Faculty Bibliography

Imaging follow-up is an established component of intracranial aneurysm management that allows ongoing assessment of rupture risk and timely intervention to maintain protection from bleeding. Yet the frequency, duration, and imaging modality for follow-up vary widely. This review outlines contemporary imaging techniques and practice for follow-up of treated and untreated aneurysms, highlighting existing knowledge gaps and technical limitations that limit standardization. Updated evidence on the expected evolution and long-term outcome of common treatment strategies is presented to guide accurate reporting of radiological outcome after treatment and considerations regarding follow-up regimen.

Definitive endoluminal reconstruction, widely known as flow diversion, revolutionized treatment of brain aneurysms. A range of targets, by location, size, etiology, and acuity, can be cured with an excellent risk/benefit profile. Requirement for effective antiplatelet state is balanced with superior treatment durability. Implant and delivery system technology continue to evolve. Some aneurysm types/locations remain undertreated. Maximizing efficacy while minimizing risks requires deep understanding of flow diversion principles, pathologic anatomy, endoluminal implants, delivery systems, and clinical management.

Although the concept of treating cerebral aneurysms by filling the sac from the inside (endosaccular) started many years ago first with detachable balloons and then coils, the use of a single metallic resheathable device acting as a flow disruptor is a much more recent innovation. The most studied device among these is certainly the WEB, which became part of standard clinical practice for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms. This study reviews the most important features of the WEB device with a short summary of the most important literature. A small section at the end reviews also other endosaccular devices.

The anatomy of vertebrobasilar perforators has been widely studied in human cadavers, with most reports found in the neurosurgical literature. These arterial perforators are extremely hard to visualize consistently with traditional two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography, but are reliably visible with cross sectional cone beam CT techniques. A clear understanding of this specific neurovascular anatomy and pathology is essential for informed treatment decisions. This review analyzes the anatomy of vertebrobasilar perforators with a focus on practical implications for aneurysm treatment, particularly flow diversion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Iatrogenic cerebrovascular injury can cause intracranial hemorrhage and pseudoaneurysm formation, putting patients at high risk for postoperative bleeding. No consensus for management exists. This study describes endovascular treatment of these acute injuries with flow diverter stents. METHODS:Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed for injury type and etiology, timing of diagnosis, and endovascular management, including antiplatelet regimens, embolization results, and clinical outcome. RESULTS:Six patients were included. Three suffered an injury to the internal carotid artery, 1 suffered an injury to the left anterior cerebral artery, 1 suffered an injury to the right posterior cerebral artery, and 1 suffered an injury to the basilar artery. Four of the 6 injuries occurred during attempted tumor resection, 1 occurred during cerebrospinal fluid leak repair, and 1 occurred during an ophthalmic artery aneurysm clipping. All injuries resulted in pseudoaneurysm formation. Four were immediately detected on angiography; 2 were initially negative on imaging. Five were treated with a pipeline embolization device, and 1 was treated with a Silk Vista Baby. Two were treated with 2 pipeline embolization devices telescopically overlapped across the pseudoaneurysm. All devices deployed successfully. No pseudoaneurysm recurrence or rebleeding occurred. No parent artery occlusion or stenosis was observed, and complete pseudoaneurysm occlusion was observed in 4 patients (in 2 patients, follow-up imaging could not be obtained). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:With proper antiplatelet regimens, flow diverter stents can be used safely to successfully treat complex acute iatrogenic injuries. Early repeat angiogram is needed when immediate postinjury imaging does not discover the point of vessel injury.

