Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:willim33

Total Results:

239


When Fixing Hinders, Why We Should Sometimes Fight the Urge to Fix [Editorial]

Ibrahim, Homam; Williams, Mathew R
PMID: 36538581
ISSN: 1941-7632
CID: 5394642

Minimally Invasive versus Full Sternotomy for Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients

Russo, Mark J; Thourani, Vinod H; Cohen, David J; Malaisrie, S Chris; Szeto, Wilson Y; George, Isaac; Kodali, Susheel K; Makkar, Raj; Lu, Michael; Williams, Mathew; Nguyen, Tom; Aldea, Gabriel; Genereux, Philippe; Fang, H Kenith; Alu, Maria C; Rogers, Erin; Okoh, Alexis; Herrmann, Howard C; Kapadia, Samir; Webb, John G; Smith, Craig R; Leon, Martin B; Mack, Michael J
BACKGROUND:Surgical aortic valve replacement can be performed either through a minimally invasive (MI) or full sternotomy (FS) approach. The present study compared outcomes of MI versus FS for isolated surgery among patients enrolled in the PARTNER 3 low-risk trial. METHODS:Patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis at low surgical risk with anatomy suitable for transfemoral access were eligible for PARTNER 3 enrollment. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of death, stroke, or rehospitalization (valve-, procedure-, or heart-failure-related) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary endpoint as well as patient-reported health status at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS:In the PARTNER 3 study, 358 patients underwent isolated surgery at 68 centers through an MI (n=107) or FS (n=251) approach (8 patients were converted from MI to FS). Mean age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were similar between groups. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the primary outcome was similar in the MI versus FS groups (16.9% versus 14.9%; hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.15 [0.66 - 2.03]; P=0.618). There were no significant differences in the 1-year rates of all-cause death (2.8% versus 2.8%), all stroke (1.9% versus 3.6%), or rehospitalization (13.3% versus 10.6%, P > 0.05 for all). Quality of life as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score at 30 days or 1 year was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:For patients at low risk for isolated surgery, MI and FS approaches were associated with similar in-hospital and 1-year outcomes.
PMID: 34958771
ISSN: 1552-6259
CID: 5108042

Bacterial endocarditis with AACEK (HACEK) organisms [Case Report]

Kuohn, Lindsey R; Ro, Richard; Bamira, Daniel; Vainrib, Alan; Freedberg, Robin; Galloway, Aubrey; Williams, Mathew R; Saric, Muhamed
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Gram-negative organisms of the AACEK group, formerly known as HACEK, rarely cause endocarditis. CASE SERIES/METHODS:We present three cases of bacterial endocarditis, involving native and prosthetic valves, caused by AACEK organisms. In two patients, Cardiobacterium hominis was the responsible organism, and in a third, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus was implicated. A dental source of infection was identified in two patients, and in all three patients, the presentation of endocarditis was subacute. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This case series highlights the indolent nature of infection with the AACEK organisms. It also demonstrates the crucial role of multimodality imaging, especially transesophageal echocardiography, in the diagnosis of AACEk endocarditis of both native and prosthetic valves, and in delineating the extent of abscess in those with prosthetic valve infection.
PMID: 36198094
ISSN: 1540-8175
CID: 5356642

Mitral Valve-in-Ring Leaflet Thrombosis: A Multimodality Imaging Primer [Case Report]

Hayes, Dena E; Bamira, Daniel; Vainrib, Alan F; Staniloae, Cezar; Jilaihawi, Hasan; Williams, Mathew; Saric, Muhamed
PMCID:9510672
PMID: 36172479
ISSN: 2468-6441
CID: 5334432

Amyloid deposition in an explanted bioprosthetic aortic valve: case report and review of the literature [Case Report]

