Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate knee intra-articular cytokine concentrations in patients undergoing isolated meniscectomy and determine if these concentrations are associated with clinical outcomes. METHODS:Concentrations of ten biomarkers were quantified in synovial fluid aspirated from the operative knees of patients who underwent isolated meniscectomy from 10/2011-12/2019. Patients completed a survey at final follow-upincluding VAS, Lysholm, Tegner, and KOOS Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS). Failure was defined as subsequent TKA or non-achievement of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for knee pain defined as VAS > 27/100. Regression analysis investigating the relationship between cytokine concentrations and failure was performed. RESULTS:[25.5, 32.4], and a mean follow-up of 8.0 ± 2.2 years. There were no demographic or clinical differences between failures (n = 41) and non-failures (n = 59) at baseline. Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1 (MCP-1) concentration was significantly higher in failures than in non-failures (344.3 pg/ml vs. 268.6 pg/ml, p = 0.016). In a regression analysis controlling for age, sex, BMI, symptom duration, length of follow-up, and ICRS grade, increased MCP-1 was associated with increased odds of failure (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS:The concentration of MCP-1 on the day of arthroscopic meniscectomy was predictive of failure as defined by an unacceptable pain level at intermediate- to long-term follow-up. This finding may help identify patients at high risk for poor postoperative outcomes following isolated meniscectomy and serve as a target for future postoperative immunomodulation research.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate long-term outcomes of patients treated with posterior medial meniscal root tear (PMMRT) repair through assessment of functional outcome scores and to identify patient surgical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics associated with improved outcomes. METHODS:This was a single-centre, retrospective study evaluating patients who had undergone a PMMR repair using a transtibial suture pullout technique with two locking cinch sutures. This was performed as a follow-up to previously published 2-year and 5-year outcome studies, using the same cohort. All patients from the prior short-term and midterm studies were invited to participate. Patient-reported outcome (PROs) scores, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, were collected. Previously collected demographic data were updated based on review of the electronic medical record. Patient outcomes were assessed preoperatively, as well as at 2-year, 5-year and 8-year postoperatively. MRI outcome measurements were assessed at 2-year and 5-year follow-ups. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26. RESULTS:Seventeen patients of the original 18 patients (94.4%) were included in the final analysis. Additionally, three patients who had additional ipsilateral surgery were excluded from the analysis of PROs. The IKDC score significantly increased from 44.7 ± 11.6 at preoperative baseline to 71.2 ± 21.3 at 8-year post-operation (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in IKDC score between 2-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.) or 5-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.). The Lysholm score significantly increased from 49.6 ± 7.3 at preoperative baseline to 76.4 ± 17.2 at 8-year follow-up (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in Lysholm scores between 2-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.) or 5-year and 8-year follow-ups (p = n.s.). A linear regression analysis found that 5-year IKDC scores were significantly correlated with 8-year IKDC scores (β = 0.681, p = 0.038). At 8-year follow-up, four (23.5%) patients required additional procedures on their operative knee (one total knee arthroplasty conversion). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients treated with repair of PMMRT had maintenance of clinical outcome improvements at long-term follow-up despite worsening MRI outcomes at short-term and medium-term follow-ups. While a high proportion of patients required additional procedures on their operative knee at 8-year follow-up, few of these patient's additional procedures were related to failure of their primary surgery. Providers and patients may expect durable clinical outcomes following the repair of PMMRT, irrespective of radiographic appearance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Operative treatment of chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) with fasciotomy is effective for symptomatic resolution, but outcomes at medium- to long-term follow-up are unclear. HYPOTHESIS/UNASSIGNED:Patients will have favorable satisfaction at medium- to long-term follow-up and a high return to sport (RTS) rate after fasciotomy for treatment of CECS. STUDY DESIGN/UNASSIGNED:Cross-sectional. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level 3. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective review of patients who underwent fasciotomy for treatment of CECS from 2010 to 2021. Outcomes were assessed using Tegner Activity Scale, symptom resolution, patient satisfaction, return to activities, and EQ-5D-5L survey. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:= 0.02) than those who had fasciotomy of >3 compartments; 19 (38.0%) patients reported experiencing paresthesia after their operation. No patients experienced major complications. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Medium- to long-term outcomes of patients with CECS treated with fasciotomy demonstrated high satisfaction levels and high RTS rate. However, rate of minor complications including paresthesia, swelling, and cramping was high.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:To identify structures at risk during proximal adductor longus repair and to report observed distances between these structures and the adductor longus (AL) footprint. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Eight hemipelves from fresh cadaver whole-body specimens were dissected using a previously established surgical approach. The tendinous attachment of the AL was scored into the underlying bone and the footprint size was measured in millimeters. A guidewire was placed at the footprint center along the longitudinal axis of the resected AL muscle. Utilizing a digital caliper, the proximity of key anatomic structures was measured as the radial distance from the guidewire and distance distal to the footprint along the guidewire axis. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:The genital branch of the genitofemoral nerve was found 7.79 ± 4.05 mm proximal and 15.37 ± 4.54 mm medial. The round ligament (n = 6) was 14.00 ± 2.75 mm and the spermatic cord (n = 2) was 13.57 ± 3.02 mm directly superficial to the AL footprint. The obturator nerve was 63.98 ± 4.57 mm distal as it crossed the adductor brevis muscle laterally. The location of the external pudendal artery was variable but was found to have a mean distance of 37.01 ± 17.97 mm distal and immediately deep to the AL. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:When repairing AL tendon injuries, the genitofemoral nerve is the structure anatomically nearest the footprint of the tendon, and this structure is most at risk for iatrogenic injury. CLINICAL RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This study investigates the structures at risk during AL repair and seeks to define their location relative to the footprint. These findings will assist surgeons in identifying the crucial anatomic structures at risk to safely perform an anatomic repair of the tendon and avoid iatrogenic complications.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare clinical outcomes and rates of secondary surgery, including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), after primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients ≥40 years of age at minimum 10-year follow-up compared with a propensity-matched control group of patients <40 years. METHODS:A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013. Patients ≥40 years old were propensity matched in a 1:1 ratio by sex and body mass index to patients <40 years old. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including Hip Outcome Score for Activities of Daily Living and Sports-Specific subscales, modified Harris Hip, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, and Visual Analog Scale for Pain and Satisfaction were collected. Rates of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) achievement at 10 years were evaluated and compared between groups. Rates of secondary surgery including revision hip arthroscopy and conversion to THA were evaluated. Gross survivorship between cohorts was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier curve. RESULTS:Fifty-three patients aged ≥40 (age 48.3 ± 5.8 years) were successfully matched to 53 patients aged <40 (age: 28.9 ± 7.2, <0.001). There were no other preoperative group differences regarding patient demographics, characteristics, or radiographic findings. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement regarding all PROs at a minimum of 10 years' follow-up (P < .001 for all). No significant difference was noted between cohorts regarding any delta (preoperative to 10-year postoperative) scores (P > .05 for all). High rates of MCID and PASS achievement were achieved in both cohorts, with no significant differences in any PRO measure (P > .05 for all). No significant differences in rates of complications (age ≥40: 2.0%, age <40: 7.7%, P = .363), rates of revision (age ≥40: 7.5%, age <40: 9.4%, P = .999), or conversion to THA (age ≥40: 13.2%, age <40: 3.8%, P = .161) were identified. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, no significant difference (P = .321) was demonstrated in overall gross survivorship between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with age ≥40 with FAIS undergoing primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated durable and comparable 10-year PRO and rates of MCID and PASS achievement compared with a propensity-matched cohort of age <40 counterparts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the patient reported outcomes (PROs) of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy (HA) for femeroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS), a condition where irregular bone growth in the hip joint leads to friction and pain during movement, who have worker's compensation (WC) or no-fault insurance (NF) versus commercial insurance (CI) at both 2 year and 5 year follow-up. METHODS:This was a single center, single surgeon, retrospective analysis performed between August 2007 and May 2023 of consecutive patients that underwent HA, a minimally invasive surgical procedure used to diagnose and treat problems inside the hip joint through small incisions, for FAIS. Patients were divided into two cohorts-those with WC/NF and those with commercial insurance (CI). Patient reported outcomes (PROs), which included modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), were collected preoperatively, as well as at least 2-year postoperatively. Additionally, other clinically relevant outcomes variables including prevalence of revision surgery and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were recorded. RESULTS: = 0.148). The WC/NF cohort had a lower rate of achieving Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) for mHHS at 2-years follow-up (66.7% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.02).The rate of revision hip arthroscopy was significantly higher in the worker's compensation/no fault cohort than the commercial insurance cohort (15.6% vs. 3.5%, p < 0.01). The rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the WC/NF cohort was not significantly different than the rate of conversion to THA in the commercial insurance cohort (0.0% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.30). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with WC/NF insurance may expect a significant improvement from baseline mHHS and NAHS following HA for FAIS at short-term follow-up. However, this improvement may not be as durable as those experienced by patients with CI. Additionally, WC/NF patients should be counseled that they have a higher risk of undergoing revision hip arthroscopy than similar CI patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III, Retrospective Comparative Prognostic Investigation.

