Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a rapid picture naming test, the Mobile Universal Lexicon Evaluation System (MULES), as a novel, vision-based performance measure for concussion screening. The MULES is a visual-verbal task that includes 54 original photographs of fruits, objects and animals. We piloted MULES in a cohort of volunteers to determine feasibility, ranges of picture naming responses, and the relation of MULES time scores to those of King-Devick (K-D), a rapid number naming test. METHODS: A convenience sample (n=20, age 34+/-10) underwent MULES and K-D (spiral bound, iPad versions). Administration order was randomized; MULES tests were audio-recorded to provide objective data on temporal variability and ranges of picture naming responses. RESULTS: Scores for the best of two trials for all tests were 40-50s; average times required to name each MULES picture (0.72+/-0.14s) was greater than those needed for each K-D number ((spiral: 0.33+/-0.05s, iPad: 0.36+/-0.06s, 120 numbers), p<0.0001, paired t-test). MULES scores showed the greatest degree of improvement between trials (9.4+/-4.8s, p<0.0001 for trials 1 vs. 2), compared to K-D (spiral 1.5+/-3.3s, iPad 1.8+/-3.4s). Shorter MULES times demonstrated moderate and significant correlations with shorter iPad but not spiral K-D times (r=0.49, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The MULES test is a rapid picture naming task that may engage more extensive neural systems than more commonly used rapid number naming tasks. Rapid picture naming may require additional processing devoted to color perception, object identification, and categorization. Both tests rely on initiation and sequencing of saccadic eye movements.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with acute optic neuritis (ON) recover high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) to 20/40 or better in 95% of affected eyes, patients with a history of ON continue to note subjective abnormalities of vision. Furthermore, substantial and permanent thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and the ganglion cell layer (GCL) is now known to occur early in the course of ON. We measured vision-specific quality of life (QOL) in patients with a history of acute ON and recovery of VA to 20/40 or better in their affected eyes to determine how these QOL scores relate to RNFL and GCL thickness and low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) across the spectrum of visual recovery. METHODS: Data from an ongoing collaborative study of visual outcomes in multiple sclerosis and ON were analyzed for this cross-sectional observational cohort. Patients and disease-free control participants completed the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) and 10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement to the NEI-VFQ-25, as well as VA and LCLA testing for each eye separately and binocularly. Optical coherence tomography measures for each eye included peripapillary RNFL thickness and macular GCL + inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) thickness. RESULTS: Patients with a history of acute ON and recovery to 20/40 or better VA (n = 113) had significantly reduced scores for the NEI-VFQ-25 (83.7 +/- 15.4) and 10-Item Neuro-Ophthalmic Supplement (74.6 +/- 17.4) compared with disease-free controls (98.2 +/- 2.1 and 96.4 +/- 5.2, P < 0.001, linear regression models, accounting for age and within-patient, intereye correlations). Most patients with 20/40 or better visual recovery (98/112, 88%) had monocular HCVA in their affected eye of 20/20 or better. Although patients with 20/50 or worse HCVA recovery demonstrated the worst performance on low-contrast acuity, affected eye RNFL and GCL + IPL thickness, and QOL scales, these measures were also significantly reduced among those with 20/40 or better HCVA recovery compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of ON and "good" visual recovery, defined in the literature as 20/40 or better HCVA, are left with clinically meaningful reductions in vision-specific QOL. Such patient-observed deficits reflect the underlying significant degrees of retinal axonal and neuronal loss and visual dysfunction that are now known to characterize ON even in the setting of maximal HCVA recovery. There remains an unmet therapeutic need for patients with ON.

BACKGROUND: Outcome measures to capture disability, such as the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), were developed to enhance outcome measurements for clinical trials in adults with multiple sclerosis (MS). The MSFC initially included three components: a timed 25-foot walk [T25FW], 9-hole peg test [9HPT], and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task [PASAT]. Modifications to the original MSFC, such as adding binocular low-contrast letter acuity (LCLA) or substituting the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) for the PASAT, improved the capacity to capture neurologic impairment in adults. Similar outcome scales for pediatric MS have not yet been established. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the three-component MSFC or a modified MSFC with LCLA and the SDMT better identifies neurological deficits in pediatric MS. METHODS: We evaluated 5 measures (T25FW, 9HPT, Children's PASAT [ChiPASAT], SDMT, and binocular LCLA [Sloan charts, 1.25% contrast]) in children with MS (disease onset <18 years) and healthy controls. To be able to compare measures whose scores have different scales, Z-scores were also created for each test based on the numbers of standard deviations from a control group mean, and these individual scale scores were combined to create composite scores. Logistic regression models, accounting for age, were used to determine whether the standard 3-component MSFC or modified versions (including 4 or 5 metrics) best distinguished children with MS from controls. RESULTS: Twenty pediatric-onset MS subjects, aged 6-21 years, and thirteen healthy controls, aged 6-19 years, were enrolled. MS subjects demonstrated worse scores on the 9HPT (p=0.004) and SDMT (p=0.001), but not the 25FTW (adjusted for height, p=0.63) or the ChiPASAT (p=0.10): all comparisons adjusted for age. Decreased (worse) binocular LCLA scores were associated with MS (vs. control status, p=0.03, logistic regression; p=0.08, accounting for age). The MSFC composite score for the traditional 3 components did not differ between the groups (p=0.28). Replacing the ChiPASAT with the SDMT (OR 0.72, p=0.05) better distinguished MS from controls. A modified MSFC-4 with the SDMT replacing the ChiPASAT and including binocular 1.25% LCLA had the greatest capacity to distinguish pediatric MS from controls (OR 0.89, p=0.04, logistic regression). Including all 5 metrics as a composite MSFC-5 did not improve the model (p=0.18). CONCLUSIONS: A modified MSFC (25FTW, 9HPT, SMDT, and binocular 1.25% LCLA) is more sensitive than the traditional MSFC or its components to capture the subtle impairments that characterize pediatric MS and should be validated in order to be considered for future pediatric MS trials.