Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:: To present the first long-term results of Szilagyi III vascular infections treated by negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with graft preservation. BACKGROUND DATA:: Szilagyi III infections are usually treated by graft/artery excision and secondary vascular/plastic reconstruction. Small series treated with NPWT without graft removal are reported with good short-term to midterm results. METHODS:: The outcomes of 44 polymorbid patients (mean age = 62 years) with Szilagyi III infections from 2002 to 2009 were analyzed. Thirteen of forty-four required intensive care unit treatment. Forty grafts (prosthetic = 24, vein = 3, biological = 13) and 9 native arteries were involved. Negative pressure wound therapy (VAC; KCI International, Amstelveen, Netherlands) was applied directly on grafts/arteries (negative pressure = 50-125 mm Hg) after radical debridement of infected tissue. Antibiotic treatment was initiated and adapted according to microbiology. RESULTS:: Median duration of NPWT was 33 days (IQR: 20-78), of hospital stay 32 (IQR: 20-82) days. All patients survived 30 days. One-year mortality was 16% (7/44). Long-term mortality after a mean follow-up of 43 months (SD: 21) was 41% (18/44).Complete wound healing was achieved in 91% (40/44). In 37 of 44 patients, grafts were preserved long-term without reinfection. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the various graft types involved. CONCLUSIONS:: Vascular graft/arterial preserving treatment with NPWT in Szilagyi III infections was safe and effective with a very low short-term mortality. The majority of infected grafts were preserved without reinfection during a mean long-term follow-up of 4 years. This new treatment algorithm avoids major reconstructive surgery and should be used when dealing with Szilagyi III vascular infections

INTRODUCTION: Ask a dysphasic patient who has received a carotid artery stent if he or she would instead have rather had a troponin enzyme leak or minor myocardial infarction (MI). Although the answer is clear to most of us, there are many interventionalists and clinicians who have inappropriately interpreted recent data from the CREST trial to conclude that carotid artery stenting (CAS) is equivalent to carotid endarterectomy (CEA)