Faculty Bibliography

On April 30th, 2011 the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) held a workshop to identify key problems in recent epilepsy clinical trials and propose approaches to address the barriers that impede development of new therapeutic options for epilepsy. Preliminary recommendations were made for selection criteria for subjects entered into epilepsy trials that maximize the scientific impact of the trial and increase the ability to recruit appropriate subjects efficiently and safely. These recommendations were further refined by the authors following the workshop, and subsequently shared with all NINDS workshop participants and with the participants of the 2011 AED XI workshop on epilepsy trials (approximately 200 participants) for further comment. The working group agreed to a final set of criteria that include updated considerations of subject age, clinical semiology, EEG and imaging results, use of prior and current therapies, co-occurring conditions, and suicidality, among others.

To present a summary of current scientific evidence about the cannabinoid, cannabidiol (CBD) with regard to its relevance to epilepsy and other selected neuropsychiatric disorders. We summarize the presentations from a conference in which invited participants reviewed relevant aspects of the physiology, mechanisms of action, pharmacology, and data from studies with animal models and human subjects. Cannabis has been used to treat disease since ancient times. Delta9 -Tetrahydrocannabinol (Delta9 -THC) is the major psychoactive ingredient and CBD is the major nonpsychoactive ingredient in cannabis. Cannabis and Delta9 -THC are anticonvulsant in most animal models but can be proconvulsant in some healthy animals. The psychotropic effects of Delta9 -THC limit tolerability. CBD is anticonvulsant in many acute animal models, but there are limited data in chronic models. The antiepileptic mechanisms of CBD are not known, but may include effects on the equilibrative nucleoside transporter; the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR55; the transient receptor potential of vanilloid type-1 channel; the 5-HT1a receptor; and the alpha3 and alpha1 glycine receptors. CBD has neuroprotective and antiinflammatory effects, and it appears to be well tolerated in humans, but small and methodologically limited studies of CBD in human epilepsy have been inconclusive. More recent anecdotal reports of high-ratio CBD:Delta9 -THC medical marijuana have claimed efficacy, but studies were not controlled. CBD bears investigation in epilepsy and other neuropsychiatric disorders, including anxiety, schizophrenia, addiction, and neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. However, we lack data from well-powered double-blind randomized, controlled studies on the efficacy of pure CBD for any disorder. Initial dose-tolerability and double-blind randomized, controlled studies focusing on target intractable epilepsy populations such as patients with Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut syndromes are being planned. Trials in other treatment-resistant epilepsies may also be warranted. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.

Epilepsy was defined conceptually in 2005 as a disorder of the brain characterized by an enduring predisposition to generate epileptic seizures. This definition is usually practically applied as having two unprovoked seizures >24 h apart. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) accepted recommendations of a task force altering the practical definition for special circumstances that do not meet the two unprovoked seizures criteria. The task force proposed that epilepsy be considered to be a disease of the brain defined by any of the following conditions: (1) At least two unprovoked (or reflex) seizures occurring >24 h apart; (2) one unprovoked (or reflex) seizure and a probability of further seizures similar to the general recurrence risk (at least 60%) after two unprovoked seizures, occurring over the next 10 years; (3) diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome. Epilepsy is considered to be resolved for individuals who either had an age-dependent epilepsy syndrome but are now past the applicable age or who have remained seizure-free for the last 10 years and off antiseizure medicines for at least the last 5 years. "Resolved" is not necessarily identical to the conventional view of "remission or "cure." Different practical definitions may be formed and used for various specific purposes. This revised definition of epilepsy brings the term in concordance with common use. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.

