Faculty Bibliography

There has been a substantial shift in the assessment of outcomes in medicine, including orthopaedic surgery. The quality movement is redefining the delivery of health care. The effect of these changes on orthopaedic surgery and orthopaedic surgeons has been significant and will become increasingly important. Orthopaedic surgeons must become active participants in the quality movement by understanding the basic principles of the movement and how they apply to patient care. A clear understanding of the different agencies (governmental and private) that are leading these initiatives is also essential. Ultimately, active participation in the quality movement will enhance the care provided to patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

The unsustainable rising cost of medical care is creating financial pressures that will critically alter the way that health care is paid for and delivered. Limited resources dictate that physicians must become more efficient at providing high quality care. In an effort to provide financial incentive for delivering quality care, the federal government instituted value-based purchasing to transform Medicare from a passive payer of claims to an active purchaser of medical care. Healthcare providers must follow the basic tenants of certain quality principles to maximize reimbursement under the value-based purchasing system.

SUMMARY: We reviewed the results of 4,723 day of sur- gery pregnancy tests performed at two of our institution's locations, our ambulatory surgery center and our acute orthopaedics hospital over a 23 month time period. All pa- tients were scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery. There were seven positive results (0.15%) and one false negative result (0.02%). The cost per positive result for both hospital locations was $1,005.32. INTRODUCTION: Performing elective surgery on pregnant women can harm the mother and fetus. In order to minimize the likelihood of this happening, we administer a urine pregnancy test to each woman of childbearing age on the date of surgery. From November 2009 to September 2011, we performed 4,723 urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) pregnancy tests on the day of surgery. We reviewed the results and cost of each pregnancy test. We then used these results to calculate the percentage of positive tests and the cost of diagnosing each pregnant female on the date of their surgery. METHODS: We obtained the records of all urine hCG preg- nancy tests performed from November 2009 to September 2011. Each test was reviewed to determine if the result was positive or negative. Costs were calculated using the charges incurred for a qualitative hCG pregnancy test. We then contacted each patient with a positive result to determine if the urine hCG test results were accurate. RESULTS: 4,723 pregnancy tests were reviewed over a 23 month period with 7 (0.15%) having a positive result. Over the 23 month time period, we were notified of one false nega - tive result (0.02%). The Positive Predictive Value (PPV) was 100% and the Negative Predictive Value (NPV) was 99.9%. The cost of a single urine hCG test was $1.49, the total cost for all 4,723 tests was $7,037.27. The cost of diagnosing 7 positive tests was $1,005.32. CONCLUSION: Routinely performing urine hCG pregnancy tests on the day of surgery is a cost effective method of pre- venting elective orthopaedic surgery on pregnant women. Of 4,723 women tested 7 had a positive result and 1 had a false negative result. The cost of $1,005.32 for each positive test must be compared with the benefit of not performing elective surgery on a pregnant female.

