Faculty Bibliography

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing single-level L5-S1 anterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between 2012 and 2024 at a single academic institution, with preoperative and one-year postoperative radiographic assessment of sagittal alignment parameters. OBJECTIVE:To quantify changes in lumbar pelvic angle (LPA), pelvic tilt (PT), global lumbar lordosis (L1-S1), regional lumbar lordosis (L4-S1), and segmental lumbar lordosis (L5-S1) among single-level L5-S1 ALIF and TLIF patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Restoration of sagittal alignment is a primary goal of lumbar fusion. While ALIF is regarded as superior to TLIF in restoring segmental lordosis, its effect on global and regional alignment remains uncertain, and few studies directly compare their impact on spinopelvic parameters. METHODS:The electronic medical record was queried for patients who underwent single-level L5-S1 ALIF or TLIF with preoperative and one-year postoperative imaging. Sagittal parameters were measured using Surgimap software. Group comparisons were assessed with unpaired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS:Radiographic measurements were available for 174 patients (ALIF n=73, TLIF n=101). ALIF patients had significantly greater improvement in L4-S1 (+4.2° vs. -1.1°, P=0.002) and L5-S1 lordosis (+4.6° vs. -4.8°, P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in postoperative changes for L1-S1 lordosis (+2.2° vs. -1.4°, P=0.250), LPA (-1.9° vs. -1.4°, P=0.743), or PT (-0.9° vs. +0.4°, P=0.093). Permutation testing confirmed that the observed difference in LPA improvement between cohorts (-0.51°) was not statistically significant (P=0.673), and post hoc analysis confirmed adequate power to detect a difference of 3.37°. Sensitivity analyses using ANCOVA, adjusting for baseline radiographic values and covariates, were concordant. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ALIF provided superior regional and segmental lordosis but did not improve global alignment compared with TLIF. This study is the first to quantify the effect of ALIF versus TLIF on LPA, highlighting the limited impact of single-level fusion on global spinopelvic alignment.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:A subset of adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients undergoing corrective surgery receive a disproportionate level of medical resources and incur greater costs. We examined the characteristics of such super-utilizers of health care resources among ASD patients. METHODS:This prospective, multicenter study analyzed data from ASD patients with > 4 levels of spinal fusion and a minimum 2-year follow-up. Index and total episode-of-care (EOC) costs in 2022 US dollars were calculated using average itemized direct costs obtained from administrative hospital records. Patients with total 2-year EOC cost > 90th percentile were considered super-utilizers, the characteristics of which we identified through a multivariate generalized logistic model. RESULTS:Of 1299 eligible patients, mean age was 60 years, 73% were female and 92% were Caucasian. Super-utilizers were older (+2.1 years; p = 0.012), had greater depression (34.2 vs 25.7%; p = 0.03), increased frailty (p = 0.009) comorbidities (p = 0.005), higher reoperation rates (54.4 vs 15.0%; p < 0.001), hospital length of stay (+ 3 days; p < 0.0001), higher surgical invasiveness (+28.6; p < 0.001), more vertebrae fused (+ 3; p < 0.0001); interbody fusions (80 vs 55%; p < 0.0001), bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) use (87.3 vs 69.4%; p = 0.0001), operative time (+91 min; p < 0.0001), and blood loss (+620 mL; p < 0.0001) compared to other ASD patients. Index cost was 65% (p < 0.0001), and cost/quality-adjusted life-year was three times higher among super-utilizers. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ASD patients with depression who undergo more complex or revision spinal surgical procedures are more likely to be super-utilizers. Identifying likely super-utilizers within the ASD population may enable targeted interventions and preoperative planning to reduce unnecessary costs, while improving patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to determine whether increased cell saver (CS) salvage transfusion to estimated blood loss (EBL) ratio (CS:EBL) is a driver in the development of cardiopulmonary (CP) and/or renal complications. METHODS:Patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) enrolled in a multicenter, observational prospective study from 13 spinal deformity centers in North America were queried. Eligible participants met at least one of the following radiographic and/or procedural inclusion criteria: pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch ≥ 25°, T1 pelvic angle ≥ 30°, sagittal vertical axis ≥ 15 cm, thoracic scoliosis ≥ 70°, thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis ≥ 50°, global coronal malalignment ≥ 7 cm, having undergone a 3-column osteotomy, spinal fusion ≥ 12 levels, and/or age ≥ 65 years with ≥ 7 levels of instrumentation. Patients were dichotomized based on whether their CS:EBL was ≥ or < 0.33. Patients who did not have CS transfused intraoperatively were excluded. Key outcomes included renal and CP-related medical complications. Patient characteristics, preoperative laboratory results, operative data, and radiographic parameters were compared using appropriate statistical tests. A conceptual multivariable logistic regression model was built to assess risk factors associated with the primary outcome. RESULTS:Four hundred six patients were included in this analysis, including 10.6% (n = 43) with a CS:EBL ≥ 0.33 and 89.4% (n = 363) with a CS:EBL < 0.33. The patients with a CS:EBL ≥ 0.33 were significantly older (mean 66.2 [SD 12.2] vs 58.9 [SD 16.4] years, p = 0.0007), experienced less EBL intraoperatively (mean 1048.3 [SD 852.2] vs 1695.6 [SD 1295.3] ml, p < 0.0001), had fewer total instrumented levels (mean 12.2 [SD 3.3] vs 14.1 [SD 3.6] levels, p = 0.0001), had fewer posterior column osteotomies performed (72.1% vs 86.8%, p = 0.0103), and had less major coronal Cobb angle correction (mean -17.0° [SD 14.6°] vs -22.7° [SD 16.7°], p = 0.0373). Despite comparable transfusion rates, patients with a CS:EBL ≥ 0.33 had fewer packed red blood cell (RBC), fresh frozen plasma, and platelet units transfused intraoperatively (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed among overall CP and renal complications. However, when stratifying CP complications by type, patients with a CS:EBL ≥ 0.33 experienced a significantly greater rate of pulmonary embolisms (PEs; 9.3% vs 1.4%, p = 0.0093) within 30 days of surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for the significant differences between the two groups found a CS:EBL ≥ 0.33 to be an independent risk factor for the development of a PE, conferring an odds ratio of 6.57 (95% CI 1.75-24.66) with excellent model diagnostics (model p value = 0.0031, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS:Patients with a high CS:EBL were at a significantly greater risk of developing a PE within the early postoperative period independent of blood loss and operative complexity. The findings support the re-evaluation of salvaged RBC use in this patient population based on perceived benefits.

OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to determine predictors of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) following cervical spinal deformity surgery. METHODS:A retrospective review was performed of a prospective, multicenter adult cervical spinal deformity database. All patients had baseline and 1-year NDI scores. Patients met MCID with an improvement of NDI by 7 points between baseline and 1 year, as previously established. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and both baseline and 1-year spinopelvic parameters were evaluated for statistical significance in a univariate logistic regression analysis. Significant variables, in addition to baseline NDI, were analyzed in a multivariable logistic regression model by backward selection with Akaike information criterion minimization. RESULTS:A total of 122 patients were included with a median age of 62 (IQR 56, 69) years; 62% of patients were female. Of the 122 patients, 72 (59%) achieved NDI MCID at 1 year. Predictors of achieving MCID on univariate analysis included a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) total score (OR 0.70, p = 0.03), depression as a comorbidity (OR 2.9, p = 0.02), lower C2 tilt at the 1-year follow-up (OR 0.92, p = 0.02), and a greater difference between 1-year postoperative C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and preoperative C2-7 SVA (OR 0.98, p = 0.0495). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, predictors of achieving MCID included a lower CCI (OR 0.62, p = 0.03), depression as a comorbidity (OR 3.1, p = 0.059), a greater change in C2-7 SVA at the 1-year follow-up compared with baseline (OR 0.97, p = 0.055), and baseline NDI (OR 1.02, p = 0.24) with an area under the curve of 0.74. CONCLUSIONS:The best-fit multivariable model included higher baseline NDI, a greater change in C2-7 SVA, patient-reported baseline depression, and lower CCI as important factors in predicting NDI MCID.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Thoracolumbar spinal deformity frequently coexists with cervical spine deformity (CD) and lower extremity osteoarthritis (OA), complicating management and compounding functional disability. This study investigates the additive burden of these conditions on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS:This retrospective analysis assessed primary thoracolumbar deformity patients undergoing corrective surgery. Demographics, spinopelvic alignment, and PROMs were characterized. Severe CD was defined by ≥1 Ames criterion. Hip (HOA) and knee (KOA) OA were defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥3. Hierarchical regression and mixed-effects models evaluated the incremental and longitudinal impacts of these conditions on PROMs. RESULTS:Among 816 patients (mean age 60.4 