Faculty Bibliography

The provision of positive pressure ventilation has the potential to provoke hemodynamic deterioration. The subject of heart-lung interactions is both complex and critical yet often obscure and fraught with misconception among trainees and seasoned clinicians alike. In this article, we focus on the impact of positive pressure ventilation on the right heart, providing a teaching approach composed of didactic sessions and simulated cases. We split our didactics and cases into two 30-minute sessions: "How the right heart fills" and "How the right heart empties." Within each session, our framework highlights key concepts with respect to circulatory physiology, respiratory system mechanics, and an amalgam of the two subjects as it pertains to managing clinical scenarios encountered during a trainee's intensive care unit rotation.

OBJECTIVES:The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic impact and clinical outcomes of saddle vs non-saddle pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS:This was a retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes among patients with saddle and non-saddle PE within a cohort referred for catheter-based thrombectomy (CBT) with invasive hemodynamic assessments. Patients who underwent CBT between August 2020 and January 2024 were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a low cardiac index (CI < 2.2 L/min/m²). Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS. RESULTS:A total of 107 patients (84 intermediate risk, 23 high-risk; mean age 58 years, 47.6% female) were included in the study, with 44 patients having saddle PE and 63 having non-saddle PE. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics and clinical characteristics between saddle and non-saddle PE, including rates of high-risk PE (25% vs 16%, P = .24), rates of RV dysfunction, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (55 vs 53 mm Hg, P = .74), mean pulmonary artery pressure (34 mm Hg vs 33 mm Hg), low cardiac index (56% vs 51%, P = .64), rates of normotensive shock (27% vs 20%, P = .44), or Composite Pulmonary Embolism Shock scores (4.5 vs 4.7, P = .25). Additionally, 30-day mortality (6% vs 5%, P = .69), ICU LOS, and hospital LOS were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients undergoing CBT, there were no significant differences in invasive hemodynamic parameters or clinical outcomes between those with saddle and non-saddle PE.

BACKGROUND:Patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) and normotensive shock may have worse outcomes. However, diagnosis of normotensive shock requires invasive hemodynamics. Our objective was to assess the predictive value of McConnell's sign in identifying normotensive shock in patients with intermediate-risk PE. METHODS:and clinical evidence of hypoperfusion (i.e. elevated lactate, oliguria). The primary outcome was the association between McConnell's sign and normotensive shock. RESULTS:, p = 0.003), and higher rates of normotensive shock (76 % vs 27 %, p = 0.005). McConnell's sign had a sensitivity of 88 % and specificity of 53 % for identifying intermediate-risk PE patients with normotensive shock. Patients with McConnell's sign had an increased odds (odds ratio 8.38, confidence interval: 1.73-40.53, p = 0.008; area under the curve 0.70, 95 % confidence interval: 0.56-0.85) of normotensive shock. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study to suggest that McConnell's sign may identify those in the intermediate-risk group who are at risk for normotensive shock. Larger cohorts are needed to validate our findings.

Emergent reperfusion, most commonly with the administration of thrombolytic agents, is the recommended management approach for patients presenting with high-risk, or hemodynamically unstable pulmonary embolism. However, a subset of patients with a more catastrophic presentation, including refractory shock and impending or active cardiopulmonary arrest, may require immediate circulatory support. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can be deployed rapidly by the well-trained team and provide systemic perfusion allowing for hemodynamic stabilization. Subsequent embolectomy or a standalone strategy allowing for thrombus autolysis may be followed with decannulation after several days. Retrospective studies and registry data suggest favorable clinical outcomes with the use of VA-ECMO as an upfront stabilization strategy even among patients presenting with cardiopulmonary arrest. In this review, we discuss the physiologic rationale, evidence base, and an approach to ECMO deployment and subsequent management strategies among select patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism.

Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling describes the relation between right ventricular contractility and its afterload and is estimated as the ratio of the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) by way of echocardiography. Whether TAPSE/PASP is reflective of invasive hemodynamics or occult shock in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is unknown. This was a single-center retrospective study over a 3-year period of consecutive patients with PE who underwent mechanical thrombectomy and simultaneous pulmonary artery catheterization with echocardiograms performed within 24 hours before the procedure. A total of 70 patients (81% intermediate risk) had complete invasive hemodynamic profiles and echocardiograms, with TAPSE/PASP calculated. The optimal cutoff for TAPSE/PASP as a predictor of a reduced cardiac index (CI) (CI ≤2.2 L/min/m²) was 0.34 mm/mm Hg, with an area under the curve of 0.97 and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 97.3%, 90.9%, 92.3%, and 96.8%, respectively. Every 0.1 mm/mm Hg decrease in TAPSE/PASP was associated with a 0.24-L/min/m² decrease in the CI. This relation was similar when restricted to intermediate-risk PE. The TAPSE/PASP ratio was predictive of normotensive shock with an odds ratio of 2.63 (95% confidence interval 1.42 to 4.76, p = 0.002) per unit decrease in the ratio. In conclusion, in patients with acute PE who underwent mechanical thrombectomy, TAPSE/PASP was a strong predictor of a reduced CI and normotensive shock. This means that noninvasive point-of-care assessment of hemodynamics may have added value in PE risk stratification.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:With an increasing demand for critical care expertise and limitations in intensivist availability, innovative staffing models, such as the utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs), have emerged. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of the study was to compare patient outcomes between APP and housestaff teams in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective study, spanning March 2022 to July 2023, compares patient characteristics and outcomes between two CICU teams embedded in the same CICU at a large urban academic hospital: one staffed by housestaff and the other by APPs (80% physician assistants, 20% nurse practitioners) who each had approximately 1 to 2 years of experience in the CICU. The primary outcome was CICU mortality. Multivariable Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the primary outcome. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Our moderately sized study demonstrated no difference in CICU or in-hospital mortality between patients managed by a housestaff team versus those managed by an APP team.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Multidisciplinary cardiogenic shock (CS) programs have been associated with improved outcomes, yet practical guidance for developing a CS program is lacking. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A survey on CS program development and operational best practices was administered to 12 institutions in diverse sociogeographic regions and practice settings. Common steps in program development were identified. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Key steps for program development were identified: measuring baseline outcomes; identifying subspecialty champions; gaining leadership and team buy-in; developing institution-specific CS protocols; educating staff and referring providers; consulting with external experts; and developing quality assessment and process improvement. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:An assessment of 12 US CS programs highlights a blueprint for establishing and maintaining a successful, multidisciplinary shock program.

BACKGROUND:The Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC) recently proposed pragmatic consensus definitions to standardize classification of cardiogenic shock (CS) in registries and clinical trials. We aimed to describe contemporary CS epidemiology using the SHARC definitions in a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) population. METHODS:The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) is a multinational research network of advanced CICUs coordinated by the TIMI Study Group (Boston, MA). CS was defined as a cardiac disorder resulting in SBP<90mmHg for ≥30 minutes (or the need for vasopressors, inotropes, or mechanical circulatory support [MCS] to maintain SBP ≥90mmHg) with evidence of hypoperfusion. Primary etiologic categories included acute myocardial infarction-related CS (AMI-CS), heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and non-myocardial (secondary) CS. Post-cardiotomy CS was not included. HF-CS was further subcategorized as de novo vs. acute-on-chronic HF-CS. Patients with both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic components of shock were classified separately as mixed CS. RESULTS:Of 8,974 patients meeting shock criteria (2017-2023), 65% had isolated CS and 17% had mixed shock. Among patients with CS (n=5,869), 27% had AMI-CS (65% STEMI), 59% HF-CS (72% acute-on-chronic, 28% de novo), and 14% secondary CS. Patients with AMI-CS and de novo HF-CS were most likely to have had concomitant cardiac arrest (p<0.001). Patients with AMI-CS and mixed CS were most likely to present in more severe shock stages (SCAI D or E; p<0.001). Temporary MCS use was highest in AMI-CS (59%). In-hospital mortality was highest in mixed CS (48%), followed by AMI-CS (41%), similar in de novo HF-CS (31%) and secondary CS (31%), and lowest in acute-on-chronic HF-CS (25%; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS:SHARC consensus definitions for CS classification can be pragmatically applied in contemporary registries and reveal discrete subpopulations of CS with distinct phenotypes and outcomes that may be relevant to clinical practice and future research.

None.

This consensus statement emerges from collaborative efforts among leading figures in critical care cardiology throughout the United States, who met to share their collective expertise on issues faced by those active in or pursuing contemporary critical care cardiology education. The panel applied fundamentals of adult education and curriculum design, reviewed requisite training necessary to provide high-quality care to critically ill patients with cardiac pathology, and devoted attention to a purposeful approach emphasizing diversity, equity, and inclusion in developing this nascent field. The resulting paper offers a comprehensive guide for current trainees, with insights about the present landscape of critical care cardiology while highlighting issues that need to be addressed for continued advancement. By delineating future directions with careful consideration and intentionality, this Expert Panel aims to facilitate the continued growth and maturation of critical care cardiology education and practice.