A study of epilepsy patients with a reproducible range of photoparoxysmal responses (PPR) (epileptiform discharges evoked by flashing lights) has been used as a "proof-of-concept" trial to determine if novel potential antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should proceed in development. The standard design for this trial requires a 3-day inpatient stay and is single-blind. We evaluated two marketed and effective AEDs-one narrow-spectrum [carbamazepine (CBZ)], and one broad-spectrum [levetiracetam (LEV)]-using a novel double-blinded, cross-over outpatient version of the trial to detect acute drug effects of the two marketed AEDs on photosensitivity. We tested 6 patients with a known stable photosensitivity response, using single oral doses of CBZ 400 mg and LEV 1000 mg, compared to 2 test days with single placebo doses. Patients who received LEV had the lowest mean PPR (compared with placebo and CBZ). The mixed effect model showed a significant effect of LEV in all eye closure conditions (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a significant change in PPR after CBZ or placebo treatment. In conclusion, LEV 1000 mg, but not CBZ 400 mg, was effective in suppressing photosensitivity within a 6-h period compared with placebo showing the ability of our novel photosensitivity trial design to demonstrate effects of broad-spectrum AEDs. We cannot confirm the ability of the photosensitivity trial to detect the narrow-spectrum AED CBZ in our design. The novel outpatient study design is feasible and is expected to reduce costs compared with previous methodology.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the relationship between efficacy and perampanel dose, integrated actual (last) dose data from three phase III trials and an extension study (blinded Conversion Period; open-label Maintenance Period) were analyzed. METHODS: Seizure frequency data were analyzed in patients who were randomized to and completed the 13-week Maintenance Period of the phase III studies on perampanel 8 mg, and who received an actual (last) dose of 12 mg during (1) the extension 16-week blinded Conversion Period or (2) weeks 1-13 of the extension Maintenance Period. Due to a treatment-by-region interaction (p = 0.042), analyses excluded patients from the Latin America region (n = 162/1,480; 10.9% of the treated cohort). RESULTS: Of 372 patients randomized to 8 mg in the phase III studies, 273 completed the Maintenance Period at 8 mg and 267 entered the extension study. In patients who then had an actual (last) dose of 12 mg during the extension blinded Conversion Period (n = 217), median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days improved from -32.4% (8 mg, phase III Maintenance Period) to -44.2% (12 mg, extension blinded Conversion Period); 50% responder rates increased slightly from 37.3% to 42.9%. In patients who completed the phase III studies on 8 mg and had an actual (last) dose of 12 mg during weeks 1-13 of the extension Maintenance Period (n = 181), median percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days improved from -34.1% (phase III Maintenance Period) to -46.0% (weeks 1-13 extension Maintenance Period); 50% responder rates were 39.2% and 46.4%. Seizure control remained substantially unchanged in patients who completed the phase III studies at 12 mg and continued on that dose during the extension. SIGNIFICANCE: Increasing perampanel dose from 8 to 12 mg can produce additional benefits in seizure control in at least some patients who tolerate the higher dose.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of once-daily 1200 mg and 2400 mg SPN-804 (Oxtellar XR, Supernus Pharmaceuticals), an extended-release tablet formulation of oxcarbazepine (OXC), added to 1-3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization. METHODS: The Prospective, Randomized Study of OXC XR in Subjects with Partial Epilepsy Refractory (PROSPER) study was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group Phase 3 study. The primary efficacy endpoint was median percent reduction from baseline in monthly (28-day) seizure frequency for the 16-week double-blind treatment period in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population with analyzable seizure data. Other efficacy analyses included proportion of patients with >/= 50% seizure reduction, proportion of patients seizure free, and the relationship between clinical response and plasma concentration. RESULTS: Median percent reduction was -28.7% for placebo, -38.2% (P = 0.08 vs placebo) for once-daily SPN-804 1200 mg, and -42.9% (P = 0.003) for SPN-804 2400 mg. Responder rates were 28.1%, 36.1% (P = 0.08), and 40.7% (P = 0.02); 16-week seizure-free rates in a pragmatic ITT analysis were 3.3%, 4.9% (P = 0.59), and 11.4% (P = 0.008), respectively. When data were analyzed separately for study site clusters, a post hoc analysis demonstrated that both SPN-804 dosages were significantly superior to placebo in median percent seizure reduction (placebo: -13.3%; 1200 mg: -34.5%, P = 0.02; 2400 mg: -52.7%, P = 0.006) in the North American study site cluster. A concentration-response analysis also supported a clinically meaningful effect for 1200 mg. Adverse event types reflected the drug's established profile. Adverse event frequency was consistent with a pharmacokinetic profile in which SPN-804 produces lower peak plasma concentrations vs immediate-release OXC. Once-daily dosing was not associated with any new safety signals. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive once-daily SPN-804 improved seizure control in patients with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures. Adverse event occurrence and discontinuations due to adverse events suggest improved tolerability vs previously published data with immediate-release OXC.

PURPOSE: Epilepsy patients have a significantly higher rate of anxiety and depression than the general population, and psychiatric disease is particularly prevalent among drug resistant epilepsy patients. Symptoms of anxiety and depression might serve as a barrier to appropriate epilepsy care. The aim of this study was to determine if drug resistant epilepsy patients with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression receive different epilepsy management than controls. METHOD: We identified 83 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy seen at the Penn Epilepsy Center. Upon enrollment, all patients completed 3 self-report scales and a neuropsychiatric inventory and were grouped into those with symptoms of anxiety and/or depression and controls. Each patient's medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 1-2 years, and objective measures of outpatient and inpatient epilepsy management were assessed. RESULTS: At baseline, 53% (n=43) of patients screened positive for symptoms of anxiety and/or depression. The remaining 47% (n=38) served as controls. Patients with anxiety and/or depression symptoms had more missed outpatient visits per year compared to controls (median 0.84 vs. 0.48, p=0.02). Patients with symptoms of both anxiety and depression were more likely to undergo an inpatient admission or procedure (56% vs. 24%, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: For most measures of epilepsy management, symptoms of anxiety and/or depression do not alter epilepsy care; however, drug resistant epilepsy patients with anxiety and/or depression symptoms may be more likely to miss outpatient appointments, and those with the highest burden of psychiatric symptoms may be admitted more frequently for inpatient services compared to controls.

Rationale: Seizure misclassification in randomized clinical studies of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can negatively impact trial outcomes. To ensure homogeneity and accuracy of seizure classification in clinical trials, The Epilepsy Study Consortium has created a seizure training program for study investigators and site coordinators to enhance the understanding of seizure types and provide independent verification of seizure classification. This prospective training has previously been used in AED clinical trials, including PREVAIL, a recently completed global, phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of USL255, once-daily extended-release topiramate, as adjunctive therapy in subjects with partial-onset seizures (NCT01142193). Methods: The PREVAIL training program included a seizure identification video providing in-depth descriptions of seizure types and advice for patient interviews. The video was moderated by a Consortium member at the investigator meetings and posted online for those unable to attend. After the video, a quiz was administered and the answers discussed in real time. PREVAIL was the first trial to implement this quiz with the requirement for retraining if a passing score (>70%) was not achieved. Additionally, each site was required to submit a Seizure Identification Form (SIF) for all subjects, which included descriptions of seizures by the subject and/or caregiver, and the investigator's classification(s) of seizure(s). The SIF was reviewed independently by the Consortium immediately after the Screening Visit and was to be approved prior to randomization. To ensure seizures were captured correctly in the case report forms (CRFs) on subsequent study visits, misclassifications were communicated to the study team to allow for subject retraining (as necessary). CRFs were checked by the sponsor/CRO to confirm that classifications matched those approved by the Consortium. Additionally, subject diaries were assessed by centralized CRO reviewers to ensure qualifying seizure type!