Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Resident burnout-the state of exhaustion, maladaptive detachment, and low sense of accomplishment-is a widely documented phenomenon that affects between 27% and 75% of residents in the United States. To our knowledge, no previous study has examined the relationship between resident burnout and performance on the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE). The current investigation sought to evaluate whether an association exists between indices of orthopaedic surgery resident burnout as assessed by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and performance on the OITE. METHODS:In a cross-sectional study of the orthopaedic surgery residents at a single large academic institution, the MBI was completed by all trainees in May 2016. The results of the 2016 OITE were documented for each resident, including the percentage of correctly answered questions and OITE percentile ranking. To control for individual test-taking skills, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 and Step-2 scores also were documented for each resident. The relationship between the MBI subscale scores and OITE performance was evaluated. RESULTS:The analysis included 100% of the 62 orthopaedic surgery residents in training at our institution. Sixteen (25.8%) of the residents experienced at least moderate emotional exhaustion, while 32 (51.6%) of the residents experienced at least moderate depersonalization and 8 (12.9%) of the residents experienced a moderate sense of impaired personal accomplishment. Postgraduate year (PGY)-2 residents had the highest emotional exhaustion and depersonalization scores compared with residents in other years of training. Each of the 3 MBI indices of burnout was associated with worse OITE performance when controlling for general test-taking ability. CONCLUSIONS:In this study of orthopaedic surgery residents at a large academic training program, burnout was present among residents in all PGYs of training; it was most prevalent during the second year of training. Increased levels of the 3 components of burnout were associated with worse performance on the OITE. While there is a lack of consensus in the existing literature, this study provides additional evidence that burnout is negatively associated with 1 aspect of overall resident performance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/CONCLUSIONS:Orthopaedic surgery residency training is challenging; residents are tasked to acquire a considerable amount of knowledge, develop complex surgical skills, and hone critical clinical thinking in a relatively short period of time. Identifying modifiable contributors to resident burnout and the development of strategies to promote resident wellness during training are important as we strive toward developing the next generation of capable, competent, and well-balanced orthopaedic surgeons.

Placental-derived tissues are a known source of anti-inflammatory and immune modulating factors. Published pilot data on amniotic suspension allograft (ASA) for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) demonstrated safety and trends for improved pain and function. A multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of symptom modulation with ASA compared with saline and hyaluronic acid (HA) in subjects with knee OA. A total of 200 subjects were randomized 1:1:1 to ASA, HA, or saline, with subjects blinded to their allocation. Changes from baseline of patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-EQ-5D-5L, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), Tegner, and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)-were compared between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months were considered treatment failures and withdrawn from the study. Statistical analysis was completed by comparing changes in PROs from baseline to 3 and 6 months for all groups. Comparison of demographics between treatment groups showed no significant differences between groups. Patients reporting unacceptable pain at 3 months in each group were ASA (13.2%), HA (68.8%), and saline (75%). Patients receiving ASA demonstrated significantly greater improvements from baseline for overall pain (VAS), KOOS pain, and KOOS-activities of daily living scores compared with those in the HA group (3 months) and both groups (6 months). ASA patients had significantly greater improvements in KOOS symptom scores compared with HA and saline at 3 and 6 months, respectively. OMERACT-OARSI responder rates for ASA, HA, and saline groups were 69.1, 39.1, and 42.6%, respectively (p = 0.0007). Subjects receiving ASA treatment showed greater improvements in PROs and fewer patients reported unacceptable pain compared with HA and saline. The evidence presented in this Level I Randomized Controlled Trial suggests that ASA injection is an effective treatment for the nonoperative management of symptomatic knee OA.

