Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:A clinical augmented reality guidance system was developed for MRI-guided musculoskeletal interventions Magnetic Resonance Image Overlay System (MR-IOS). The purpose of this study was to assess MRI compatibility, system accuracy, technical efficacy, and operator performance of the MR-IOS. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:The impact of the MR-IOS on the MR environment was assessed by measuring image quality with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and signal intensity uniformity with the system in various on/off states. The system accuracy was assessed with an in-room preclinical experiment by performing 62 needle insertions on a spine phantom by an expert operator measuring entry, depth, angle, and target errors. Technical efficacy and operator performance were tested in laboratory by running an experiment with 40 novice operators (20 using freehand technique versus 20 MR-IOS-guided) with each operator inserting 10 needles into a geometric phantom. Technical efficacy was measured by comparing the success rates of needle insertions between the two operator groups. Operator performance was assessed by comparing total procedure times, total needle path distance, presumed tissue damage, and speed of individual insertions between the two operator groups. RESULTS:The MR-IOS maximally altered SNR by 2% with no perceptible change in image quality or uniformity. Accuracy assessment showed mean entry error of 1.6 ± 0.6 mm, depth error of 0.7 ± 0.5 mm, angle error of 1.5 ± 1.1°, and target error of 1.9 ± 0.8 mm. Technical efficacy showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031) between success rates (freehand 35.0% vs. MR-IOS 80.95%). Operator performance showed: mean total procedure time of 40.3 ± 4.4 (s) for freehand and 37.0 ± 3.7 (s) for MR-IOS (p = 0.584), needle path distances of 152.6 ± 15.0 mm for freehand and 116.9 ± 8.7 mm for MR-IOS (p = 0.074), presumed tissue damage of 7,417.2 ± 955.6 mm(2) for freehand and 6062.2 ± 678.5 mm(2) for MR-IOS (p = 0.347), and speed of insertion 5.9 ± 0.4 mm/s for freehand and 4.3 ± 0.3 mm/s for MR-IOS (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The MR-IOS is compatible within a clinical MR imaging environment, accurate for needle placement, technically efficacious, and improves operator performance over the unassisted insertion technique. The MR-IOS was found to be suitable for further testing in a clinical setting.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the feasibility, technical success, and effectiveness of high-resolution magnetic resonance (MR)-guided posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN) blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 12 posterior femoral cutaneous nerve blocks in 8 patients [6 (75%) female, 2 (25%) male; mean age, 47 years; range, 42-84 years] with chronic perineal pain suggesting PFCN neuropathy was performed. Procedures were performed with a clinical wide-bore 1.5-T MR imaging system. High-resolution MR imaging was utilized for visualization and targeting of the PFCN. Commercially available, MR-compatible 20-G needles were used for drug delivery. Variables assessed were technical success (defined as injectant surrounding the targeted PFCN on post-intervention MR images) effectiveness, (defined as post-interventional regional anesthesia of the target area innervation downstream from the posterior femoral cutaneous nerve block), rate of complications, and length of procedure time. RESULTS:MR-guided PFCN injections were technically successful in 12/12 cases (100%) with uniform perineural distribution of the injectant. All blocks were effective and resulted in post-interventional regional anesthesia of the expected areas (12/12, 100%). No complications occurred during the procedure or during follow-up. The average total procedure time was 45 min (30-70) min. CONCLUSIONS:Our initial results demonstrate that this technique of selective MR-guided PFCN blocks is feasible and suggest high technical success and effectiveness. Larger studies are needed to confirm our initial results.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To prospectively assess the technical performance of an augmented reality system for MR-guided spinal injection procedures. METHODS:The augmented reality system was used with a clinical 1.5-T MRI system. A total of 187 lumbosacral spinal injection procedures (epidural injection, spinal nerve root injection, facet joint injection, medial branch block, discography) were performed in 12 human cadavers. Needle paths were planned with the Perk Station module of 3D Slicer software on high-resolution MR images. Needles were placed under augmented reality MRI navigation. MRI was used to confirm needle locations. T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI was used to visualise the injectant. Outcome variables assessed were needle adjustment rate, inadvertent puncture of non-targeted structures, successful injection rate and procedure time. RESULTS:Needle access was achieved in 176/187 (94.1 %) targets, whereas 11/187 (5.9 %) were inaccessible. Six of 11 (54.5 %) L5-S1 disks were inaccessible, because of an axial obliquity of 30˚ (27˚-34˚); 5/11 (45.5 %) facet joints were inaccessible because of osteoarthritis or fusion. All accessible targets (176/187, 94.1 %) were successfully injected, requiring 47/176 (26.7 %) needle adjustments. There were no inadvertent punctures of vulnerable structures. Median procedure time was 10.2 min (5-19 min). CONCLUSIONS:Image overlay navigated MR-guided spinal injections were technically accurate. Disks with an obliquity ≥27˚ may be inaccessible.