Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:As the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient population is aging, the prevalence of polypharmacy is rising. However, data exploring the prevalence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes associated with polypharmacy among older adults with IBD are limited. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:To determine (i) prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 medications) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) utilization in older adults with IBD, (ii) changes in medications over time (iii) predictors of polypharmacy, and (iv) the impact of polypharmacy/PIMs on one-year hospitalization rates. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective single-center study of older adults with IBD from September 1st 2011 to December 31st 2022. Wilcoxon-signed rank and McNemar's tests were used to assess changes in polypharmacy between visits, with ordinal logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models used to determine risk factors for polypharmacy and time to hospitalization, respectively. RESULTS:Among 512 older adults with IBD, 74.0% experienced polypharmacy at initial visit, with 42.6% receiving at least one PIM. Additionally, severe polypharmacy (≥10 medications) was present among 28.6% individuals at index visit and increased to 38.6% by last visit (p<0.01). Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≥70 years, BMI ≥30.0 kg/m2, prior IBD-related surgery, and the presence of comorbidities were associated with polypharmacy. Moreover, severe polypharmacy (adjHR 1.95, 95%CI 1.29-2.92), as well as PIM use (adjHR 2.16, 95%CI 1.37-3.43) among those with polypharmacy, were significantly associated with all-cause hospitalization within a year of index visit. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Severe polypharmacy was initially present in more than 25% of older adults with IBD and increased to 34% within 4 years of index visit. Severe polypharmacy, as well as PIM utilization among those with polypharmacy, were also associated with an increased risk of hospitalization at one-year, highlighting the need for deprescribing efforts in this population.

Frailty is a syndrome that can inform clinical treatments and interventions for older adults. Although implementation of frailty across medical subspecialties has the potential to improve care for the aging population, its uptake has been heterogenous. While frailty assessment is highly integrated into certain medical subspecialties, other subspecialties have only recently begun to consider frailty in the context of patient care. In order to advance the field of frailty-informed care, we aim to detail what is known about frailty within the subspecialties of internal medicine. In doing so, we highlight cross-disciplinary approaches that can enhance our understanding of frailty, focusing on ways to improve the implementation of frailty measures, as well as develop potential interventional strategies to mitigate frailty within these subspecialties. This has important implications for the clinical care of the aging population and can help guide future research.

Inflammaging, a state of chronic, progressive low-grade inflammation during aging, is associated with several adverse clinical outcomes, including frailty, disability, and death. Chronic inflammation is a hallmark of aging and is linked to the pathogenesis of many aging-related diseases. Anti-inflammatory therapies are also increasingly being studied as potential anti-aging treatments, and clinical trials have shown benefits in selected aging-related diseases. Despite promising advances, significant gaps remain in defining, measuring, treating, and integrating inflammaging into clinical geroscience research. The Clin-STAR Inflammation Research Interest Group was formed by a group of transdisciplinary clinician-scientists with the goal of advancing inflammaging-related clinical research and improving patient-centered care for older adults. Here, we integrate insights from nine medical subspecialties to illustrate the widespread impact of inflammaging on diseases linked to aging, highlighting the extensive opportunities for targeted interventions. We then propose a transdisciplinary approach to enhance understanding and treatment of inflammaging that aims to improve comprehensive care for our aging patients.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Intravenous (IV) steroids are commonly used to treat acute flares of Crohn's disease (CD). However, it is unclear if they are beneficial in the setting of uncomplicated small bowel obstruction (SBO). We sought to examine if IV steroid administration improved short-term outcomes in patients with CD hospitalized for acute, uncomplicated SBO across three New York City hospital systems. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective study included patients ≥ 18 years old admitted between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, with Crohn's disease and an admission diagnosis of uncomplicated acute SBO, defined as cases without adhesions, fistula, phlegmon, and sepsis. Primary endpoints (length of stay and frequency of surgery) were compared between patients who received IV steroids upon admission and those who did not. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = .85). Sex, age, disease duration, concomitant biologic therapy, and NG tube placement did not independently contribute to either outcome. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:These findings suggest that IV steroid administration for uncomplicated SBO in CD patients does not decrease hospital length of stay or need for surgery. Further research may help identify specific obstruction patterns or other therapies associated with different outcomes.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who need intestinal resection, prior data suggest that earlier surgical intervention may be associated with improved outcomes. However, surgery is often deferred for additional trials of advanced therapies, which potentially shifts patients from a fit to a frail preoperative state. OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:This study aimed to evaluate clinical changes that occur in the year prior to intestinal resection in patients with IBD. DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This was a multi-hospital retrospective study of patients ⩾18 years old who underwent initial IBD-related intestinal resection between January 1, 2018 and May 31, 2023. Clinical characteristics and radiographical skeletal muscle mass were compared using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for categorical variables. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.06). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:In the 6-12 months prior to an IBD-related intestinal resection, as compared to the month prior, individuals were less likely to be malnourished, have an infection, or need hospitalization for IBD. This suggests that minimizing delays to surgery may lead to improved outcomes.

Young adults (approximately 18-35 years) with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) represent a distinct demographic with unique developmental and physiological characteristics, yet they are underrepresented in clinical trials. This commentary synthesizes insights from a roundtable discussion facilitated by the Crohn's and Colitis Young Adults Network (CCYAN) between young adult patients with IBD and medical professionals, including physicians, nurses, psychologists, and trainees/medical students. Themes include defining young adults as a distinct demographic in research, improving outcomes for young adults with IBD through age-specific data disaggregation, barriers for participation and post-trial responsibilities, as well as regulatory and legislative policy opportunities to enhance young adult representation in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is frequently accompanied by kidney complications. Potential triggers or subpopulations at high-risk of kidney problems are not well elucidated. We hypothesized that surgical interventions, specifically colectomy, might in part explain this risk. METHODS:Nationwide Swedish cohort study comprising 82,051 individuals with biopsy-proven IBD diagnosed during 1965-2017, with follow-up until 2019. We investigated the association between incident colectomy (time-varying exposure) and future risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and kidney failure (diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease or death due to chronic kidney disease) using Cox proportional hazard models. We also examined the impact of partial vs. total colectomy and the presence/duration of a stoma. Covariates included demographics, education level, and selected comorbidities. RESULTS:Over a median follow-up of 14 years, 16,479 individuals underwent colectomy, and 2,556 AKI and 1,146 kidney failure events occurred. Colectomy was associated with an increased relative risk of both AKI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.37; 95%CI 2.17-2.58) and kidney failure (1.54; 1.34-1.76). Compared to pre-colectomy periods, undergoing total colectomy and colectomy with prolonged stoma showed higher risks of both kidney outcomes versus partial colectomy or colectomy with a temporary stoma, respectively. Subgroup analyses suggested higher risks in patients with ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS:In people with IBD, rates of AKI and kidney failure are higher among those undergoing colectomy, particularly among those following total colectomy, or colectomy with a prolonged stoma. This study identifies a high-risk population that may benefit from established protocols for kidney function monitoring/surveillance and referral to nephrologist care.