Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Donor pool expansion is critical as lung candidates suffer high mortality, yet older donor lungs remain underutilized. We evaluated whether accepting an older donor (defined 4 ways: donor age 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, or 60-69 y) lung transplant was associated with a survival benefit over waiting for a younger donor offer. METHODS:Adult candidates who received a lung offer were identified using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, 2015-2022. Offers were categorized by donor age and candidate lung allocation score (LAS; <40, 40-55, >55). Postoffer mortality was compared between candidates for whom the offer was accepted ("acceptors") versus declined ("decliners") within each age-LAS category using weighted Cox regression. RESULTS:A total of 21 426 candidates received an offer from a donor age ≥30 y; 11 679 accepted. For LAS >55 candidates, a survival benefit was observed for acceptors of donors ages 30-39 y (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] of mortality: 0.450.520.59), 40-49 y (wHR: 0.610.700.79), and 50-59 y (wHR: 0.670.770.88); P < 0.001. For candidates with LAS 40-55, results suggest a survival benefit of accepting lung offers from donors age 30-39 y (wHR: 0.770.870.99) and 40-49 y (wHR: 0.760.870.99); P = 0.03. However, for candidates with LAS <40, a survival benefit was not observed for accepting any older donor transplant, with possible harm in accepting an age 50+ donor offer. CONCLUSIONS:Compared with declining and waiting for a younger donor offer, accepting an older donor lung transplant was associated with a survival advantage in candidates with high LAS in the precontinuous distribution era. Decision makers should consider these findings while recognizing potential changes in waiting time dynamics in the current era.

Racial/ethnic disparities in the deceased organ donor referral process may contribute to the organ shortage and place minority communities at a greater disadvantage. Prior literature cites substantial inequalities, though methodological concerns may bias estimates. Using Organ Retrieval and Collection of Health Information for Donation data, we conducted a simulation study and re-analysis of 132,968 referrals 2015-2021 across six organ procurement organizations (OPOs). We excluded brain death declaration and cause/mechanism/circumstances of death from the approach model and conducted Poisson regression with robust standard errors. We found Black patients were approached at a more similar rate relative to White patients, although disparities remained (incidence rate ratio (IRR): _0.910.94_0.97). Black patients provided authorization at a 31% lower rate than White patients (IRR: _0.670.69_0.71). Slight disparities were observed at procurement (IRR: _0.940.96_0.99). Our findings are directionally similar to prior literature but suggest substantially less inequality (vs 23% and 65% higher risk of approach and authorization, for non-Black vs Black referrals). Accurate quantification of racial/ethnic disparities in transplantation impacts public perception of those involved, particularly OPOs, and is paramount to any study. Importantly, continued measures are needed to promote equality among Black and minority patients in our national organ donation and transplant system.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:) and long-term premature cognitive aging. We tested whether CMV was associated with post-KT cognitive impairment. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:In a 2-center prospective cohort study of 574 KTRs (mean age: 54.7 y), we obtained CMV donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus and measured pre- and post-KT cognitive function using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination. We estimated post-KT global cognitive function trajectories by CMV serostatus using adjusted mixed effect models with linear spline terms. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:(slope = 0.01 points/year; 95% CI, -1.87 to 1.89). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:KTRs may be at elevated risk for post-KT cognitive impairment; clinicians may prioritize early interventions in this population.

Transplantation of kidneys from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+) has been shown to be safe and effective, but there is a unique risk of donor-derived HIV-superinfection (HIV-SI) in these recipients. Recipients from a multicenter observational HIV D+/R+ study were examined for HIV-SI using site-directed next-generation sequencing (Illumina). Eighteen HIV D+/R+ kidney transplant recipients had both baseline and follow-up samples that successfully amplified. One recipient was confirmed to have experienced donor-derived HIV-SI at week 26, but did not experience any clinically significant changes. HIV-SI in HIV D+/R+ transplant recipients is rare, and the clinical ramifications appear negligible.

