Faculty Bibliography

The destruction of World Trade Center on 11 September 2001 exposed local community members to a complex mixture of known carcinogens and potentially carcinogenic substances. To date, breast cancer has not been characterized in detail in the WTC-exposed civilian populations. The cancer characteristics of breast cancer patients were derived from the newly developed Pan-Cancer Database at the WTC Environmental Health Center (WTC EHC). We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program breast cancer data as a reference source. Between May 2002 and 31 December 2019, 2840 persons were diagnosed with any type of cancer at the WTC EHC, including 601 patients with a primary breast cancer diagnosis (592 women and 9 men). There was a higher proportion of grade 3 (poorly differentiated) tumors (34%) among the WTC EHC female breast cancers compared to that of the SEER-18 data (25%). Compared to that of the SEER data, female breast cancers in the WTC EHC had a lower proportion of luminal A (88% and 65%, respectively), higher proportion of luminal B (13% and 15%, respectively), and HER-2-enriched (5.5% and 7%, respectively) subtypes. These findings suggest considerable differences in the breast cancer characteristics and distribution of breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in the WTC-exposed civilian population compared to that of the general population. This is important because of the known effect of molecular subtypes on breast cancer prognosis.

Changing practice guidelines and recommendations have important implications for cancer survivors. This study investigated genetic testing patterns and outcomes and reported family history of pancreatic cancer (FHPC) in a large registry population of breast cancer (BC) patients. Variables including clinical and demographic characteristics, FHPC in a first or second-degree relative, and genetic testing outcomes were analyzed for BC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in the NYU Langone Health Breast Cancer Database. Among 3334 BC patients, 232 (7%) had a positive FHPC. BC patients with FHPC were 1.68 times more likely to have undergone genetic testing (p < 0.001), but 33% had testing for BRCA1/2 only and 44% had no genetic testing. Pathogenic germline variants (PGV) were identified in 15/129 (11.6%) BC patients with FHPC, and in 145/1315 (11.0%) BC patients without FHPC. Across both groups, updates in genetic testing criteria and recommendations could impact up to 80% of this cohort. Within a contemporary cohort of BC patients, 7% had a positive FHPC. The majority of these patients (56%) had no genetic testing, or incomplete testing by current standards, suggesting under-diagnosis of PC risk. This study supports recommendations for survivorship care that incorporate ongoing genetic risk assessment and counseling.

COVID-19 can be especially dangerous in vulnerable populations such as those with cancer undergoing treatment. When it is discovered in an asymptomatic patient through imaging, there is a paucity of evidence-based treatment recommendations.

BACKGROUND:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has enabled more patients to be eligible for breast-conservation surgery (BCS). Achieving negative lumpectomy margins, however, is challenging due to changes in tissue composition and potentially scattered residual carcinoma in the tumor bed. Data regarding BCS after NAC have shown variable re-excision rates. MarginProbe (Dilon Technologies, Newport News, VA, USA) has been shown to identify positive resection margins intraoperatively and to reduce the number of re-excisions in primary BCS, but has not been studied in NAC+BCS cases. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics, margin status, and re-excision rates for NAC+BCS patients with and without the use of MarginProbe. METHODS:The Institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried for patients who received NAC and had BCS from 2010 to 2019. The variables of interest were demographics, tumor characteristics, pathologic complete response (pCR), MarginProbe use, and re-excision rates. RESULTS:The study population consisted of 214 patients who had NAC, 61 (28.5 %) of whom had NAC+BCS. The median age of the patients was 53.5 years. A pCR was achieved for 19 of the patients (31.1 %). Of the remaining 42 patients, 9 (21 %) had close or positive margins that required re-excision. Re-excision was associated with a larger residual tumor size (p = 0.025) and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease before NAC (p = 0.041). MarginProbe use was associated with a lower re-excision rate for the patients who had NAC+BCS (6 % vs. 31 %, respectively). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The patients with a larger residual tumor burden and ER-positive disease had a greater risk for inadequate margins at surgery. MarginProbe use was associated with a lower re-excision rate. Techniques to reduce the need for re-excision will support the use of BCS after NAC.

