Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:brancr01
Are barrier creams actually effective?
Alvarez MS; Brown LH; Brancaccio RR
This article reviews the current information surrounding the efficacy of barrier creams as a protective measure against contact dermatitis. The principles of the proposed effects of barrier creams on the skin and the experimental and clinical data regarding their efficacy in the prevention of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis are discussed
PMID: 11892056
ISSN: 1529-7322
CID: 34898
Allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis
Chapter by: Fogelman JP; Brancaccio RR
in: Current dermatologic diagnosis & treatment by Freedberg IM; Sanchez MR [Eds]
Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001
pp. 12-13
ISBN: 0781735319
CID: 3670
Delayed type hypersensitivity to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide [Case Report]
Brancaccio RR; Zappi EG
Corticosteroids are the most widely used class of drugs in dermatology. In the past, allergic contact dermatitis to topical corticosteriods was rarely reported. In this article, we present a case of delayed type hypersensitivity to triamcinolone acetonide
PMID: 10664873
ISSN: 0011-4162
CID: 57564
Patch testing for chromium sensitivity [2] (multiple letters) [Letter]
Finley BL; Proctor DM; Harris M; Fowler J; Cohen DE; Brancaccio R
EMBASE:200202157
ISSN: 1046-199x
CID: 25642
Diagnostic tests for type IV or delayed hypersensitivity reactions
Cohen DE; Brancaccio RR; Soter NA
PMID: 10943299
ISSN: 1075-7910
CID: 11548
Utility of a standard allergen series alone in the evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis: a retrospective study 1662 patients [Meeting Abstract]
Jacobs SL; Brancaccio RR; Belsito DV; Cohen DE
ORIGINAL:0004276
ISSN: 1046-199x
CID: 25645
Facial dermatitis in a plastics factory worker [Case Report]
Gallagher C; Cohen D; Brancaccio R
PMID: 10444110
ISSN: 1046-199x
CID: 6175
Allergic contact and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens [Case Report]
Mark KA; Brancaccio RR; Soter NA; Cohen DE
BACKGROUND: The panel of patch test allergens used for the evaluation of patients with suspected photoallergy typically does not include plant and pesticide allergens. The prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens was determined for this subgroup of patients. OBSERVATION: Positive reactions were detected in 12 of 26 patients who were tested with our photoallergen series: 5 with allergic contact dermatitis, 5 with photoallergic contact dermatitis, and 2 with both. Four of the 12 patients had positive patch and photo-patch test reactions to plant allergens, pesticide allergens, or both. The positive patch test reactions were to the plants Taraxacum officinale (dandelion) and Tanacetum vulgare (tansy) and to the pesticides folpet and captafol. Positive photo-patch test reactions were to the pesticides folpet and captan. The histories of the patients suggested that 2 or 3 of the 4 patients had clinically relevant reactions. In the other 8 patients, positive reactions to the patch and photo-patch tests included fragrances, sunscreens, and antibacterial agents. CONCLUSION: Plant and pesticide allergens should be included in the patch and photo-patch test series used for the evaluation of patients with suspected photoallergy
PMID: 9923784
ISSN: 0003-987x
CID: 7401
Six-hour versus 48-hour patch testing with varying concentrations of potassium dichromate
Kosann MK; Brancaccio RR; Shupack JL; Franks AG Jr; Cohen DE
This study examines the possibility of using patch contact times shorter in duration than the standard 48 hours. Using varying concentrations of potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7), this study analyzed results from two sets of patches applied to the backs of 11 subjects for durations of 6 and 48 hours, respectively. Results showed that after the 48-hour application period, all subjects reacted to K2Cr2O7 at some concentration. For the patches applied for 6 hours, 7 of the 11 subjects (64%) reacted to K2Cr2O7 at some concentration. Minimum elicitation thresholds (METs), the lowest concentration at which a reaction was observed, were established for both the 6-hour and 48-hour application times. The ratio of an individual's 6-hour MET to their 48-hour MET was calculated to evaluate the feasibility of patch testing with a higher concentration of an allergen for a shorter time period. Although the results clearly indicated that a higher concentration of allergen is required in order to elicit a reaction at 6 versus 48 hours, a fair amount of interindividual variability is exhibited by these 6-hour to 48-hour MET ratios. This observed variability would seem to preclude the use of 6-hour duration patch contact times for routine patch testing with K2Cr2O7
PMID: 9601909
ISSN: 1046-199x
CID: 12112
What is new in clinical research in contact dermatitis
Cohen DE; Brancaccio RR
The field of cutaneous allergy has enjoyed dynamic research advances in epidemiology and clinical contact dermatitis. Studies regarding outcomes analysis, validity, predictive value, and sensitivity have allowed clinicians to better understand the importance of patch test results. In the clinical arena, new and clinically relevant allergens are being discovered, such as corticosteroids, metals, preservatives, surfactants, and glues. Continued epidemiologic surveillance of new allergens will enable manufacturers to develop safer products for patients to use
PMID: 9001867
ISSN: 0733-8635
CID: 12429