Weerasekare, Jonika M; Zhou, Fang; Skolnick, Adam H; Jilaihawi, Hasan; Williams, Mathew R; Dasari, Surendra; McPhail, Ellen D; Theis, Jason D; Dao, Linda N; Bois, John P; Maleszewski, Joseph J; Bois, Melanie C
Herein we present a case of an 80-year-old gentleman who presented with exertional dyspnea status post aortic valve replacement with #23 Trifecta pericardial St. Jude aortic bioprosthetic valve (BV) 12 years prior. He subsequently underwent valve re-replacement due cusp calcification. Histologically, the surgically explanted BV revealed Congophilic deposits with birefringence under cross-polarized light. Extensive work-up identified no systemic source of amyloid in this patient. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-based (LC-MS/MS) proteomics showed the amyloid was composed of human-origin amyloid signature proteins (apolipoprotein A4, apolipoprotein E, serum amyloid P) and human-origin mu heavy chains. Background bovine collagen was also present. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed collections of 7.5-10 nm nonbranching fibrils, consistent with amyloid. Using these techniques, we classified the amyloid as Mu heavy chain, deposition of which is highly unusual in BV. Finally, we provide a review of the literature regarding isolated amyloid deposition in BV.
PMID: 36038051
ISSN: 1879-1336
CID: 5332042

5-Year Follow-Up From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry for Degenerated Aortic Surgical Bioprostheses

Hahn, Rebecca T; Webb, John; Pibarot, Philippe; Ternacle, Julien; Herrmann, Howard C; Suri, Rakesh M; Dvir, Danny; Leipsic, Jonathon; Blanke, Philipp; Jaber, Wael A; Kodali, Susheel; Kapadia, Samir; Makkar, Raj; Thourani, Vinod; Williams, Mathew; Salaun, Erwan; Vincent, Flavien; Xu, Ke; Leon, Martin B; Mack, Michael
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at 5 years. BACKGROUND:TAVR for degenerated surgical bioprostheses in patients at high risk for reoperative surgery is an important treatment option that may delay or obviate the need for surgical intervention; however, long-term outcomes of this procedure are unknown. METHODS:The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) 2 ViV and continued access registries prospectively enrolled patients with failed surgical bioprostheses at high risk for reoperation. Five-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up data were obtained in 95.9% of patients. RESULTS:In 365 (96 registry and 269 continued access) patients, the mean age was 78.9 ± 10.2 years, the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of surgical mortality score was 9.1 ± 4.7%, and New York Heart Association functional class was III or IV in 90.4%. At 5 years, the Kaplan-Meier rates of all-cause mortality and any stroke were 50.6% and 10.5%, respectively. Using Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions, the incidence of structural valve deterioration, related hemodynamic valve deterioration, or bioprosthetic valve failure at 5 years was 6.6%. Aortic valve re-replacement was performed in 6.3% (n = 14), the majority of which was due to stenosis (n = 6) and combined aortic insufficiency/paravalvular regurgitation (n = 3). The mean gradient, Doppler velocity index, paravalvular regurgitation, and quality of life measured by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores in survivors remained stable from 30 days postprocedure through 5 years. CONCLUSIONS:At the 5-year follow-up, TAVR for bioprosthetic aortic valve failure in high surgical risk patients was associated with sustained improvement in clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.
PMID: 35393102
ISSN: 1876-7605
CID: 5205012

The PARTNER 3 Bicuspid Registry for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Surgical-Risk Patients

Williams, Mathew R; Jilaihawi, Hasan; Makkar, Raj; O'Neill, William W; Guyton, Robert; Malaisrie, S Chris; Brown, David L; Blanke, Philipp; Leipsic, Jonathon A; Pibarot, Philippe; Hahn, Rebecca T; Leon, Martin B; Cohen, David J; Bax, Jeroen J; Kodali, Susheel K; Mack, Michael J; Lu, Michael; Webb, John G
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The study compared 1-year outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) morphology and clinically similar patients having tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) morphology. BACKGROUND:There are limited prospective data on TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 device in low-surgical-risk patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis and bicuspid anatomy. METHODS:Low-risk, severe aortic stenosis patients with BAV were candidates for the PARTNER 3 (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves 3) (P3) bicuspid registry or the P3 bicuspid continued access protocol. Patients treated in these registries were pooled and propensity score matched to TAV patients from the P3 randomized TAVR trial. Outcomes were compared between groups. The primary endpoint was the 1-year composite rate of death, stroke, and cardiovascular rehospitalization. RESULTS:Of 320 total submitted BAV patients, 169 (53%) were treated, and most were Sievers type 1. The remaining 151 patients were excluded caused by anatomic or clinical criteria. Propensity score matching with the P3 TAVR cohort (496 patients) yielded 148 pairs. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics; however, BAV patients had larger annuli and they experienced longer procedure duration. There was no difference in the primary endpoint between BAV and TAV (10.9% vs 10.2%; P = 0.80) or in the rates of the individual components (death: 0.7% vs 1.4%; P = 0.58; stroke: 2.1% vs 2.0%; P = 0.99; cardiovascular rehospitalization: 9.6% vs 9.5%; P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS:Among highly select bicuspid aortic stenosis low-surgical-risk patients without extensive raphe or subannular calcification, TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve demonstrated similar outcomes to a matched cohort of patients with tricuspid aortic stenosis.
PMID: 35272777
ISSN: 1876-7605
CID: 5177622

