Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:tonga02

Total Results:

60


Deep Learning-based Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via a Unified Model for Prostate Lesion Detection Using Multisite Biparametric MRI Datasets

Li, Hao; Liu, Han; von Busch, Heinrich; Grimm, Robert; Huisman, Henkjan; Tong, Angela; Winkel, David; Penzkofer, Tobias; Shabunin, Ivan; Choi, Moon Hyung; Yang, Qingsong; Szolar, Dieter; Shea, Steven; Coakley, Fergus; Harisinghani, Mukesh; Oguz, Ipek; Comaniciu, Dorin; Kamen, Ali; Lou, Bin
Purpose To determine whether the unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) method with generated images improves the performance of a supervised learning (SL) model for prostate cancer (PCa) detection using multisite biparametric (bp) MRI datasets. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included data from 5150 patients (14 191 samples) collected across nine different imaging centers. A novel UDA method using a unified generative model was developed for PCa detection using multisite bpMRI datasets. This method translates diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and individual diffusion-weighted (DW) images acquired using various b values, to align with the style of images acquired using b values recommended by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines. The generated ADC and DW images replace the original images for PCa detection. An independent set of 1692 test cases (2393 samples) was used for evaluation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the primary metric, and statistical analysis was performed via bootstrapping. Results For all test cases, the AUC values for baseline SL and UDA methods were 0.73 and 0.79 (P < .001), respectively, for PCa lesions with PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and 0.77 and 0.80 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater. In the 361 test cases under the most unfavorable image acquisition setting, the AUC values for baseline SL and UDA were 0.49 and 0.76 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 3 or greater and 0.50 and 0.77 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater. Conclusion UDA with generated images improved the performance of SL methods in PCa lesion detection across multisite datasets with various b values, especially for images acquired with significant deviations from the PI-RADS-recommended DWI protocol (eg, with an extremely high b value). Keywords: Prostate Cancer Detection, Multisite, Unsupervised Domain Adaptation, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, b Value Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
PMCID:11449150
PMID: 39166972
ISSN: 2638-6100
CID: 5771572

Implications of MRI contrast enhancement following focal prostate cancer cryoablation

Wysock, James; Persily, Jesse; Tong, Angela; Rapoport, Eli; Zaslavsky, Ben; Tafa, Majlinda; Lepor, Herbert
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Local disease recurrence following focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer may be due to failure to eradicate focal disease or development of disease in the untreated prostate (in- and out-of-field recurrences). Several studies suggest in-field contrast enhancement (CE) on post-treatment multi-parametric (mp) MRI between 6-12 months following FT indicates residual disease. The present study assesses the incidence and oncologic implications of early CE observed following primary partial gland cryoablation (PPGCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:The surveillance protocol for men enrolled in our prospective outcomes study following PPGCA included mpMRI at 6-12 months, 2 years, 3.5 years, and 5 years. All cases of in-field early CE were re-reviewed retrospectively and graded using the previously described Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation scoring system. All patients exhibiting early CE were re-evaluated by a single radiologist at 2-year mpMRI Results: A total of 320 men enrolled in our PPGCA outcomes study had at least 6 months of follow up. Three hundred fifteen (98%) of these men had undergone post-PPGCA mpMRI at 6-12 months. Of these men, 9 were found to have early in-field CE and 8 underwent repeat MRI at 2 years. In all 8 cases, the CE resolved on the 2-year mpMRI. Of these 8 patients, seven underwent repeat protocol biopsy at 2 years and in-field significant disease was detected in only 1 case. CONCLUSIONS:The most compelling evidence that early CE is not indicative of prostate cancer recurrence is that all lesions resolved within 24 months. While incidence of early CE is low, its consistent resolution calls into question the clinical significance of this finding after PPGCA.
PMID: 39462529
ISSN: 1195-9479
CID: 5746622

Accelerated Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver at 1.5 T With Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction: Impact on Image Quality and Lesion Detection

