Faculty Bibliography

Clinical decisions utilizing either Doppler echocardiographic or cardiac catheterization data were compared in adult patients with isolated or combined aortic and mitral valve disease. A clinical decision to operate, not operate or remain uncertain was made by experienced cardiologists given either Doppler echocardiographic or cardiac catheterization data. A prospective evaluation was performed on 189 consecutive patients (mean age 67 years) with valvular heart disease who were being considered for surgical treatment on the basis of clinical information. All patients underwent cardiac catheterization and detailed Doppler echocardiographic examination. Three sets of two cardiologist decision makers who did not know patient identity were given clinical information in combination with either Doppler echocardiographic or cardiac catheterization data. The combination of Doppler echocardiographic and clinical data was considered inadequate for clinical decision making in 21% of patients with aortic and 5% of patients with mitral valve disease. The combination of cardiac catheterization and clinical data was considered inadequate in 2% of patients with aortic and 2% of patients with mitral valve disease. Among the remaining patients, the cardiologists using echocardiographic or angiographic data were in agreement on the decision to operate or not operate in 113 (76% overall). When the data were analyzed by specific valve lesion, decisions based on Doppler echocardiography or catheterization were in agreement in 92%, 90%, 83% and 69%, respectively, of patients with aortic regurgitation, mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation. Differences in cardiac output determination, estimation of valvular regurgitation and information concerning coronary anatomy were the main reasons for different clinical management decisions. These results suggest that for most adult patients with aortic or mitral valve disease, alone or in combination, Doppler echocardiographic data enable the clinician to make the same decision reached with catheterization data

Twenty-nine patients were studied by pulsed, continuous wave, and color Doppler before and after percutaneous transseptal valvuloplasty. New atrial septal defects were detected in 14 patients, and the patients were monitored for up to 320 days after the procedure. The diameter of the defect, best evaluated by the transesophageal approach, was 3 to 15 mm. A narrow, high velocity (1.4 to 3.1 meters per second) left-to-right shunt jet was detected in 13 of 14 patients. The shunt jet was continuous in nine of 14 patients, late systolic-holodiastolic in four patients, and bidirectional in one patient. Cardiac catheterization in nine patients confirmed the Doppler findings and demonstrated a peak pressure gradient of 10 to 32 mm Hg between the left and right atria. Oximetry revealed a calculated pulmonary to systemic flow ratio ranging from 2.3:1 in the patient with the largest atrial septal defect by echocardiography to 1:1 (no oxygen saturation step-up) in the patient with the smallest atrial septal defect. In the three patients who underwent cardiac surgery, the operative findings confirmed those of echocardiography. We concluded that atrial septal defects are common after transseptal valvuloplasty. Usually, their relatively small size and the underlying valvular disease that produces high left atrial pressure are responsible for the high pressure gradient between the left and right atria. This results in the high velocity and continuous shunt jet detected by Doppler echocardiography

An unusually high atrial shunt flow velocity pattern was recorded in a patient whose atrial septal defect was created iatrogenically during a transatrial septal approach to aortic valvuloplasty. The flow velocity pattern measured by Doppler echocardiography was predictive of the high transatrial pressure gradient noted later at catheterization