Objectives: Changes in the joint microenvironment following an intra-articular injury have been implicated in the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis. Few studies have evaluated alterations in the joint microenvironment in the setting of meniscus injury. The purpose of the current study was to determine the changes in synovial fluid biomarker concentrations caused by meniscus pathology by comparing samples from injured, symptomatic knees to samples from asymptomatic contralateral knees.
Method(s): Patients undergoing surgery for unilateral meniscus injury were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board approved study from October 2011 to December 2016. A cohort was formed consisting of patients that had synovial fluid samples collected from both the injured and contralateral uninjured knee at the time of arthroscopic surgery. Patients with ligamentous injury of the knee were excluded from the current analysis. Synovial fluid samples were collected just prior to incision and the concentrations of 10 biomarkers of interest were determined using a multiplex magnetic bread immunoassay.
Result(s): The current analysis included synovial fluid samples from 82 knees (41 operative and 41 contralateral knees) from 41 patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery to treat a symptomatic meniscus injury. The mean age of patients was 49.86 +/- 11.75 years. Based on linear mixed effects models, there were significantly greater concentrations of 4 of the 5 pro-inflammatory biomarkers in symptomatic knees compared to asymptomatic knees when controlling for the duration of symptoms, BMI, age, and the random effects of by-patient variability. Knees with symptomatic meniscus injuries had 126.8 times greater concentration of IL-6, 2.7 times greater concentration of MCP-1, 2.0 times greater concentration of MIP-1beta, and 5.4 times greater concentration of MMP-3 compared to the contralateral, asymptomatic knee (Table 1). When controlling for the chronicity of the injury, presence of synovitis, and age of the patient, knees with concomitant high-grade cartilage lesions (ICRS 3 or 4) were associated with 2.1 times greater concentration of MCP-1, 1.9 times greater concentration of MIP-1beta, and 3.4 times greater concentration of VEGF compared to knees with concomitant low-grade cartilage lesions (ICRS 1 or 2). When controlling for the other variables, the presence of synovitis was associated with an 89.5% lower concentration of TIMP-1 compared to operative knees without synovitis. The age of the patient was found to affect the concentrations of IL-6, MCP-1, and VEGF. For all knees included in the study, each 1 year increase in age was associated with a 6% increase in IL-6, 3% increase in MCP-1, and 4% increase in VEGF (Figure 1).
Conclusion(s): This study is the first that examines the synovial fluid biomarker concentrations in the setting of a symptomatic isolated meniscus injury. We demonstrated that 4 of the 5 proinflammatory biomarkers that were tested are found in greater concentration in the symptomatic knee. Furthermore, we described the effects of associated cartilage damage, synovitis, and patient age on biomarker concentrations. Understanding the implication of these alterations in the intra-articular microenvironment in the setting of meniscal pathology may hold the key to identifying treatment targets in an effort to prevent the onset of post-meniscectomy osteoarthritis. (Table Presented)

Objectives: The current opioid epidemic necessitates physicians to seek ways to decrease patients' requirements of narcotic medications without sacrificing their postoperative comfort level. This study evaluated patients' pain following arthroscopic shoulder instability repair and compared the use of narcotic medications between patients prescribed NSAIDs with rescue opioid prescription to those prescribed opioids alone. We hypothesized there would not be a significant difference in postoperative pain and addition of NSAIDs would result in decreased opioid use.
Method(s): Forty patients scheduled to undergo an arthroscopic shoulder instability repair were randomized to receive Ibuprofen 600mg and a 10-pill rescue prescription of Percocet 5/325mg (n=20) or Percocet 5/325mg (n=20). Primary outcomes were the amount of Percocet tablets used in the first week and VAS on postoperative day (POD) 1, 4, and 7. Statistical analysis was done using independent t-tests and bivariate analysis for correlation. Findings were considered significant at p<0.05.
Result(s): Forty patients with a mean age of 35.08 (+/- 8.48)were enrolled between December 2017 and May 2018. The total amount of opioid consumption was statistically significantly lower in the multimodal group compared to the opioid group (p <0.04) as well as Percocet consumption between POD 0-4 (p <0.04). There were no significant differences in VAS at any point between the two groups. One patient in the Ibuprofen cohort experienced dizziness on POD 1. Two patients in the Percocet cohort experienced nausea and vomiting on POD 1 and POD 4.
Conclusion(s): Multimodal analgesia using NSAIDs with an opioid rescue prescription has resulted in significant reduction in postoperative narcotic consumption. As both cohorts showed similar pain levels, it is possible to alleviate postoperative pain with lower amounts of opioids than are currently being prescribed. The public health crisis of opioid abuse requires an immediate solution beginning with the reduction of post-operative narcotics distribution

