Faculty Bibliography

Lateral abdominal wall hernias may occur after a variety of procedures, including anterior spine exposure, urologic procedures, ostomy closures, or after trauma. Anatomically, these hernias are challenging and require a complete understanding of abdominal wall, interparietal and retroperitoneal, anatomy for successful repair. Mesh placement requires extensive dissection of often unfamiliar planes, and its fixation is difficult. We report our experience with open mesh repair of lateral abdominal wall hernias. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed to identify patients with a classification of lateral abdominal wall hernia who underwent an open repair. A total of 61 patients underwent open lateral hernia repairs. Mean patient age was 58 years (range 25-78), with a mean body mass index of 32 kg/m(2) (range 19.0-59.1). According to the European Hernia Society classification, defects were located subcostal (L1, 14 patients), flank (L2, 33 patients), iliac (L3, 11 patients), and lumber (L4, 3 patients). Mean defect size was 78.6 cm(2), with a mean greatest single dimension of 9.2 cm (range 2-25 cm). Retromuscular or interparietal repair was performed in 50.8 per cent, preperitoneal in 41.0 per cent, intraperitoneal in 6.6 per cent, and onlay in 1.6 per cent. The rate of surgical site occurrence was 49.2 per cent, primarily seroma and surgical site infection rate was 13.1 per cent. With a mean follow-up of 15.4 months, seven patients (11.5%) have documented recurrence. Synthetic mesh reconstruction of lateral wall hernias is challenging. Our experience demonstrates the safety and success of repair using synthetic mesh primarily in the retromuscular, interparietal, or preperitoneal planes.

Horizontal panniculectomy (PAN) offers the advantage of wide exposure for hernia repair with elimination of excess skin and adiposity, at the expense of massive subcutaneous flap creation and its attendant risks. We report our experience with ventral hernia repair (VHR) with PAN compared with patients with hernia repair alone. A prospective database was reviewed retrospectively for all patients undergoing open VHR + PAN. A matched cohort of patients without PAN was used for comparison, resulting in 43 study and 43 control patients. Incidence of surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infection (SSI), and recurrence were analyzed. A total of 43 patients underwent PAN + VHR with mesh. Mean body mass index was 34.3 kg/m(2), with 35 per cent having undergone prior bariatric surgery. Repair techniques included retromuscular (74.4%), preperitoneal (11.6%), intraperitoneal (6.9%), onlay (4.6%), and suture (2.3%). Mesh used was polypropylene (76.7%), polyester (18.6%), bioabsorbable (2.3%), and polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) (2.3%). Component separation was performed in 44.2 per cent of patients. There was a significant difference in total SSO between PAN + VHR and VHR alone (46.5% vs 27.9%; P < 0.001), though the difference for individual SSOs was not significant. There was no difference in SSI between groups (16.3% vs 20.9%; P = 0.776). Mean follow-up was 11.4 months, with recurrence rate of 11.6 per cent in the PAN group and 9.3 per cent in the control group (P = 0.725). Panniculectomy at the time of VHR does not increase the incidence of SSI, though higher rates of skin necrosis and cellulitis were seen. There is no difference in recurrence. This approach is a valid option for patients with excessive abdominal panniculus requiring VHR.

BACKGROUND:Mesh repair of incisional hernias has been consistently shown to diminish recurrence rates after repair, with an increased risk of infectious complications. We present a consecutive series of elective, retrorectus mesh repairs of the abdominal wall and attempt to determine predictors of wound events and recurrence. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:A retrospective review was performed to include elective, retromuscular mesh repairs of complex incisional hernias from August 2006 to August 2013. Demographics, operative details, and postoperative events including wound events, surgical site infections (SSI), and recurrences were recorded. RESULTS:Over the 7-year period, 255 retromuscular mesh repairs of midline incisional defects were performed. Median age of the patients was 58 years, with an average BMI of 32.2 kg/m(2). Average size of the fascial defect was 181.4 cm(2), with recurrent defects making up 48% of repairs. Wound events occurred in 37.7% of cases; SSIs occurred in 19.6% of cases. Recurrence rate was 16.9%, with mean time to recurrence of 19.2 months. With respect to mesh type, recurrences were 16.2% with synthetic, 17.1% for bioabsorbable, and 25% for biologic mesh. When evaluating polypropylene meshes, recurrence was more likely with lightweight mesh (22.9%) vs midweight mesh (10.6%) (p = 0.045). Predictors of SSI included history of mesh infection (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% CI 1.9 to 12.1; p < 0.001) and recurrent repairs (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1 to 5.8; p < 0.05). The only predictor of recurrence was the presence of an SSI (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5 to 6.3; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Wound events are common after open mesh repairs of complex incisional hernias. Previous mesh infections and recurrent repairs increase the likelihood of an SSI, which significantly increases the risk of recurrence. Recurrences after retrorectus mesh repairs are significantly higher with lightweight compared with mid-weight meshes.

