Faculty Bibliography

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may be performed in the same procedure as diagnostic coronary angiography (ad hoc PCI). This study aimed to evaluate current rates of ad hoc PCI use and associated risks of adverse outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

Coronary stenting without angioplasty pretreatment (direct stenting) may simplify procedures in appropriate lesions. Direct stenting is facilitated by smaller profile coronary stent platforms. The present study was designed for regulatory approval of a novel drug-eluting coronary stent and incorporates both randomized comparison for non-inferiority to an approved predicate device as well as a nested evaluation of subjects eligible for direct stenting. STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES: Prospective, single-blind, randomized, active-control, multi-center study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of the novel Svelte sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) systems. A total of 1630 subjects with up to 3 target lesions will be randomized 1:1 to the Svelte SES versus either the Xience or Promus everolimus-eluting stents (control). Randomization will be stratified by whether or not a direct stenting strategy is planned by the investigator. The primary endpoint is target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months post index procedure, defined as cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization, and the primary analysis is a non-inferiority test with a non-inferiority margin of 3.58%. Secondary clinical endpoints include individual components of TLF, stent thrombosis and measures of procedural resource utilization including contrast administration, fluoroscopy exposure and procedural resource utilization as well as costs. CONCLUSION: The OPTMIZE Trial will evaluate the safety, efficacy and clinical value of the novel Svelte SES in subjects with up to 3 lesions, and will provide a comparison of direct stenting between randomized devices.

The association of hyperglycemia at admission and final thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow with 1-year mortality of patient with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not much been explored. We evaluated the association of hyperglycemia and final TIMI flow with 1-year mortality in patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary PCI. We retrospectively analyzed 856 patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI in a tertiary care academic center between January 2014 and July 2016. Based on the receiver operating characteristics curve, the cutoff used for hyperglycemia in this study was greater than or equal to 169 mg/dL. Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the association of hyperglycemia and TIMI flow with 1-year mortality. Compared with patients with lower blood glucose level (<169 mg/dL; n  = 549), a greater proportion of patients who presented with hyperglycemia (≥169 mg/dL; n  = 307) had final TIMI flow 0 to 1 (3.3 vs. 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio = 5.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-23.9, p  = 0.02). Hyperglycemia was associated with an increased risk for 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]= 2.0, 95% CI: 1.13-3.53, p  = 0.017). Multivariable Cox regression showed that the interaction of hyperglycemia and final TIMI flow 0 to 1 was associated with an elevated risk for 1-year mortality (adjusted HR= 9.4, 95% CI: 2.34-37.81, p  = 0.002). A higher proportion of patients with acute STEMI who presented with hyperglycemia had final TIMI flow 0 to 1 after primary PCI. The interaction of hyperglycemia and final TIMI flow 0 to 1 was associated with an increased risk for 1-year mortality. This study suggests that aggressive control of hyperglycemia prior to primary PCI may facilitate better angiographic and clinical outcomes after primary PCI. Clinical Trial Registration  Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier number: NCT02319473.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:To review the contemporary evidence for robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary and vascular interventions, discussing its current capabilities, limitations, and potential future applications. RECENT FINDINGS:Robotic-assisted cardiovascular interventions significantly reduce radiation exposure and orthopedic strains for interventionalists, while maintaining high rates of device and clinical success. The PRECISE and CORA-PCI studies demonstrated the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in increasingly complex coronary lesions. The RAPID study demonstrated similar findings in peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). Subsequent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of second-generation devices, with automations mimicking manual PCI techniques. While innovations such as telestenting continue to bring excitement to the field, major limitations remain-particularly the lack of randomized trials comparing robotic-assisted PCI with manual PCI. Robotic technology has successfully been applied to multiple cardiovascular procedures. There are limited data to evaluate outcomes with robotic-assisted PCI and other robotic-assisted cardiovascular procedures, but existing data show some promise of improving the precision of PCI while decreasing occupational hazards associated with radiation exposure.

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy of post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) bivalirudin infusion (at full PCI dose) to prevent stent thrombosis (ST) compared with heparin monotherapy. BACKGROUND:Early randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that compared with heparin use, bivalirudin use during primary PCI is associated with an increased risk of ST. However, bivalirudin was stopped in those trials at the end of the procedure and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) were routinely used with heparin. The increased risk of ST may be eliminated by continuing bivalirudin infusion post-procedure for few hours. Indeed, in most recent trials, a trend of lower ST risk has been observed with a post-procedure infusion of bivalirudin compared with heparin monotherapy (without the routine use of GPI). METHODS:Relevant RCTs were included and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effect models. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of early definite ST. RESULTS:Four RCTs involving 13,505 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with heparin monotherapy, bivalirudin (with a post-procedure infusion) was associated with a 55% decrease in the risk of early definite ST (RR: 0.45, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.85; P = 0.015). There was no difference in the risk of early ST between bivalirudin (with a post-procedure infusion) and heparin with GPI. CONCLUSIONS:For primary PCI, a bivalirudin-based anticoagulant strategy (with post procedure infusion) is associated with a lower risk of early definite ST compared with treatment with heparin monotherapy (without GPI).

