Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:There is no known effective therapy for patients with COVID-19. Initial reports suggesting the potential benefit of Hydroxychloroquine/Azithromycin (HY/AZ) have resulted in massive adoption of this combination worldwide. However, while the true efficacy of this regimen is unknown, initial reports have raised concerns regarding the potential risk of QT prolongation and induction of torsade de pointes (TdP). OBJECTIVE:to assess the change in QTc interval and arrhythmic events in patients with COVID-19 treated with HY/AZ METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 251 patients from two centers, diagnosed with COVID-19 and treated with HY/AZ. We reviewed ECG tracings from baseline and until 3 days after completion of therapy to determine the progression of QTc and incidence of arrhythmia and mortality. RESULTS:QTc prolonged in parallel with increasing drug exposure and incompletely shortened after its completion. Extreme new QTc prolongation to > 500 ms, a known marker of high risk for TdP had developed in 23% of patients. One patient developed polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) suspected as TdP, requiring emergent cardioversion. Seven patients required premature termination of therapy. The baseline QTc of patients exhibiting extreme QTc prolongation was normal. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The combination of HY/AZ significantly prolongs the QTc in patients with COVID-19. This prolongation may be responsible for life threating arrhythmia in the form of TdP. This risk mandates careful consideration of HY/AZ therapy in lights of its unproven efficacy. Strict QTc monitoring should be performed if the regimen is given.

Conducted energy weapon (commonly known as TASER) discharge in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators is known to cause electromagnetic interference and inappropriate ventricular fibrillation sensing without delivery of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators therapy during conducted energy weapon application. We report the first known case of conducted energy weapon discharge resulting in inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillators therapy. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Clinical trials have failed to reliably show improved outcomes with utilization of contact-force sensing (CFS) radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheters. It is unknown whether the unfavorable outcomes observed in these trials are attributable to inexperience with CFS technology. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To compare catheter ablation outcomes of stepwise linear ablation with versus without CFS technology and to assess the impact of operator experience with CFS technology on procedural outcomes. METHODS:Clinical outcomes were evaluated in 228 consecutive NPAF patients undergoing first-time left atrial ablation using a stepwise linear approach. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals following index ablation. RESULTS:A total of 228 patients were included in our study. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 12 and 24 months between CFS and non-CFS patients (p = 0.5 and p = 0.169). The time to recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 24 months in the second half of CFS patients was significantly lower when compared to both the first half of CFS patients (p = 0.002) and non-CFS patients (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While there was no difference in overall outcomes between CFS and non-CFS ablation using a stepwise linear approach in patients with NPAF, procedural efficacy of the second half of CFS patients was significantly improved compared to both the first half of CFS patients and all non-CFS patients. Lack of benefit seen in clinical trials using CFS technology may be related to operator inexperience with CFS ablation catheters at the time of the trials.

BACKGROUND:Increased peak luminal esophageal temperature (LET) is associated with increased risk of esophageal injury following left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation. The magnitude, distribution, and risk factors of LET increase with high power short duration (HPSD) LAPW ablation are not well understood. OBJECTIVE:We aimed to describe the spatial and temporal characteristics of LET changes associated with HPSD LAPW RFA. METHODS:LET was sampled at 20Hz using a 12-point esophageal temperature monitor (CIRCA S-CATH, Circa Scientific, Inc.) in 16 patients undergoing LAPW ablation. Esophageal temperature sensor position and lesion locations were recorded using an electroanatomic mapping system with fluoroscopic integration (CARTO 3, CARTOUNIVU, Biosense Webster, Inc). Point-by-point LAPW ablation was performed at 50W for 6s. The first 20 LAPW lesions were individually analyzed in each patient. RESULTS:LET increase ≥4°C (8 lesions: Max LET 5.8°C), 2-4°C (34 lesions), and 1-2°C (58 lesions) occurred at 9±2 mm, 8±2 mm, and 13±2mm from sensors, respectively. Lesions placed >20mm from a temperature sensor did not result in an LET increase ≥2°C. Temperature resolution to within 1°C of baseline occurred at ∼60s after cessation of RF. Consecutive lesions resulting in additive heating of at least 1°C occurred in 17 lesion pairs with an inter-lesion distance of 9±4mm and inter-lesion time of 21±4s. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:HPSD LAPW ablation can result in severe esophageal temperature increases. Significant LET increase will be undetected when lesions are >20mm away from a temperature sensor. Additive LET increase was observed with consecutive lesions placed less than 20mm apart within 60s.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Elimination of pace-capture along pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) lesion sets reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. Pacing from the RF ablation electrode during RF application is prevented within the CARTO electroanatomic mapping system (Biosense Webster, Inc.) due to theoretical safety considerations. We evaluated a method of pacing the distal ablation electrode during RF application in the CARTO system, thus avoiding repeated activation and inactivation of the pacing channel and facilitating immediate recognition of pace-capture loss. We investigated the safety, feasibility, and utility of simultaneous pace-ablate (SPA) during AF ablation with the CARTO-3 system and a contact-force sensing RF ablation catheter. METHODS:Safety of feasibility of SPA was evaluated in 250 patients undergoing first-time AF ablation. Frequency and regional distribution of pace-capture following PVI was evaluated in a cohort of 50 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF. RESULTS:SPA was successfully performed in all 250 patients without adverse event. At least one pace-capture site was noted in 22 of 50 PAF patients (44%), and pace-capture following PVI was most common at anterior and superior left atrial sites. There were 2.0 ± 3.3 RF applications during pacing via the distal ablation electrode per patient, and all lesions sets were successfully rendered unexcitable. CONCLUSIONS:Pace-capture along the completed PVI lesion set remains common despite utilization of contact-force sensing RF ablation catheters and automated lesion annotation. Simultaneous pace-ablate in AF ablation using the CARTO system may be safely used to render atrial lesion sets unexcitable.

