Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:To compare complications and outcomes after hysterectomy for benign compared with malignant indications in the United States. METHODS:Women who underwent hysterectomy in the United States for either benign or malignant indications from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were excluded if the procedure was not performed for primary gynecologic indications. Appropriate procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. Univariate and multivariable models for complication risk were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS:We identified 59,525 eligible patients, with 49,331 (82.9%) hysterectomies performed for benign and 10,194 (17.1%) for malignant indications. All complications, including wound complications (2.5% benign compared with 5.5% malignant, P<.001), venous thromboembolism (0.33% compared with 1.7%, P<.001), urinary tract infection (2.7% compared with 3.2%, P=.009), sepsis (0.53% compared with 1.9%, P<.001), blood transfusion (2.6% compared with 11.5%, P<.001), death (0.02% compared with 0.10%, P<.001), unplanned readmission (1.8% compared with 4.5%, P<.001), and returns to the operating room (0.91% compared with 1.4%, P<.001), were significantly more common for malignant hysterectomies. The overall rate of complications for benign cases was 7.9% compared with a rate of 19.4% for malignant hysterectomy. The median operating time for laparoscopy in benign cases was significantly longer than for open or vaginal hysterectomy procedures (127 minutes compared with 105 or 94 minutes, respectively; P<.001). The median operating time in malignant cases was significantly longer than for benign cases (P<.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Hysterectomies performed for gynecologic malignancies are associated with a more than twofold higher complication rate compared with those performed for benign conditions. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with a decreased complication rate compared with open surgery. These data can be used for patient counseling and surgical planning, determining physician and hospital costs of care, and considered when assigning value-based reimbursement.

Standard radiation therapy for patients undergoing primary chemosensitized radiation for carcinomas of the cervix usually consists of external beam radiation followed by an intracavitary brachytherapy boost. On occasion, the brachytherapy boost cannot be performed due to unfavorable anatomy or because of coexisting medical conditions. We examined the safety and efficacy of using CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a boost to the cervix after external beam radiation in those patients unable to have brachytherapy to give a more effective dose to the cervix than with conventional external beam radiation alone. Six consecutive patients with anatomic or medical conditions precluding a tandem and ovoid boost were treated with combined external beam radiation and CyberKnife boost to the cervix. Five patients received 45 Gy to the pelvis with serial intensity-modulated radiation therapy boost to the uterus and cervix to a dose of 61.2 Gy. These five patients received an SBRT boost to the cervix to a dose of 20 Gy in five fractions of 4 Gy each. One patient was treated to the pelvis to a dose of 45 Gy with an external beam boost to the uterus and cervix to a dose of 50.4 Gy. This patient received an SBRT boost to the cervix to a dose of 19.5 Gy in three fractions of 6.5 Gy. Five percent volumes of the bladder and rectum were kept to ≤75 Gy in all patients (i.e., V75 Gy ≤ 5%). All of the patients remain locally controlled with no evidence of disease following treatment. Grade 1 diarrhea occurred in 4/6 patients during the conventional external beam radiation. There has been no grade 3 or 4 rectal or bladder toxicity. There were no toxicities observed following SBRT boost. At a median follow-up of 14 months, CyberKnife radiosurgical boost is well tolerated and efficacious in providing a boost to patients with cervix cancer who are unable to undergo brachytherapy boost. Further follow-up is required to see if these results remain durable.

We report a case of a previously healthy woman after an uneventful caesarean section who developed polymicrobial necrotizing fasciitis. She was given a non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drug (NSAID) after her delivery. Her post-delivery course was complicated by septic shock, and required multiple debridements before abdominal reconstruction. This case describes the increased risk of necrotizing fasciitis with NSAID use. Unusual were the organisms causing the polymicrobial necrotizing fasciitis: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter agglomerans, Acinetobacter baumannii, and two strains of Enterobacter cloacae.