Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:collaf03
Pathologic characteristics, patterns of care, and outcomes of Asian-Americans and Pacific islanders with uterine cancer
Huang, Yongmei; Hou, June Y; Melamed, Alexander; St Clair, Caryn M; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Gockley, Allison; Ananth, Cande V; Neugut, Alfred I; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
OBJECTIVES:To compare the patterns of care and outcomes of Asian-Americans/Pacific Islanders (AAPI) to non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with uterine cancer, and examine differences across Asian country of origin. METHODS:National Cancer Database was used to identify AAPI and NHW women with uterine cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2017. Marginal multivariable log-linear regression models and Cox proportional-hazards models were developed to estimate differences in quality-of-care and all-cause mortality between AAPI and NHW women and across AAPI ethnic groups. RESULTS:We identified 13,454 AAPI and 354,693 NHW women. Compared to NHW women, AAPI patients were younger at diagnosis (median age 57 vs. 62 years), had fewer comorbidities, more often had serous or sarcoma histologic subtypes and stage III/IV cancer. AAPI women had a slightly higher rate of receiving pelvic lymphadenectomy for deeply invasive or high-grade tumors (77.6% vs. 74.3%), and a lower rate of undergoing minimally invasive surgery (70.4% vs. 74.8%) for stage I-IIIC tumors. Among patients undergoing hysterectomy, AAPI women had a lower mortality compared with NHW women for cancer stage I/II/III, and a 28% reduction for type I (grade 1 or 2 endometrioid cancers) disease (aHR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81). Among AAPI subgroups, Pacific Islanders had the worst survival across different cancer stage and disease type. CONCLUSION:AAPI women are diagnosed with uterine cancer at a younger age and have more aggressive histologic subtypes and advanced stage than their White counterparts. They have a similar level of quality-of-care as NHW women, and an improved survival for early stage and type I disease.
PMID: 35183383
ISSN: 1095-6859
CID: 5860202
Adoption of minimally invasive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with metastatic uterine cancer
Zhou, Zhen Ni; Chen, Ling; Melamed, Alexander; St Clair, Caryn M; Hou, June Y; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Gockley, Allison; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
OBJECTIVE:Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced stage uterine cancer is increasing. We analyzed the use and outcomes of open versus minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for women with stage IV uterine cancer who received NACT and underwent IDS. METHODS:The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage IV uterine cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 and treated with NACT. Among women who underwent IDS, overall survival (OS) was compared between those who underwent laparotomy vs a minimally invasive approach. To account for imbalances in confounders, a propensity score analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. RESULTS:A total of 1618 women were identified. Minimally invasive IDS was performed in 31.1% and increased from 16.2% in 2010 to 40.4% in 2017 (P < 0.001). More recent year of diagnosis and performance of surgery at a comprehensive cancer center were associated with increased use of MIS (P < 0.05). Women with serous and clear cell tumors, and carcinosarcomas (compared to endometrioid tumors), as well as Medicaid coverage (compared to commercial insurance) were less likely to undergo an MIS approach (P < 0.05). The median OS was 28 months (95% CI 23.7-30.7) and 24.3 months (95% CI 22.3-26.1) for MIS and laparotomy, respectively. After propensity score balancing, there was no association between the use of MIS and survival (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-1.14). CONCLUSIONS:Among women with stage IV uterine cancer treated with NACT performance of minimally invasive debulking surgery is increasing. Compared to laparotomy, MIS does not appear to negatively impact survival.