IntroductionFlow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is an effective endovascular treatment. However, the metal surface's thrombogenicity and need for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) are notable limitations. Few prior studies have reported specifically on flow diverters' safety in patients with hemoglobinopathies, a population at increased risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications.MethodsNatural language processing queried our institution's medical records for intracranial embolization procedures from 2014 to 2024, screening for "hemoglobinopathy," "thalassemia," and "sickle cell." Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsSixteen procedures in 14 patients were identified in which a mean 2.0 PEDs per patient were used. Most patients were female (71.4%). Median age was 48.8 years. Five patients had sickle cell disease, two had sickle cell trait, two had sickle cell or hemoglobin C trait and alpha thalassemia minor, and five had alpha thalassemia minor. The 14 patients were treated for 20 aneurysms; four treatments covered two distinct aneurysms. Median dome size per treatment was 4.0 mm. Of the 16 aneurysm treatments, five (31.2%) treated an irregular aneurysm. Most (56.2%) treatments used multiple PEDs. All patients were discharged on DAPT after verifying effect with P2Y12 assays. Follow-up DSA, CTA, or MRA was obtained in 12/14 (85.7%) patients at a median 1.6 years. Complete occlusion was achieved in all aneurysms. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at a median 2.2 years. There were no thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications, neurological deficits, or mortalities.ConclusionPipeline embolization can safely and effectively treat patients with hemoglobinopathies.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:We describe a case of bilateral, multiple, branch retinal artery occlusions (BRAO) associated with carotid webs. METHODS:A thorough chart review was conducted for the patient. Relevant literature was systematically reviewed. RESULTS:Eight cases of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) associated with retinal artery occlusions have been reported. Two additional cases of FMD with other ocular involvement have been described. No cases of carotid webs associated with retinal artery occlusions were found. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Carotid webs, an uncommon variant of FMD, are a recognized causative etiology of arterial, ischemic stroke. The case described here of bilateral, multifocal BRAOs represents a unique manifestation of this variant of FMD. This diagnosis should be considered in the setting of an otherwise unrevealing BRAO workup, as recognition of this association may be sight and life-saving.

Typical carotid webs are nonatherosclerotic shelf-like projections of fibromyxoid tissue extending from the posterior wall of the proximal internal carotid artery (ICA). Carotid webs may precipitate acute embolic stroke, especially in younger patients. We describe our experience with pathology-proven carotid webs of atypical appearance, or atypical carotid webs (ACWs), a subset of carotid webs exhibiting abnormal location, morphology, or association with atherosclerotic changes. Our electronic medical record database was queried for all imaging impressions containing "carotid web," "shelf," or "protrusion" from 2018-2024. Imaging was reviewed by an experienced neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon. Patients with typical carotid webs or those with different diagnoses (e.g. dissection/thrombus) were excluded. Twenty-seven patients were treated for typical carotid webs; 24 were treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and had pathology-confirmed webs. Five patients (three male) were identified to have ACWs and included in this report. Mean age was 43.6 years. All ACWs were identified by computed tomography angiography (CTA). All patients presented with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). One web was located on the anterior ICA wall, three were of abnormal morphology different from a "shelf-like" projection, and one was associated with atherosclerotic change. No patients experienced a further stroke or TIA following CEA. ACWs may precipitate ischemic stroke and can be treated and definitively diagnosed with CEA. Due to their unusual appearance, ACWs may evade radiographic identification or be misdiagnosed. As ACWs have not been previously reported in the literature, awareness of their existence must be raised to increase their detection and treatment.

OBJECTIVE:Tobacco smoking is among the factors known to significantly augment the risk of untreated intracranial aneurysm (IA) growth and rupture. Smoking appears to have a variable effect on different endovascular treatment modalities. The impact of smoking on the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device use for wide-neck IAs has not been evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of WEB devices by smoking status. METHODS:A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted on the data of patients from 36 sites worldwide treated with the WEB device for intracranial saccular aneurysms. Patients were stratified based on smoking status (current, former, and never smokers). The Student t-test and chi-square test were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS:Of 1376 patients with available smoking status, 504 were current smokers, 358 were former smokers, and 514 were never smokers. Upon adjusting for significant confounders, no association was found between smoking and recurrence outcomes (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.69-2.80; p = 0.36), thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, and mortality among IAs treated with the WEB device. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between former and never smokers (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.70-2.18; p = 0.46). The location of aneurysms differed between smoking groups, with former smokers having more anterior circulation aneurysms compared with current and never smokers (99.0% vs 96.9% vs 95.3%; p = 0.01). In terms of clinical symptoms, headache and dizziness were more common in the never smokers compared with current and former smokers (13.9% vs 8.9% vs 7.7%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:This large-scale study suggests no significant correlation between smoking and the recurrence of IAs treated with the WEB device. Biological studies are warranted to better understand the biological impact of smoking on the growth and rupture of treated IAs.