Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have high rates of myocardial infarction (MI), but whether the nature of coronary lesions susceptible to plaque rupture is altered and whether the high rate of MI is related to a greater burden of atherosclerotic lesions in individuals with CKD is uncertain. METHODS: We used quantitative coronary angiography to assess atherosclerotic plaque location and characteristics at baseline and at the time of MI in 62 patients with and without CKD. Univariate and multivariable conditional logistic regression models were used to assess whether the association between pre-MI angiographic findings and MI differs in individuals with and without CKD. RESULTS: The risk of MI rose as the distance from the coronary ostium decreased both in patients with CKD (odds ratio per 10 mm 0.92 [95 % CI 0.87-0.99]) and in those without CKD (odds ratio 0.83 [95 % CI 0.75-0.93]). Although tighter degrees of coronary stenosis were associated with increased risks of MI in patients with and without CKD, the majority of MIs (70.9 % in patients with CKD and 89.5 % in those without CKD) occurred in segments with <50 % diameter stenosis at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of lesions progressing to MI are similar in individuals with and without CKD and the majority of events occur in areas with <50 % stenosis at baseline. Given the high burden of non-stenotic lesions in patients with CKD, an interventional strategy aimed solely at sites with high-grade stenosis is unlikely to markedly reduce the risk of MI in patients with CKD.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study sought to evaluate whether impaired vasodilator function, an early manifestation of coronary artery disease, which precedes angiographic stenosis, accounts for increased risk among patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction. BACKGROUND:Patients with renal dysfunction are at increased risk of adverse cardiac outcomes, even in the absence of overt myocardial ischemia or infarction. METHODS:We included 866 consecutive patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction referred for rest and stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography and followed them for a median of 1.28 years (interquartile range: 0.64 to 2.34). Regional myocardial perfusion abnormalities were assessed by semiquantitative visual analysis of positron emission tomography images. Rest and stress myocardial blood flow were calculated using factor analysis and a 2-compartment kinetic model; they were also used to compute coronary flow reserve (stress/rest myocardial blood flow). The primary endpoint was cardiac death. RESULTS:Overall, 3-year cardiac mortality was 16.2%. After adjusting for clinical risk, left ventricular ejection fraction, as well as the magnitude of scar and/or ischemia, coronary flow reserve below the median (<1.5) was associated with a 2.1-fold increase in the risk of cardiac death (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 3.5, p = 0.004). Incorporation of coronary flow reserve into cardiac death risk assessment models resulted in an increase in the C-index from 0.75 to 0.77 (p = 0.05) and in a net reclassification improvement of 0.142 (95% CI: 0.076 to 0.219). Among patients at intermediate risk based on all data other than coronary flow reserve, the net reclassification improvement was 0.489 (95% CI: 0.192 to 0.836). Corresponding improvements in risk assessment for mortality from any cause were also demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS:The presence of coronary vascular dysfunction in patients with moderate to severe renal dysfunction, as assessed by positron emission tomography, is a powerful, independent predictor of cardiac mortality and provides meaningful incremental risk stratification over conventional markers of clinical risk.

