Faculty Bibliography

Aims: Our institution implemented a Value-Based Medicine (VBM) clinical pathway to standardize the pre-, peri-, and post-operative management of longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) patients. The goal of the program was to decrease patient length of stay (LOS) while maintaining the same clinical outcomes seen prior to initiation. Methods: The VBM pathway was instituted in September of 2014. A retrospective review was performed of all primary LSG cases from 2011-2015. Pre-VBM LSG patients were matched to post-VBM patients in a 1:1 ratio. Matching criteria were age within five years, body-mass index (BMI) within 5 kg/m, expected LOS within 0.5 days, same sex, and same status for prior abdominal surgery. Patients < 18 years of age, body mass index (BMI) < 35, and those with prior bariatric surgery were excluded from analysis. Primary outcomes were LOS, LOS > 2 days, operating room (OR) time, and cost per admission. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmissions and reoperations. Results: There were 426 pre-VBM and 507 post-VBM patients. After matching for age, sex, BMI, expected LOS and previous abdominal surgery, there were 330 patients in each of the pre-VBM and post-VBM groups. There were no clinically significant demographic differences between the two groups. The post-VBM group had shorter mean OR time (75.1 vs 95.8 min, p<.0001), shorter LOS (1.50 vs 1.94 days, p<.0001), lower cost (median cost $792 less than pre-VBM group, p<.0001), and lower reoperation rate (0.0% vs 2.1%, p=.015). Readmission rate was lower in the post-VBM group, but did not reach statistical significance (2.7% vs 4.9%, p=.154). After controlling for hospital trends over time, LOS > 2 days (p=.008) and median cost (p=.019) remained significant. OR time (p=.058) and mean LOS (p=.338) still showed an improved trend, but could not be directly correlated to VBM implementation. Conclusions: Standardization of clinical care for LSG patients is feasible and effective. Patient length of stay and hospital cost were successfully decreased with no negative impact seen on 30-day post-operative outcomes

Introduction: Endoscopic stent placement after sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) leak is usually considered part of the treatment algorithm. We have experienced varying success with stents and have also seen patients who have difficulty tolerating the stent or who have experienced worsening leak with the stent. The purpose of this study is to review our experiences with these stents to contribute to the growing literature of the effectiveness in the management of sleeve leaks. Setting: Academic medical center. Methods: A retrospective review of all reported sleeve leaks between 2 high-volume bariatric surgery centers were reviewed. Data was collected on the presentation of these leaks as well as the entire post-operative course. Cases spanned from 2006 to 2016. Information was collected on clinical presentation, radiographic findings, endoscopic findings, stent placement, stent complications, re-intervention rate, and re-operation rate. Stent complications were defined as any persistent leak, PO intolerance, nausea/vomiting, radiographic evidence of migration, or abdominal pain that required either replacement/repositioning or removal of the stent. Results: 32 sleeve leaks were identified across our institutions. Two cases were excluded for lack of post-operative course data. 18 (60%) of 30 were treated at some point with an endoscopic stenting procedure. Complications that could be attributed directly to the stent were identified in 14 of the 18 cases (78%).The average number of interventions in the stent group was 3.7 compared to 0.75 in the no stent group (p<0.005).The average number of total admitted days was significantly higher in the stent group with 25.5 days versus 12.58 (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Patients who undergo stenting for the management of leak following a sleeve gastrectomy appear to require more interventions and have higher length of stay. Further studies are needed in order to better identify those patients who may benefit from endoscopic interventions and those who should be managed alternatively

BACKGROUND: There are minimal long-term data on biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) with or without duodenal switch (BPD/DS). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term weight loss, co-morbidity remission, complications, and quality of life after BPD and BPD/DS. SETTING: An academic, university hospital in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent BPD or BPD/DS between 1999 and 2011. Outcomes included weight loss measures at 2, 5, and 10-15 years postoperatively; co-morbidity remission; long-term complications; nutritional deficiencies; and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent BPD (34%) or BPD/DS (64%). Mean preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 50.2 kg/m2. Mean follow up was 8.2 years (range: 1-15 yr) with 72% of eligible patients in active follow up at 10-15 years postoperatively. Excess weight loss (EWL) was 65.1% at 2 years, 63.8% at 5 years, and 67.9% at 10-15 years. Approximately 10% higher %EWL was achieved for those with preoperative BMI<50 kg/m2 versus>/=50 kg/m2 and patients who underwent BPD/DS versus BPD. Although co-morbidities improved, 37% of patients developed long-term complications requiring surgery. There were no 30-day mortalities; however, there was one mortality from severe malnutrition. Nutritional deficiencies in fat-soluble vitamins, anemia, and secondary hyperparathyroidism were common. Overall, 94% of patients reported satisfaction with their choice of surgery. CONCLUSION: This clinical experience supports the long-term positive safety profile and efficacy of BPD and BPD/DS at a single U.S. center. Higher levels of excess weight loss are achieved by patients with a lower preoperative BMI and BPD/DS. Although nutritional deficiencies and postoperative complications are common, patient satisfaction remains high.

