Faculty Bibliography

With the advances of mechanical circulatory support, the selection of patients has undergone many changes over the last decade. Determining who is suitable for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is important to understanding the overall risk and outcomes. As devices improve, it is expected that changes will continue in this field. This review describes current state of patient selection, evaluation, and optimization prior to implantation of a long-term circulatory support device.

Heart failure is recognized with increasing frequency worldwide and often progresses to an advanced refractory state. Although the reference standard for treatment of advanced heart failure remains cardiac transplantation, the increasing shortage of donor organs and the unsuitability of many patients for transplantation surgery has led to a search for alternative therapies. One such therapy is mechanical circulatory support, which helps relieve the load on the ventricle and thereby allows it to recover function. In addition, there is increasing evidence supporting the use of mechanical devices as a bridge to recovery in patients with acute refractory heart failure. In this article, the imaging evaluation of various commonly used short- and long-term cardiac assist devices is discussed, and their relevant mechanisms of action and physiology are described. Imaging, particularly computed tomography (CT), plays a crucial role in preoperative evaluation for assessment of candidacy for implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) or total artificial heart (TAH). Also, echocardiography and CT are indispensable in assessment of complications associated with cardiac devices. Complications commonly associated with short-term assist devices include bleeding and malpositioning, whereas long-term devices such as LVADs may be associated with infection, pump thrombosis, and cannula malfunction, as well as bleeding. CT is also commonly performed for preoperative planning before LVAD or TAH explantation, replacement of a device or one of its components, and cardiac transplantation. Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Mechanical circulatory support devices are the mainstay of treatment for severe cardiogenic shock refractory to pharmacologic therapy. Their evolution over the past few decades has been remarkable with a common theme of developing reliable, less bulky and more easily percutaneously implantable devices. The goal of this article is to review existing devices and advances in technology and provide insight into direction of further research and evolution of mechanical circulatory support devices for temporary support.

Number of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantations increases every year, particularly LVADs for destination therapy (DT). Right ventricular failure (RVF) has been recognized as a serious complication of LVAD implantation. Reported incidence of RVF after LVAD ranges from 6% to 44%, varying mostly due to differences in RVF definition, different types of LVADs, and differences in patient populations included in studies. RVF complicating LVAD implantation is associated with worse postoperative mortality and morbidity including worse end-organ function, longer hospital length of stay, and lower success of bridge to transplant (BTT) therapy. Importance of RVF and its predictors in a setting of LVAD implantation has been recognized early, as evidenced by abundant number of attempts to identify independent risk factors and develop RVF predictor scores with a common purpose to improve patient selection and outcomes by recognizing potential need for biventricular assist device (BiVAD) at the time of LVAD implantation. The aim of this article is to review and summarize current body of knowledge on risk factors and prediction scores of RVF after LVAD implantation. Despite abundance of studies and proposed risk scores for RVF following LVAD, certain common limitations make their implementation and clinical usefulness questionable. Regardless, value of these studies lies in providing information on potential key predictors for RVF that can be taken into account in clinical decision making. Further investigation of current predictors and existing scores as well as new studies involving larger patient populations and more sophisticated statistical prediction models are necessary. Additionally, a short description of our empirical institutional approach to management of RVF following LVAD implantation is provided.

BACKGROUND: Drive-line infections (DLIs) frequently complicate ventricular assist device (VAD) support. We sought to describe the detailed effects of DLIs over time in patients with continuous-flow VADs, including the onset, risk factors, organisms involved, association with invasive infections, and outcomes. METHODS: We reviewed data for patients with HeartMate II VADs (HMII) who were implanted at the Cleveland Clinic from October 2004 to September 2011 and followed through December 2011. DLIs were defined according to published criteria. RESULTS: DLIs developed in 45 of 194 HMII VADs over a median period of 232 days (range 22 to 883 days). Hazard for DLI was 2.0%/month, but transiently peaked at 11%/month at 7.5 months after implant. Pseudomonas aeruginosa accounted for 31%, 42% and 55% of initial, final and deep DLIs, respectively. Of the 40 superficial DLIs, 13 (32.5%) became deep. DLI-associated bacteremia and hospitalization occurred in 14 of 45 (31%) and 30 of 45 (67%), respectively. All patients received antibiotics (median 171 days), but only 3 of 44 (6.8%) developed an antibiotic complication. DLIs increased the risk for death while on VAD support (HR 2.20, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.05; p = 0.01). Six and 12 months after DLI, mortality was 9.8% and 31%, but the competing event of transplantation occurred successfully in 20% and 28%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Most DLIs begin superficially with peak hazard at 7.5 months after implant. Depth of infection and infecting organism may evolve over months on support, with Pseudomonas becoming more prominent. Although effectively managed for prolonged periods, DLIs are associated with reduced survival on VAD support. Earlier transplantation is the most successful approach to treatment.

Right ventricular failure is a difficult problem to manage and typically carries a dismal prognosis. In the setting of post-left ventricular assist device implantation (LVAD), right ventricular dysfunction both in the early and late stages is of particularly high incidence and concern. There are currently no agreed upon preoperative algorithms to predict patients at risk for this problem, thus adding another level of complexity to treatment. Furthermore, there is no current technology available for chronic right ventricular support and the devices currently in use are LVADS modified to adapt to the right circulatory system. This review provides an overview of right ventricular failure, particularly after LVAD implantation, and describes the survival outcomes and continued challenges in this area.