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To prospectively assess overlay technology in providing accurate and efficient targeting for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided shoulder and hip joint arthrography. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A prototype augmented reality image overlay system was used in conjunction with a clinical 1.5-T MR imager. A total of 24 shoulder joint and 24 hip joint injections were planned in 12 human cadavers. Two operators (A and B) participated, each performing procedures on different cadavers using image overlay guidance. MR imaging was used to confirm needle positions, monitor injections, and perform MR arthrography. Accuracy was assessed according to the rate of needle adjustment, target error, and whether the injection was intraarticular. Efficiency was assessed according to arthrography procedural time. Operator differences were assessed with comparison of accuracy and procedure times between the operators. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test were used to assess group differences. RESULTS:Forty-five arthrography procedures (23 shoulders, 22 hips) were performed. Three joints had prostheses and were excluded. Operator A performed 12 shoulder and 12 hip injections. Operator B performed 11 shoulder and 10 hip injections. Needle adjustment rate was 13% (six of 45; one for operator A and five for operator B). Target error was 3.1 mm±1.2 (standard deviation) (operator A, 2.9 mm±1.4; operator B, 3.5 mm±0.9). Intraarticular injection rate was 100% (45 of 45). The average arthrography time was 14 minutes (range, 6-27 minutes; 12 minutes [range, 6-25 minutes] for operator A and 16 minutes [range, 6-27 min] for operator B). Operator differences were not significant with regard to needle adjustment rate (P=.08), target error (P=.07), intraarticular injection rate (P>.99), and arthrography time (P=.22). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Image overlay technology provides accurate and efficient MR guidance for successful shoulder and hip arthrography in human cadavers.

OBJECTIVE:The purposes of this review are to summarize the indications for MDCT arthrography of the shoulder, highlight the features of MDCT acquisition, and describe the normal and abnormal MDCT arthrographic appearances of the shoulder. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:MDCT arthrography is a valid alternative for shoulder imaging of patients with contraindications to MRI or after failed MRI. MDCT arthrography is accurate for assessment of a variety of shoulder abnormalities and, with further validation, may become the imaging test of choice for evaluation of the postoperative shoulder.

OBJECTIVE:Limb salvage surgery comprises surgical techniques designed to resect musculoskeletal extremity tumors and subsequently reconstruct a limb with an acceptable oncologic, functional, and cosmetic result. Today, 70-90% of malignant extremity tumors are being treated with limb salvage surgery. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The purpose of this article is to describe the operative techniques, review the imaging techniques, and to illustrate imaging findings related to the surgeries in complicated and uncomplicated cases.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy of an augmented reality image overlay system in MRI-guided spinal injection procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:An augmented reality prototype was used in conjunction with a 1.5-T MRI system. A human lumbar spine phantom was used in which 62 targets were punctured to assess the accuracy of the system. Sixty anatomic targets (facet joint, disk space, and spinal canal) were punctured to assess how the accuracy of the system translated into practice. A visualization software interface was used to compare planned needle paths and final needle locations on coregistered CT images (standard of reference). Outcome variables included entry error, angle error, depth error, target error, successful access of anatomic targets, number of needle adjustments, and time requirements. RESULTS:Accuracy assessments showed entry error of 1.6 ± 0.8 mm, angle error of 1.6° ± 1.0°, depth error of 0.7 ± 0.5 mm, and target error of 1.9 ± 0.9 mm. All anatomic targets (60 of 60 insertions) were successfully punctured, including all 20 facet joints, all 20 disks, and all 20 spinal canals. Four needle adjustments (6.7%) were required. Planning of a single needle path required an average of 55 seconds. A single needle insertion required an average of 1 minute 27 seconds. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The augmented reality image overlay system evaluated facilitated accurate MRI guidance for successful spinal procedures in a lumbar spine model. It exhibited potential for simplifying the current practice of MRI-guided lumbar spinal injection procedures.