OBJECTIVE:An important part of clinical training is learning how to identify and prevent hospital-acquired conditions or injuries. Despite this, there are few standardized methods in graduate medical education (GME) for teaching and assessing resident patient safety skills. Residents often do not report safety events, and increasing resident engagement can positively impact patient safety. In the current study, we sought to apply such a tool in gauging the capacity of orthopedic surgery interns at a large academic medical center to identify patient safety hazards and begin a discussion regarding the management of potential patient safety issues. METHODS:A total of 27 orthopedic surgery interns at a single large academic medical center participated in the current observational study divided into two distinct groups in the summers of 2016 and 2017. A patient room was simulated with a training mannequin lying supine in a hospital bed. A mock patient chart and handoff were created in the electronic medical record (EMR) on the bedside computer. Patient safety hazards and errors of care were placed around the room and in the EMR, including several derived from the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goals. Each intern was given a maximum of 20 minutes to identify as many of the simulated patient safety hazards as possible. A debrief was conducted at the end of the exercise to discuss their responsibility to speak up when hazards are identified in a non-simulated patient room. For analysis, the hazards were distributed into four categories: room organization, EMR, patient care, and white board. Each intern's individual score (number of complete identifications/total number of hazards) and the group's performance as a whole in each category were calculated. RESULTS:The mean individual score was 51.54% (26.67% to 70.00%) in group A and 40.41% (25.71% to 54.29%) in group B. In group A, room organization hazards were identified more than any other category (74.62%), followed by patient care errors (40.38%), EMR hazards (40.17%), and white board errors (38.46%). In group B, room organization was identified the most (57.74%), followed by EMR (50%), and patient care and white board hazards (28.57% each). Certain critical safety hazards were identified by a small number of interns. For example, the inadequate handoff was only identified by four interns in each group. CONCLUSIONS:Hazards related to room cleanliness were easier to identify than hazards related to specific errors in patient care. A wide variation in the identification of critical safety issues was observed among the trainees assessed. This type of simulated educational experience provides important opportunities for resident-specific education in the realm of patient safety and health care quality.

Background: Pectoralis major ruptures are increasing in incidence primarily due to an increase in awareness, activity level among young males between 20 - 40 years of age, and use of anabolic steroids. Although the majority of pectoralis major ruptures are acute injuries, many chronic ruptures are unrecognized and it is imperative to understand proper evaluation of these injuries, as well as the appropriate treatment for acute and chronic ruptures. Purpose: Pectoralis major ruptures can lead to deformity and physical disability if left untreated. This review paper discusses the both acute and chronic ruptures as well as indications for nonoperative treatment and operative treatment to give the reader the best understanding of this diagnosis and proper management. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using a search of electronic databases. Search terms such as pectoralis major rupture, pectoralis major repair, pectoralis major tendon transfer and pectoralis major nonoperative treatment were used. Case reports, systematic reviews, prospective and retrospective studies were included to provide a comprehensive review. The only exclusion criteria consisted of studies not published in English. This review article includes the anatomy and biomechanics of the pectoralis major muscle, proper evaluation of the patient, operative and nonoperative treatment of acute and chronic pectoralis major ruptures, and outcomes of the recommended treatment. Conclusion: Nonoperative treatment is indicated for patients with medical comorbidities, older age, incomplete tears, or irreparable damage. Patients treated non-operatively have been shown to lose strength, but regain full range of motion. Patients with surgery before 6 weeks reported better outcomes than patients with surgery between 6-8 weeks. The chronicity of the rupture (>8 weeks) increases likelihood of reconstruction, involving the use of autografts or allografts. Patients treated with delayed repair had significantly better strength, satisfaction and outcomes than patients with nonoperative treatment. The pectoralis tendon can also be transferred in patients with rotators cuff tears, atrophy, or significant functional limitation. Tendon transfers have been shown to have unpredictable outcomes, but overall satisfactory results.