Ginocchio, Luke A; Jaglan, Sonam; Tong, Angela; Smereka, Paul N; Benkert, Thomas; Chandarana, Hersh; Shanbhogue, Krishna P
OBJECTIVE:To perform image quality comparison between deep learning-based multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (DL-mb-DWI), accelerated multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (accelerated mb-DWI), and conventional multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (conventional mb-DWI) in patients undergoing clinical liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS:Fifty consecutive patients who underwent clinical MRI of the liver at a 1.5-T scanner, between September 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022, were included in this study. Three radiologists independently reviewed images using a 5-point Likert scale for artifacts and image quality factors, in addition to assessing the presence of liver lesions and lesion conspicuity. RESULTS:DL-mb-DWI acquisition time was 65.0 ± 2.4 seconds, significantly (P < 0.001) shorter than conventional mb-DWI (147.5 ± 19.2 seconds) and accelerated mb-DWI (94.3 ± 1.8 seconds). DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores than conventional mb-DWI for conspicuity of the left lobe (P < 0.001), sharpness of intrahepatic vessel margin (P < 0.001), sharpness of the pancreatic contour (P < 0.001), in-plane motion artifact (P = 0.002), and overall image quality (P = 0.005) by reader 2. DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores for conspicuity of the left lobe (P = 0.006), sharpness of the pancreatic contour (P = 0.020), and in-plane motion artifact (P = 0.042) by reader 3. DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores for strength of fat suppression (P = 0.004) and sharpness of the pancreatic contour (P = 0.038) by reader 1. The remaining quality parameters did not reach statistical significance for reader 1. CONCLUSIONS:Novel diffusion-weighted MRI sequence with deep learning-based image reconstruction demonstrated significantly decreased acquisition times compared with conventional and accelerated mb-DWI sequences, while maintaining or improving image quality for routine abdominal MRI. DL-mb-DWI offers a potential alternative to conventional mb-DWI in routine clinical liver MRI.
PMID: 38722777
ISSN: 1532-3145
CID: 5733992

FastMRI Prostate: A public, biparametric MRI dataset to advance machine learning for prostate cancer imaging

Tibrewala, Radhika; Dutt, Tarun; Tong, Angela; Ginocchio, Luke; Lattanzi, Riccardo; Keerthivasan, Mahesh B; Baete, Steven H; Chopra, Sumit; Lui, Yvonne W; Sodickson, Daniel K; Chandarana, Hersh; Johnson, Patricia M
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has experienced remarkable advancements in the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for image acquisition and reconstruction. The availability of raw k-space data is crucial for training AI models in such tasks, but public MRI datasets are mostly restricted to DICOM images only. To address this limitation, the fastMRI initiative released brain and knee k-space datasets, which have since seen vigorous use. In May 2023, fastMRI was expanded to include biparametric (T2- and diffusion-weighted) prostate MRI data from a clinical population. Biparametric MRI plays a vital role in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Advances in imaging methods, such as reconstructing under-sampled data from accelerated acquisitions, can improve cost-effectiveness and accessibility of prostate MRI. Raw k-space data, reconstructed images and slice, volume and exam level annotations for likelihood of prostate cancer are provided in this dataset for 47468 slices corresponding to 1560 volumes from 312 patients. This dataset facilitates AI and algorithm development for prostate image reconstruction, with the ultimate goal of enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis.
PMID: 38643291
ISSN: 2052-4463
CID: 5726322

The "Hungry Judge" effect on prostate MRI reporting: Chronobiological trends from 35'004 radiologist interpretations

Becker, Anton S; Woo, Sungmin; Leithner, Doris; Tong, Angela; Mayerhoefer, Marius E; Vargas, H Alberto
AIM/OBJECTIVE:To investigate the associations between the hour of the day and Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores assigned by radiologists in prostate MRI reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:Retrospective single-center collection of prostate MRI reports over an 8-year period. Mean PI-RADS scores assigned between 0800 and 1800 h were examined with a regression model. RESULTS: = 0.005, p < 0.001), with malignant scores more frequently assigned later in the day. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings suggest chronobiological factors may contribute to variability in radiological assessments. Though the magnitude of the effect is small, this may potentially add variability and impact diagnostic accuracy.
PMID: 39128251
ISSN: 1872-7727
CID: 5701892

Best Practices: Ultrasound Versus MRI in the Assessment of Pelvic Endometriosis

Tong, Angela; Cope, Adela G; Waters, Timothy L; McDonald, Jennifer S; VanBuren, Wendaline
Endometriosis is a common yet morbid disease. Imaging plays an important role in diagnosis and treatment planning. Both ultrasound (US) and MRI are used to detect disease. We performed a literature review to assess whether one is superior. A total of 33 studies from the 4482 identified in the initial search were found to assess the efficacy of US and/or MRI in detecting pelvic endometriosis. Most studies were performed at centers with extensive experience with endometriosis, using dedicated US and MRI protocols. A wide range of sensitivities and specificities was reported, but overall weighted means of diagnostic statistics between US and MRI were similar. The choice of dedicated US versus MRI in evaluation of endometriosis should therefore be based on the expertise in the region. The data also showed US had better accuracy for identifying depth of wall invasion in bowel wall disease, whereas MRI better visualized pelvic wall and extraperitoneal disease. Routine US and MRI protocols performed worse than dedicated US and MRI protocols, which may account for delays in diagnoses. Clinical and research efforts directed at improving the sensitivity of routine imaging for diagnosing deep endometriosis could improve patient access to appropriate care.
PMID: 39259005
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 5690372

