Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:T cells. Here, using a novel SCLC murine model, we investigated the effects of a mouse version of nemvaleukin (mNemvaleukin) on tumor growth and antitumor immunity. METHODS:SCLC model that mimics human disease was generated. After confirming tumor burden by MRI, mice were randomized into four treatment groups: vehicle, mNemvaleukin alone, chemotherapy (cisplatin+etoposide) alone, or the combination of mNemvaleukin and chemotherapy. Tumor growth was measured by MRI and survival was recorded. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and peripheral blood immune cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Cytokine and chemokine secretion were quantified and transcriptomic analysis was performed to characterize the immune gene signatures. RESULTS:T cells. mNemvaleukin alone, and in combination with chemotherapy, promoted proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production, which was further confirmed by transcriptomic analysis. CONCLUSIONS:mNemvaleukin, a novel cytokine-based immunotherapy, significantly inhibited murine SCLC tumor growth and prolonged survival, which was further enhanced by the addition of chemotherapy. mNemvaleukin alone, and in combination with chemotherapy, drove a strong antitumor immune program elicited by cytotoxic immune cells. Our findings support the evaluation of nemvaleukin alone or in combination with chemotherapy in clinical trials for the treatment of SCLC.

Purpose/Objective(s): Standard therapy for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT), which is usually followed by adjuvant durvalumab. We performed a prospective trial testing sequential pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy without chemotherapy for biomarker-selected LA-NSCLC patients. Materials/Methods: Patients with AJCC version 8 stage III NSCLC or unresectable stage II NSCLC and ECOG performance status 0-1 were eligible for this trial. Subjects with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) >= 50% received three cycles of induction pembrolizumab (200 mg, every 21 days), underwent restaging FDG-PET/CT, received risk-adapted thoracic radiotherapy (55 Gy delivered to tumors or lymph nodes with metabolic tumor volume exceeding 20 cc and 48 Gy delivered to smaller lesions, all in 20 daily fractions), and then received up to 13 cycles of additional pembrolizumab. Subjects with PD-L1 TPS < 50% received concurrent chemoRT, and adjuvant durvalumab was recommended for patients without disease progression. The primary study endpoint was one-year progression-free survival (PFS) for subjects treated with pembrolizumab and radiotherapy (pembroRT), which we hypothesized would exceed 65%. Other study endpoints included 1-year overall survival (OS) and rates of clinician-scored (CTCAE v. 4.03) and patient-reported (PRO-CTCAE) adverse events observed over one year.
Result(s): Twenty-five subjects with PD-L1 TPS >= 50% and 12 subjects with PD-L1 TPS < 50% from three institutions were enrolled between August 2018 and November 2021. Median age was 70. Twenty-four subjects had stage II-IIIA disease, and 13 had stage IIIB-IIIC disease. Except for PD-L1 TPS, subject characteristics did not differ significantly across treatment groups. Ten out of the 12 subjects with ChemoRT received adjuvant durvalumab, and one received adjuvant osimertinib for EGFR mutation. The median follow-up duration is 15 months. Compared to patients treated with chemoRT, treatment with pembroRT has yielded numerically higher 1-year PFS (72% v. 46%, log rank p=0.232) and OS (91% v. 73%, log rank p=0.213) rates. Similar rates of grade 3 physician-scored adverse events have been observed with pembroRT (24%) and chemoRT (25%). Less severe patient-reported adverse events occurred with pembroRT compared to chemoRT (See Table).
Conclusion(s): Treatment with pembrolizumab and risk-adapted radiotherapy without chemotherapy is a promising approach for LA-NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS >= 50%. In addition to yielding high disease control rates, this strategy appears to reduce patient-reported adverse events compared to standard chemoRT and adjuvant therapy.
Copyright

Many decades in the making, immunotherapy has demonstrated its ability to produce durable responses in several cancer types. In the last decade, immunotherapy has shown itself to be a viable therapeutic approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several clinical trials have established the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), particularly in the form of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies and anti-programmed death 1 ligand (PD-L1) antibodies. Many trials have shown progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit with either ICB alone or in combination with chemotherapy when compared to chemotherapy alone. The identification of biomarkers to predict response to immunotherapy continues to be evaluated. The future of immunotherapy in lung cancer continues to hold promise with the development of combination therapies, cytokine modulating therapies and cellular therapies. Lastly, we expect that innovative advances in technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, will begin to play a role in the future care of patients with lung cancer.