Interactions between sodium intake, the renin-angiotensin system, and renal and cardiovascular outcomes are incompletely understood. The analysis by Lambers Heerspink et al. shows that angiotensin receptor blockade improves diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease more when dietary sodium intake is low, and suggests possible harm when sodium intake is high. These findings highlight dietary salt as a modifiable cardiovascular and renal risk factor and emphasize the need for detailed mechanistic studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Revascularization by coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently deferred in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) to avoid precipitating end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but reliable estimates of absolute and relative risks of death and ESRD after CABG and PCI are unavailable. METHODS AND RESULTS/RESULTS:CKD patients undergoing CABG (n=4547) or PCI (n=8620) were identified and tracked using the 5% Medicare sample. The cumulative incidence of ESRD and death were reported for observed events. A Cox model with the Fine-Gray method was used to account for competing risks in assessing relative hazards of death and ESRD. Three-year cumulative incidence of ESRD was lower (CABG, 6.8%; PCI, 5.4%) than death (CABG, 28.3%; PCI, 32.8%). The adjusted hazard ratio of death was higher during the first 3 months after CABG than after PCI (1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.40; P<0.001), but lower from 6 months onward (0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.69). Conversely, risk of ESRD after CABG was higher during the first 3 months (1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-2.01; P<0.001), but was not statistically significant from 3 months onward. The adjusted hazard ratio of combined death or ESRD was similar to death. CONCLUSIONS:Among CKD patients undergoing coronary revascularization, death is more frequent than ESRD. The incidence of ESRD was lower throughout follow-up after PCI, but long-term risks of death or combined death and ESRD were lower after CABG. Our data suggest better overall clinical outcomes with CABG than with PCI in CKD patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:CKD patients have high mortality risk after myocardial infarction (MI). An adequate supply of coronary collaterals to the culprit vessel responsible for MI is associated with reduced risks of death and complications. Whether a diminished supply of collaterals contributes to the high risk in CKD patients is uncertain. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Quantitative coronary angiography was performed in a consecutive series of individuals with (n=58) and without (n=165) CKD (estimated GFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2)) who underwent coronary angiography at the time of MI. Collateral supply was analyzed and candidate predictors were assessed in patient-level and individual artery-level models using logistic regression and ordered categorical regression, respectively. RESULTS:There were no significant differences in collateral supply among 58 CKD patients and 165 individuals with preserved renal function. Culprit artery collaterals were present in 25.0% of CKD patients compared with 27.2% of individuals with preserved renal function (P=0.76). The odds of having an adequate supply of culprit vessel collaterals were also not significantly different in individuals with and without CKD, respectively. CKD patients were 2.22-fold more likely to have visible collaterals to the nonculprit vessels in unadjusted analyses. The difference was not significant after correction for percent stenosis and comorbid factors. CONCLUSIONS:Our results do not support an independent association between CKD and diminished collateral supply to either the culprit or nonculprit vessels in MI. Additional studies are warranted to better define associations between myocardial capillary supply, collateral supply, and the full range of human CKD.

BACKGROUND:Patients with chronic kidney disease have been under-represented in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents relative to bare-metal stents and are at high risk of mortality. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Cohort study with propensity score matching. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:All adults with chronic kidney disease and severely decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR; serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL or dialysis dependence) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement between April 1, 2003, and September 30, 2005, at all acute-care nonfederal hospitals in Massachusetts. PREDICTOR/METHODS:Patients were classified as drug-eluting stent-treated if all stents were drug eluting and bare-metal stent-treated if all stents were bare metal. Patients treated with both types of stents were excluded from the primary analysis. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:2-year crude mortality risk differences (drug-eluting - bare-metal stents) were determined from vital statistics records, and risk-adjusted mortality, myocardial infraction (MI), and revascularization differences were estimated using propensity score matching of patients with severely reduced GFR based on clinical and procedural information collected at the index admission. RESULTS:1,749 patients with severely reduced GFR (24% dialysis dependent) were treated with drug-eluting (n = 1,256) or bare-metal stents (n = 493) during the study. Overall 2-year mortality was 32.8% (unadjusted drug-eluting stent vs bare-metal stent; 30.1% vs 39.8%; P < 0.001). After propensity score matching 431 patients with a drug-eluting stent to 431 patients with a bare-metal stent, 2-year risk-adjusted mortality, MI, and target-vessel revascularization rates were 39.4% versus 37.4% (risk difference, 2.1%; 95% CI, -4.3 to 8.5; P = 0.5), 16.0% versus 19.0% (risk difference, -3.0%; 95% CI, -8.2 to 2.1; P = 0.3), and 13.0% versus 17.6% (risk difference, -4.6%; 95% CI, -9.5 to 0.3; P = 0.06). LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Observational design, ascertainment of serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL and dialysis dependence from case report forms. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with severely decreased GFR, treatment with drug-eluting stents was associated with a modest decrease in target-vessel revascularization not reaching statistical significance and was not associated with a difference in risk-adjusted rates of mortality or MI at 2 years compared with bare-metal stents.