BACKGROUND:People with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are at an increased risk for end-stage lung disease, for which lung transplantation (LT) may be necessary. METHODS:We aimed to characterize the national practice patterns of LT in recipients with HIV (HIV R+) and post-LT outcomes, including rejection in the US over time. Using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data (from January 1, 2004, to December 1, 2024, for practice patterns and from January 1, 2016, to December 1, 2024, for outcomes), we compared 96 adult HIV R+ to 42 341 LT recipients without HIV (HIV R-). We examined the association between HIV and outcomes using Gini coefficients, Cox regression, and modified Poisson regression before and after 2020. RESULTS:HIV R+ LTs increased from 0.1% in 2004 to 0.4% of LTs in 2024 (p = 0.07). Pre-2020, 18 centers performed 80% of HIV R+ LTs (Gini = 0.78); post-2020, 14 centers performed 80% of HIV R+ LTs (Gini = 0.76), indicating no expansion of the practice across centers. HIV R+ did not have an increased risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio pre-2020: 0.91 [95% confidence interval 0.41-1.62], p = 0.7 and post-2020: 1.05 [0.49-3.25], p = 0.8), or increased risk of 1-year rejection rate (adjusted relative risk pre-2020: 0.60 [0.20-1.77], p = 0.3, and post-2020: 0.77 [0.26-2.2], p = 0.6). CONCLUSIONS:Increasing numbers of HIV R+ LTs and comparable outcomes to those without HIV are encouraging, yet few centers perform these transplants.

Impaired cognition in liver recipients has been studied in the immediate posttransplant period but is poorly understood in the long term, despite its importance to quality of life. In a single-center cohort of liver recipients transplanted in 2010-2022 and >1 year after transplant, we assessed cognitive performance using a telephone-based battery. We compared depression, anxiety, and self-reported function by cognitive performance using descriptive statistics. Among 120 participants (median age 65, median 7.3 y after transplant), 25% had below-expectation cognition, 53% at-expectation cognition, and 22% above-expectation. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Below-expectation performance was most commonly observed in verbal learning (28%) and verbal memory (22%). Overall, 46% had symptoms of depression (38%) and/or anxiety (28%); anxiety was less common among those with above-expectation cognition (0%) versus below-expectation (34%) or at-expectation cognition (38%, p=0.01). The impaired global daily function was reported by 36% of recipients but was not associated with objective cognitive performance. Below-expectation cognition was prevalent among 25% of liver recipients at least 1 year after transplant and was associated with a higher likelihood of reporting psychiatric distress. These findings underscore the need for longitudinal assessment of cognitive and mental health outcomes among recipients of liver transplants.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Early post-kidney transplant (KT) changes likely impact body composition, resulting in adverse post-KT outcomes. We estimated post-KT trajectories of computed tomography (CT)-based muscle quantity/quality and tested whether they were associated with mortality and death-censored graft loss (DCGL) among frail and nonfrail recipients. METHODS:We leveraged a cohort of 294 adult KT recipients (December 2008-February 2020) with CT measurements (muscle quantity: skeletal muscle index; muscle quality: skeletal muscle radiation attenuation). We used mixed linear regression models to estimate 3-year post-KT muscle quantity/quality trajectories. Cox proportional hazard models quantified the association between time-varying pre-/post-KT muscle mass measurements and post-KT mortality and DCGL. RESULTS:) was associated with elevated mortality risk (aHR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08-3.70), but not among nonfrail recipients. Among older (≥65 years) recipients, lower muscle quantity was associated with increased DCGL risk (aHR: 2.70, 95% CI: 1.04-7.04), but not among younger recipients. Lower muscle quality (per 10 HU) was associated with elevated mortality (aHR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.61-3.08) and DCGL (aHR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.16-3.12) risk. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Lower pre-/post-KT muscle quantity/quality were associated with higher risks of post-KT adverse outcomes. Pre-/post-KT rehabilitation to improve muscle quantity/quality may be an effective clinical intervention to minimize risks of adverse post-KT outcomes.

Given the unique risk profile of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), characterizing their cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk after COVID-19 remains critical for targeted management. We performed a retrospective analysis of 809 clinically diagnosed symptomatic COVID-19 events among 778 KTRs from one Maryland health system (3/2020-1/2024) to characterize incidence and risk factors of post-COVID-19 CVD. We followed KTRs until composite CVD (acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, heart failure (HF), CVD death), non-CVD death, or one year after COVID-19 and identified risk factors using LASSO-based sub-distribution hazards regression. Incidence of post-COVID CVD was 8.7% at one-year (2.7% ACS, 1.4% stroke, 3.6% HF, and 1.0% CVD death). KTRs with CVD history had higher incidence than those without (19.1% vs 5.0%). Older age, Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, prior CVD, and COVID-19 hospitalization increased post-COVID CVD risk; BMI>30 and treatment with remdesivir decreased post-COVID CVD risk. COVID-19 hospitalization conferred equivalent risk to prior CVD: incidence was 11.2% among KTRs with prior CVD but no hospitalization, 12.0% among KTRs with hospitalization but no prior CVD, 25.2% among KTRs with both, and 1.8% among KTRs with neither. Post-COVID-19 CVD risk was high among KTRs and hospitalization for COVID-19 was as important as having had a prior cardiovascular event.