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report the safety and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance (MRI)--guided core biopsy of osseous lesions in children with chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis (CRMO) that were visible on MRI but were occult on radiography and computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:A retrospective analysis of MRI-guided osseous biopsy performed in seven children (four girls and three boys; mean age 13 years (range 11 to 14) with CRMO was performed. Indication for using MRI guidance was visibility of lesions by MRI only. MRI-guided procedures were performed with 0.2-Tesla (Magnetom Concerto; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; n = 5) or 1.5-T (Magnetom Espree; Siemens; n = 2) open MRI systems. Core needle biopsy was obtained using an MRI-compatible 4-mm drill system. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia was used. Parameters evaluated were lesion visibility, technical success, procedure time, complications and microbiology, cytology, and histopathology findings. RESULTS:Seven of seven (100%) targeted lesions were successfully visualized and sampled. All obtained specimens were sufficient for histopathological analysis. Length of time of the procedures was 77 min (range 64 to 107). No complications occurred. Histopathology showed no evidence of malignancy, which was confirmed at mean follow-up of 50 months (range 28 to 78). Chronic nonspecific inflammation characteristic for CRMO was present in four of seven (58%) patients, and edema with no inflammatory cells was found in three of seven (42%) patients. There was no evidence of infection in any patient. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:MRI-guided osseous biopsy is a safe and accurate technique for the diagnosis of pediatric CRMO lesions that are visible on MRI only.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy procedures of head and neck lesions using 0.23T open MRI with optical tracking. METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 77 patients (51 male, 26 female; mean age, 43 years; range, 11-88 years) who underwent MRI-guided percutaneous biopsy of a head and neck lesion was performed. Mean lesion diameter was 3 cm (range, 1-7.8 cm). Rapid gradient echo sequences were used for image guidance. 23/77 lesions were biopsied after intravenous gadolinium. Tissue sampling techniques included needle aspiration (n = 19) and core needle biopsy (n = 58). Outcome variables included technical success, diagnostic accuracy, procedure time and complications. RESULTS:In all patients, a sufficient amount of tissue for pathological analysis was obtained. Pathological analysis diagnosed 41 malignant lesions and 36 benign lesions. In 42 cases, surgical correlation was available. In 35 cases, the final diagnosis was confirmed by imaging and clinical follow-up. MR-guided biopsy had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 93.2%, 100%, 100%, 91.7%, and 96%, respectively. Procedure time was 29 min (range, 15-47 min). No major complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS:MRI-guided biopsy of head and neck lesions has a high diagnostic performance and is safe in clinical practice. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:• MRI-guided biopsy helps clinicians to assess patients with head&neck masses. • Differention of malignant and benign lesions is possible with 96% accuracy. • The safety profile of MRI-guided biopsy of head&neck lesions is favorable. • MRI guidance enables accurate biopsy without the use of ionizing radiation.

OBJECTIVE:To assess the artefact properties of a MR-compatible carbon fibre needle with a nitinol mandrin in vitro and to report first clinical experiences. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:In vitro, the carbon fibre/nitinol needle was imaged at different angles against the main magnetic field (1.5T open bore magnet). A gradient echo MR fluoroscopy sequence (GRE: TR 9.3 ms, TE 3.12 ms, bandwidth 200 Hz/pixel, flip-angle 12°) and a fast turbo spin echo sequence (FSE: TR 412 ms, TE 9.7 ms, bandwidth 200 Hz/pixel, flip-angle 150°) were used. Artefact width, needle intensity contrast and needle tip location errors were assessed. In vivo, lumbar periradicular corticosteroid injections and one sclerotherapy were performed with carbon fibre needles (10 procedures) and with titanium alloy needles (2 procedures). The artefact sizes and contrasts were measured. RESULTS:In vitro, artefact diameters of the carbon fibre needle ranged from 3.3 to 4.6 mm, contrasts from 0.11 to 0.52, with larger artefact contrasts and widths with the GRE sequence. Needle tip location errors of -2.1 to -2.8 mm were observed. Decreasing angles to the main field lead to smaller artefacts. In vivo, the carbon fibre/nitinol needle produced smaller artefacts (mean width FSE/GRE: 2.8mm/4.6mm) with lower contrast (0.30-0.42) than the titanium alloy needle (mean width FSE/GRE: 4.1 mm/7.5 mm, contrast 0.60-0.73). CONCLUSIONS:The carbon fibre/nitinol needle is useful for performing MR-guided interventions at 1.5T, producing more subtle artefacts than a titanium alloy needle, but with an incomplete depiction and thus inaccurate localization of the needle tip.