Faculty Bibliography

Patients, clinicians, and hospitals have undergone monumental changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. This time of troubles has forced us to consider the fundamental obligations that neurologists have to our own individual patients as well as the greater community. By returning to our fundamental understanding of these duties we can ensure that we are providing the most ethically appropriate contingency and crisis care possible. We recommend specific adaptations to both the inpatient and outpatient settings, as well as changes to medical and trainee education. Furthermore, we explore the daunting but potentially necessary implementation of scare resource allocation protocols. As the pandemic evolves, we will need to adapt continuously to these rapidly changing circumstances and consider both national and regional standards and variation.

Direct access through the sinuses and nasopharyngeal mucosa in the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) raises concern for a contaminated operative environment and subsequent infection. The reported rate of meningitis in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery in the literature ranges from 0.7 to 3.0% [1, 2]. The only factor identified as being independently associated with meningitis in a statistically significant manner is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak [1-5]. However, many centers performing high volume of EEAs use postoperative antibiotic coverage independent of the presence intraoperative or postoperative CSF leak. Furthermore, while meningitis remains a severe concern, most centers use postoperative gram-positive coverage to prevent toxic shock syndrome caused by Staphylococcus aureus infection in the setting of prolonged nasal packing. There are currently a multitude of approaches regarding perioperative antibiotic coverage in EEAs [1-4]. Given the lack of consensus in the literature and our experience regarding the benefit of discontinuation of prolonged prophylactic antibiotics throughout the breadth of neurosurgical procedures, we sought to analyze the need for postoperative antibiotics in EEAs further. As such, we performed a prospective analysis compared with a retrospective cohort to delineate whether discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics leads to a change in the rate of postoperative infections. The retrospective cohort consisted of patients who underwent an EEA from January 1, 2013 to May 31, 2019. These patients all received postoperative antibiotics while nasal packing was in place (median 7 days). Starting on April 1, 2019 until August 1, 2019, we discontinued postoperative antibiotic use. Patients from this group made up the prospective cohort. The retrospective cohort had 315 patients (66% pituitary macroadenomas vs. 7% microadenomas, 4% meningiomas, 4% craniopharyngiomas, 4% chordomas, and 15% others) while the prospective group had 23 patients (57% pituitary macroadenomas, 30% craniopharyngiomas, 8% meningiomas/chordomas, and 5% others). The primary endpoint was rate of postoperative infections and specifically, meningitis and multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) infections. There was no statistically significant difference in the use of nasal packing (p = 0.085), intraoperative CSF leak (p = 0.133), and postoperative CSF leak (p = 0.507) between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the number of patients with positive preoperative MSSA and MRSA nasal swabs (p = 0.622). There was a significant decrease in the number of patients discharged with antibiotics (55.1% in the retrospective and 4.5% in the prospective group, p = 0.000). The number of patients with positive blood cultures (p = 0.701) and positive urine cultures (p = 0.691) did not differ significantly between the two groups. Finally, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative CSF infections (p = 0.34) or MDRO infections (0.786) between the two groups. We describe promising preliminary results that demonstrate that discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics in EEAs do not lead to a statistically significant increase in the rate of postoperative CSF or MDRO infections. The previous algorithm for postoperative antibiotic coverage in our center, like many centers, called for gram-positive coverage, which may have contributed to the overall preponderance of gram-negative meningitis cases in this cohort

Background and Purpose/UNASSIGNED:The ideal dosing regimen of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4FPCC) after warfarin-induced intracranial hemorrhage (WICH) remains unclear. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the 4FPCC package insert dosing strategy (standard dose [SD]) with our institutional guideline for high-dose (HD) 4FPCC for patients with WICH. Methods/UNASSIGNED:We compared the percentage of SD and HD patients who achieved an international normalized ratio (INR) ≤1.3 at a single institution between January 2014 and July 2017. Additionally, we assessed hematoma expansion, recurrence of INR > 1.3, and occurrence of thrombotic events within 7 days of 4FPCC administration. Results/UNASSIGNED:= .243). Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:High-dose 4FPCC appears to be more effective at lowering INR and preventing bleed expansion in patients with WICH, while maintaining a similar safety profile.

Over 115 000 people are waiting for life-saving organ transplants, of whom a small fraction will receive transplants and many others will die while waiting. Existing efforts to expand the number of available organs, including increasing the number of registered donors and procuring organs in uncontrolled environments, are crucial but unlikely to address the shortage in the near future and will not improve donor/recipient compatibility or organ quality. If successful, organ bioengineering can solve the shortage and improve functional outcomes. Studying manufactured organs in animal models has produced valuable data, but is not sufficient to understand viability in humans. Before risking manufactured organ experimentation in living humans, study of bioengineered organs in recently deceased humans would facilitate evaluation of the function of engineered tissues and the complex interactions between the host and the transplanted tissue. Although such studies do not pose risk to human subjects, they pose unique ethical challenges concerning the previous wishes of the deceased, rights of surviving family members, effective operation and fair distribution of medical services, and public transparency. This article investigates the ethical, legal and social considerations in performing engineered organ research on the recently deceased.

Introduction Tranexamic Acid (TXA) is an intravenous antifibrinolytic agent that is used routinely for elective surgery. We report a case of inadvertent intrathecal injection of TXA resulting in refractory status epilepticus. Methods Case report. Results A 71-year-old healthy female admitted for bilateral total knee replacement was inadvertently administered 300mg of TXA intrathecally instead of bupivacaine. Soon after administration, she developed myoclonic jerking. When the error was identified, 15cc of CSF was removed. She was intubated, administered levetiracetam, started on a propofol infusion, and transferred to the neurointensive care unit (NICU). She developed persistent spontaneous and stimulus induced generalized myoclonus refractory to propofol. Midazolam infusion was added. NCHCT and CTA demonstrated pneumocephalus, but no acute arterial or venous thrombosis or stroke. vEEG revealed generalized nonconvulsive seizures occurring once per minute, not correlating with spinal myoclonus . Propofol and midazolam infusions were increased to 150 mcg/kg/min and 2.6 mg/kg/hr, respectively, to achieve burst suppression, and valproic acid was added. Over the following week, the drips were adjusted to suppress seizure activity. By hospital day 8, she was weaned off all infusions without recurrence of seizures. By hospital day 19, she was on levetiracetam monotherapy. She was discharged to rehab after a 22-day hospital course, and was discharged home 45 days after initial presentation. Residual deficits at the time of discharge included mild cognitive impairment and gait instability. She remains seizure-free since hospital day 45 on levetiracetam 500mg BID. Conclusions We report a case of refractory status epilepticus and spinal myoclonus after accidental intrathecal TXA administration. With aggressive management, the patient survived with mild residual deficits. The mechanism by which TXA causes status epilepticus and spinal myoclonus is hypothesized to be related to its inhibitory effects on GABA and glycine receptors, respectively