Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine the feasibility of assessing early osteoarthritis (OA) in hips with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) using delayed Gadolinium enhanced MRI of Cartilage (dGEMRIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Thirty-seven hips in 30 patients who had a dGEMRIC scan and radiographic evidence of FAI were identified. Clinical symptoms were assessed. Radiographic measurements were performed to determine acetabular and femoral morphology. The severity of radiographic OA was determined using Tönnis grade and minimum joint space width (JSW). On MRI, the alpha angle was measured on the sagittal oblique slices. Correlations between dGEMRIC index, patient symptoms, morphologic measurements, radiographic OA, and age were determined. RESULTS:Significant correlations were observed between dGEMRIC index, pain (P < 0.05), and alpha angle (P < 0.05). The correlation of dGEMRIC with alpha angle suggests that hips with more femoral deformity show signs of early OA. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The results of osteoplasty for FAI depend on the amount of pre-existing OA in the joint. dGEMRIC may be a useful technique for diagnosis and staging of early osteoarthritis in hips with impingement.

BACKGROUND:Hip dysplasia leads to abnormal loading of articular cartilage, which results in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anatomic and demographic factors associated with the early onset of osteoarthritis in dysplastic hips by utilizing the delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) index as a marker of the disease. METHODS:Ninety-six symptomatic dysplastic hips in seventy-four patients were assessed with standard radiographs and a dGEMRIC scan. The lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg, the acetabular index of Tönnis, and the break in the Shenton line were measured on a standing anteroposterior radiograph. Anterior undercoverage was assessed by measuring the anterior center-edge angle on a Lequesne false-profile view. A labral tear was considered to be present when contrast agent was seen through the entire thickness of the labrum on magnetic resonance arthrography. Osteoarthritis was defined as a dGEMRIC value of <390 msec (two standard deviations below the dGEMRIC index in normal hips). RESULTS:The mean dGEMRIC index (and standard deviation) for this cohort (473 +/- 104 msec) was significantly lower than that of a morphologically normal hip (570 +/- 90 msec). The anterior center-edge angle, the joint space width, and the presence of a labral tear were all found to be associated with osteoarthritis in the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified age, the anterior center-edge angle, and the presence of a labral tear as independent factors associated with osteoarthritis. A second model was fitted with omission of the anterior center-edge angle because the lateral and anterior center-edge angles were highly correlated and the lateral center-edge angle is a more common clinical measure. This model identified age, the lateral center-edge angle, and the presence of a labral tear as significant independent factors associated with osteoarthritis. CONCLUSIONS:As has been demonstrated in previous studies of the hip, this investigation showed osteoarthritis to be associated with increasing age and the severity of dysplasia, as demonstrated both by the Wiberg lateral center-edge angle and the Lequesne anterior center-edge angle. Additionally, we identified a labral tear as being a risk factor for osteoarthritis.

Eight asymptomatic volunteers and 10 patients with early hip osteoarthritis (OA) were investigated with hip delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) at 30, 65, 100, and 135 min after IV injection with Gd-DTPA(2-). In asymptomatic volunteers there was a decrease in the dGEMRIC index (T(1)(Gd)) between 30 and 100 min. In patients the wash-in of Gd-DTPA(2-) was faster, with a low T(1)(Gd) at 30 min that did not change significantly over time. Therefore, earlier time points showed a larger separation in T(1)(Gd) between asymptomatic and OA hips, with more convenient timing logistics. However, T(1)(Gd) at 30 min had a larger standard deviation (SD) in the OA group, possibly due to variability of the steep slope of wash-in. This sensitivity to the imaging window may be less desirable for longitudinal studies in which reproducibility is a concern. At all time points, T(1)(Gd) was 20-30% lower in patients than in asymptomatic volunteers (P < 0.003), which demonstrates the sensitivity of dGEMRIC to early hip OA.

BACKGROUND:This study surveyed microsurgeons on treatments chosen for infants with brachial plexus birth palsies who have had failure of antigravity biceps and/or triceps function due to nerve surgery or natural history. METHODS:Questionnaires were sent to surgeons participating in a prospective multicenter brachial plexus birth palsy study. With a response rate of 82 percent, the sample comprised 22 surgeons with extensive experience in treating brachial plexus birth palsy. The survey gathered collective information on two unique clinical groups: (1) infants with no antigravity biceps function but intact antigravity deltoid and radial nerve function and (2) infants with no antigravity radial nerve function (wrist and digital extension, triceps) but intact antigravity biceps and deltoid function. Analysis of data and age-based trends was performed using the Fisher's exact test. RESULTS:With failure of biceps recovery, surgeons preferred microsurgery for children 6 to 18 months old and tendon transfers for children older than 18 months. Both procedures were preferred over observation alone (p < 0.001). With regard to microsurgery techniques, with increasing age, surgeons used nerve transfers more than resected neuroma and grafting. With tendon transfers, regional transfers were performed more than 90 percent of the time at all ages. For patients with no antigravity radial nerve function, most cases at all ages were managed by observation rather than microsurgery or tendon transfers (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:The authors' data indicate a general consensus in treatment choices for the two cases of microsurgical failure in infants with brachial plexus birth palsies as well as in satisfaction among experienced surgeons in using these treatments.

BACKGROUND:Hip dysplasia leads to abnormal loading of articular cartilage, which results in osteoarthritis. Pelvic osteotomies such as the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy can improve the mechanics of the joint, but the results are variable and appear to depend on the amount of preexisting arthritis. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) is a technique designed to measure early arthritis, and it potentially could be used to select hips with too severe arthritis to benefit from a joint-preserving reconstructive procedure. The purpose of our study was to identify radiographic, clinical, and magnetic resonance imaging measurements that predict failure after pelvic osteotomy. METHODS:We performed a cohort study of forty-seven patients undergoing a Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia. Our goal was to identify preoperative radiographic factors, such as the grade of arthritis, joint congruency, and the dGEMRIC index, that are associated with a poor outcome after osteotomy. RESULTS:Hips in which the osteotomy did not fail had a significant decrease in pain compared with their status preoperatively (p < 0.0001). Hips in which the osteotomy did fail had had significantly more arthritis on preoperative radiographs (as demonstrated by the joint space width and the Tönnis grade [p = 0.01]), more subluxation (p = 0.02), and a lower dGEMRIC index (p < 0.001) than the hips in which the osteotomy did not fail. Multivariate analysis identified the dGEMRIC index as the most important predictor of failure of the osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS:Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia can decrease pain and improve function in symptomatic dysplastic hips. The dGEMRIC index, as an early measure of osteoarthritis, appears to be useful for identifying poor candidates for a pelvic osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.