fracture repair without the software (control) and the subsequent 57 patients underwent repair with use of the augmented reality software (AR). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Tip apex distance (TAD) and femoral head zone (AP: superior, center, inferior; Lateral: anterior, center, posterior) were measured using standardized techniques. RESULTS:The mean TAD was lower for the AR vs. control cohort (10.7±2.9 mm vs 15.4±3.8 mm; p<0.001). TAD <10mm for AR vs. control: 25 (43.9%) vs. 3 (5.3%), p<0.001. TAD <15mm for AR vs. control: 50 (87.7%) vs. 44 (77.2%), p<0.001. On the AP view center position was achieved in 50.9% vs. 7.0% of cases for the AR vs. control cohort, respectively. On the lateral view, center position was achieved in 68.4% vs. 12.3% of cases for the AR vs. control cohort, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study suggests that use of the novel augmented reality software for assistance in lag screw positioning within the femoral head improves overall TAD and ability to achieve the center-center position.

BACKGROUND:The association of tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) with posterior malleolar fractures is well described. The purpose of this study was to identify specific radiographic parameters that are predictive of any pattern of associated distal intra-articular fractures in TSFs. METHODS:All TSFs presenting over a 6-year period were identified. A radiographic review of plain radiographs and CT scans included: identification of any associated ankle fracture, classification using the OTA System, measurements of the TSF obliquity angle (FOA), relative distance from distal extent of the TSF to plafond (DFP%), and presence and level of any associated fibular fractures. Patients with and without associated ankle fractures were statistically compared. Multivariate logistic regression determined independent predictors of associated ankle fractures. RESULTS:405 TSFs in 397 patients were identified, with 145 TSFs with associated distal intra-articular fractures. There were 94 (23.2%) posterior malleolar fractures, 19 (13.1%) medial malleolar fractures, 42 (29.0%) lateral malleolar fractures involving the syndesmosis and 14 (9.7%) Chaput fragments. Multivariate regression demonstrated AO/OTA classification type 42-A1, 42-B1 or 42-C1 (OR 2.3 [95% CI 1.3-4.0]; p = 0.003), FOA greater than 45° (OR 2.7 [95% CI 1.5-4.8]; p = 0.001) and DFP% less than 33% (OR 4.1 [95% CI 2.0-9.0]; p = 0.005) were independent correlates of associated ankle fractures regardless of mechanism of injury. CONCLUSIONS:Different patterns of intra-articular fractures beyond posterior malleolar fractures can occur in TSFs. Fracture angles greater than 45° and extent into the distal 33% of the tibial shaft are independent predictors of distal intra-articular fractures in TSFs regardless of mechanism of injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Diagnostic Level III.

BACKGROUND:Value is defined as outcome/cost. The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in the lengths of care, outcomes, and costs between skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and home with health services (HHS) for patients treated with arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture (FNF). METHODS:Between October 2018 and September 2020, 192 patients eligible for the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) bundle program treated for a displaced FNF with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) and discharged to SNF or HHS were analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, post-operative outcomes, costs of care, and discharge rehabilitation details. Variables were compared using chi-square or T-tests as appropriate. There were 60 (31%) patients discharged to HHS (37% THA, 63% HA) and 132 (69%) patients discharged to SNF (14% THA, 86% HA). Patients discharged to SNF were older (p<0.01), had lower Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool (RAPT) scores (p<0.01), had higher comorbidity scores (p=0.011), and had longer post-hospitalization care (p<0.01). RESULTS:There were no differences in rates of inpatient minor complications (p=0.520), inpatient major complications (p=0.119), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions (p=0.193) or readmissions within 30 (p=0.690) and 90 days (p=0.176). Costs of care at a SNF was higher than HHS (p<0.01). In multivariate regressions, a lower RAPT score was associated with discharge to SNF (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, p<0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among CJR bundle patients treated for a displaced FNF with arthroplasty, discharge with HHS may be a more cost-effective option than discharge to a SNF that does not increase risk of readmission in medically appropriate patients.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The main two forms of treatment for distal femur fractures are locked lateral plating and retrograde nailing. The goal of this trial was to determine whether there are significant differences in outcomes between these forms of treatment. DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial. SETTING/METHODS:20 academic trauma centersPatients/Participants: 160 patients with distal femur fractures were enrolled. 126 patients were followed 12 months. Patients were randomized to plating in 62 cases and to intramedullary nailing in 64 cases. INTERVENTION/METHODS:Lateral locked plating or retrograde intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Functional scoring including SMFA, Bother Index, EQ Health and EQ Index. Secondary measures included alignment, operative time, range of motion, union rate, walking ability, ability to manage stairs and number and type of adverse events. RESULTS:Functional testing showed no difference between the groups. Both groups were still significantly affected by their fracture 12 months post injury. There was more coronal plane valgus in the plating group, which approached statistical significance. Range of motion, walking ability & ability to manage stairs were similar between the groups. Rate and type of adverse events were not statistically different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:Both lateral locked plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing are reasonable surgical options for these fractures. Patients continue to improve over the course of the year following injury, but remain impaired one year post operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of energy mechanism on outcomes following repair of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in the middle aged and geriatric population. METHODS:Two hundred sixty-nine patients who presented to our academic medical center between 2006 and 2020, and underwent operative treatment of a proximal humerus fracture were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved database. Patients above 55 were divided into high energy (motor vehicle accident, pedestrian struck, or fall > 2 stairs) or low energy mechanisms (fall from standing or < 2 stairs). Of 97 patients with complete documentation and follow-up, 72 were included in the low velocity (LV) group and 25 were included in the high velocity (HV) group. Demographic information, primary injury details, healing and time to union, range of motion (ROM), complications, and need for reoperation were assessed at initial presentation and subsequent follow-up appointments. RESULTS:Mean age, BMI, and gender were significantly different between the LV and HV cohorts (p = 0.01, 0.04, 0.01). OTA/AO fracture patterns were similar between the groups. (p = 0.14). Bony healing and complications occurred with similar frequency between groups (p = 1.00, 0.062). The most common complications in the LV and HV groups included avascular necrosis (9.7%, 16.0%), and screw penetration (4.2%, 12.0%), while the HV group also had rotator cuff issues including weakness and tendonitis (12.0%). There was no significant difference in need for reoperation between cohorts (p = 0.45). Time to healing, shoulder ROM, and DASH scores did not differ between each group. CONCLUSIONS:Energy and mechanism demonstrates similar outcomes in operatively treated proximal humerus fractures. These factors should not play a role in decisions for surgery in these patients and can help guide patient expectations.