Introduction: The impact of resident involvement on outcomes after bariatric procedures is not well understood. Prior studies have demonstrated increased complication rates with resident involvement in Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB). These studies did not include data for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB). At our institution, attending surgeons operate with both residents and physician assistants (PA) interchangeably, thus controlling for surgeon variability. Our objective was to demonstrate that resident involvement in complex bariatric surgeries does not increase complication rates when residents and PA's work with the same attending surgeons. Methods and Procedures: Patients undergoing bariatric procedures at our institution between 3/2012 and 3/2015 were identified using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. All patients under 18 years of age were excluded. Cases were stratified into four different categories- RYGB, LSG, LAGB, and LAGB revision (replacement, removal, or port revision). Data included patient demographics, comorbidities, length of stay, and 30-day complications. The primary outcomes of the study were operative time and 30-day overall complication rate. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, major complications and reoperation rates. Results: There were 2741 bariatric surgeries performed from 2012-2015. Of those, 2067 had resident involvement and 674 had PA involvement. 30-day complication rates for all surgery types, with and without residents, were 5.3 % and 6.1 %, respectively (p = .45). Complication rates for LSG (p = .716), LAGB (p = .694), LAGB revision (p = .493), and RYGB (p = .126) were also not significant. Operative duration for all surgery types was longer with residents (77.0 vs 60.6 min, p<.0001). Operative duration was longer with resident involvement for LSG (101.1 vs 76.6 min, p<.0001), LAGB (51.6 vs 42.4 min, p<.0001), and LAGB revision (63.0 vs 51.6 min, p = .007). After risk adjustment, OR time for RYGB was significantly longer as well (134.3 min vs 119.3 min, p = .038). Length of stay was also found to be significantly increased in the resident group (1.23 vs 1.09 days, p = .0007). Conclusion: Resident involvement as first assistant in the OR does not increase complication rates in bariatric surgery. Operative times and length of stay are prolonged, as shown in other studies, but no difference was seen in complication rates for cases involving a resident and cases involving a dedicated operative PA. Teaching advanced bariatric surgery techniques to residents is both safe and essential to their education

Aims: Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is the most commonly performed surgical procedure for severe gastroesophageal reflux. Recent studies, however, have shown the 180-degree anterior fundoplication to be equivalent in treating reflux and superior in treating dysphagia and gas-related symptoms. This video highlights the safe and effective laparoscopic revision of a Nissen to an anterior fundoplication for symptoms of obstructive dysphagia. Methods: A 56 y.o. male with refractory gastroesophageal reflux and a large hiatal hernia underwent an uncomplicated Nissen fundoplication with vagal preservation. After the operation, he developed symptoms of obstructive dysphagia, hiccups, and trapped air. Upper GI series demonstrated smooth narrowing of the gastroesophageal junction with delayed esophageal emptying and stasis. Endoscopic balloon dilation and medical therapy were unsuccessful and the symptoms persisted for over a year. The decision was made for reoperation to loosen the wrap. Intraoperatively, the Nissen fundoplication appeared to be in good position. The wrap was taken down and a portion of the fundus appeared damaged from the dissection and dense adhesions. The damaged fundus was resected with an Endo GIA linear stapler. An intraoperative methylene blue leak test did not identify any leaks. A 180-degree anterior fundoplication was performed to ensure suturing to healthy tissues. Operative time was 96 minutes and blood loss was 25cc. Results: The patient was discharged to home the same day and has had an uneventful recovery. At the 4-month follow-up, an upper GI series demonstrated normal appearance of the fundoplication, as well as normal esophageal emptying without delay or obstruction. The patient's dysphagia has improved and he has no reflux symptoms, but still has intermittent hiccups. Conclusion: In cases of severe dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication, laparoscopic conversion to a partial anterior fundoplication is a safe and feasible option. Complete takedown of the posterior wrap, recognition of normal anatomy, and avoidance of suturing to damaged tissues are essential components of this procedure