Femoral tunnel malposition has been shown to be a risk factor for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction failure. Palpation of the "saddle point" between the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle can be an effective strategy; however, compared to using fluoroscopy, tunnel placement using palpation alone may result in significantly more frequent malposition. Accordingly, use of radiographic landmarks has gained in popularity. However, the technique is not without its pitfalls. The first issue lies with obtaining an adequate x-ray. Deviation from a true lateral x-ray by as little as 5° can result in significant tunnel malposition. Including sufficient visible femoral shaft is also required; a minimum requirement is 4 cm. The literature widely varies as to the anatomic, fluoroscopic position. Schottle's point (1.3 mm anterior to the posterior cortical extension line) is the most well studied.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Gluteus medius and minimus tears, or hip abductor tendon tears, are increasingly identified as a source of lateral hip pain. Once underappreciated and undertreated, they are now recognized as a cause of greater trochanteric pain syndrome and a pathology amenable to both nonoperative and operative modalities. This review summarizes relevant anatomy, clinical presentation, and treatment options for gluteus medius tears, focusing on surgical options. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:When surgical intervention is indicated, repair, reconstruction, or tendon transfer may be considered. Open and endoscopic repair techniques demonstrate similar outcomes with improvements in patient-reported outcomes and low complication and retear rates for both partial and full thickness tears. Variations in fixation construct and graft augmentations have been described, though clinical evidence remains limited to support specific techniques. Gluteus maximus transfer via open approach is a salvage option for the severely atrophied, retracted, or revision gluteus tendon; however, persistent limitations in abduction strength and gait abnormalities are common. Emerging evidence continues to evolve our understanding of surgical decision-making for gluteus tendon tears. The current literature supports either open or endoscopic repair techniques and open tendon transfer as a salvAage option. Further study is needed to determine the optimal fixation construct, the role of graft augmentation, and patient-related factors that influence postoperative outcomes.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To identify the preoperative risk factors associated with contralateral symptom development and surgical intervention for patients presenting with unilateral femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. METHODS:A literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus computerized databases according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies evaluating preoperative risk factors associated with the contralateral progression of FAI were included. Quality assessment was completed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. RESULTS:A total of 5 studies (n = 1,011 patients; mean age, 29.9 years) published from 2013 to 2022 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Mean follow-up ranged from 12 to 132 months. The overall rate of contralateral progression of symptomatic FAI ranged from 32.4% to 81%. Increased alpha angle was frequently reported factor associated with contralateral symptom progression, followed by decreased total arc of rotation, decreased internal rotation, reduced neck-shaft angle, and head-neck offset. The incidence rate of progression to contralateral surgery ranged from 15.7% to 24% of patients. Younger age was frequently reported factor associated with contralateral surgical intervention, followed by male sex, increased level of activity, and increased alpha angle. CONCLUSIONS:Increased alpha angle and younger age were commonly reported risk factors associated with an increased risk of symptom development and surgical progression of contralateral FAI, respectively. The overall rate of contralateral progression of symptomatic FAI and the rate of progression to surgical intervention ranged up to 81% and 24%, respectively. This information may help both patients and surgeons to establish expectations regarding development of contralateral hip symptoms and possible need for surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III; systematic review of Level II and III investigations.