Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine if magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could accurately determine the width of the labrum. METHODS:Consecutively enrolled patients between the ages of 18 and 65 indicated for hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement were included between December 2017 and June 2018. Inclusion criteria for preoperative MRIs included: MRI availability in picture archiving and communication system; performance on a 1.5T or 3T MRI or 3T MRA; and adequate quality and lack of labrum ossification. Intraoperative labral width measurements were taken at standardized locations using an established acetabular "clockface" paradigm. Measurement was performed using a calibrated probe. The labral width was defined as the distance from the labrum extended laterally from the acetabular rim. MRI measurements were taken by 2 blinded musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologists at the same positions. Measurements were made at the 11:30 o'clock position (indirect rectus) on coronal proton density (PD) sequence, at 3 o'clock position (psoas-U) on axial oblique PD sequence, and at 1:30 (a point halfway between the 2) on sagittal fat-suppressed PD. The surgeons were blinded to the radiologists' measurements and vice versa. Intraoperative and radiographic labral width measurements were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), absolute agreement, and 2-way random effects model. The 2 radiologists' measurements were compared for interrater reliability using the same ICC model. RESULTS:Fifty-one patients were included (30 females, 26 right hips). Average labrum width at the 3:00, 11:30, and 1:30 o'clock positions by arthroscopic measurement were 5.8 mm (range; standard deviation, 2-8; ±1.4), 6.3 mm (2-10; ±1.5) and 6.0 mm (2-9; ±1.5), and by MRI were 6.3 mm (2-10; ±1.5), 6.7 mm (3-10; ±1.4), and 6.1 mm (2-9; ±1.6), respectively. When including all MRI modalities, ICC agreement between intraoperative assessment, and radiologist assessment at the 3:00 o'clock, 11:30, and point halfway between was 0.82 (P < .001), 0.78 (P < .001), 0.84 (P < .001), respectively. Radiologist interrater ICC agreement at the same points was 0.88 (P < .001), 0.93 (P < .001), and 0.88 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:Strong agreement was found between radiologic and arthroscopic measurement of labrum width when using MRI, suggesting MRI is an accurate way to measure labral width. There was not a significant difference between different MRI modalities. Accurately measuring labral width preoperatively with MRI may aid in surgical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level II, diagnostic study.

Hip MRI and arthroscopy have important roles for the evaluation of the patient with hip pain. An understanding of what orthopedic surgeons want to know before and after hip arthroscopy as well as the limitations of arthroscopy would enable radiologists to improve their imaging interpretations and produce more clinically relevant, management guiding reports. The goal of this article is to review the basic principles of hip arthroscopy and MRI and compare their strengths and weaknesses. Normal clinically relevant hip anatomy, important pathologic conditions such as labral tears and cartilage injuries, femoroacetabular impingement specific findings like cam and pincer morphology, extra-articular conditions such as abductor and iliopsoas tendons pathology and common post-operative appearances are reviewed on MRI and arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the short-term results of meniscal root repair surgery, assessing clinical and radiographic outcomes, utilizing MRI to assess root healing and extent of post-operative extrusion. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study evaluating patients who had undergone a medial meniscus posterior root repair using a transtibial pullout technique with two locking cinch sutures. Demographic data were collected from patient charts. Clinical outcomes were assessed with pre- and post-operative IKDC and Lysholm scores. Pre-op scores were taken at the patients' initial clinical visit, mean 1.55 months prior to surgery (+/- 1.8 months, min 0.3, max 7.3). Radiographic outcomes were assessed with MRI evaluation of root healing, meniscal extrusion, and cartilage degeneration using ICRS criteria. Tunnel placement was evaluated and compared to the anatomic footprint. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (47.2 years +/- 11.9) were evaluated at mean follow-up of 24.9 months (+/- 7.2, min 18.4, max 35.6). The IKDC score significantly increased from 45.9 (+/- 12.6) pre-operatively to 76.8 (+/- 14.7) post-operatively (p < 0.001). Lysholm scores also increased from 50.9 (+/- 7.11) to 87.1 (+/- 9.8) (p < 0.001). Mean tunnel placement was 5.3 mm (+/- 3.5, range 0-11.8) away from the anatomic footprint. Mean extrusion increased from 4.74 mm (+/- 1.7) pre-operatively to 5.98 (+/- 2.8) post-operatively (p < 0.02). No patients with > 3 mm of extrusion on pre-operative MRI had < 3 mm of extrusion on post-operative MRI. Both medial femoral condyle and medial tibial plateau ICRS grades worsened significantly (p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). On MRI, one root appeared completely healed, 16 partially healed, and one not healed. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with the transtibial suture pull-out technique with two locking cinch sutures had improved clinical outcomes, but only partial healing in the majority of cases, increased extrusion, and progression of medial compartment cartilage defect grade on follow-up MRI. Patients should be counseled that although clinical outcomes in the short term may be optimistic, long-term outcomes regarding progression to degenerative arthritis may not be as predictable. CLINICAL LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