Aims: Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) often present after discharge from the hospital, making it difficult to diagnose leak in the early postoperative period. This study evaluates preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors in their association with leaks after LSG. Methods: A retrospective case-controlled study of 1762 LSG from 2006-2014 was performed. All radiographically confirmed leaks were included. Controls were patients who underwent LSG without leak, selected using a 10:1 (control:study) case-match. Data included patient characteristics, intraoperative factors, and esophagram results. Clinical indicators including SIRS criteria (presence of = 2: temperature<36 degreeC or >38 degreeC, heart rate>90 bpm, respiratory rate>20 breaths/min,WBC>12,000 or <4,000) and self-reported pain score were collected on postoperative day (POD) 2 and at the time of leak, if applicable. Statistics included univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression. Results: Of the 1762 LSG, 20 (1.1 %) leaks were compared with 200 case-matched controls. Three patients developed leak during their index admission (mean = 1.3 days, range = [1,2]), while the majority (n = 17) were discharged and developed symptoms at a mean of 17.1 days (median = 15, range = [4,63]) postoperatively. Leaks were similar to controls in baseline characteristics; however, the leak group had fewer black patients (5 % vs. 17 %, p = 0.022). There were no differences in intraoperative characteristics including staple reinforcement, bougie size, leak test, or operativetime between groups. Contrast extravasation on routine postoperative esophagram was seen in only two (10 %) of the twenty patients with enteric leaks; other esophagram findings (e.g. delay, dilatation) did not differ between leaks and controls. Patients with both early and late leaks demonstrated significant clinical abnormalities at the time of leak presentation, prior to confirmatory radiographic study. In multiple regression analysis, independent factors associated with leak included fever (p<0.0001), SIRS criteria (p = 0.0034), and pain score = 9 (p = 0.010). Conclusions: Contrast extravasation on routine postoperative esophagram may detect early leaks after LSG, but the vast majority of leaks have normal results and present days to weeks after discharge. Therefore, clinical indicators (specifically fever, SIRS criteria, and pain score) are the most useful factors to raise concern for leaks prior to confirmatory radiographic study, and may be used as criteria to selectively obtain postoperative esophagrams after LSG

Aims: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a commonly performed primary bariatric procedure. Although bariatric surgery is becoming increasingly recognized as an effective treatment option for diabetes, there remain concerns about the operative risks faced by diabetic patients. This study's Objective: was to determine the safety of bariatric surgery in the subset of diabetic patients who do not require insulin (NIDDM). Methods: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) = 35 kg/m2 who underwent LSG in 2012 in the ACS-NSQIP database were identified. Emergency cases were excluded from analysis. Data included patient demographics, comorbidity, hospital length of stay, and 30-day complications. The primary outcome was 30-day overall complication rate and secondary outcomes included major complications and reoperation rates. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and two-sample t tests were used to evaluate differences between groups. Results: Of 6062 LSG performed in 2012, 4726 (83.4 %) were non-diabetic and 941 (16.6 %) were NIDDM. NIDDM were more likely to be male (28.9 % vs. 19.3 %, p<0.001), older (47.6 years vs. 42.5 years, p<0.001), and had a higher BMI (46.4 kg/m2 vs. 45.7 kg/m2, p = 0.027) when compared to non-diabetics. In addition to diabetes, NIDDM had a higher rate of COPD (2.8 % vs. 0.6 %, p<0.001). The NIDDM group had a slightly longer mean operative time, as well (101.1 vs. 96.9 minutes, p = 0.014). The overall 30-day complication rate did not differ between groups (6.5 % NIDDM vs. 5.6 % non-diabetic, p = 0.305). In sub-analyses of specific complications, NIDDM had a slightly higher rate of blood transfusions (1.8 % vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.037). Other postoperative complications, including wound infection, intraabdominal infection, sepsis, renal injury, urinary tract infection, postoperative myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, deep vein thrombosis, reoperation, and readmission did not differ between groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe procedure for non-insulin dependent diabetics with regards to early post-operative complications

Aims: Although laparoscopic bariatric surgery is accepted as the most effective treatment for morbid obesity, some patients fail to lose weight, develop postoperative weight regain, or develop other complications. Revisional bariatric surgery can correct such complications. Our video highlights sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure for failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Methods: This patient is a 36-year-old male with a BMI of 42 kg/m². Following a Lap- Band procedure three years ago, the patient failed to lose weight because dysphagia and reflux prevented him from tolerating Lap-Band adjustments. An upper GI series confirmed that the band was in good position. The decision was made to remove the Lap-Band and convert him to a sleeve gastrectomy. The operation began with lysis of adhesions and release of the gastrogastric plication, allowing removal of the band. The underlying pseudocapsule was excised in order to minimize the disparity in tissue thickness during stapling, as well as to relieve any constriction on the gastric tissue. The greater curvature of the stomach was mobilized proximally to the angle of His and distally to a point 2-3 cm proximal to the pylorus. A 40-French bougie was placed down to the duodenum and a longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy was performed with multiple firings of a linear stapler covered with bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement material. The upper portion of the staple line was oversewn with omentum and the incisura was sutured down to the transverse mesocolon to prevent rotation. Operative time was 51 minutes and blood loss was 20 cc. Results: An esophagram on the first postoperative day demonstrated a normal sleeve gastrectomy without leak or obstruction. The patient was able to tolerate thin liquids, and was discharged home on the second postoperative day. Two months after surgery, the patient is doing well with no dysphagia or reflux and a current BMI of 38 kg/m². Conclusions: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a safe and feasible solution for laparoscopic adjustable gastric band intolerance and failure of weight loss. The procedure can be safely performed in a single-stage with concurrent removal of the gastric band