Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare the ICU length of stay (LOS), overall hospital LOS, in-hospital complications, and mortality rate between trauma ICU patients with orthopedic injuries versus those without. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study in which the trauma registry of a single level 1 trauma center was queried over a 6-year period for patients admitted to the ICU during hospitalization. Patients were stratified based on the presence/absence of an orthopedic fracture. Negative binomial regression was used to evaluate the effect of orthopedic injury on overall hospital and ICU LOS while controlling for confounding factors. Secondary outcomes included group differences with respect to in-hospital complications, mortality, and discharge disposition. RESULTS:A total of 1,785 trauma patients were admitted to the ICU and included. Among all trauma ICU patients, 61.1 % (n = 1,091) had no associated orthopedic injuries whereas 38.9 % (n = 694) had at least one. Patients with orthopedic injuries had higher odds of being severely injured (ISS ≥ 16: OR [CI] =1.47 [1.2-1.8]; p < 0.001) despite presenting with a higher level of consciousness than those without orthopedic injuries (mean GCS: 13.3 ± 3.5 vs 12.5 ± 4.1, p < 0.001). Multivariable models demonstrated having an orthopedic injury did not moderate ICU LOS (IRR [CI] = 0.93 [0.9-1.0]; p = 0.110) but did contribute significantly to increasing hospital LOS (IRR [CI] = 1.23 [1.1-1.3]; p < 0.001). There was no evidence to suggest that orthopedic injury increases the risk of in-hospital complication or in-hospital mortality. Orthopedically injured trauma ICU patients were less likely to be discharged home than those without orthopedic injuries. CONCLUSIONS:Trauma ICU patients with an associated orthopedic injury have significantly longer hospital stays compared to those without an orthopedic injury, despite no evidence to suggest that the orthopedic injury affects the duration of ICU stay or in-hospital complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III, Retrospective cohort study.

https://ota.org/education/ota-online-resources/video-library-procedures-techniques/lateral-tibial-plateau.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Pulmonary hypertension (PHTN) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in noncardiac surgery and elective surgery. This population of patients has a low physiological reserve and is prone to cardiac arrest as a result. This study aims to identify the impact that PHTN has on outcomes among geriatric hip fracture patients. METHODS:A 3:1 propensity-score-matched retrospective case (PHTN)-control (no PHTN [N]) study of hip fracture patients from 2014 to 2022 was performed. Patients were matched utilizing propensity score matching of a validated geriatric trauma risk assessment tool (STTGMA). All patients were reviewed for hospital quality measures and outcomes. Comparative univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted between the two matched cohorts. A sub-analysis compared patients across PHTN severity levels (mild, moderate, severe) based on pulmonary artery systolic pressures (PASP) as measured by transthoracic echocardiogram. RESULTS:PHTN patients (n = 67) experienced a higher rate of inpatient, 30-day, and 1-year mortality, major complications, and 90-day readmissions as compared to the N cohort (n = 201). PHTN patients with a PASP > 60 experienced a significantly higher rate of major complications, need for ICU, longer admission length, and worse 1-year functional outcomes. Pulmonary hypertension was found to be independently associated with a 3.5 × higher rate of 30-day mortality (p = 0.016), 2.7 × higher rate of 1-year mortality (p = 0.008), 2.5 × higher rate of a major inpatient complication (p = 0.028), and 1.2 × higher rate of 90-day readmission (p = 0.044). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients who had a prior diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension before sustaining their hip fracture experienced significantly worse inpatient and post-discharge outcomes. Those with a PASP > 60 mmHg had worse outcomes within the PHTN cohort. Providers must recognize these at-risk patients at the time of arrival to adjust care planning accordingly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:III.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine when patients return to work following operative repair of tibial shaft fractures (TSF) and what risk factors are associated with a delayed return to work (RTW), defined as greater than 180 days after operative repair. METHODS:Retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of TSF patients who underwent operative repair. Time to RTW was based on documented work-clearance communications from the operating surgeon. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on when they returned to work: early (≤ 90 days), average (91-80 days), and late (≥ 180 days). Univariate analysis was performed, and significant variables were included in multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS:There were 168 patients identified. Eighteen were excluded (retired, unemployed, or never returned to work) leaving 150 patients. The average time to RTW for the overall study population was 4.17 ± 2.06 months. There were 39 (26.0%) patients in the early RTW group, 85 (56.7%) in the average RTW group, and 26 (17.3%) in the late RTW group. Patient with high-energy injuries (p = 0.024), open fractures (p = 0.001), initial external-fixation (p = 0.036), labor-intensive job (p = 0.018) and post-operative non-weight bearing status (p = 0.023) all had significantly longer RTW. Multinomial logistic regression including these parameters found a closed fracture was associated with a 1.9 decreased risk of delayed RTW (p = 0.004, 95% CI 0.039-0.533). CONCLUSIONS:Open fractures, initial external-fixation, restricted post-operative weight-bearing and labor-intensive jobs are associated with a delayed RTW following operative repair of TSFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the association between obesity and treatment approaches, perioperative factors, and clinical and radiographic outcomes following subtrochanteric fracture fixation. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective Cohort. SETTING/METHODS:Academic Medical Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients operatively treated for an AO/OTA 32Axa, 32Bxa, or 32Cxa subtrochanteric femur fracture. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:Injury characteristics, perioperative parameters, fixation information, postoperative complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes. Univariate analyses were conducted between the obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and the nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2) cohorts. Regression analyses were performed to assess BMI as a continuous variable. RESULTS:Of 230 operatively treated subtrochanteric fracture patients identified, 49 (21%) were obese and 181 (79%) were nonobese. The average age of the obese cohort was 69.6 ± 17.2 years, with 16 (33%) male and 33 (77%) female. The average age of the nonobese cohort was 71.8 ± 19.2 years, with 60 (33%) male and 121 (77%) female. Aside from BMI, there were no significant differences in demographics between the obese and nonobese (age [P = 0.465], sex [P = 0.948], American Society of Anesthesiology Score [P = 0.739]). Both cohorts demonstrated similar injury characteristics including mechanism of injury, atypical fracture type, and AO/OTA fracture pattern (32A, 32B, 32C). Obese patients underwent more open reduction procedures (59% open obese, 11% open nonobese, P < 0.001), a finding further quantified by a 24% increased likelihood of open reduction for every 1 unit increase in BMI (OR: 1.2, 95% CI, 1.2-1.3, P < 0.001). There was no difference in average nail diameter, 1 versus 2-screw nail design, or number of locking screws placed. The obese cohort was operated more frequently on a fracture table (P < 0.001) when compared with the nonobese cohort that was operated more frequently on a flat table (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences (P > 0.050) in postoperative complications, mortality/readmission rates, hospital quality measures, fixation failure, or time to bone healing. CONCLUSIONS:The treatment of subtrochanteric fractures in obese patients is associated with a higher likelihood of surgeons opting for open fracture reduction and the use of different operating room table types, but no difference was observed in postoperative complications, mortality or readmission rates, or healing timeline when compared with nonobese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The primary goal of this study was to determine the anatomic relationship between the clavicle and the apical lung segment. The secondary goal was to determine the incidence of pneumothorax (PTX) in patients who underwent clavicle ORIF to analyze the utility of postoperative chest radiographs. METHODS:Six hundred thirty-one patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture who underwent superior plating at a single institution were identified. Forty-two patients had a CT scan of the chest. Three points on the uninjured clavicle were defined: 2 cm from the medial end of the clavicle, the mid-point of the clavicle, and 2 cm from the lateral end of the clavicle. At each point, the distance from both the inferior cortex and the superior cortex of the clavicle to the apical lung segment was measured. All 631 patients who underwent Open Reduction and Internal Fixation had a postoperative chest radiograph to evaluate implant placement, restoration of clavicular length, and presence of PTX. RESULTS:From the lateral end of the clavicle, the mean distance of the lung was 60.0 ± 14.9 mm (20.1 to 96.1 mm) from the inferior cortex of the clavicle. At the mid-point, the mean distance of the lung was 32.3 ± 7.2 mm (20.4 to 45.5 mm) from the inferior cortex of the clavicle. At the medial end, the mean distance of the lung was 18.0 ± 5.5 mm (8.1 to 28.9 mm) from the inferior cortex of the clavicle. A review of postoperative radiographs for all 631 patients revealed none (0%) with a postoperative iatrogenic PTX. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The risk of injury is minimal in all three zones. Postoperative chest radiographs after clavicle fracture repair to rule out PTX are unnecessary.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Osteonecrosis (ON) of the humeral head is defined as "avascular" when the death of bone is due to a disrupted blood supply. It is a known complication following proximal humeral fractures and can lead to poor long-term outcomes and even additional revision surgeries. CASE REPORT/UNASSIGNED:Patient AP developed symptomatic ON, 3 years following repair of a 4-part valgus impacted proximal humerus fracture. The point of interest in this case is the length of time from injury at which she developed symptomatic ON. Following surgical repair, she was seen at standard intervals, 6 weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12- month follow-ups and demonstrated an excellent recovery. By the 1 year follow-up appointment, she had obtained a range of motion in her left shoulder of 170° forward elevation and 60° in external rotation. At this point, she was able to discontinue physical therapy and was radiographically and clinically healed. However, 2 years after, she began experiencing sudden onset of pain with shoulder ROM and progressive limitation. She was diagnosed with an ON of her proximal humerus. The patient was prescribed a 3-month course of corticosteroid, 3 months following her operation for a gynecological-related issue. However, with strong progress being made 9 months after this prescription, and problems occurring over 2 years after taking the medication, it is unclear whether the ON was related to her fracture pattern or developed as a result of the corticosteroid usage or a combination of the 2 due to a "double hit." CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This case review points out the potential need for continued monitoring even after radiographic and clinical healing is achieved in these injuries.

