Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE:To investigate if metformin use reduces the odds of developing new neovascular AMD (nAMD). METHODS:This is a case-control study of 86,930 subjects with new diagnoses of nAMD and 86,918 matched control subjects using the Merative Marketscan Research Databases. Subjects were analyzed using multivariable conditional logistic regression to identify the risks of various exposures on developing nAMD. A subgroup analysis of 22,117 diabetic cases and 21,616 diabetic control subjects was also performed. RESULTS:Metformin use was associated with reduced odds ratio of developing nAMD (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.98) in full sample and diabetic cohort particularly in patients without any diabetic retinopathy-an effect that persisted after Bonferroni correction. In the diabetic cohort without diabetic retinopathy, reduced odds ratio was observed at 24-month cumulative doses of 1 to 300 g, 301 to 630 g, and 631 to 1,080 g. CONCLUSION:Metformin use was associated with reduced odds ratio of nAMD, particularly in patients without diabetic retinopathy. The protective effect was noted for 24-month cumulative doses below 1,080 g. Metformin may be a novel preventive strategy for nAMD.

PURPOSE:To evaluate risk factors associated with severe retinopathy of prematurity ROP (sROP) in two separate cohorts of infants. METHODS:We performed a retrospective study of the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database between 2003 and 2022. Infants with ROP were stratified into two cohorts: group A (defined as infants with both birth weight [BW] <1000 g and gestational age [GA] <29 weeks) and group B (defined as infants with either BW ≥1000 g or GA ≥29 weeks). Infants with sROP were defined as those who received treatment for ROP. Outpatient and inpatient claims using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify neonatal comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for sROP requiring treatment with respect to various comorbidities. RESULTS:A total of 425 of 8,789 infants with ROP developed sROP (4.8%). We identified 2,726 infants in group A, of whom 387 (14.2%) required a procedure, and 6,063 in group B, of whom 38 (0.6%) required a procedure. In group A, intraventricular hemorrhage (OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.09-1.74) and patent ductus arteriosus ligation (OR = 1.65; 95% CI, 1.25-2.16) were the comorbidities that significantly increased the odds of sROP on multivariable analysis. In group B, infection (OR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.01-3.80) was the only comorbidity that significantly increased the adjusted odds of sROP. CONCLUSIONS:Risk factors for sROP may differ between smaller and larger infants. Infection may serve as an important risk factor for ROP progression amongst larger infants due to its connection with poor postnatal growth.

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is a relatively common retinal disorder that leads to central vision impairment, often with a high recurrence rate. The exact etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms have not been fully elucidated but are likely to be associated with hyperpermeability of the choroidal capillaries and failure of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), leading to serous detachment of the neurosensory retina. Multimodal imaging plays a critical role in the diagnostic approach and monitoring of CSCR. Fortunately, the natural course of the disease is usually self-limiting, with spontaneous resolution and total fluid reabsorption. However, some patients may exhibit recurrences or persistent subretinal fluid (chronic CSCR), leading to progressive and irreversible RPE atrophy or photoreceptor damage. Thus, to prevent permanent visual loss, individualized treatment should be considered. Recent developments in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach have contributed to better outcomes in patients with CSCR. More studies are required to improve our understanding of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment, with a significant impact on the management of this challenging clinical entity. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge about the clinical features, diagnostic workup, and therapeutic approach of CSCR.

PURPOSE:To examine the efficacy and clinical characteristics of successful full-thickness macular hole closure with topical therapy. METHODS:Retrospective case series of full-thickness macular holes managed by a single retinal physician (DS) diagnosed and treated from 2017 to 22. RESULTS:Of 168 patients with full-thickness macular holes, 71 patients were started on steroid, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory (NSAID) drops. 49 patients (mean 67 years, 59% women) were included in the analysis, and 22 patients were excluded for poor follow-up. In total, 7/49 were secondary post-PPV holes and 42/49 were idiopathic. In addition, 18/49 eyes (36.7%) achieved closure on topical therapy, of which 13 were idiopathic. Hole size was directly correlated with odds of closure: for every 10 μm decrease in size and odds of closure increased by 1.2× ( P = 0.001, CI 1.1-1.4). Average time to closure was 107.2 days (range 20-512 days) and was not correlated with hole size ( P = 0.217, CI -0.478 to +1.938). The presence of VMT was found to be inversely related to successful closure (OR 6.1, P = 0.029, CI 1.2-31.3). There was no significant difference in final best-corrected visual acuity for eyes undergoing primary pars plana vitrectomy versus those trialing drops before undergoing pars plana vitrectomy ( P = 0.318, CI -0.094 to +0.112). CONCLUSION:In the first study to date to report the overall efficacy and clinical characteristics of successful macular hole closure with topical therapy, drops achieved an overall closure rate of 36.7%, with higher efficacy in smaller holes and those without VMT. Rates of MH narrowing and reduction in central foveal thickness acted as predictors of effectiveness of drop therapy.