Performance of O-RADS MRI Score in Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Teratomas: MR Feature Analysis for Differentiating O-RADS 4 From O-RADS 2

Petrocelli, Robert; Doshi, Ankur; Slywotzky, Chrystia; Savino, Marissa; Melamud, Kira; Tong, Angela; Hindman, Nicole
OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study is to evaluate the performance of the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score and perform individual MRI feature analysis for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian teratomas. METHODS:In this institutional review board-approved retrospective study, consecutive patients with a pathology-proven fat-containing ovarian mass imaged with contrast-enhanced MRI (1.5T or 3T) from 2013 to 2022 were included. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated masses per the O-RADS MRI lexicon, including having a "characteristic" or "large" Rokitansky nodule (RN). Additional features analyzed included the following: nodule size/percentage volume relative to total teratoma volume, presence of bulk/intravoxel fat in the nodule, diffusion restriction in the nodule, angular interface, nodule extension through the teratoma border, presence/type of nodule enhancement pattern (solid versus peripheral), and evidence for metastatic disease. An overall O-RADS MRI score was assigned. Patient and lesion features associated with malignancy were evaluated and used to create a malignant teratoma score. χ2, Fisher's exact tests, receiver operating characteristic curve, and κ analysis was performed. RESULTS:One hundred thirty-seven women (median age 34, range 9-84 years) with 123 benign and 14 malignant lesions were included. Mean teratoma size was 7.3 cm (malignant: 14.4 cm, benign: 6.5 cm). 18/123 (14.6%) of benign teratomas were assigned an O-RADS 4 based on the presence of a "large" (11/18) or "noncharacteristic" (12/18) RN. 12/14 malignant nodules occupied >25% of the total teratoma volume (P = 0.09). Features associated with malignancy included the following: age <18 years, an enhancing noncharacteristic RN, teratoma size >12 cm, irregular cystic border, and extralesional extension; these were incorporated into a malignant teratoma score, with a score of 2 or more associated with area under the curve of 0.991 for reviewer 1 and 0.993 for reviewer 2. Peripheral enhancement in a RN was never seen with malignancy (64/123 benign, 0/14 malignant) and would have appropriated downgraded 9/18 overcalled O-RADS 4 benign teratomas. CONCLUSIONS:O-RADS MRI overcalled 15% (18/123) benign teratomas as O-RADS 4 but correctly captured all malignant teratomas. We propose defining a "characteristic" RN as an intravoxel or bulk fat-containing nodule. Observation of a peripheral rim of enhancement in a noncharacteristic RN allowed more accurate prediction of benignity and should be added to the MRI lexicon for improved O-RADS performance.
PMID: 38968317
ISSN: 1532-3145
CID: 5684842

Utility of ADC Values for Differentiating Uterine Sarcomas From Leiomyomas: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Woo, Sungmin; Beier, Sarah R; Tong, Angela; Hindman, Nicole M; Vargas, Hebert A; Kang, Stella K
PMID: 38899844
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 5672242

FastMRI Prostate: A Publicly Available, Biparametric MRI Dataset to Advance Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Imaging

Tibrewala, Radhika; Dutt, Tarun; Tong, Angela; Ginocchio, Luke; Keerthivasan, Mahesh B; Baete, Steven H; Chopra, Sumit; Lui, Yvonne W; Sodickson, Daniel K; Chandarana, Hersh; Johnson, Patricia M
The fastMRI brain and knee dataset has enabled significant advances in exploring reconstruction methods for improving speed and image quality for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) via novel, clinically relevant reconstruction approaches. In this study, we describe the April 2023 expansion of the fastMRI dataset to include biparametric prostate MRI data acquired on a clinical population. The dataset consists of raw k-space and reconstructed images for T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted sequences along with slice-level labels that indicate the presence and grade of prostate cancer. As has been the case with fastMRI, increasing accessibility to raw prostate MRI data will further facilitate research in MR image reconstruction and evaluation with the larger goal of improving the utility of MRI for prostate cancer detection and evaluation. The dataset is available at https://fastmri.med.nyu.edu.
PMID: 37131871
ISSN: 2331-8422
CID: 5771552

Radiologists staunchly support patient safety and autonomy, in opposition to the SCOTUS decision to overturn Roe v Wade [Letter]

