Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of Doxil with low-dose continuous infusion topotecan and subsequently with low-dose oral topotecan. Other specific aims were preliminary assessment of activity in advanced ovarian and tubal malignancies, pharmacokinetics of oral topotecan, and correlation of response with topoisomerase I and II expression in tumors. METHODS: Eligible patients had histopathologically documented advanced cancers beyond standard therapy, performance status <2, and adequate organ functions. Doxil (30-40 mg/m2 i.v.) was given on day 1, with topotecan either oral topotecan 0.4 mg/m2 bid for 14 days or continuous infusion topotecan (0.3-0.4 mg/m2/d) for 14 to 21 days, in 28-day cycles. Fifty-seven patients, 23 with epithelial ovarian or tubal cancers were enrolled. Plasma levels of lactone form of topotecan were determined on patients receiving oral topotecan. RESULTS: Grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea were dose-limiting toxicities at the highest dose levels explored. Doxil (40 mg/m2/day 1) and continuous infusion topotecan at 0.4 mg/m2/days 1 to 14 could be safely given and is the recommended phase II dose. Oral topotecan was limited by low and erratic plasma topotecan levels and frequent gastrointestinal toxicity. Particularly long partial responses and stable disease were observed in patients with epithelial ovarian or tubal cancers. Clinical benefit (objective responses and stable diseases) correlated with elevated expression of both topoisomerases by immunohistochemistry in four of six epithelial ovarian or tubal cancer tumor samples. CONCLUSION: Doxil with 14-day topotecan infusion is a well-tolerated regimen and suitable for study in platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian or tubal cancers. Frequent gastrointestinal toxicity and/or erratic absorption complicate treatment with a longer topotecan infusion or with oral topotecan, respectively, and these combinations are not recommended

A phase II trial, using neoadjuvant chemotherapy and intraperitoneal (IP) consolidation, was conducted in patients with locally advanced, potentially resectable gastric cancer or cancer of the gastroesophageal junction, both staged as T3N0, T4N0, or any TN1 or TN2 disease. Preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of irinotecan 75 mg/m(2) with cisplatin 25 mg/m(2)/week for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week break. Unless disease progression was encountered, surgery was performed and followed by two courses of adjuvant therapy with IP floxuridine 3 g x 3 days plus IP cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 3. Of 32 evaluable patients, 29 (90.6%) underwent surgery, and 25 (86.2%) had R0 on resection. Evidence of primary-tumor downstaging was documented in at least one half of the patients. Toxicity of induction therapy was primarily grade 3/4 neutropenia (38.2%/8.8%), grade 3 diarrhea (20.6%), and grade 3 nausea/vomiting (14.7%). Except for three catheter complications, toxicities with IP therapy were infrequent. After a median follow-up of 28.0 months in 32 patients, 10 patients (31.3%) had no evidence of disease, 4 (12.5%) were alive with disease, 13 (40.6%) had died from disease, and 5 (15.6%) died from unrelated causes. Among 25 patients who underwent R0 resection, there were no local recurrences. Sites of first recurrences were outside the abdominal cavity in seven patients, in the liver in two, and in the abdominal cavity in four patients. Median overall survival for all 32 patients was 36.5 months from the start of treatment after median follow-up of 28 months, whereas median disease-specific survival had not been reached at the time of this analysis. For patients with R0 resection, median overall survival was 48 months after median follow-up of 35 months. The data suggest that an approach consisting of systemic induction therapy, curative surgery with high R0 resection rates, and IP adjuvant therapy has acceptable toxicity and encouraging survival outcomes