Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:rechtm01
MR imaging of the pancreas at high field strength: comparison of six sequences
Semelka, R C; Simm, F C; Recht, M P; Deimling, M; Lenz, G; Laub, G A
The authors compared six MR sequences comprising conventional breath-hold [rapid spin echo (RASE) repetition time (TR) 240 ms/echo time (TE) 8 ms/90 degrees, fast low angle shot (FLASH) 130/4.5/80 degrees, TurboFLASH 6.5/3.5/8 degrees], fat suppressed regular spin echo (FS SE 330/15/90 degrees), and two combined fat suppressed breath-hold sequences (FS FLASH 130/8/80 degrees, FS RASE 240/10/90 degrees) for studying the normal pancreas. Sequences were selected on the basis of features desirable for demonstrating the pancreas, particularly absence or decrease in artifacts and improved dynamic range of intraabdominal tissue signal intensities. Ten normal volunteers were studied, six at 1.5 T and four at 1.0 T, and comparison was made to regular short TR/TE SE. Quantitative pancreas signal-to-noise (S/N) and pancreas fat-to-noise (SD/N) measurements and qualitative evaluation of overall resolution and artifacts were determined. Fat suppressed FLASH had the highest S/N (44.1 +/- 10.8, p less than 0.0001) and SD/N (35.0 +/- 11.9, p less than 0.0001), and seven studies were considered good or very good. Fat suppressed SE had good S/N (32.6 +/- 7.7) and SD/N (19.0 +/- 3.6), and eight FS SE studies were considered good or very good. Among the nonsuppressed sequences, FLASH had the best combination of quantitative and qualitative measurements. Our results suggest that fat suppression may be important for studying the pancreas and that nonsuppressed FLASH may be a reasonable alternative
PMID: 1939776
ISSN: 0363-8715
CID: 87115
T1-weighted sequences for MR imaging of the liver: comparison of three techniques for single-breath, whole-volume acquisition at 1.0 and 1.5 T
Semelka, R C; Simm, F C; Recht, M; Deimling, M; Lenz, G; Laub, G A
The authors compared three T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques that acquire images encompassing the entire liver in one breath hold. Twenty healthy volunteers were imaged--10 at 1.0 T and 10 at 1.5 T--and the results compared with those of regular short repetition time/echo time spin-echo imaging. Rapid acquisition spin echo was resistant to artifacts and had good image quality but had the lowest liver signal-to-noise (S/N) and spleen-liver signal-difference-to-noise (SD/N) values. Fast low-angle shot (FLASH) had the highest S/N and SD/N, very good image quality, and only mild artifacts. TurboFLASH had good S/N and SD/N, but reduced matrix size decreased image quality. All three sequences had better SD/N than regular spin echo, and FLASH and TurboFLASH had higher S/N. On the basis of this study, the FLASH sequence appears the most attractive for T1-weighted breath-hold imaging
PMID: 1871271
ISSN: 0033-8419
CID: 97825
Simple technique for redirecting malpositioned central venous catheters
Recht, M P; Burke, D R; Meranze, S G; Cope, C
PMID: 2104707
ISSN: 0361-803x
CID: 87116
Recurrent esophageal carcinoma at thoracotomy incisions: diagnostic contributions of CT [Case Report]
Recht, M P; Coleman, B G; Barbot, D J; Rosato, E F; Aronchick, J M; Epstein, D M; Gefter, W B; Miller, W T
Three cases of surgical implantation of esophageal carcinoma during esophagogastrectomy are presented. The CT and radiographic appearance is demonstrated. A possible etiology and method for decreasing the risk of surgical spread of tumor are discussed
PMID: 2910949
ISSN: 0363-8715
CID: 87117
Barrett's esophagus in scleroderma: increased prevalence and radiographic findings
Recht, M P; Levine, M S; Katzka, D A; Reynolds, J C; Saul, S H
Ten of 27 patients (37%) with scleroderma who underwent endoscopy at our hospital between 1980 and 1984 for symptoms of reflux esophagitis had biopsy-proven Barrett's esophagus. Two of those 10 patients had esophageal adenocarcinomas. In a blinded review of esophagrams (all but 2 using double-contrast technique) from 16 of the 27 patients, only 1 patient was thought to be at high risk for Barrett's esophagus due to a high esophageal stricture with an adjacent reticular pattern of the mucosa. The latter patient had biopsy-proven Barrett's mucosa. Eight patients were thought to be at moderate risk for Barrett's esophagus due to reflux esophagitis and/or distal strictures in 6 and polypoid intraluminal masses in 2. Three of the 6 patients with esophagitis and/or strictures had Barrett's esophagus, and both patients with masses had adenocarcinomas arising in Barrett's mucosa. Finally, 7 patients who had no esophagitis or strictures were thought to be at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. None of those 7 had histologic evidence of Barrett's mucosa. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to classify patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy in these patients
PMID: 3350262
ISSN: 0364-2356
CID: 87118
Radiology of wrist and hand injuries in athletes
Recht, M P; Burk, D L Jr; Dalinka, M K
Traumatic injuries are a major cause of hand and wrist pain in athletes. Wrist injuries include fractures, dislocations, and instability patterns. Hand injuries include tendon injuries, ligamentous injuries, and fractures. In this article we have presented the radiographic appearance of the more common of these injuries
PMID: 3333928
ISSN: 0278-5919
CID: 87119
Vascular anomalies in association with osteodystrophies--a spectrum [Case Report]
Kessler, H B; Recht, M P; Dalinka, M K
A wide spectrum of osseous abnormalities has been reported in association with vascular lesions. Enchondromas, bone hypertrophy, bone lysis, and sclerotic bone lesions have all been reported in association with hemangiomas, lymphangiomas, varicosities, and arteriovenous fistulae. These associations can be grouped into four major syndromes: Maffucci syndrome, mixed sclerosing bone dystrophy with angiodysplasia, congenital angiectatic hypertrophy (Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome), and massive osteolysis (Gorham syndrome)
PMID: 6310795
ISSN: 0364-2348
CID: 87120