Instruments and implants sterilized by immediate use steam sterilization (IUSS), formerly called flash sterilization, can increase the patient's risk for acquiring a surgical site infection. We implemented a hospital-wide initiative to determine the reasons that perioperative personnel use IUSS to sterilize items and then designed a program to reduce the hospital's rates. Program initiatives included educating perioperative personnel, improving scheduling processes, holding vendor discussions, purchasing additional instrument sets, and transitioning from paper wrap to metal containers for instrument sets. In addition, we instituted a policy whereby nursing leaders are required to approve IUSS before it can be used and developed guidelines for immediate and rapid processing in the sterile processing department, and we monitor compliance daily and communicate results regularly to all team members. These efforts decreased our facility use of IUSS for implants from 10.22% in January 2008 to 0.09% in August 2012, and we decreased our use of IUSS for instruments from 79% in May 2010 to 7.5% in February 2012. We simultaneously implemented a process to reduce surgical site infection rates and saw an improvement in surgical site infection from 5.4% in the first quarter of 2010 to 1.4% in the fourth quarter of 2012.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-acquired infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are a source of morbidity and mortality. S. aureus is the most common pathogen in prosthetic joint infections and the incidence of MRSA is increasing. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the MRSA prevalence density rate at a specialty orthopaedic hospital before and after implementation of a screening and decolonization protocol, (2) to compare our prevalence density with that of an affiliated university hospital to control for changes in MRSA prevalence density that might have been independent of the decolonization protocol, and (3) to measure the admission prevalence density rate of MRSA in an elective orthopaedic surgery population and the compliance rate of 26 patients with the protocol. METHODS: In October 2008, we implemented a MRSA screening and decolonization protocol for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. Nasal swabs were used for screening and mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine skin antisepsis where prescribed for decolonization to all patients. At the surgical visit, compliance was measured and the patients who were MRSA positive received vancomycin for antibiotic prophylaxis. Institution wide surveillance for multidrug-resistant organisms, including MRSA provided a comparison of the change in MRSA burden at the orthopaedic hospital versus the university hospital. RESULTS: Before implementation of the preoperative staphylococcal decolonization protocol there were 79 MRSA-positive cultures in 64,327 patient-days for a prevalence density rate of 1.23 per 1000 patient-days. After protocol implementation, 53 MRSA-positive cultures were identified in 63,860 patient-days for a rate of 0.83 per 1000 patient-days. Before the protocol, the MRSA prevalence density at the specialty hospital was similar to that of the university hospital; after implementation of the protocol, the prevalence density at the specialty hospital was 33% lower than that of the university hospital. The MRSA admission prevalence was 3.02%. The compliance rate was greater than 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a staphylococcal decolonization protocol at a single specialty orthopaedic hospital decreased the prevalence density of MRSA.

Rising implant prices and evolving technologies are important factors contributing to the increased cost of arthroplasty. Assessing how patients value arthroplasty, new technologies, and their perceived outcomes is critical in planning cost-effective care, as well as evaluating new-technologies. One hundred one patients undergoing arthroplasty took part in the survey. We captured demographics, spending practices, knowledge of implants, patient willingness to pay for implants, and preferences related to implant attributes. When patients were asked if they would be satisfied with "standard of care" prosthesis, 80% replied "no". When asked if they would pay for a higher than "standard of care" prosthesis, 86% replied "yes". The study demonstrated that patients, regardless of their socio-economic status, are not satisfied with standard of care implants when newer technologies are available, and they may be willing to share in the cost of their prosthesis. Patients also prefer the option to choose what they perceive to be a higher quality or innovative implant even if the "out of pocket" cost is higher.

BACKGROUND: The episode-of-care concept promulgated by the federal government requires hospitals to assume the cost burden for all care rendered up to 30 days after discharge, including all readmissions occurring in that time. Although surgical site infections (SSIs) are a leading cause of readmission after total joint arthroplasties (TJA) and spine surgery, it is unclear whether these readmissions occur relative to the 30-day period. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether (1) most readmissions for SSIs occurred in 30 days, (2) the type of procedure performed affected the timing of readmission, and (3) the type of infecting organism influenced the timing of readmission. METHODS: From our hospital database we identified 91 patients treated with elective TJAs and spine surgery from 2007 through 2010 who were readmitted with SSIs. Of the 91 patients, 46 had undergone spine surgery and 45 had TJAs. For each of these readmissions, we determined the type of surgery, the length of time from initial discharge to readmission, and the type of infecting organism. RESULTS: Readmissions after spine surgery were more likely to occur within 30 days of discharge (80.4% for spine, 58.3% for TJAs). In the TJA cohort, there was a trend toward readmissions occurring within 30 days of discharge more often in the THA subset. We identified no correlation between type of infecting organism and timing of readmission. CONCLUSIONS: With the episode-of-care model, SSIs pose a substantial cost burden for hospitals since the majority would be included in the 30-day period included in the bundled reimbursement.

The aim of this retrospective study was to identify risk factors for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (HA-CDI) in orthopaedic patients. Thirty-two HA-CDI cases were each matched with two controls. Incidence rate was 0.33 cases per 1000 patient-days. Univariate analyses showed that surgery >24 h after admission, antibiotics for treatment, and proton pump inhibitors were associated with HA-CDI. Multivariate analyses revealed that surgery >24 h after admission was associated with HA-CDI. Patients hospitalized before surgery had a greater risk of HA-CDI, suggesting opportunities to reduce environmental exposure to C. difficile by timelier preoperative medical optimization in the outpatient setting.