Faculty Bibliography

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms seems to have better outcomes than open repair if certain strategies, techniques, and adjuncts are employed. These include a standard approach or protocol; use of fluid restriction (hypotensive hemostasis), performance of the procedure in a site equipped for excellent fluoroscopic imaging and open surgery, use of percutaneous approaches and local anesthesia for initial guide wire and catheter placement, placement of a large supraceliac aortic sheath, and obtaining balloon control only when absolutely necessary. Details of obtaining this control are critical, and aortic control must not be lost until the rupture site is excluded. Multiple balloons might be required, including ones placed within the endograft. Sheath placement and fixation until the balloon is removed are also critically important. Bifurcated and unilateral endografts can be used successfully. Abdominal compartment syndrome must be looked for and treated aggressively; endovascular repair must be used in the highest-risk patients, including those in profound hemorrhagic shock, to gain the greatest advantages of this approach.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviews a single-center experience of endovascular popliteal aneurysm (PAA) repair. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify all endovascular PAA repairs performed between September 2004 and January 2011. RESULTS: We identified 21 patients (mean age, 74 +/- 9 years, 91% men) with PAAs (mean size, 2.89 +/- 1.0 cm) in 26 limbs, of which 38% were symptomatic. All patients underwent endovascular repair with a Viabahn covered stent graft (W. L. Gore & Assoc, Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz). Postoperatively, all patients were maintained on antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel or aspirin, or both. Mean follow-up was 22 +/- 17 months (range, 1-57 months). One patient with one aneurysm was lost to follow-up. Primary and secondary patencies were both 91.2% at 1 year and were 85.5% and 91.2%, respectively, at 2 years. The limb salvage rate was 100%. Four stent graft failures occurred at a mean of 12.3 +/- 11 months. One technical failure due to stent graft infolding required conversion to an open femoral-popliteal bypass. Three additional graft failures occurred in patients with poor (single-vessel) runoff. Compared with patients with two- or three-vessel runoff, the graft failure rate in patients with single-vessel runoff was statistically significant (P = .02). Two of the graft failures were successfully treated with open thrombectomy, and one required a tibial artery bypass for limb salvage. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular repair of PAAs is feasible and has acceptable midterm patency rates. Poor distal runoff predicted graft failure.

In 2011, five independent, international guideline committees reported their recommendations for the management of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. These included the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association, the Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Society of Cardiology, the Australasian, and the UK National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. As the recommendations of these five guideline committees were based on the same published literature, it would be expected that they are similar, at least to a large extent. Surprisingly, there were considerable differences between the five guidelines regarding the management of both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid patients. The differences in the recommendations between the five Guideline Committees are analyzed and discussed.

INTRODUCTION:: Iatrogenic arterial injury is an uncommon but recognized complication of posterior spinal surgery. The spectrum of injuries includes vessel perforation leading to hemorrhage, delayed pseudoaneurysm formation, and threatened perforation by screw impingement on arterial vessels. Repair of these injuries traditionally involved open direct vessel repair or graft placement, which can be associated with significant morbidity. METHODS:: We identified five cases of iatrogenic arterial injury during or after posterior spinal surgery between July 2004 and August 2009 and describe the endovascular treatment of these five patients. RESULTS:: In two patients, intraoperative arterial bleeding was encountered during posterior spinal surgery. The posterior wounds were packed, temporarily closed, and the patients were placed supine. Angiography in both patients demonstrated arterial injury necessitating repair. Covered stent grafts were deployed through femoral cutdowns to exclude the areas of injury. In three additional patients, postoperative computed tomography imaging demonstrated pedicle screws abutting or penetrating the thoracic or abdominal aorta. In all three patients, angiography or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), or both, confirmed indention or perforation of the aorta by the screw. Aortic stent graft cuffs were deployed through femoral cutdowns to cover the area of aortic contact before hardware removal. All five patients did well and were discharged home in good condition. CONCLUSIONS:: Endovascular repair of arterial injuries occurring during posterior spine procedures is feasible and can offer a safe and less invasive alternative to open repair

The diagnosis and treatment of vascular disease is becoming increasingly complex and involves many specialties. The VEITHsymposium focuses on all important aspects of vascular disease management and brings together vascular surgeons, cardiologists, interventional radiologists and all other relevant specialists to provide a current overview of important developments, new technologies, controversies and new horizons in the field. This 5-day meeting has several special components on its first day, followed by plenary sessions dealing with all important aspects of vascular disease and its treatment. 2012 Future Medicine Ltd