The purpose of this work was to develop a novel method to disentangle the intra- and extracellular components of the total sodium concentration (TSC) in breast cancer from a combination of proton ([Formula: see text]H) and sodium ([Formula: see text]) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. To do so, TSC is expressed as function of the intracellular sodium concentration ([Formula: see text]), extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and the water fraction (WF) based on a three-compartment model of the tissue. TSC is measured from [Formula: see text] MRI, ECV is calculated from baseline and post-contrast [Formula: see text]H [Formula: see text] maps, while WF is measured with a [Formula: see text]H chemical shift technique. [Formula: see text] is then extrapolated from the model. Proof-of-concept was demonstrated in three healthy subjects and two patients with triple negative breast cancer. In both patients, TSC was two to threefold higher in the tumor than in normal tissue. This alteration mainly resulted from increased [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] 30 mM), which was [Formula: see text] 130% greater than in healthy conditions (10-15 mM) while the ECV was within the expected range of physiological values (0.2-0.25). Multinuclear MRI shows promise for disentangling [Formula: see text] and ECV by taking advantage of complementary [Formula: see text]H and [Formula: see text] measurements.

The management of intraductal papilloma (IDP) diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) is controversial due to the variable upgrade rates to breast carcinoma (BC) on subsequent surgical excision reported in the literature. The purpose of our study was to investigate the upgrade rate of IDP diagnosed on CNB to BC in subsequent surgical excision and the impact of clinical, pathologic and radiologic variables. This is a retrospective cohort of all women who had a diagnosis of IDP on a CNB between 2005 and 2018 in a tertiary academic center with subsequent surgical excision. Upgrade was defined as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinoma on surgical excision. Statistical analyses included Pearson's chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum and logistic regression. A total of 216 women with IDP in a CNB were included. Nineteen patients (8.8%) upgraded to BC in the overall cohort, including 14 DCIS and 5 invasive carcinomas. An upgrade rate of 27% was found in atypical IDP (14 of 51 cases), while only 3% of pure IDP upgraded to BC (5 of 165 cases). Older age (>53 years) at time of biopsy (OR=1.05, 95%CI 1.01-1.09, p=0.027) and concomitant atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) (OR=9.69, 95%CI 3.37-27.81, p<0.0001) were significantly associated with upgrade. Our results support surgical excision of IDP on CNB when associated with ADH or diagnosed in women older than 53 years of age. The low surgical upgrade rate of 3% for pure IDP on CNB in younger women should be part of the management discussion.

Background/Objective: According to the US Census data, adoptees account for 2.5% of the US population (7.8 million). However, the number of adoptees diagnosed with breast cancer is unknown. Many adoptees face the unique challenge of lacking access to their family health history and limited access to screening and risk-reducing interventions. This important health disparity among adoptees has raised awareness in the importance genetic testing (GT), although it does not completely fill the disparity gap of lacking family history. The National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) released an updated position statement in 2018 that supported the use of genetic testing, including genome-wide testing, for adopted adults. The purpose of our study was to investigate the adoptees in a cohort of newly diagnosed breast cancers and to look at the clinicopathologic characteristics, including the uptake of genetic testing, and to see if there were any differences compared to the non-adopted breast cancer patients.
Method(s): The Institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried for all patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010-2018. Variables of interest included adoption status and other clinical and tumor characteristics. Statistical analyses included descriptive and Pearson's Chi Square tests.
Result(s): Out of 3,507 patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer, 34 (1%) were adopted. The median age at diagnosis for the total population was 60 years (range 23-96 years). When we compared the adopted and non-adopted groups, age was not statistically different (p=0.817); race was not statistically different (p=0.077), although there was a slightly higher proportion of Hispanics in the adopted vs. non-adopted cohorts (15% vs. 6%). When we looked at genetic testing, 56% of the adoptees were tested compared to 45% of non-adopted patients, but this was not significant (p=0.229). All adopted patients were negative for BRCA1/2 and other mutations. Interestingly, 29% of the adopted patients had a first-degree relative with breast cancer compared to 31% of non-adopted patients. The tumor characteristics between the adopted and non-adopted cohorts were not statistically different. The majority had early stage (Stage 0, I, II) disease (93%), invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (73%), and ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative cancers (71%).
Conclusion(s): In a contemporary cohort of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, we found no difference between the adopted and non-adopted patients based on age, race, education, and tumor characteristics. However, there was a higher proportion of adopted patients who got genetic testing compared to the non-adopted cohort. Both groups also reported a similar proportion of having a first-degree relative with breast cancer, which indicates the increased communication between the adoptees and their biological parents

Women with breast biopsies showing high-risk proliferative lesions such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Other factors including age, family history of breast cancer, and extent of AH may play a role in increasing breast cancer risk. In addition to women with AH, there is a subset of women with a positive family history of breast cancer, without a known germline mutation, which places them also at an increased risk for breast cancer. Clinical management, screening, chemoprevention, and surgical risk-reduction are discussed in this review to inform the management of these high-risk women. Advanced imaging technology, pharmacologic research into different targets, and innovations in breast reconstruction are changing the way in which patients are counseled of their individual risk.