PMID: 34920885
ISSN: 1095-6859
CID: 5860162
Value of additional sections: Tissue handling of small biopsies in detecting squamous dysplasia of the uterine cervix
Cimic, Adela; Smithgall, Marie C; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Liu-Jarin, Xiaolin; Vranic, Semir
Cervical cancer screening is currently based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) molecular testing, Pap cytology testing, and histologic evaluation of cervical biopsies. As primary HPV screening for cervical cancer becomes widely used, some of the recommended screening guidelines propose colposcopy and biopsies following positivity for HPV16/18 without cytologic triage. In such instances, a biopsy would be the only tissue sample available for informing further management. The use of additional histologic levels on cervical biopsies is commonly employed to achieve a diagnosis, although no set criteria for when to obtain additional levels exist. In this study, we evaluated the value of additional sections in cervical biopsy and endocervical curetting, as well as clinical and histologic features that should be considered when ordering additional levels. Additional levels were obtained for the following scenarios: benign mucosa with Pap discrepancy (HSIL or ASC-H interpretation), size discrepancy with the gross description, suspicious atypia for a high-grade lesion, and long-standing high-risk HPV infection. A change in diagnosis was observed in 21.4% of the cases, with an upgrade to a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (CIN2-3) in 12.1% of cases. An initial impression of atypia significantly correlated with both a change in diagnosis and an upgrade to CIN2-3. In the era of primary HPV screening, when evaluating tissue samples following positive HPV test, small, atypical foci should be followed by additional levels. We recommend six (6) initial levels on all cervical biopsies, particularly if there is no loss of tissue between the levels, to ensure an accurate interpretation. This will be crucial in the timely and accurate identification of HPV-related intraepithelial lesions and proper subsequent management.
PMID: 34896888
ISSN: 1532-8198
CID: 5860142
Long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer
Praiss, Aaron M; Huang, Yongmei; St Clair, Caryn M; Melamed, Alexander; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Hou, June Y; Gockley, Allison; Hillyer, Grace C; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
BACKGROUND:Total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH) has been proposed as an alternative to laparoscopic (TLH) and abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), particularly for women with medical comorbidities. We examined the use and long-term outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy for women with early-stage endometrial cancer. METHODS:The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database was used to identify women with stage I-II endometrial cancer treated with primary hysterectomy from 2000 to 2015. Multivariable regression models were developed to examine clinical, demographic, and pathologic factors associated with performance of TVH. The association between route of hysterectomy and cancer-specific and overall survival was examined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS:A total of 19,212 patients including 837 (4.6%) who underwent TVH were identified. Performance of TVH declined from 4.5% in 2000 to 2.2% in 2015 (P < 0.0001). Compared to patients 65-69 years of age, patients 75-79 years old (aRR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79) and those >80 years old (aRR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.30-1.97) were more likely to undergo TVH. Women with high grade tumors were less likely to undergo TVH. Five-year overall and cancer specific survivals were similar for TAH, TLH, and TVH. In multivariable models, there was no association between TVH and either cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.22) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy. CONCLUSION:Use of TVH for stage I and II endometrial cancer has decreased in the U.S. Chronologic age is the greatest predictor of performance of TVH. Performance of TVH does not negatively impact survival for women with early-stage endometrial cancer.
PMID: 34763940
ISSN: 1095-6859
CID: 5860112
Trends in the Use of Minimally Invasive Adnexal Surgery in the United States
Dioun, Shayan; Huang, Yongmei; Melamed, Alexander; Gockley, Allison; St Clair, Caryn M; Hou, June Y; Tergas, Ana I; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
OBJECTIVE:To examine the utilization of minimally invasive adnexal surgery, including ovarian cystectomy and oophorectomy, among women with benign gynecologic diseases and compare the associated morbidity and mortality of minimally invasive and open surgery. METHODS:Women with benign ovarian pathology who underwent an ovarian cystectomy or oophorectomy from 2016 through 2018 in the Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample and Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases were included. Patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy or concurrent hysterectomy were excluded. Population-level weighted estimates were developed, and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and hospital charges were examined based on surgical approach for each procedure. RESULTS:The cohort included 351,207 women who underwent oophorectomy and 220,893 women who underwent cystectomy, when weighted representing 547,836 and 328,408 patients, respectively, nationwide. A minimally invasive surgical approach was used in 294,190 (89.6%) patients who underwent ovarian cystectomy, and in 478,402 (87.3%) of patients who underwent oophorectomy. Use of minimally invasive surgery for cystectomy increased from 88.7% in 2016 to 91.0% in 2018, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery for oophorectomy increased from 85.8% to 88.7% over the same time period (P<.001 for both). The complication rates for ovarian cystectomy were 2.7% for minimally invasive surgery and 8.8% for laparotomy (P<.001); for oophorectomy the complication rate was 3.1% for minimally invasive surgery and 22.9% for laparotomy (P<.001). CONCLUSION:Minimally invasive surgery is used in the majority of women who are undergoing oophorectomy and ovarian cystectomy for benign indications. Compared with laparotomy, minimally invasive surgery is associated with fewer complications.
