Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is observed in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated low-grade gliomas (LGGs), but agents that inhibit this pathway, including mTOR inhibitors, have not been studied in this population. We evaluate the efficacy of the orally administered mTOR inhibitor everolimus for radiographically progressive NF1-associated pediatric LGGs. METHODS:Children with radiologic-progressive, NF1-associated LGG and prior treatment with a carboplatin-containing chemotherapy were prospectively enrolled on this phase II clinical trial to receive daily everolimus. Whole blood was analyzed for everolimus and markers of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/mTOR pathway inhibition. Serial MRIs were obtained during treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 48 weeks. RESULTS:Twenty-three participants (median age, 9.4 y; range, 3.2-21.6 y) were enrolled. All participants were initially evaluable for response; 1 patient was removed from study after development of a malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Fifteen of 22 participants (68%) demonstrated a response, defined as either shrinkage (1 complete response, 2 partial response) or arrest of tumor growth (12 stable disease). Of these, 10/15 remained free of progression (median follow-up, 33 mo). All remaining 22 participants were alive at completion of therapy. Treatment was well tolerated; no patient discontinued therapy due to toxicity. Pharmacokinetic parameters and pre-dose concentrations showed substantial between-subject variability. PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition markers demonstrating blood mononuclear cell mTOR pathway inactivation was achieved in most participants. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Individuals with recurrent/progressive NF1-associated LGG demonstrate significant disease stability/shrinkage during treatment with oral everolimus with a well-tolerated toxicity profile. Everolimus is well suited for future consideration as upfront or combination therapy in this patient population.

We report a case of a slow-growing, diffuse, infiltrating glioma in the right brainstem of an 9 year-old boy. The tumor was negative by immunohistochemical staining for histone H3 K27M, BRAF V600E, and IDH1 R132H mutations. Fluorescence in situ hybridization did not reveal a BRAF duplication. Genomic profiling of the tumor, by DNA methylation array and cancer whole exome and transcriptome sequencing, was performed. This analysis showed copy number alterations, including gains of several chromosomes. In addition, a novel fusion involving the first 17 exons of FGFR2 fused to exon 2 of VPS35 was identified. This novel fusion is predicted to result in activation of FGFR signaling, and is potentially targetable using FGFR inhibitors. This tumor expands the spectrum of pediatric diffuse gliomas.

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) is a rare type of brain tumor that affects children and young adults. Molecular prognostic markers of PXAs remain poorly established. Similar to gangliogliomas, PXAs show prominent immune cell infiltrate, but its composition also remains unknown. In this study, we correlated DNA methylation and BRAF status with clinical outcome and explored the tumor microenvironment. We performed DNA methylation in 21 tumor samples from 18 subjects with a histological diagnosis of PXA. MethylCIBERSORT was used to deconvolute the PXA microenvironment by analyzing the associated immune cell-types. Median age at diagnosis was 16 years (range 7-32). At median follow-up of 30 months, 3-year and 5-year overall survival was 73% and 71%, respectively. Overall survival ranged from 1 to 139 months. Eleven out of 18 subjects (61%) showed disease progression. Progression-free survival ranged from 1 to 89 months. Trisomy 7 and CDKN2A/B (p16) homozygous deletion did not show any association with overall survival (p = 0.67 and p = 0.74, respectively). Decreased overall survival was observed for subjects with tumors lacking the BRAF V600E mutation (p = 0.02). PXAs had significantly increased CD8 T-cell epigenetic signatures compared with previously profiled gangliogliomas (p = 0.0019). The characterization of immune cell-types in PXAs may have implications for future development of immunotherapy.

We present the case of a 22-year-old woman who developed increasing headaches, nausea, and vomiting. Imaging identified a 3 × 3 cm heterogeneously enhancing cystic mass in the posterior III ventricular/pineal region. Pathology review of the initial lesion revealed a highly malignant spindle cell neoplasm composed of round to mostly oval elongated cells with relatively small amounts of cytoplasm arranged in sheets and fascicles with focal storiform pattern. Whole genome methylation analysis through unsupervised clustering with data generated from other primary intracranial tumors and peripheral sarcomas was performed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and classified the tumor with the group of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (ARMS). Further RNA sequencing revealed an in frame PAX3 (EX 7)-NCOA2 (EX12) fusion confirming the diagnosis. This is the first evidence of occurrence of PAX3-NCOA2 in primary CNS ARMS.

The rapid development of immuno-oncology (I-O) therapies for multiple types of cancer has transformed the cancer treatment landscape and brightened the long-term outlook for many patients with advanced cancer. Responding to ongoing efforts to generate value assessments for novel therapies, multiple stakeholders have been considering the question of "What makes I-O transformative?" Evaluating the distinct features and attributes of these therapies, and better characterizing how patients experience them, will inform such assessments. This paper defines ways in which treatment with I-O is different from other therapies. It also proposes key aspects and attributes of I-O therapies that should be considered in any assessment of their value and seeks to address evidence gaps in existing value frameworks given the unique properties of patient outcomes with I-O therapy. The paper concludes with a "data needs catalogue" (DNC) predicated on the belief that multiple key, unique elements that are necessary to fully characterize the value of I-O therapies are not routinely or robustly measured in current clinical practice or reimbursement databases and are infrequently captured in existing research studies. A better characterization of the benefit of I-O treatment will allow a more thorough assessment of its benefits and provide a template for the design and prioritization of future clinical trials and a roadmap for healthcare insurers to optimize coverage for patients with cancers eligible for I-O therapy.