Risk for non-home discharge following surgery for ischemic mitral valve disease

Lala, Anuradha; Chang, Helena L; Liu, Xiaoyu; Charles, Eric J; Yerokun, Babatunde A; Bowdish, Michael E; Thourani, Vinod H; Mack, Michael J; Miller, Marissa A; O'Gara, Patrick T; Blackstone, Eugene H; Moskowitz, Alan J; Gelijns, Annetine C; Mullen, John C; Stevenson, Lynne W; DeRose, Joseph J; Wang, Alice; Smith, Peter K; Acker, Michael A; Ailawadi, Gorav; Miller, Marissa A; Taddei-Peters, Wendy C; Buxton, Dennis; Caulder, Ron; Geller, Nancy L; Gordon, David; Jeffries, Neal O; Lee, Albert; Gombos, Ilana Kogan; Ralph, Jennifer; Weisel, Richard D; Gardner, Timothy J; O'Gara, Patrick T; Rose, Eric A; Gelijns, Annetine C; Parides, Michael K; Ascheim, Deborah D; Moskowitz, Alan J; Bagiella, Emilia; Moquete, Ellen; Chang, Helena; Chase, Melissa; Foo, James; Chen, Yingchun; Goldfarb, Seth; Gupta, Lopa; Kirkwood, Katherine; Dobrev, Edlira; Levitan, Ron; O'Sullivan, Karen; Overbey, Jessica; Santos, Milerva; Williams, Deborah; Weglinski, Michael; Williams, Paula; Wood, Carrie; Ye, Xia; Nielsen, Sten Lyager; Wiggers, Henrik; Malgaard, Henning; Mack, Michael; Adame, Tracine; Settele, Natalie; Adams, Jenny; Ryan, William; Smith, Robert L; Grayburn, Paul; Chen, Frederick Y; Nohria, Anju; Cohn, Lawrence; Shekar, Prem; Aranki, Sary; Couper, Gregory; Davidson, Michael; Bolman, R Morton 3rd; Burgess, Anne; Conboy, Debra; Lawrence, Rita; Noiseux, Nicolas; Stevens, Louis-Mathieu; Prieto, Ignacio; Basile, Fadi; Dionne, Joannie; Fecteau, Julie; Blackstone, Eugene H; Gillinov, A Marc; Lackner, Pamela; Berroteran, Leoma; Dolney, Diana; Fleming, Suzanne; Palumbo, Roberta; Whitman, Christine; Sankovic, Kathy; Sweeney, Denise Kosty; Geither, Carrie; Doud, Kristen; Pattakos, Gregory; Clarke, Pamela A; Argenziano, Michael; Williams, Mathew; Goldsmith, Lyn; Smith, Craig R; Naka, Yoshifumi; Stewart, Allan; Schwartz, Allan; Bell, Daniel; Van Patten, Danielle; Sreekanth, Sowmya; Wang, Alice; Alexander, John H; Milano, Carmelo A; Glower, Donald D; Mathew, Joseph P; Harrison, J Kevin; Welsh, Stacey; Berry, Mark F; Parsa, Cyrus J; Tong, Betty C; Williams, Judson B; Ferguson, T Bruce; Kypson, Alan P; Rodriguez, Evelio; Harris, Malissa; Akers, Brenda; O'Neal, Allison; Puskas, John D; Thourani, Vinod H; Guyton, Robert; Baer, Jefferson; Baio, Kim; Neill, Alexis A; Voisine, Pierre; Senechal, Mario; Dagenais, François; O'Connor, Kim; Dussault, Gladys; Ballivian, Tatiana; Keilani, Suzanne; Speir, Alan M; Magee, Patrick; Ad, Niv; Keyte, Sally; Dang, Minh; Slaughter, Mark; Headlee, Marsha; Moody, Heather; Solankhi, Naresh; Birks, Emma; Groh, Mark A; Shell, Leslie E; Shepard, Stephanie A; Trichon, Benjamin H; Nanney, Tracy; Hampton, Lynne C; Mangusan, Ralph; Michler, Robert E; D'Alessandro, David A; DeRose, Joseph J Jr; Goldstein, Daniel J; Bello, Ricardo; Jakobleff, William; Garcia, Mario; Taub, Cynthia; Spevak, Daniel; Swayze, Roger; Sookraj, Nadia; Perrault, Louis P; Basmadjian, Arsène-Joseph; Bouchard, Denis; Carrier, Michel; Cartier, Raymond; Pellerin, Michel; Tanguay, Jean François; El-Hamamsy, Ismail; Denault, André; Demers, Philippe; Jonathan Lacharité, Sophie Robichaud; Horvath, Keith A; Corcoran, Philip C; Siegenthaler, Michael