years, 67.1% female), 24.8% had CD, 43.7% HOA, and 40.4% KOA at baseline. Regression revealed that HOA worsened Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) total (R2 = 0.056, P = .008), ODI Walking (R2 = 0.121, P <.001), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (R2 = 0.108, P = .013), and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical Component Score (PCS) (R2 = 0.098, P = .022). KOA primarily affected pain and psychosocial outcomes, including ODI Pain (R2 = 0.033, P = .001), PROMIS Depression (R2 = 0.018, P = .002), Scoliosis Research Society-22 Mental (R2 = 0.033, P = .004), and VR-12 Mental Component Score (R2 = 0.023, P = .025). CD contributed to ODI (R2 = 0.063, P = .018) and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Activity (R2 = 0.044, P = .032). Mixed-effects models showed improvements in all PROMs from baseline to 2-year follow-up (P <.001). However, HOA reduced improvements in ODI (3.41 points, P = .009), PROMIS Physical Function (1.37 points, P = .009), and VR-12 PCS (2.21 points, P = .003). KOA was associated with reduced walking tolerance (ODI Walking: 0.21 points, P = .020) and increased psychological burden (PROMIS Anxiety: 1.71 points, P = .007; VR-12 MCS: 2.01 points, P = .027). CD affected ODI Walking (0.51 points, P = .007) and VR-12 PCS (3.19 points, P = .043). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:HOA patients undergoing deformity correction have worse preoperative physical disability and impaired postoperative functional recovery. KOA is associated with greater psychological burden. Severe CD has smaller physical impact. These findings highlight the need for individualized, multidisciplinary management strategies, with particular emphasis on early identification and targeted intervention for hip pathology to optimize outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Prospective, multi-center analysis. OBJECTIVE:Evaluate preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative health related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes for adult spine deformity (ASD) using legacy HRQOL measures and computer adaptive testing (CAT) version of the patient reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:PROMIS is the NIH recommended measure for patient reported outcomes. No data exists evaluating minimum 2-year ASD surgical outcomes using PROMIS CAT compared to legacy HRQOL measures. METHODS:ASD patients > 18 years of age were enrolled into a prospective, multi-center, observational study. Patients were administered legacy HRQOLs (SRS-22r, ODI, NRS back and leg pain, VR-12) and PROMIS CAT for Pain Interference, Physical Function, Satisfaction with Participation in Social Roles, Satisfaction with Participation in Discretionary Social Activities, Depression, and Anxiety. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative HRQOL scores were compared and ASD PROMIS scores were compared to general population PROMIS values. RESULTS:144 of 190 patients had complete data at minimum 2-year follow-up. Mean preoperative values included: age=62.6 years, scoliosis=34.2°, SVA=74.2mm, PI-LL=16.7. At mean 2.3 year follow-up surgical treatment improved spine alignment (scoliosis=14.7°, SVA=34.5mm, and PI-LL=4.5°; P<0.0001). All legacy HRQOL and PROMIS scores improved from preoperative to minimum 2-year postoperative (P<0.005). Referencing PROMIS scores to normative values demonstrated 50-85% of ASD patients preoperatively reported moderate-severe deficits in all domains. At minimum 2-year postoperative 52-88% of ASD patients reported normal values-mild deficits in all PROMIS domains. PROMIS social health domains demonstrated the greatest improvement. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first study evaluating minimum 2-year ASD surgical outcomes using PROMIS CAT. ASD patients demonstrated postoperative improvements in all PROMIS health domains, with the social health domains improving most. The majority of ASD patients reported normal PROMIS values at minimum 2-years postoperative.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE:The ISSG-AO Spinal Deformity Complication Classification System (SDCCS) predicts Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) coding and cost. BACKGROUND:Inconsistent definitions of complications contribute to variation in reported surgical complication rates. Incorrect complication reporting can lead to over or under DRG reimbursement. The ISSG-AO SDCCS provides improved complication reporting reproducibility and may help predict complication costs. METHODS:ASD patients were grouped into: DRG without complication or comorbidity (CC) or Major CC (MCC) (DRGs 455 & 458), with CC (DRGs 454 & 457), and with MCC (DRGs 453 & 456). Complications were graded by intervention severity per ISSG-AO system: grade 0 (none), 1 (mild-e.g., med change), 2 (moderate-e.g., ICU), 3 (severe-e.g., reoperation). Cost were based on Medicare inpatient prospective payment system (IPSS, Medicare Allowable rate). A multinomial logistic model identified key predictors of DRG assignment by complication grades. RESULTS:Of the 675 patients, 14% were in DRGs without CC/MCC, 71% in DRGs with CC, and 15% were DRGs with MCC. Patients with complications requiring intervention mostly fell into the higher DRG categories (97%). Patients who received an intervention are approximately 6.75 (2.01-22.75, P<.0021) times more likely to be classified under DRG with CC and 15.72 (95% CI, 4.23-58.45, P<.0001) times more likely to be classified with DRG with MCC compared to those who did not receive an intervention. Each unit increase in Edmonton Frailty Score raises the odds of being in DRG with MCC by 1.24 (95% CI 1.04-1.48, P 0.017). Similar trends were seen for OR time and LOS. Reimbursement showed incremental increase from $49.5K to $56K to $70K across DRG categories. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with elevated ISSG-AO scores are more likely to be categorized into higher DRGs, experience extended lengths of stay and generate greater healthcare expenditures. The ISSG-AO SDCCS predicts DRG thereby helping standardize complication reporting.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare the impact of lumbar lordosis correction achieved by cephalad versus caudal distribution on radiographic alignment and surgical outcomes among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients. METHODS:Patients who underwent ASD surgery with uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) at or above L1, had preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) > 10°, and had full-body radiographs available were included. Eligible patients were categorized by the focus of lordosis correction: caudal (L4-S1 lordosis between 35 and 45°) and cephalad lordosis-based correction. Patient demographics, preoperative and 2 years spinopelvic alignment and PROMs, and 2 years postoperative surgical complications were compared. RESULTS:In total, 187 (111 caudal and 76 cephalad) patients were included, with mean age of 66.2 years, 78.6% female, and mean frailty score of 3.6. Caudally-restored patients often had an upper thoracic UIV, sacrum/ilium LIV, longer length of fusion, and no lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) while cephaladly-restored patients had two or more LLIFs above L4 (p < 0.001). Preoperatively, there were no significant differences in radiographic alignment and PROMs between the two groups (p > 0.02). Two years postoperatively, caudally-restored patients had higher L1-S1 LL (p = 0.015) and L4-S1 LL (p < 0.001), and lower PI-LL (p = 0.039) and SVA (p = 0.001). In addition, they had higher SRS-22 activity (p = 0.045), pain (p = 0.047), appearance (p = 0.046), and total (p = 0.016) scores. Finally, they had lower rates of sensory deficits (p < 0.001), motor deficits (p = 0.003), implant failure (p = 0.092), and reoperation (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Caudal lordosis-based correction of spinal deformity patients was associated with higher PROMs and lower rates of neurologic deficits, implant failure, and revisions at 2 years. These findings, while subject to unmeasured confounding, indicate that great caution should be taken when considering cephalad-based correction of ASD.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE:To examine the degree of overlap between disability, multimorbidity, and frailty in a cohort of ASD patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Frailty is a popular topic in spine research, as it is a reported risk factor for poor outcomes. Disability, multimorbidity, and frailty can coexist, sometimes causing or exacerbating one another. It is important to distinguish these conditions for perioperative optimization and to guide research initiatives. METHODS:A multicenter registry of ASD patients was queried for baseline data regarding frailty, as measured by the Edmonton Frail Scale, disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index, and multimorbidity, as measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index. The relationships between these measures and both chronological and biological age (PhenoAge) were explored. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) examined areas of overlap between these diagnoses. RESULTS:There were 861 patients contributing data, mostly female (68%), most undergoing primary surgery at a median age of 66 years (Interquartile Range (55.1-71.6), with 6% classified as "Frail." Chronological and PhenoAge showed weak to moderate associations with disability and frailty, though PhenoAge was stronger. There was no evidence of distinct clusters, rather a continuity of condition severity. EFA found overlap between subjective and objective measures of disability, function, and frailty. CONCLUSIONS:Frailty was rare (6%) in this multicenter cohort of patients. Conflation of disability and frailty is a real risk due to overlap in measures of both conditions. Disability and frailty do not form discrete categories but rather exist along a continuum, underscoring the need to abandon categorical labels in favor of continuous measures for both clinical assessment and research settings.