The authors report 2 cases of orthostatic headaches associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) secondary to CSF leaks that were successfully treated with an alternative dural repair technique in which a tubular retractor system and a hydrogel dural sealant were used. The 2 patients, a 63-year-old man and a 45-year-old woman, presented with orthostatic headache associated with SIH secondary to suspected lumbar and lower cervical CSF leaks, respectively, as indicated by bony defects or epidural fluid collection. Epidural blood patch repair failed in both cases, but both were successfully treated with the minimally invasive application of a hydrogel dural sealant as a novel adjunct to traditional dural repair techniques. Both patients tolerated the procedure well. Moreover, SIH symptoms and MRI signs were completely resolved at 1-month follow-up in both patients. The minimally invasive dural repair procedure with hydrogel dural sealant described here offers a viable alternative in patients in whom epidural blood patches have failed, with obscure recalcitrant CSF leaks at the cervical as well as lumbar spinal level. The authors demonstrate that the adjuvant use of sealant is a safe and efficient repair method regardless of dural defect location.

For years, surgical dictum has posited that permanent synthetic mesh is contraindicated in the repair of a hernia in a contaminated field. Numerous investigators, however, have demonstrated the acceptably low morbidity associated with the use of heavy-weight polypropylene mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated fields. Recently, experience utilizing more modern, light-weight polypropylene mesh constructs in contaminated fields has grown considerably. The time has come to critically reevaluate the unfounded fear of utilizing permanent synthetic mesh in contaminated fields, as we will review the data speaking to the safety of mesh in these contaminated fields.

Most authors recommend an antireflux operation at the time of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. A fundoplication combats the potential postoperative reflux resulting from disruption of the hiatal anatomy and may minimize recurrence. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the differences in postoperative dysphagia, reflux symptoms, and hiatal hernia recurrence in patients with and without a fundoplication at the time of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Patients undergoing laparoscopic PEH repair from July 2006 to June 2012 were identified. Open repairs and reoperative cases were excluded. Patient characteristics, operative details, complications, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Over the six-year period, 152 laparoscopic PEH repairs were performed. Mean age was 65.8 years (range, 31 to 92) and average body mass index was 29.9 kg/m(2) (range, 18 to 52 kg/m(2)). Concomitant fundoplication was performed in 130 patients (86%), which was determined based on preoperative symptoms and esophageal motility. Mean operative times were similar with fundoplication (188 minutes) and without (184.5 minutes). At a mean follow-up of 13.9 months, there were 19 recurrences: 12.3 per cent (16 of 130) in the fundoplication group and 13.6 per cent (three of 22) in those without. Dysphagia lasting greater than six weeks was present in eight patients in the fundoplication group (6.2%) and in none in those without (P = 0.603). Eighteen percent of patients without a fundoplication reported postoperative reflux compared with 5.4 per cent of patients with a fundoplication (P = 0.055). In the laparoscopic repair of PEH, the addition of a fundoplication minimizes postoperative reflux symptoms without additional operative time. Neither dysphagia nor hiatal hernia recurrence is affected by the presence of a fundoplication.

BACKGROUND:Given the questionable long-term durability of biologic meshes, additional prosthetic options for ventral hernia repairs (VHR) in contaminated fields are necessary. Recent evidence suggests improved bacterial resistance of reduced-weight, large-pore synthetics, giving a potential mesh alternative for repair of contaminated hernias. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of 2 institutions' experience implanting lightweight polypropylene synthetic mesh in clean-contaminated and contaminated fields. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Open VHRs performed with polypropylene mesh in the retro-rectus position in clean-contaminated and contaminated fields were evaluated. Primary outcomes parameters included surgical site infection, surgical site occurrence, mesh removal, and hernia recurrence. RESULTS:One hundred patients (50 male, 50 female) with a mean age of 60 ± 13 years and a mean body mass index (calculated as kg/m(2)) of 32 ± 9.3 met inclusion criteria. There were 42 clean-contaminated and 58 contaminated cases. The incidence of surgical site occurrence was 26.2% in clean-contaminated cases and 34% in contaminated cases. The 30-day surgical site infection rate was 7.1% for clean-contaminated cases and 19.0% for contaminated cases. There were a total of 7 recurrences with a mean follow-up of 10.8 ± 9.9 months (range 1 to 63 months). Mesh removal was required in 4 patients: 2 due to early anastomotic leaks, 1 due to stomal disruption and retraction in a morbidly obese patient, and 1 from a long-term enterocutaneous fistula. CONCLUSIONS:Although perhaps not yet considered standard of care in the United States, we have demonstrated favorable infection, recurrence, and mesh removal rates associated with the use of synthetic mesh in contaminated VHR.