P; Murphy, Mandy; Iraola, Margaret; Greenberg, Ann; Sai-Sudhakar, Chittoor; Hasan, Ayseha; McDavid, Asia; Kinn, Bradley; Pagé, Pierre; Sirois, Carole; Latter, David; Leong-Poi, Howard; Bonneau, Daniel; Errett, Lee; Peterson, Mark D; Verma, Subodh; Feder-Elituv, Randi; Cohen, Gideon; Joyner, Campbell; Fremes, Stephen E; Moussa, Fuad; Christakis, George; Karkhanis, Reena; Yau, Terry; Farkouh, Michael; Woo, Anna; Cusimano, Robert James; David, Tirone; Feindel, Christopher; Garrard, Lisa; Fredericks, Suzanne; Mociornita, Amelia; Mullen, John C; Choy, Jonathan; Meyer, Steven; Kuurstra, Emily; Gammie, James S; Young, Cindi A; Beach, Dana; Villanueva, Robert; Atluri, Pavan; Woo, Y Joseph; Mayer, Mary Lou; Bowdish, Michael; Starnes, Vaughn A; Shavalle, David; Matthews, Ray; Javadifar, Shadi; Romar, Linda; Kron, Irving L; Ailawadi, Gorav; Johnston, Karen; Dent, John M; Kern, John; Keim, Jessica; Burks, Sandra; Gahring, Kim; Bull, David A; Dixon, Dennis O; Haigney, Mark; Holubkov, Richard; Jacobs, Alice; Miller, Frank; Murkin, John M; Spertus, John; Wechsler, Andrew S; Sellke, Frank; Byington, Robert; Dickert, Neal; Ikonomidis, John S; Williams, David O; Yancy, Clyde W; Fang, James C; Giannetti, Nadia; Richenbacher, Wayne; Rao, Vivek; Furie, Karen L; Miller, Rachel; Pinney, Sean; Roberts, William C; Walsh, Mary N; Hung, Judy; Zeng, Xin; Kilcullen, Niamh; Hung, David; Keteyian, Stephen J; Brawner, Clinton A; Aldred, Heather; Browndyke, Jeffrey; Toulgoat-Dubois, Yanne
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the frequency and risk factors for non-home discharge (NHD) and its association with clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) at 1 year following cardiac surgery in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR). METHODS:Discharge disposition was evaluated in 552 patients enrolled in trials of severe or moderate IMR. Patient and in-hospital factors associated with NHD were identified using logistic regression. Subsequently, association of NHD with 1-year mortality, serious adverse events (SAEs), and QOL was assessed. RESULTS:NHD was observed in 30% (154/522) with 25% (n = 71/289) in moderate and 36% (n = 83/233) in patients with severe IMR (unadjusted P = .006), a difference not significant after including age (5-year change: adjusted odds ratio [adjOR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.72; P < .001), diabetes (adjOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.27-2.94; P = .002), and previous heart failure (adjOR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.06-2.52; P = .03). Odds of NHD were increased for patients with postoperative SAEs (adjOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.19-2.86; P = .01) but not based on type of cardiac surgery. Greater rates of death and SAEs were observed in NHD patients at 1 year: adjusted hazard ratio, 4.29 (95% CI, 2.14-8.59; P < .001) and adjusted rate ratio, 1.45 (95% CI, 1.03-2.02; P = .03), respectively. QOL did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS:NHD is common following surgery for IMR, influenced by older age, diabetes, previous heart failure, and postoperative SAEs. These patients may be at greater risk of death and subsequent SAEs after discharge. Discussion of NHD with patients may have important implications for decision-making and guiding expectations following cardiac surgery.
PMID: 32307181
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 5451222