PMID: 34619737
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 5860082
Patterns of care for women with placenta accreta spectrum
Couret, Michelle; Huang, Yongmei; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Friedman, Alexander; Hou, June Y; St Clair, Caryn M; Tergas, Ana I; Ananth, Cande V; Wright, Jason D
BACKGROUND:Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is a spectrum of conditions in which the placenta is abnormally adherent and invades the uterine wall. This invasion can cause life-threatening hemorrhage and lead to significant adverse maternal outcomes. Numerous studies have shown an association between treatment of PAS at high volume, specialized centers and improved maternal outcomes; however, little is known about how these data have influenced practice. OBJECTIVE:The objective of the study was to examine the patterns of care for women with placenta accreta spectrum over time. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Data from New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) from 2000 to 2017 was used for this analysis. The study cohort comprised of women aged 15-54 years with PAS who underwent a hysterectomy during their delivery hospitalization. Study outcomes included severe maternal morbidity as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, surgical complications, and transfusion. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles based on the volume of PAS hysterectomy cases. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics were compared across volume tertiles. Random intercept log-linear regression models with Poisson distributions and log link functions were fit to examine the association between hospital PAS volume and the outcomes of interest. RESULTS:A total of 1958 women with PAS who underwent hysterectomy at 123 hospitals were identified. The number of hospitals providing care ranged from 46 centers in 2000 to 52 hospitals in 2016. The median hospital-level case volume of PAS was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-2) in 2000 and rose slightly to 2 (IQR, 1-4) by 2016. The PAS volume cut-point for the top decile of hospitals was three cases in 2000 and increased to six cases in 2016. There was no significant change in the median travel distance for women with PAS over time. The rate of severe maternal morbidity increased significantly from 14.1% (95% CI: 7.8-24.0%) in 2000 to 19.0% (95% CI: 13.6-25.8%) in 2016. Transfusion occurred in 66.2% (95% CI: 54.6-76.1%) of cases in 2000 compared to 60.1% (95% CI: 52.3-67.4%) in 2016. Surgical complications occurred in 16.9% (95% CI: 9.9-27.3%) of cases in 2000 to 24.7% (95% CI: 18.6-32.0) in 2016. There was no difference in the adjusted rates of transfusion or surgical complications based on hospital volume. Compared to low-volume centers, the risk of severe maternal morbidity was reduced by 33% (aRR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.90) at the intermediate volume centers. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There has been little change in the patterns of care for women with PAS in New York State. While the volume of patients with PAS has increased at the highest volume centers, a large number of relatively low-volume centers still provide care for a significant number of women with PAS.