BACKGROUND:The surgical approach used for arthroplasty in the setting of hip fracture has traditionally been decided based on surgeon preference. This study analyzed the ef-fect of the surgical approach on hospital quality measures, complications, and mortality in patients treated with hip arthroplasty for fracture fixation. METHODS:A cohort of consecutive acute hip fracture pa-tients who were 60 years of age or older and who underwent hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) at one academic medical center between January 2014 and January 2018 was included. Patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), surgery details, complications, ambulation at dis-charge, discharge location, readmission, and mortality were recorded. Two cohorts were included based on the surgical approach: the anterior-based cohort included the direct an-terior and anterolateral approaches and the posterior-based cohort included direct lateral and posterior approaches. RESULTS:Two hundred five patients were included: 146 underwent HA (81 anterior-based and 65 posterior-based) and 79 underwent THA (37 anterior-based and 42 posterior-based). The mean age of the HA and THA cohorts was 84.1 ± 7.5 and 73.7 ± 8.0 years, respectively. There was no dif-ference in LOS, time to surgery, or surgical time between the two cohorts for HA and THA. There were no differences in perioperative complications, including dislocation, ob-served based on surgical approach. No difference was found between readmission rates and mortality. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In this cohort of hip fracture arthroplasty patients, there was no difference observed in hospital quality measures, readmission, or mortality in patients based on sur-gical approach. These results are in contrast with literature in elective arthroplasty patients supporting the use of an anterior approach for potential improved short-term outcomes.

Critical bone loss after open fractures, while relatively uncommon, occurs most frequently in high-energy injuries. Fractures of the tibia account for the majority of open fractures with significant bone loss. A number of different surgical strategies exist for treatment of tibial bone loss, all with different advantages and disadvantages. Care should be taken by the surgeon to review appropriate indications and all relevant evidence before selecting a strategy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose was to compare perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent general or regional anesthesia for intramedullary (IM) nailing of tibial shaft fractures (TSFs). METHODS:Retrospective chart review was performed on a consecutive series of low-energy TSF patients who presented to a single academic medical center and a level 1 trauma center who underwent operative repair with a reamed IM nail. Collected information included demographics, injury information, anesthesia type (general or regional i.e. peripheral nerve block), intra-operative opiate consumption (converted to morphine milliequivalents [MME], and post-operative pain visual-analog scale [VAS] pain scores. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the type of anesthesia received and univariate analysis was performed to compare the 3 groups. RESULTS:Seventy-six patients were included, with an average age of 44.47±16.0 years. There were 38 (50 %) who were administered general anesthesia and 38 (50 %) who were administered regional anesthesia in the form of a peripheral nerve block. There were no differences between the groups with respect to demographics, medical co-morbidities, rate of open fractures or AO/OTA fracture classification. Regional anesthesia patients received less intra-operative MME than general anesthesia patients (17.57±10.6, 28.96±13.8, p < 0.001). Patients who received regional anesthesia also spent less time in the operating room, received less MME on post-operative day 1, and ambulated further on post-operative day 1, however none of these differences were statistically significant. There were no cases of missed post-operative compartment syndrome or complications related to the administration of the peripheral nerve block. CONCLUSIONS:Regional anesthesia in TSF surgery received less intra-operative opioid requirements, without any untoward effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic Level III.