Karandikar, Aditya; Solberg, Agnieszka; Fung, Alice; Lee, Amie Y; Farooq, Amina; Taylor, Amy C; Oliveira, Amy; Narayan, Anand; Senter, Andi; Majid, Aneesa; Tong, Angela; McGrath, Anika L; Malik, Anjali; Brown, Ann Leylek; Roberts, Anne; Fleischer, Arthur; Vettiyil, Beth; Zigmund, Beth; Park, Brian; Curran, Bruce; Henry, Cameron; Jaimes, Camilo; Connolly, Cara; Robson, Caroline; Meltzer, Carolyn C; Phillips, Catherine H; Dove, Christine; Glastonbury, Christine; Pomeranz, Christy; Kirsch, Claudia F E; Burgan, Constantine M; Scher, Courtney; Tomblinson, Courtney; Fuss, Cristina; Santillan, Cynthia; Daye, Dania; Brown, Daniel B; Young, Daniel J; Kopans, Daniel; Vargas, Daniel; Martin, Dann; Thompson, David; Jordan, David W; Shatzkes, Deborah; Sun, Derek; Mastrodicasa, Domenico; Smith, Elainea; Korngold, Elena; Dibble, Elizabeth H; Arleo, Elizabeth K; Hecht, Elizabeth M; Morris, Elizabeth; Maltin, Elizabeth P; Cooke, Erin A; Schwartz, Erin Simon; Lehrman, Evan; Sodagari, Faezeh; Shah, Faisal; Doo, Florence X; Rigiroli, Francesca; Vilanilam, George K; Landinez, Gina; Kim, Grace Gwe-Ya; Rahbar, Habib; Choi, Hailey; Bandesha, Harmanpreet; Ojeda-Fournier, Haydee; Ikuta, Ichiro; Dragojevic, Irena; Schroeder, Jamie Lee Twist; Ivanidze, Jana; Katzen, Janine T; Chiang, Jason; Nguyen, Jeffers; Robinson, Jeffrey D; Broder, Jennifer C; Kemp, Jennifer; Weaver, Jennifer S; Conyers, Jesse M; Robbins, Jessica B; Leschied, Jessica R; Wen, Jessica; Park, Jocelyn; Mongan, John; Perchik, Jordan; Barbero, José Pablo Martínez; Jacob, Jubin; Ledbetter, Karyn; Macura, Katarzyna J; Maturen, Katherine E; Frederick-Dyer, Katherine; Dodelzon, Katia; Cort, Kayla; Kisling, Kelly; Babagbemi, Kemi; McGill, Kevin C; Chang, Kevin J; Feigin, Kimberly; Winsor, Kimberly S; Seifert, Kimberly; Patel, Kirang; Porter, Kristin K; Foley, Kristin M; Patel-Lippmann, Krupa; McIntosh, Lacey J; Padilla, Laura; Groner, Lauren; Harry, Lauren M; Ladd, Lauren M; Wang, Lisa; Spalluto, Lucy B; Mahesh, M; Marx, M Victoria; Sugi, Mark D; Sammer, Marla B K; Sun, Maryellen; Barkovich, Matthew J; Miller, Matthew J; Vella, Maya; Davis, Melissa A; Englander, Meridith J; Durst, Michael; Oumano, Michael; Wood, Monica J; McBee, Morgan P; Fischbein, Nancy J; Kovalchuk, Nataliya; Lall, Neil; Eclov, Neville; Madhuripan, Nikhil; Ariaratnam, Nikki S; Vincoff, Nina S; Kothary, Nishita; Yahyavi-Firouz-Abadi, Noushin; Brook, Olga R; Glenn, Orit A; Woodard, Pamela K; Mazaheri, Parisa; Rhyner, Patricia; Eby, Peter R; Raghu, Preethi; Gerson, Rachel F; Patel, Rina; Gutierrez, Robert L; Gebhard, Robyn; Andreotti, Rochelle F; Masum, Rukya; Woods, Ryan; Mandava, Sabala; Harrington, Samantha G; Parikh, Samir; Chu, Sammy; Arora, Sandeep S; Meyers, Sandra M; Prabhu, Sanjay; Shams, Sara; Pittman, Sarah; Patel, Sejal N; Payne, Shelby; Hetts, Steven W; Hijaz, Tarek A; Chapman, Teresa; Loehfelm, Thomas W; Juang, Titania; Clark, Toshimasa J; Potigailo, Valeria; Shah, Vinil; Planz, Virginia; Kalia, Vivek; DeMartini, Wendy; Dillon, William P; Gupta, Yasha; Koethe, Yilun; Hartley-Blossom, Zachary; Wang, Zhen Jane; McGinty, Geraldine; Haramati, Adina; Allen, Laveil M; Germaine, Pauline
PMID: 36064645
ISSN: 1873-4499
CID: 5771532