Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:chalae02
U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Guidance Regarding Morcellation of Leiomyomas: Well-Intentioned, But Is It Harmful for Women?
Parker, William H; Kaunitz, Andrew M; Pritts, Elizabeth A; Olive, David L; Chalas, Eva; Clarke-Pearson, Daniel L; Berek, Jonathan S
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning against the use of laparoscopic power morcellators in the majority of women undergoing myomectomy or hysterectomy for the treatment of leiomyomas because of the concern for inadvertent spread of tumor cells if an undiagnosed cancer were present. The authors, representing a 45-member review group, reviewed the current literature to formulate prevalence rates of leiomyosarcoma in women with presumed leiomyomas and to asses reliable data regarding patient survival after morcellation. The authors disagree with the FDA's methodology in reaching their conclusion and provide clinical recommendations for care of women with leiomyomas who are planning surgery.
PMID: 26646134
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 3460152
How Obstetricians-Gynecologists Cope With On-Call-Related Fatigue [Meeting Abstract]
Atallah, Fouad; Smith, Heather A.; Hegg, Logan; Chalas, Eva; McCalla, Sandra; Goffman, Dena
ISI:000398934900203
ISSN: 0029-7844
CID: 4142652
Learning Curve Analysis of Robot-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Gynecologic Oncology Practice at Winthrop University Hospital
Sharma, S; Chalas, E; Jimenez, E; Calixte, R
PMID: 27679121
ISSN: 1553-4669
CID: 3460202
Clinical Outcomes of Hysterectomies Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database [Meeting Abstract]
Chalas, Eva; Chen, Hui; Chan, Kent C.; Fazzari, Melissa; Jimenez, Edward A.; Villella, Jeannine Ann
ISI:000354128700163
ISSN: 0029-7844
CID: 3461012
Evaluation for Health Care Disparities in Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Whites With Cervical Cancer Using the National Cancer Database [Meeting Abstract]
Rojas, Veronica; Fazzari, Melissa; Jimenez, Edward A.; Garcia, Joan Rose Rosario; Toskos, Heather; Chalas, Eva
ISI:000354128700357
ISSN: 0029-7844
CID: 3465812
Gynecologic oncology quality measures: what really matters? [Editorial]
Chalas, Eva
PMID: 23953769
ISSN: 1095-6859
CID: 3460132
Ovaries, estrogen, and longevity [Editorial]
Chalas, Eva
PMID: 23635666
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 3460112
Polymicrobial abdominal wall necrotizing fasciitis after cesarean section
DeMuro, Jp; Hanna, Af; Chalas, E; Cunha, Ba
We report a case of a previously healthy woman after an uneventful caesarean section who developed polymicrobial necrotizing fasciitis. She was given a non-steroidal anti-inflamatory drug (NSAID) after her delivery. Her post-delivery course was complicated by septic shock, and required multiple debridements before abdominal reconstruction. This case describes the increased risk of necrotizing fasciitis with NSAID use. Unusual were the organisms causing the polymicrobial necrotizing fasciitis: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter agglomerans, Acinetobacter baumannii, and two strains of Enterobacter cloacae.
PMID: 24960796
ISSN: 2042-8812
CID: 3433432
Endometrial cancer recurrence: Adjuvant high-dose rate vaginal brachytherapy (HDR) versus HDR with whole pelvic radiation. [Meeting Abstract]
Villella, Jeannine A.; Palaia, Thomas; Chalas, Eva; Patrick, Patricia; Haas, Jonathan A.
ISI:000318009803504
ISSN: 0732-183x
CID: 3502592
CyberKnife Boost for Patients with Cervical Cancer Unable to Undergo Brachytherapy
Haas, Jonathan Andrew; Witten, Matthew R; Clancey, Owen; Episcopia, Karen; Accordino, Diane; Chalas, Eva
Standard radiation therapy for patients undergoing primary chemosensitized radiation for carcinomas of the cervix usually consists of external beam radiation followed by an intracavitary brachytherapy boost. On occasion, the brachytherapy boost cannot be performed due to unfavorable anatomy or because of coexisting medical conditions. We examined the safety and efficacy of using CyberKnife stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a boost to the cervix after external beam radiation in those patients unable to have brachytherapy to give a more effective dose to the cervix than with conventional external beam radiation alone. Six consecutive patients with anatomic or medical conditions precluding a tandem and ovoid boost were treated with combined external beam radiation and CyberKnife boost to the cervix. Five patients received 45 Gy to the pelvis with serial intensity-modulated radiation therapy boost to the uterus and cervix to a dose of 61.2 Gy. These five patients received an SBRT boost to the cervix to a dose of 20 Gy in five fractions of 4 Gy each. One patient was treated to the pelvis to a dose of 45 Gy with an external beam boost to the uterus and cervix to a dose of 50.4 Gy. This patient received an SBRT boost to the cervix to a dose of 19.5 Gy in three fractions of 6.5 Gy. Five percent volumes of the bladder and rectum were kept to ≤75 Gy in all patients (i.e., V75 Gy ≤ 5%). All of the patients remain locally controlled with no evidence of disease following treatment. Grade 1 diarrhea occurred in 4/6 patients during the conventional external beam radiation. There has been no grade 3 or 4 rectal or bladder toxicity. There were no toxicities observed following SBRT boost. At a median follow-up of 14 months, CyberKnife radiosurgical boost is well tolerated and efficacious in providing a boost to patients with cervix cancer who are unable to undergo brachytherapy boost. Further follow-up is required to see if these results remain durable.
PMID: 22655266
ISSN: 2234-943x
CID: 3460072