PMID: 31744356
ISSN: 1476-4954
CID: 5859882
Disparities in Access to High-Volume Surgeons Within High-Volume Hospitals for Hysterectomy
Knisely, Anne; Huang, Yongmei; Melamed, Alexander; Gockley, Allison; Tergas, Ana I; St Clair, Caryn M; Hou, June Y; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Accordino, Melissa; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
OBJECTIVE:To examine access to high-volume surgeons in comparison with low-volume surgeons who perform hysterectomies within high-volume hospitals and to compare perioperative morbidity and mortality between high-volume and low-volume surgeons within these centers. METHODS:Women who underwent hysterectomy in New York State between 2000 and 2014 at a high-volume (top quartile by volume) hospital were included. Surgeons were classified into quartiles based on average annual hysterectomy volume. Multivariable models were used to determine characteristics associated with treatment by a low-volume surgeon in comparison with a high-volume surgeon and to estimate the association between physician volume, and morbidity and mortality. RESULTS:A total of 300,586 patients cared for by 5,505 surgeons at 59 hospitals were identified. Women treated by low-volume surgeons, in comparison with high-volume surgeons, were more often Black (19.4% vs 14.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26; 95% CI 1.09-1.46) and had Medicare insurance (20.6% vs 14.5%; aOR 1.22; 95% CI 1.04-1.42). Low-volume surgeons were more likely to perform both emergent-urgent procedures (26.1% vs 6.4%; aOR 3.91; 95% CI 3.26-4.69) and abdominal hysterectomy, compared with minimally invasive hysterectomy (77.8% vs 54.7%; aOR 1.91; 95% CI 1.62-2.24). Compared with patients cared for by high-volume surgeons, those operated on by low-volume surgeons had increased risk of a complication (31.0% vs 10.3%; adjusted risk ratios [aRR] 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.98) and mortality (2.2% vs 0.2%; aRR 3.04; 95% CI 2.20-4.21). In sensitivity analyses, differences in morbidity and mortality remained for emergent-urgent procedures, elective operations, cancer surgery, and noncancer procedures. CONCLUSION:Socioeconomic disparities remain in access to high-volume surgeons within high-volume hospitals for hysterectomy. Patients who undergo hysterectomy at a high-volume hospital by a low-volume surgeon are at substantially greater risk for perioperative morbidity and mortality.
PMID: 34237769
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 5860072
Intraoperative Rupture of the Ovarian Capsule in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Dioun, Shayan; Wu, Jenny; Chen, Ling; Kaplan, Samantha; Huang, Yongmei; Melamed, Alexander; Gockley, Allison; St Clair, Caryn M; Hou, June Y; Tergas, Ana I; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Machida, Hiroko; Mikami, Mikio; Matsuo, Koji; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
OBJECTIVE:To examine the effects of intraoperative ovarian capsule rupture on progression-free survival and overall survival in women who are undergoing surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer. DATA SOURCES:MEDLINE using PubMed, EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Scopus (Elsevier) were searched from inception until August 11, 2020. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION:High-quality studies reporting survival outcomes comparing ovarian capsule rupture to no capsule rupture among patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent surgical management were abstracted. Study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and studies with scores of at least 7 points were included. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS:The data were extracted independently by multiple observers. Random-effects models were used to pool associations and to analyze the association between ovarian capsule rupture and oncologic outcomes. Seventeen studies met all the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Twelve thousand seven hundred fifty-six (62.6%) patients did not have capsule rupture and had disease confined to the ovary on final pathology; 5,532 (33.7%) patients had intraoperative capsule rupture of an otherwise early-stage ovarian cancer. Patients with intraoperative capsule rupture had worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.92, 95% CI 1.34-2.76, P<.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I2=41%, P=.07) when compared with those without capsule rupture. Pooled results from these studies showed a worse overall survival (HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.15-1.91, P=.003), with moderate heterogeneity (I2=53%, P=.02) when compared with patients without intraoperative capsule rupture. This remained significant in a series of sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION:This systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality observational studies shows that intraoperative ovarian capsule rupture results in decreased progression-free survival and overall survival in women with early-stage ovarian cancer who are undergoing initial surgical management. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:PROSPERO, CRD42021216561.