Background: Unfavorable outcomes for stepwise linear ablation of non-paroxysmal atrial fbrillation (NPAF) in clinical trials may be attributable to pro-arrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. It is unknown if recurrent arrhythmia following stepwise linear ablation is more likely to be successfully ablated compared to recurrent arrhythmia following a more limited initial procedure The optimal ablation strategy for catheter ablation of NPAF using a contact-force sensing (CFS) radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter remains unclear. Objective: To compare 2-procedure outcomes of stepwise linear RFA to left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing NPAF ablation using a CFS RFA catheter. Methods: We compared clinical outcomes of two cohorts of 100 consecutive NPAF patients undergoing frst-time RFA using a CFS RFA catheter. Group 1: stepwise linear ablation (July 2014-July 2015); Group 2: left atrial posterior wall isolation (October 2015-June 2016). Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals following ablation procedures. Results: Baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar. Mean follow-up time was 656 +/- 361 days for Group 1 and 436 +/- 228 days for Group 2. At 24-month follow up, Kaplan-Meier estimated single procedure arrhythmia free survival was signifcantly greater in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (76% vs 59%, respectively; p = 0.01), primarily driven by a higher rate of recurrence of atrial tachycardia (12% vs 35%, respectively; p < 0.001). Among patients with recurrent arrhythmia after a single procedure, Group 2 patients were less likely to require repeat ablation compared to Group 1 (6/24 vs 34/41, respectively; p < 0.001) and less likely to recur after repeat ablation (1/6 vs 13/34, respectively; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Compared to stepwise linear ablation, LA posterior wall isolation for catheter ablation of NPAF resulted in a lower incidence of recurrent arrhythmia at 2 years, a lower likelihood of requiring repeat ablation amongst patients with recurrence, and a lower likelihood of recurrence following a second ablation

Background: Unfavorable outcomes observed with stepwise linear ablation of non-paroxysmal AF (NPAF) in large clinical trials utilizing ablation catheters without contact-force sensing (CFS) may be attributable to pro-arrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. The optimal ablation strategy for catheter ablation of NPAF using a contact force sensing radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter remains unclear. Objective: To compare catheter ablation outcomes of stepwise linear ablation to left atrial (LA) posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing NPAF ablation using a CFS RF ablation catheter. Methods: We performed pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) followed by isolation of the LA posterior wall in 80 consecutive patients undergoing first-time NPAF ablation between November 2015 and March 2016 (Group 1) and compared clinical outcomes to those of 112 consecutive patients who underwent PVAI followed by step-wise linear ablation for NPAF between May 2014 and November 2015 (Group 2). All ablation procedures were performed using the Carto 3 mapping system and SmartTouch RF ablation catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc.). Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals. Arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Baseline characteristics of Group 1 and Group 2 were similar. At 12 months follow-up, arrhythmia-free survival was significantly greater in Group 1 patients compared with Group 2 (81.9% vs. 67.5%, respectively; p=0.0318). There was no significant difference in survival free from AF between group 1 and group 2 (89% vs. 84.1%, respectively; p=0.3431), however group 1 patients developed significantly fewer post-ablation atrial tachycardias (AT) than group 2 patients (8.1% vs 30.1%, respectively; p<0.001). Conclusion: Among patients undergoing NPAF ablation using a contact force sensing RF ablation catheter, LA posterior wall isolation resulted in fewer recurrent atrial arrhythmias than a stepwise linear approach. The reduction in recurrent atrial arrhythmias is driven primarily by a reduction in recurrent AT