The destruction of the World Trade Center towers on 11 September 2001 exposed local residents, workers, and individuals in the area (Survivors) to dust and fumes that included known and suspected carcinogens. Given the potential for inhalation of toxic substances and the long latency after exposure, the incidence of lung cancer is expected to increase in WTC-exposed individuals. We describe the characteristics of women WTC Survivors with lung adenocarcinoma who were enrolled in the WTC Environmental Health Center (WTC EHC) between May 2002 and July 2021. A total of 173 women in WTC EHC had a diagnosis of any type of lung cancer, representing 10% of all cancers in women. Most of the lung cancers (87%) were non-small cell carcinomas, with adenocarcinoma (77%) being the most common subtype. Nearly half (46%) of these patients were exposed to dust clouds on 11 September 2001. Race and ethnicity varied by smoking status, as follows: 44% of Asian women compared with 29% of non-Hispanic White women were never-smokers (p &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference between the pathologic characteristics of adenocarcinomas between never and ever smokers. We also summarize EGFR, ALK, KRAS, ROS-1 and BRAF mutation status stratified by smoking, race and ethnicity. The identification of a relatively high proportion of women never-smokers with lung cancer warrants further investigation into the role of WTC dust exposure.

MET exon 14 skipping alteration (MET∆14Ex) is an actionable oncogenic driver that occurs in 2-4% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. The precise role of MET∆14Ex in tumor progression of NSCLC is poorly understood. Using multiple isogenic MET∆14Ex cell models established with CRISPR editing, we demonstrate that MET∆14Ex expression increases receptor kinase activity and downstream signaling by impairing receptor internalization and endocytic degradation, significantly boosting cell scatter, migration, and invasion capacity in vitro as well as metastasis in vivo. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that MET∆14Ex preferentially activates biological processes associated with cell movement, providing novel insights into its unique molecular mechanism of action. Activation of PI3K/Akt/Rac1 signaling and upregulation of multiple matrix metallopeptidases (MMPs) by MET∆14Ex induced cytoskeleton remodeling and extracellular matrix disassembly, which are critical functional pathways that facilitate cell invasion and metastasis. Therapeutically, MET inhibitors dramatically repressed MET∆14Ex-mediated tumor growth and metastasis in vivo, indicating potential therapeutic options for MET∆14Ex-altered NSCLC patients. These mechanistic insights into MET∆14Ex-mediated invasion and metastasis provide a deeper understanding of the role of MET∆14Ex in NSCLC.

There is growing evidence that molecular testing is feasible on all types of cytological preparation, which is fortunate as more diagnostic markers and biomarkers for targeted therapies are discovered for use in pulmonary and pleural malignancies. In this article we will discuss the pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic (interpretive) considerations for successful implementation of molecular tests for diagnostic and predictive markers in respiratory and pleural cytology. The vast majority of laboratories are familiar with, and have validated their molecular protocols for, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens, which are not directly applicable to cytology specimens. Thus, rigorous validation must be performed for each type of fixative and cytology preparation before it is implemented in the clinical setting.

Patients with one form of cancer are at increased risk for another, and this is true for lung cancer, where synchronous primary lung cancers are an increasing multifaceted challenge.^1,2 Here, we present the case of a middle age woman who was found to have bilateral lung masses. Biopsy and subsequent testing revealed unique synchronous lung adenocarcinomas, each with unique genetic signatures. Despite having two unique tumors, she was found to have CHEK2 mutations in both tumors and in germline testing. Because of this extensive testing that showed unique tumors, she was ultimately diagnosed with stage IIIb and IA2 lung cancers, and this changed her treatment options. Consideration of unique primary tumors leads to thorough diagnostics, which changed this patient's diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. We hope this case raises awareness for multiple primary tumors, as well as CHEK2 as an important oncogene.