PMID: 34237756
ISSN: 1873-233x
CID: 5860062
Fragmentation of surgery and chemotherapy in the initial phase of ovarian cancer care and its association with overall survival
Cham, Stephanie; Huang, Yongmei; Melamed, Alexander; Worley, Michael J; Hou, June Y; Tergas, Ana I; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Gockley, Allison; Clair, Caryn M S T; Hershman, Dawn L; Wright, Jason D
BACKGROUND:Fragmentation occurs when a patient receives care at more than one hospital, and the long-term effects in ovarian cancer are unknown. We examined the association between fragmentation of primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and overall survival (OS). METHODS:The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer between 2004 and 2016 who underwent PDS followed by AC. Fragmentation was defined as receipt of AC at a different institution than where PDS was performed. After propensity score weighting, proportional hazard models were developed to estimate the association between fragmented care and OS. RESULTS:Of the 36,300 patients identified, 13,347 (36.8%) had fragmented care. Patient factors associated with fragmentation included older age, higher income, and longer travel distance for PDS; hospital factors included PDS performed at a community center or a facility with lower annual surgical volume (P < 0.05, all). Fragmentation was associated with a 15% risk of 30-day delay to AC (aRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.09-1.22). In a propensity scoring weighted analysis, mortality was reduced when AC was fragmented (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97). Sensitivity analyses indicated fragmentation was associated with improved survival in metropolitan residents. Stratified analyses indicated patients who traveled 50 miles or more with PDS and AC at the same institution had the worst OS. CONCLUSION:Fragmentation of PDS and AC has no adverse effects on long-term survival. Survival outcomes were worst for those who received care at the same institution 50 miles or more away.
PMID: 33965245
ISSN: 1095-6859
CID: 5860042
Association of New Perioperative Benzodiazepine Use With Persistent Benzodiazepine Use
Wright, Jason D; Cogan, Jacob C; Huang, Yongmei; Tergas, Ana I; St Clair, Caryn M; Hou, June Y; Khoury-Collado, Fady; Gockley, Allison; Accordino, Melissa; Melamed, Alexander; Hershman, Dawn L
IMPORTANCE:Increased use of benzodiazepines has resulted in increasing rates of misuse and adverse effects associated with these drugs. Little is known about the initial exposure and source of benzodiazepines among those who use them persistently. OBJECTIVE:To examine the frequency of use and persistent use of benzodiazepines among patients undergoing major and minor surgical procedures. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS:This cohort study included 2 509 599 adult patients who underwent 1 of 11 common surgical procedures in the United States from 2009 to 2017 and were recorded in the MarketScan database. The rates of perioperative and persistent benzodiazepine use were examined in benzodiazepine-naive patients. Data analysis was conducted from July to November 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES:Receipt of a perioperative benzodiazepine prescription and persistent use (ie, fill of a second prescription 90-180 days after surgery) among those who received a benzodiazepine perioperatively. RESULTS:Among 2 509 599 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 54.4 (15.3) years, and 1 596 137 (63.6%) were women. Perioperative benzodiazepine use was noted in 63 931 patients (2.6%). The median (interquartile range) benzodiazepine supply was 10 (5-23) days. Among benzodiazepine-naive patients prescribed a perioperative benzodiazepine, the rate of persistent benzodiazepine use was 19.5% (95% CI, 19.2%-19.8%). During the 90 to 180-day period after surgery, 7013 of 12 468 patients (56.2%) received 1 prescription for benzodiazepines while 5455 (43.8%) received 2 or more prescriptions. Among patients prescribed a benzodiazepine, persistent use was more common in Medicaid recipients (vs patients with commercial insurance: adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.62), patients 70 years or older (vs those aged 40-49 years: aRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.23), in women (vs men: aRR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.06-1.15), in patients with more medical comorbidities (eg, Elixhauser comorbidity score ≥3 vs 0: aRR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04-1.19), and in those with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, insomnia or substance use disorder (eg, with vs without anxiety: aRR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.37-1.50). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE:In this study, a relatively small percentage of surgical patients were prescribed benzodiazepines in the perioperative period; however, 1 in 5 of these patients went on to persistent benzodiazepine use.
PMCID:8176328
PMID: 34081136
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 5860052