Bleeding and thrombotic complications continue to plague continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) therapy in patients with end-stage heart failure. Warfarin genotyping information can be incorporated into decision making for initial dosing as recommended by the Food and Drug Administration; however, clinical utility of this data in the CF-LVAD population has not been well studied. Genotypes testing for CYP2C9 and VCORC1 polymorphisms were determined in 90 CF-LVAD patients. Outcomes studied were the association of CYP2C9 (*1, *2, or *3) and VKORC1 (-1639 G>A) gene variants with time-to-target international normalized ratio (INR), total warfarin dose, maintenance warfarin dose. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients carrying a rare variant in the VKORC1 gene had a significantly lower cumulative warfarin dose until target INR achieved (18.9 vs. 35.0 mg, p = 0.002), days spent until INR target achieved (4.9 vs. 7.0 days, p = 0.021), and discharge warfarin dose (3.2 vs. 5.6 mg, p = 0.001) compared with patients with wild-type genotype. Genotype-guided warfarin dosing may lead to safer anticoagulation and potentially improve outcomes in CF-LVAD patients.

Introduction: Large clinical trials have recently demonstrated stepwise linear ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF) to be inferior to pulmonary vein isolation alone. It is unknown whether the unfavorable outcomes observed in these trials can be attributed to the pro-arrhythmic effects of incomplete ablation lines. We hypothesized that improved lesion quality related to use of contact-force sensing (CFS) ablation catheters would improve procedural outcomes. Methods: We prospectively analyzed procedural outcomes of 74 consecutive patients with NPAF undergoing first-time radiofrequency catheter ablation with a CFS catheter (Smart Touch, Biosense Webster) using a step-wise approach (Group 1). The clinical outcomes of these patients were compared with 74 consecutive patients with NPAF who underwent catheter ablation between September 2013 and June 2014 with a non-contact force sense radiofrequency ablation catheter (Group 2) at a single tertiary care medical center. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 2-week event monitors at 3-month intervals following index ablation. Results: Baseline characteristics of Group 1 and Group 2 were similar, although in Group 1 there was a greater prevalence of patients with persistent NPAF lasting for 6-months or longer prior to initial ablation (43% vs 21%, p=0.071). The recurrence rate at 1 year as estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method was not significantly different between Group 1 and Group 2 (25.7% vs 29.7%, p=0.582). The presenting recurrent arrhythmia was most frequently atrial tachycardia (AT) in both groups (Group 1: n=19, AT 68.4% and AF 31.6% vs Group 2: n=22, AT 59.1% and AF 40.9%). A similar proportion of patients in both groups underwent repeat ablation (Group 1: 17.6% vs Group 2: 13.5%, p=0.496). Conclusions: Utilization of a CFS ablation catheter was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for stepwise catheter ablation for NPAF. The optimal strategy for NPAF ablation using a contact-force sensing catheter remains undefined

As more women with repaired congenital heart disease survive to their reproductive years and many other women are delaying pregnancy until later in life, a rising concern is the risk of cardiac arrhythmias during pregnancy. Naturally occurring cardiovascular changes during pregnancy increase the likelihood that a recurrence of a previously experienced cardiac arrhythmia or a de novo arrhythmia will occur. Arrhythmias should be thoroughly investigated to determine if there is a reversible etiology, and risks/benefits of treatment options should be fully explored. We discuss the approach to working up and treating various arrhythmias during pregnancy with attention to fetal and maternal risks as well as treatment of fetal arrhythmias. Acute management in stable patients includes close monitoring and intravenous pharmacologic therapy, while DC cardioversion should be used to terminate arrhythmias in hemodynamically unstable patients. Long-term management may require continued oral antiarrhythmic therapy, with particular attention to fetal safety, to prevent complications associated with arrhythmias.