BACKGROUND:Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is frequently observed in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its presence is associated with a poor prognosis. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition and beta-adrenergic blockade are the cornerstones of medical management for LVSD. Current guidelines advocate that CKD patients with advanced LVSD should receive these therapies. The extent to which these recommendations are followed is unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate practice patterns for LVSD management across the spectrum of patients with advanced CKD, and to determine the rate of utilization of recommended therapies for LVSD. METHODS:This cross-sectional study encompassed all long-term dialysis patients (n=299) and patients with advanced pre-dialysis CKD who were followed in a multidisciplinary clinic (n=176) at a tertiary care center in Toronto, Canada. Echocardiographic and pharmacotherapy data were sought for each patient. In patients with moderate-severe LVSD (ejection fraction <40%), we evaluated the extent to which optimal pharmacotherapy, defined as the receipt of a beta-adrenergic receptor blocker and a RAS inhibitor (an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker), was applied. We then sought to identify factors to explain the usage of these therapies. RESULTS:Of the 475 eligible patients, 387 had echocardiographic data available for analysis. Among these individuals, 34 (8.8%) had moderate-severe LVSD, of whom 23 (67.7%) were receiving optimal therapy. Non-receipt of optimal therapy could not be explained by hypotension, hyperkalemia, known drug sensitivities, or pill burden. CONCLUSIONS:Approximately one-third of patients with advanced CKD and significant LVSD were not receiving optimal pharmacotherapy, in the absence of known contraindication or intolerance. Identifying and overcoming barriers to care will be crucial in order to enhance the management of this high-risk population.

BACKGROUND:Sudden cardiac death constitutes the leading cause of death in patients receiving dialysis. Little is known about the trends in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use and the outcomes of such device placement. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:US long-term dialysis patients who received an ICD in 1994-2006. PREDICTORS, OUTCOMES, & MEASUREMENTS: ICD utilization rates and incident rates of all-cause mortality, device infections, and other device-related procedures were measured. We compared mortality between recipients and otherwise similar patients who did not receive such a device using high-dimensional propensity score matching. We also examined the associations of demographics, dialysis type, baseline comorbid conditions, cardiovascular events at the time of admission, and recent infection with the study outcomes. RESULTS:9,528 patients received an ICD in 1994-2006, with >88% placed after 2000. Almost all ICD use in the 1990s was for secondary prevention, however, half the patients received ICDs for apparent primary prevention in 2006. Mortality rates after implantation were high (448 deaths/1,000 patient-years) and most deaths were cardiovascular. Postimplantation infection rates were high, especially in the first year after implantation (988 events/1,000 patient-years) and were predicted by diabetes and recent infection. Patients receiving ICDs for secondary prevention had an overall 14% (95% CI, 9%-19%) lower mortality risk compared with propensity-matched controls, but these benefits seemed to be restricted to the early postimplantation time. LIMITATIONS/CONCLUSIONS:Lack of clinical data, especially for laboratory and heart function studies. Residual confounding by indication. CONCLUSIONS:ICD use in dialysis patients is increasing, but rates of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality remain high in dialysis patients receiving these devices. Device infections are common, particularly in patients with recent infections. Randomized trials of ICDs are needed to determine the efficacy, safety, and risk-benefit ratio of these devices in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND:Soluble endoglin, a TGF-β receptor, plays a key role in cardiovascular physiology. Whether circulating concentrations of soluble endoglin are elevated in CKD or underlie the high risk of cardiovascular death associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unknown. METHODS:Individuals with and without CKD were recruited at a single center. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the modified MDRD study equation and the serum creatinine at the time of recruitment, and patients were assigned to specific CKD stage according to usual guidelines. Serum endoglin concentration was measured by ELISA and univariate and multivariable regression was used to analyze the association between eGFR or CKD stage and the concentration of soluble endoglin. RESULTS:Serum endoglin was measured in 216 patients including 118 with stage 3 or higher CKD and 9 individuals with end stage renal disease (ESRD). Serum endoglin concentration did not vary significantly with CKD stage (increase of 0.16 ng/mL per 1 stage increase in CKD, P = 0.09) or eGFR (decrease -0.06 ng/mL per 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) increase in GFR, P = 0.12), and was not higher in individuals with ESRD than in individuals with preserved renal function (4.2±1.1 and 4.3±1.2 ng/mL, respectively). Endoglin concentration was also not significantly associated with urinary albumin excretion. CONCLUSIONS:Renal function is not associated with the circulating concentration of soluble endoglin. Elevations in soluble endoglin concentration are unlikely to contribute to the progression of CKD or the predisposition of individuals with CKD to develop cardiovascular disease.