Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:cerfor01
Discharging Patients Home with a Chest Tube and Digital System after Robotic Lung Resection
Geraci, Travis C; McCormack, Ashley J; Cerfolio, Robert J
BACKGROUND:Our objective is to assess the feasibility, safety, and outcomes for patients discharged home with a chest tube connected to a digital drainage system after robotic pulmonary resection. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database as a quality improvement initiative. All patients had planned discharge on postoperative day one (POD1) after robotic pulmonary resection. Those with an air leak were discharge home with a chest tube connected to a digital drainage system with daily communication with the surgeon. RESULTS:From January 2019 to February 2023 there were 580 consecutive robotic resections, of which 69 (12%) patients had an air leak on POD1; 38/276 (14%) after lobectomy, 24/226 (11%) after segmentectomy, and 7/78 (9%) after wedge resection. Of these 69 patients, 52 patients (75%) were discharged on POD1, 15 patients (22%) on POD2, and 2 patients (3%) on POD3. Chest tubes were removed a median outpatient chest tube duration was 4 days (IQR 3-5). Of the 69 patients sent home with a digital drainage system, there was one complication requiring readmission for increasing subcutaneous emphysema. Five patients (7%) had system malfunctions that required return to our clinic for problem solving. There were no 30 or 90-day mortalities. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who undergo robotic pulmonary resection and have an air leak can be safely and effectively discharged on the first post-operative day and managed as an outpatient by using daily texts and or videos with pulse oximetry data on a digital drainage system with limited morbidity.
PMID: 38789008
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 5655192
Comparing Robotic, Thoracoscopic, and Open Segmentectomy: A National Cancer Database Analysis
Caso, Raul; Watson, Thomas J; Tefera, Eshetu; Cerfolio, Robert; Abbas, Abbas E; Lazar, John F; Margolis, Marc; Hwalek, Ann E; Khaitan, Puja Gaur
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Minimally invasive approaches to lung resection have become widely acceptable and more recently, segmentectomy has demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes when compared to lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies comparing outcomes following segmentectomy by different surgical approaches are lacking. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes of patients undergoing robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), or open segmentectomy for NSCLC using the National Cancer Database. METHODS:NSCLC patients with clinical stage I who underwent segmentectomy from 2010 to 2016 were identified. After propensity-score matching (1:4:1), multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of 30-d readmissions, 90-d mortality, and overall survival. RESULTS:22,792 patients met study inclusion. After matching, approaches included robotic (n = 2493; 17%), VATS (n = 9972; 66%), and open (n = 2493; 17%). An open approach was associated with higher 30-d readmissions (7% open versus 5.5% VATS versus 5.6% robot, P = 0.033) and 90-d mortality (4.4% open versus 2.2% VATS versus 2.5% robot, P < 0.001). A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival (50% open versus 58% VATS versus 63% robot, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:For patients with clinical stage I NSCLC undergoing segmentectomy, compared to the open approach, a VATS approach was associated with lower 30-d readmission and 90-d mortality. A robotic approach was associated with improved 5-y survival compared to open and VATS approaches when matched. Additional studies are necessary to determine if unrecognized covariates contribute to these differences.
PMID: 38359682
ISSN: 1095-8673
CID: 5635902
Outside the Operating Room: Alternative Pathways for Doctors and Surgeons to Lead
Cerfolio, Robert James
In this article, we ask the reader to fully vet why they want to lead and who they want to lead. We then describe the different leaderships styles needed to effectively lead and deliver executive outcomes. We discuss the novel concept of different coachability styles and explain how an effective leader must understand when to apply one leadership style over another and which person of team will respond better to style over the others. The novel metric called the EQI-the efficiency quality index-by definition prevents this problem and is described and discussed.
PMID: 37953053
ISSN: 1558-5069
CID: 5610042
Assessment of the well-being of significant others of cardiothoracic surgeons
Ungerleider, Jamie D; Ungerleider, Ross M; James, Les; Wolf, Andrea; Kovacs, Melissa; Cerfolio, Robert; Litle, Virginia; Cooke, David T; Jones-Ungerleider, K Candis; Maddaus, Michael; Luc, Jessica G Y; DeAnda, Abe; Erkmen, Cherie P; Bremner, Kathy; Bremner, Ross M
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to evaluate how the current working climate of cardiothoracic surgery and burnout experienced by cardiothoracic surgeons influences their spouses and significant others (SOs). METHODS:or independent samples t tests, as appropriate. RESULTS:Responses from 238 SOs were analyzed. Sixty-six percent reported that the stress on their cardiothoracic surgeon partner had a moderate to severe influence on their family, and 63% reported that their partner's work demands didn't leave enough time for family. Fifty-one percent reported that their partner rarely had time for intimacy, 27% reported poor work-life balance, and 23% reported that interactions at home were usually or always not good-natured. SOs were most affected when their partner was <5 years out from training, worked in private vs academic practice, and worked longer hours. Having children, particularly younger than age 19 years, and a lack of workplace support resources further diminished well-being. CONCLUSIONS:The current work culture of cardiothoracic surgeons adversely affects their SOs, and the risk for families is concerning. These data present a major area for exploration as we strive to understand and mitigate the factors that lead to burnout among cardiothoracic surgeons.