Sex-Based Differences in Outcomes With Percutaneous Transcatheter Repair of Mitral Regurgitation With the MitraClip System: Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry From 2011 to 2017

Villablanca, Pedro A; Vemulapalli, Sreekanth; Stebbins, Amanda; Dai, Dadi; So, Chak-Yu; Eng, Marvin H; Wang, Dee Dee; Frisoli, Tiberio M; Lee, James C; Kang, Guson; Szerlip, Molly; Ibrahim, Homam; Staniloae, Cezar; Gaba, Prakriti; Lemor, Alejandro; Finn, Matthew; Ramakrishna, Harish; Williams, Mathew R; Leon, Martin B; O'Neill, William W; Shah, Binita
BACKGROUND:Women have a higher rate of adverse events after mitral valve surgery. We sought to evaluate whether outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair intervention by sex have similar trends to mitral valve surgery. METHODS:The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse events defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, and any bleeding in the overall study cohort. Patients who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for mitral regurgitation with the MitraClip system in the Society of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry were evaluated. Linked administrative claims from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used to evaluate 1-year clinical outcomes. Associations between sex and outcomes were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model for in-hospital outcomes and Cox model for 1-year outcomes. RESULTS:<0.001) and had a lower adjusted odds ratio of device success (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67-0.90]), driven by lower odds of residual mitral gradient <5 mm Hg (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54 [CI, 0.46-0.63]) when compared with males. At 1-year follow-up, the primary outcome did not differ by sex. Female sex was associated with lower adjusted 1-year risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80 [CI, 0.68-0.94]), but the adjusted 1-year risk of stroke and any bleeding did not differ by sex. CONCLUSIONS:No difference in composite outcome of all-cause mortality, stroke, and any bleeding was observed between females and males. Adjusted 1-year all-cause mortality was lower in females compared with males.
PMID: 34784236
ISSN: 1941-7632
CID: 5049102

Multiphase Assessment of Mitral Annular Dynamics in Consecutive Patients With Significant Mitral Valve Disease

Nakashima, Makoto; Williams, Mathew; He, Yuxin; Latson, Larry; Saric, Muhamed; Vainrib, Alan; Staniloae, Cezar; Hisamoto, Kazuhiro; Ibrahim, Homam; Querijero, Michael; Tovar, Joseph; Kalish, Chloe; Pushkar, Illya; Jilaihawi, Hasan
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to clarify the dynamics of the mitral annulus throughout the cardiac cycle and its relevance to transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) sizing and case selection. BACKGROUND:Limited data are available regarding the relevance of mitral annular (MA) and neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) dynamics in the overall population presenting with significant mitral valve disease. METHODS:Patients attending a combined surgical-transcatheter heart valve clinic for severe symptomatic mitral valve disease were assessed using multiphase computed tomography. The relative influence of MA and neo-LVOT dynamics to TMVR case selection was studied. RESULTS:A total of 476 patients with significant mitral valve disease were evaluated. In 99 consecutive patients with severe mitral regurgitation, a 10-phase assessment showed that the mitral annulus was on average largest in late systole. On comparing maximal MA dimension with late systolic dimension, TMVR size assignment changed in 24.2% of patients. If the average MA perimeter was used to determine sizing, 48.5% were excluded because of MA dimension being too large; in a multiphase assessment of the neo-LVOT, an additional 16.2% were excluded on the basis of neo-LVOT dimension. In an expanded series of 312 consecutive patients, selection protocol influenced anatomical exclusion: a manufacturer-proposed early systolic approach excluded 69.2% of patients, whereas a late systolic approach excluded 82.7% of patients, the vast majority because of large mitral annuli. CONCLUSIONS:Contemporary TMVR can treat only a minority of patients with severe mitral regurgitation, principally because of limitations of large MA dimension.
PMID: 34600871
ISSN: 1876-7605
CID: 5026992