OBJECTIVE:To review the MRI appearance of medial patellofemoral capsuloligamentous plication (also known as reefing or imbrication) for proximal patellar realignment in patients with patellofemoral instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of our surgical and PACS databases identified cases of medial plication performed between June 2011 and July 2016. Pre- and postoperative MRI characteristics were reviewed. Correlation was made with operative reports and clinical records to define postoperative appearances on MRI. RESULTS:Forty-one patients underwent medial plication during the study period; 29 were excluded owing to a lack of postoperative imaging. Ultimately, 12 knees were included in 11 patients who had postoperative MRI studies available (8 women and 3 men, mean age 27.3 ± 10.2 years). Ten (83%) of the surgeries were performed open and 2 (17%) arthroscopically. There were differences in the post-surgical MRI appearance of medial plications carried out after surgery using the open and arthroscopic techniques. The open technique produces a "heaped up" distal vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) with centralized patellar insertion (100%), which was absent in the case of arthroscopic plication, where subtle medial retinaculum thickening was demonstrated without alteration of its patellar insertion. The mean postoperative lateral patellar and patellofemoral congruence angles measured 2.5° ± 5.6° and 12.4° ± 19.9° respectively. A significant association was found regarding change in patellofemoral alignment (p = 0.018 and p = 0.004 respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The MRI appearance of medial plication is not well described in the radiology literature; radiologists should be familiar with anticipated post-plication findings to avoid potential confusion for pathology and allow more accurate interpretation of postoperative imaging findings from this common surgery.

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this article is to review the postoperative MRI appearances of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) after surgery was performed using newer techniques, including patch repair, muscle tendon transfer, superior capsular reconstruction, and subacromial balloon implantation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Newer surgical techniques are emerging for the management of massive RCTs. As radiologists become increasingly likely to encounter postoperative imaging studies of RCTs repaired using these techniques, familiarity with the normal postoperative appearances and complications associated with these techniques becomes important.

The meniscus plays a vital role in knee biomechanics, and its physical absence or functional incompetence (e.g., irreparable root or radial tear) leads to unacceptably high rates of joint degeneration in affected populations. Meniscal allograft transplantation has been used successfully to treat patients with postmeniscectomy syndrome, and there is early laboratory and radiographic evidence hinting at a potential prophylactic role in preventing joint degeneration. We present a technique for lateral meniscal allograft transplantation using the CONMED Meniscal Allograft Transplantation system.

Horizontal cleavage tears (HCT) commonly occur in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus due to aging and degeneration. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical treatment of HCTs and their effect on dynamic tibiofemoral contact mechanics. The tibiofemoral contact mechanics of 10 cadaver knees were investigated using a custom dynamic loading apparatus, pressure sensor, and motion sensing camera. Three loading conditions were analyzed: 500 N compressive load, 500 N compressive load with 100 N posterior shear, and 500 N compressive load with 2.5 Nm of internal torque. Real-time peak contact pressures and contact areas were recorded throughout the full range of motion. After testing the intact meniscal state, a horizontal cleavage tear was created and included 50% of the width of the meniscus. The following procedures were performed, and the loading conditions described above were analyzed: HCT superior flap removal (5 specimens), HCT inferior flap removal (remaining 5 specimens), and both flaps removed (all 10 specimens). Statistical analysis was performed using a mixed linear effects model using the R-statistical package. The mixed linear effects statistical model identified statistically significant differences between independent variables, including the procedure performed, meniscal flap removed, meniscal region, loading condition, and knee flexion angle with respect to contact area and peak contact pressure. Peak contact pressure and contact area were not affected by selective flap removal (superior vs. inferior) or removal of both flaps of the HCT. We recommend that in the treatment of horizontal cleavage tears of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, the outer 50% of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus should be maintained for load transmission.

PURPOSE: To determine when patients recover the ability to safely operate the brakes of an automobile after a right-knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: A computerized driving simulator was used to determine braking ability after an isolated right-knee ACLR. Thirty healthy volunteers were tested at 1 visit to determine normal mean values, and 27 treatment subjects were tested at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 6 weeks after ACLR. Nine study subjects were treated with a patella tendon (BPTB) autograft, 9 were treated with a hamstring (HS) autograft, and 9 were treated with a tibialis anterior (TA) allograft. The driving simulator collected data on brake reaction time (BRT), brake travel time (BTT), and total brake time (TBT) at each visit. RESULTS: The control group generated a BRT of 725 milliseconds, BTT of 2.87 seconds, and TBT of 3.59 seconds. At week 1, all treatment patients had significant differences compared with controls for BRT, BTT, and TBT, except the BTT of the HS group. At week 3, all measures for the allograft group and the BRT for both autograft groups were no longer significantly different compared with controls, but significant differences were found for TBT in the HS and BPTB groups (P = .03, P = .01). At week 6, BRT, BTT, and TBT were no longer significantly different for either the HS group or BPTB group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent a right-knee ACLR with a TA allograft regained normal braking times by week 3 postoperatively. In contrast, those treated with a BPTB or HS autograft demonstrated significantly delayed braking times at 3 weeks but returned to normal braking ability by week 6. Those treated with an autograft had an earlier return of normalized BRT than BTT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control series.