PMID: 37160214
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 5507952
Well-being of Cardiothoracic Surgeons in the Time of COVID-19: A Survey by the Wellness Committee of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery
Bremner, Ross M; Ungerleider, Ross M; Ungerleider, Jamie; Wolf, Andrea S; Erkmen, Cherie P; Luc, Jessica G Y; Litle, Virginia R; Cerfolio, Robert J; Cooke, David T
The prevalence of burnout among physicians has been increasing over the last decade, but data on burnout in the specialty of cardiothoracic surgery are lacking. We aimed to study this topic through a well-being survey. A 54-question well-being survey was developed by the Wellness Committee of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) and sent by email from January through March of 2021 to AATS members and participants of the 2021 annual meeting. The 5-item Likert-scale survey questions were dichotomized, and associations were determined by Chi-square tests or independent samples t-tests, as appropriate. The results from 871 respondents (17% women) were analyzed. Many respondents reported at least moderately experiencing: 1) a sense of dread coming to work (50%), 2) physical exhaustion at work (58%), 3) a lack of enthusiasm at work (46%), and 4) emotional exhaustion at work (50%). Most respondents (70%) felt that burnout affected their personal relationships at least "some of the time," and many (43%) experienced a great deal of work-related stress. Importantly, most respondents (62%) reported little to no access to workplace resources for emotional support, but those who reported access reported less burnout. Most respondents (57%) felt that the COVID-19 pandemic has negatively affected their well-being. On a positive note, 80% felt their career was fulfilling and enjoyed their day-to-day job at least "most of the time." Cardiothoracic surgeons experience high levels of burnout, similar to that of other medical professionals. Interventions aimed at mitigating burnout in this profession are discussed.
PMCID:9561391
PMID: 36244627
ISSN: 1532-9488
CID: 5360032
A chest tube after robotic thymectomy is unnecessary
McCormack, Ashley J; El Zaeedi, Mohamed; Dorsey, Michael; Cerfolio, Robert J
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes are frequently placed after thymectomy, without data to support this common practice. We report our experience in eliminating them after robotic thymectomy. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a retrospective database review of patients who underwent robotic thymectomy performed by a single surgeon in which intraoperative chest tube insertion was not planned. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Between January 2018 and October 2022, 75 patients underwent robotic thymectomy performed by a single surgeon. Of those, 64 (85.3%) underwent a left-sided thoracic approach. The most common indication for resection was a suspicious anterior mediastinal mass. There were no conversions to an open operation. The median operative time was 72 minutes (range, 38-164 minutes), and the median estimated blood loss was 20 cc (range, 10-60 cc). Ten patients (13.3%) went home on the day of surgery, and all others (86.7%) were discharged on postoperative day 1. A chest tube was placed in 1 patient at time of closure because of a persistent air leak after extensive adhesiolysis from a prior thoracotomy; the tube was removed on the day of surgery after resolution of the air leak. No other patient required chest tube placement intraoperatively, immediately postoperatively, or within 60 days postoperation. Two patients underwent outpatient thoracentesis within 1 month postoperation for effusions. There were no 30- or 90-day mortality and no major morbidities. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:A chest tube after robotic thymectomy is not necessary in almost all patients and can be safely omitted. The dogmatic routine practice of chest tube placement should be questioned.
PMCID:10775103
PMID: 38204665
ISSN: 2666-2736
CID: 5755342
The process and safety of removing chest tubes 4 to 12 hours after robotic pulmonary lobectomy and segmentectomy
McCormack, Ashley J; El Zaeedi, Mohamed; Geraci, Travis C; Cerfolio, Robert J
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes cause pain and morbidity. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a quality initiative study and review of patients who underwent robotic pulmonary resection by 1 surgeon (R.J.C.). The goal was to remove chest tubes within 4 to 12 hours after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy. Primary outcome was removal without the need for reinsertion, thoracentesis, or any morbidity due to early removal of the chest tube. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic pneumothorax, pleural effusion, chylothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, and chest tube reinsertion or thoracentesis within 60 days of surgery. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .001) were associated with chest tube removal within 4 to 12 hours of surgery. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes can be safely removed within 4 to 12 hours after robotic segmentectomy and lobectomy. Factors associated with successful early chest tube removal are nonsmoking, segmentectomy, and team members becoming comfortable with the process.
PMCID:10775092
PMID: 38204643
ISSN: 2666-2736
CID: 5755332
The ABSITE Blueprints
Ajouz, Hana; Cerfolio, Robert J.; Brathwaite, Collin E.M.; Pachter, Hersch Leon
[S.l.] : Springer International Publishing, 2023
Extent: 1 v.
ISBN: 9783031326424
CID: 5717652
Driving change and quality care in a healthcare"”the Efficiency Quality Index
Cerfolio, Robert J.
SCOPUS:85179933493
ISSN: 2519-0792
CID: 5620842
Commentary: Scrubs united with suits to provide quality care and profits [Comment]
Cerfolio, Robert J
PMID: 36931998
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 5595012