Importance:Anatomical scoring systems for coronary artery disease, such as the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, are well established tools for understanding patient risk. However, they are cumbersome to compute manually for large data sets, limiting their use across broad and varied cohorts. Objective:To adapt an anatomical scoring system for use with registry data, allowing facile and automatic calculation of scores and association with clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Design, Setting, and Participants:This cross-sectional observational cohort study involved procedures performed in all cardiac catheterization laboratories in the largest integrated health care system in the United States, the Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Patients undergoing coronary angiography in the VA Healthcare System followed by percutaneous or surgical revascularization within 90 days were observed and data were analyzed from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures:An anatomical scoring system for coronary artery disease complexity before revascularization was simplified and adapted to data from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program. The adjusted association between quantified anatomical complexity and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeat revascularization, was assessed for patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Results:A total of 50 226 patients (49 359 men [98.3%]; mean [SD] age, 66 [9] years) underwent revascularization during the study period, with 34 322 undergoing PCI and 15 904 undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). After adjustment, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity was associated with increased hazard of MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% CI, 2.01-2.23). In contrast, the highest tertile of anatomical complexity among patients undergoing CABG was not independently associated with overall MACCEs (adjusted HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17), and only repeat revascularization was associated with increasing complexity (adjusted HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70) in this subgroup. Conclusions and Relevance:These findings suggest that an automatically computed score assessing anatomical complexity can be used to assess longitudinal risk for patients undergoing revascularization. This simplified scoring system appears to be an alternative tool for understanding longitudinal risk across large data sets.

BACKGROUND:Although patients prefer radial over femoral approach, some develop post-procedural arm pain after transradial procedures. This complication has been poorly defined in prior studies. We evaluated the extent of non-ischemic arm pain after transradial arterial access and identify variables that may be associated with this complication. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of a 1706 patient database on patients who underwent transradial catheterization at three experienced radial centers. Arm pain was assessed by adult visual analogue scale (score > 4) defined as moderate to severe pain at the accessed forearm not related to hand ischemia and was evaluated at one day after the procedure. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of post-procedural arm pain. RESULTS:The overall incidence of post-procedural arm pain one day after a transradial procedure was 4.5%. Covariate associated with post-procedural arm pain were hemostasis compression >4 h (odds ratio (OR) = 29.47, p < 0.001), radial artery occlusion by Doppler evaluation (OR = 3.35, p < 0.001), radial artery diameter < 2.8 mm (OR = 2.66, p = 0.01), and multiple puncture attempts (OR = 2.31, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION:Approximately 1 in 20 patients undergoing transradial procedure have post-procedural arm pain one day after the procedure. Predictors of this complication relate to radial hemostasis, radial artery occlusion, radial artery diameter, and number of access attempts.

BACKGROUND:Advances in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO PCI) techniques have led to increased procedural success rates among operators. While utilization of CTO PCI has disseminated widely, the learning curve for new operators has not been well-defined. METHODS:Between July 2009 and December 2015, 93 875 CTO PCI cases were extracted from the CathPCI Registry. We delineated a cohort of new CTO operators performing <10 CTO PCI cases per given year. In-hospital outcomes for subsequent CTO PCIs were stratified by the number of prior cases accrued by each operator. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate differences in outcomes with increasing experience. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events defined as the composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, tamponade, or urgent coronary artery bypass grafting. RESULTS:Among 70 916 cases performed by 7251 new operators, procedure success rate was 61.4% and major adverse cardiovascular event rate was 4.2%. Meanwhile, the rate of major bleeding was 4.0%, myocardial infarction 2.0%, mortality 0.6%, tamponade 0.3%, and renal failure 0.2%. Adjusted regression models demonstrated piecewise linear improvements in guidewire crossing, stent placement, and procedure success with accrued volume, albeit with increased contrast use, fluoroscopy time, and bleeding. Major adverse cardiovascular event rates were stable beyond the 12th case (odds ratio per 5 case increase 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03, P=0.7980). CONCLUSIONS:Among a large number of new CTO PCI operators in the United States, there exists an experiential learning curve for procedural success. However, there were higher rates of bleeding despite case experience, while major adverse cardiovascular events remained relatively unchanged after initiation.

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.