Background Siglec-15 (S15) is a member of the Siglec family of immunoglobulin superfamily proteins involved in immune regulation. NC318 is a first-in-class humanized IgG1k monoclonal antibody that blocks S15-mediated immune suppression. Methods The Phase 1 dose-escalation study was a classical 3 +3 design in 15 tumor types (n=49). Phase 2 (n=47) was conducted at 400 mg q2w in 4 tumor types. Inclusion criteria included subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors refractory or resistant to currently available therapies with a TPS PD-L1 score <50%. The median number of previous therapies was >=3, including checkpoint inhibitors (figure 1). Results NC318 was well tolerated with no novel immunologic or safety signals observed. Disease control rate amongst evaluable population (n=83) is 38% {1 CR, 3 PR and 28 SD (stable disease)}. Median duration of disease control is 24 weeks (16-48 weeks) amongst 20 subjects achieving a minimal 16- week duration of stable disease. Two NSCLC subjects (1CR and 1PR) are still on therapy over 2 years. We observed an increase in a soluble form of Siglec-15 (sS15) in all patients receiving NC318 treatment that was dose-dependent. sS15 serves as a pharmacodynamic marker for NC318 activity. PK/ PD modeling of NC318 from this Phase1/2 study using sS15 as a PD marker suggested increasing the dose of NC318 to 800 mg q1w to enhance overall exposure of NC318. Development of an S15 specific IHC assay allowed us to do posthoc analysis by immuno-histochemistry (IHC) from screening biopsies amongst subjects who showed disease control (CR, PR and SD) compared to subjects with progressive disease. S15 expression on tumor cell membrane was a predictor for stable disease, longer duration on therapy when compared to progressive disease {H score >= 1 (p=0.046), including NSCLC subjects}, as well as for progression-free survival (PFS) (figures 2 and 3). There was no correlation with the outcome whether PD-L1 was positive or negative. Together, development of a predictive indicator of S15 staining coupled with the NC318 PK/PD data, resulted in a protocol amendment to prospectively enroll subjects with Siglec-15+ adenocarcinoma lung, squamous H&N, and breast cancers at 800 mg q1w. Soluble S15, immunophenotyping, cytokine and chemokine levels and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions NC318 shows promising early evidence of disease control in subjects with Siglec-15 positive advanced or metastatic solid tumors in phase 1 & 2 studies, prompting evaluation of S15 expression as a predictive biomarker in the prospective study at 800mg q1w dosing

Background XmAb20717 is a humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody that simultaneously targets PD-1 and CTLA-4. We report updated data on patients treated at the recommended expansion dose from an ongoing, multicenter, Phase 1, doseescalation and -expansion study of intravenous XmAb20717 in patients with selected advanced solid tumors that progressed after treatment with all standard therapies or with no standard therapeutic options. Methods A maximum tolerated dose was not reached in dose escalation. XmAb20717 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) was selected as the expansion dose, based on consistent T-cell proliferation in peripheral blood indicative of dual PD-1/CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade, and response to treatment (RECIST [1.1]).1 Parallel expansion cohorts included ~20 patients each with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and a basket of tumor types without an FDAapproved checkpoint inhibitor (CI). Patients treated with 10 mg/kg in dose escalation were pooled with expansion cohorts for analysis of clinical activity and safety. Results As of 9 June 2021, 110 patients, ranging in age from 39 to 89 years and 66.4% male, were treated, and 5 were continuing treatment. Patients had received a median of 4 prior systemic treatment regimens, including CI therapy for 64.5%. The objective response rate was 13.0% (10/77 patients evaluable for efficacy), including 1 complete response (melanoma [confirmed]) and 9 partial responses (confirmed: 1 melanoma, 2 RCC, 2 CRPC, 1 ovarian cancer; unconfirmed: 1 melanoma, 2 NSCLC). The CRPC responders (2/7 with RECIST-measurable disease) had confirmed PSA decreases >= 50% from baseline (to 0.02 and 0.3 ng/mL); neither had progression on bone scans. All responders had prior CI exposure, except those with CRPC. Robust CD4 and CD8 T-cell activation was seen. Low baseline tumoral expression of myeloid recruitment genes, including IL-8, was associated with clinical benefit. Grade >= 3 immunotherapy-related adverse events in >= 3 patients included rash (16.4%), transaminase elevations (9.1%), hyperglycemia (4.5%), acute kidney injury (3.6%), amylase and lipase increased (2.7%), and lipase increased (2.7%). Conclusions Preliminary data indicate 10 mg/kg XmAb20717 Q2W was associated with complete and partial responses in multiple tumor types and was generally well-tolerated in these heavily pretreated patients with advanced cancer. Changes in T-cell populations in the periphery and tumor are consistent with robust dual checkpoint blockade. These findings support further development of XmAb20717 in advanced solid tumors, including metastatic prostate cancer