Faculty Bibliography

The NR4A orphan receptors (Nur77, NURR1, and NOR-1) are emerging as key regulators of cytokine and growth factor action in chronic inflammatory diseases. In this study, we address the role of these receptors in cartilage homeostasis during inflammatory joint disease. We document for the first time expression of the NR4A receptors in osteoarthritic cartilage. Relative to Nur77 and NOR-1, NURR1 is expressed at the highest level and correlates with cyclooxygenase-2 levels in cartilage. Consistent with this observation, cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) rapidly and potently induces NURR1 expression in chondrocytes, suggesting that this receptor may regulate PGE(2)-mediated processes in cartilage. We demonstrate that PGE(2) represses interleukin-1beta-induced matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1 and that transient overexpression of NURR1 is sufficient to antagonize expression of this gene. Furthermore, MMP-1 promoter activity is potently suppressed by NURR1, resulting in a significant reduction in endogenous MMP-1 mRNA and secreted pro-MMP-1 protein. In addition, NURR1 selectively antagonizes cytokine-induced MMP-3 and -9 expression with minimal effects on MMP-2 and -13 and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 and -2. To explore the molecular mechanisms of NURR1 transrepression, we reveal that this receptor targets a critical region of the MMP-1 promoter (-1772 to -1546 bp) and that repression does not require consensus binding sites for NURR1. We confirm that NURR1 targets a 40-bp promoter sequence that is also positively regulated by ETS transcription factors. Finally, functional studies indicate that transcriptional antagonism exists between NURR1 and ETS1 on the MMP-1 promoter. We propose a protective function for NURR1 in cartilage homeostasis by selectively repressing MMP gene expression during inflammation

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment has witnessed major advances over the last 10 to 20 years. Methotrexate has emerged as the cornerstone of treatment with new biologic agents being used in addition in severe and resistant patients. New drugs being developed with novel modes of action are promising to expand treatment options and help provide better disease control for RA patients. In addition to medications, equally important is aggressive disease activity monitoring using one of the composite scores available in order to match treatments to disease activity. Disease activity score (DAS), DAS28 (with a 28 joint count), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID) are valuable tools and should be used in routine care to achieve disease control

Osteoarthritis (OA) is often a progressive and disabling disease resulting from a combination of risk factors, including age, genetics, trauma, and knee alignment, as well as an imbalance of physiologic processes resulting in inflammatory cascades on a molecular level. The synovium, bone, and cartilage are each involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to progressive joint degeneration, and, thus, also serve as targets for therapies. Efforts to identify disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) have been hampered by several factors, but the focus has now shifted toward the validation of chemical and imaging biomarkers that should aid in DMOAD development. In this review, we summarize current pathological mechanisms occurring in the individual but interconnected compartments of OA joints, as well as discuss related therapeutic interventions that are currently available or on the horizon

OBJECTIVE: Serial measurements of anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and complement are routine in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but their utility as biomarkers in preemptive treatment to prevent flares remains a subject of controversy. We hypothesized that concomitant elevation of anti-dsDNA and C3a can predict SLE activity in patients with stable or inactive disease and that short-term treatment with corticosteroids can avert flares. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 154 patients were evaluated monthly for up to 18 months, with measurements of C3a, C3, C4, CH50, and anti-dsDNA levels. Patients who remained clinically stable but showed serologic evidence of an SLE flare (elevation of both the anti-dsDNA level by 25% and the C3a level by 50% over the previous 1-2 monthly visits) were randomized to receive either prednisone or placebo therapy at a dosage of 30 mg/day for 2 weeks, 20 mg/day for 1 week, and 10 mg/day for 1 week. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (21 randomized to prednisone and 20 randomized to placebo) experienced a serologic flare. Analysis of severe flares occurring </=90 days from randomization revealed that 6 occurred in patients taking placebo and none occurred in patients taking prednisone (P = 0.007). Severe flares resulted in an increase in the prednisone dosage to >40 mg/day and/or the addition of an immunosuppressive agent. Furthermore, improvement in scores on the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index, decreased levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies, and increased levels of C4 occurred 1 month after initiation of prednisone treatment. CONCLUSION: These preliminary data support our hypothesis that in a subset of clinically stable SLE patients with a combination of elevated C3a and anti-dsDNA levels, short-term corticosteroid therapy may avert a severe flare