Cartilage injury, such as full-thickness lesions, predisposes patients to the premature development of osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease. While surgical management of cartilage lesions has improved, long-term clinical efficacy has stagnated, owing to the lack of hyaline cartilage regeneration and inadequate graft-host integration. This study tests the hypothesis that integration of cartilage grafts with native cartilage can be improved by enhancing the migration of chondrocytes across the graft-host interface via the release of chemotactic factor from a degradable polymeric mesh. To this end, a polylactide-co-glycolide/poly-ε-caprolactone mesh was designed to localize the delivery of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), a well-established chondrocyte attractant. The release of IGF-1 (100 ng/mg) enhanced cell migration from cartilage explants, and the mesh served as critical structural support for cell adhesion, growth, and production of a cartilaginous matrix in vitro, which resulted in increased integration strength compared with mesh-free repair. Further, this neocartilage matrix was structurally contiguous with native and grafted cartilage when tested in an osteochondral explant model in vivo. These results demonstrate that this combined approach of a cell homing factor and supportive matrix will promote cell-mediated integrative cartilage repair and improve clinical outcomes of cartilage grafts in the treatment of osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND:There is mixed opinion regarding the optimal femoral fixation method for hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Currently, no study exists showing a superior method of femoral fixation, and thus the topic has remained controversial. The purpose of this study is to network meta-analyze the randomized control trials comparing cortical-button (CB), cross-pin (CP) and interference screws (IS) for femoral fixation with hamstring tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction. METHODS:The literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized control trials comparing CB, CP and IS were included. Clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach to network meta-analysis, with all statistical analysis performed using R, with a p-value <0.05 being considered statistically significant. RESULTS:There were 11 studies included comparing; 194 patients with CB to 201 patients with CP (6 studies), 48 patients with CB to 50 patients with IS (1 study), and 172 patients with CP to 162 patients with IS (5 studies). One study compared all three groups, including 48 patients with CB, 50 patients with IS, and 52 with CP. There was a mean follow-up time of 26.4 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the fixation methods when evaluating knee stability, functional outcomes, graft failures, or revision procedures. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Using a network meta-analysis, our study found that, there was no difference in failure rate, knee stability, functional outcomes or incidence of revision procedures between CB, CP or IS femoral fixation techniques of hamstring tendon autografts in ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level I, network meta-analysis of Level I studies.

BACKGROUND:/UNASSIGNED:Changes in the joint microenvironment after an injury to the articular surface of the knee have been implicated in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. While prior studies focused on changes in this microenvironment after anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, few have explored the biomarker changes that occur in the setting of meniscal injuries. PURPOSE:/UNASSIGNED:To determine whether meniscal injury results in significant alterations to synovial fluid biomarker concentrations as compared with noninjured contralateral knees. Additionally, to explore the relationship between synovial fluid biomarkers and the degree of cartilage injury seen in these patients. STUDY DESIGN:/UNASSIGNED:Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS:/UNASSIGNED:Patients undergoing surgery for unilateral meniscal injury were prospectively enrolled from October 2011 to December 2016, forming a cohort that had synovial fluid samples collected from both the injured knee and the contralateral uninjured knee at the time of meniscal surgery. Synovial fluid samples were collected just before incision, and the concentrations of 10 biomarkers of interest were determined with a multiplex magnetic bead immunoassay. The concentrations of synovial fluid biomarkers from the operative and contralateral knees were compared. Additionally, the synovial fluid biomarker concentrations of operative knees from patients with associated high-grade cartilage lesions were compared with those with low-grade lesions. RESULTS:/UNASSIGNED:The current analysis included synovial fluid samples from 82 knees (41 operative and 41 contralateral) from 41 patients undergoing arthroscopic surgery to treat a symptomatic meniscal injury. The mean ± SD age of patients was 49.86 ± 11.75 years. There were significantly greater concentrations of 4 of the 5 proinflammatory biomarkers (IL-6, MCP-1, MIP-1β, and MMP-3) in symptomatic knees as compared with asymptomatic knees when controlling for the duration of symptoms, body mass index, age, and the random effects of by-patient variability. In the injured knees, associated high-grade cartilage lesions were predictive of elevated MCP-1, MIP-1β, and VEGF levels. Low synovial fluid concentration of TIMP-1 or a greater ratio of MMP-3 to TIMP-1 was associated with the presence of synovitis. Increasing age was found to be an independent predictor of increased IL-6, MCP-1, and VEGF concentrations in the setting of symptomatic meniscal injury. CONCLUSION:/UNASSIGNED:The authors identified 4 proinflammatory synovial fluid biomarkers whose concentrations were significantly different after meniscal injury as compared with uninjured contralateral knees. Furthermore, they describe the effects of associated cartilage damage, synovitis, and patient age on biomarker concentrations.