Faculty Bibliography

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common benign adenoma in men, affecting nearly all of them. BPH represents a clinically significant cause of bladder outflow obstruction in up to 40% of men. The growing frequency of diagnosis is due to increasing life expectancy and a trend toward seeking medical advice at earlier stages of the disease. The last decade has witnessed a significant shift in emphasis in the management of BPH, with medical therapies and, to a lesser extent, minimally invasive therapies becoming the predominant active therapy choices. The development of effective therapies such as alpha-adrenergic blockers and 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors and the possibility of their combined use represent the most significant advance in the treatment of BPH

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening is an integral part of current screening for prostate cancer. Together with digital rectal examinations, it is recommended annually by the American Cancer Society. PSA screening has resulted in a significant stage migration in the past decades. Different forms of PSA, including free PSA, volume adjusted, complexed, intact, or pro-PSA, are being used in the screening process. Other aspects of the screening process include age at diagnosis, survival, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment. Recent studies have cast doubt on whether PSA screening positively affects mortality and how the quality of life of patients may be affected by screening. Future considerations include the need for more longitudinal studies as well as further study of the PSA components that may become more relevant in the future

OBJECTIVE: Fluorocystography (FC) is the reference standard for assessing the integrity of the vesicourethral anastomosis after radical prostatectomy (RP). We describe a new technique, transperineal sonocystography (TPSC), as a cost-effective alternative and more informative than FC. METHODS: Between May 1, 2007, and October 1, 2008, 175 consecutive men underwent open or robotically assisted RP. Before Foley catheter removal, all men underwent both TPSC and FC, which were performed and interpreted by a single radiologist. Transperineal sonocystography was performed first with real-time imaging after gravity filling of the bladder with 150 mL of normal saline. Extravasation of saline was calculated by computer software after outlining the observed pooling of extravasated saline in the transverse and longitudinal views. Fluorocystography was performed after TPSC using our standard protocol, with qualitative classification of anastomotic leaks as none, slight, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: The mean extravasation volume +/- SEM was 16.3 +/- 2.9 mL. Of the 175 patients, 142 (81.2%) showed no anastomotic leaks on TPSC. Of the remaining 33 patients (18.8%), TPSC identified 20 (11.4%), 13 (7.4%), and 0 patients with slight, moderate, and severe leaks, respectively. Excellent concordance was shown between TPSC and FC. CONCLUSIONS: Transperineal sonocystography was equivalent to FC in detecting anastomotic leaks after RP. It provides a safe, inexpensive, and effective alternative to traditional FC for evaluating the integrity of the vesicourethral anastomosis after RP

OBJECTIVES: To critically examine the cardiovascular and thromboembolic risks associated with erythropoietin stimulating proteins (ESPs) in men with normal hemoglobin levels undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy. METHODS: Between October 1, 2000, through December 31, 2006, a total of 1308 men underwent open radial retropubic prostatectomy by a single surgeon. Of these men, 1095 received preoperative ESPs. Hematocrit levels measured at baseline, immediately before anesthesia induction and at hospital discharge, were prospectively entered into a database. Thromboembolic and cardiovascular complications were prospectively captured during the hospitalization and after surgery. RESULTS: The mean Delta preoperative hematocrit level was 5.9 g/dL. The pre-anesthesia induction hematocrit level was 49.2%. Hospital discharge hematocrit level was 33.6 g/dL. The overall risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications in men receiving ESP were 0.55% and 0.45%, respectively. The risk of cardiovascular and thromboembolic complications were independent of the Delta in preoperative hematocrit or the absolute level of the pre-anesthesia induction hematocrit. CONCLUSIONS: ESPs represent a safe and effective preoperative blood management strategy for men undergoing open radical retropubic prostatectomy

PURPOSE: To our knowledge we report the first large, randomized, prospective penile rehabilitation clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of nightly intraurethral alprostadil vs sildenafil citrate after nerve sparing prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, open label, multicenter American study in men with normal erectile function who underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. The International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain was the primary end point. Subjects initiated nightly treatment within 1 month of surgery with intraurethral alprostadil or oral sildenafil citrate (50 mg) for 9 months. After 1-month washout and before sexual activity subjects self-administered sildenafil citrate (100 mg) for a total of 6 attempts in 1 month. Secondary end points were the global assessment question, sexual encounter profile, Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction and measured stretched penile length. RESULTS: Of 139 men who started intraurethral alprostadil and 73 who started sildenafil citrate, 97 and 59, respectively, completed the trial. There were no statistically significant differences in International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain and intercourse success rates to intraurethral alprostadil. The global assessment question was significantly better only at 6 months for intraurethral alprostadil (p <0.028). At completion there were no differences between treatments for any of the end points. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to directly compare the ability of alprostadil and a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor to enhance penile recovery subsequent to bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. The use of nightly subtherapeutic intraurethral alprostadil is well tolerated after radical prostatectomy. The benefit to return of erectile function of nightly sildenafil citrate and subtherapeutic intraurethral alprostadil appears to be comparable within the first year of surgery

OBJECTIVES: To examine the pathologic findings and biochemical recurrence rates for a consecutive cohort of candidates for active surveillance who underwent radical prostatectomy. The role of active surveillance for the treatment of low-risk prostate cancer is highly controversial. METHODS: Between October 2000 and February 2008, a single surgeon performed 1565 open radical retropubic prostatectomies for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cases were selected for extraction if they fulfilled 1 of 2 published criteria for active surveillance in our prospective longitudinal outcomes database. A retrospective review of the prospectively collected database was executed to elucidate the outcomes of candidates for active surveillance who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. Gleason score, pathologic stage, and surgical margins were prospectively captured in our database. The 5-year, biochemical-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis plots. RESULTS: Overall, 45.9%-47.2% of cases were pathologically upgraded to a Gleason score >/= 7. Moreover, 12.3%-13.1% of cases were found to have a primary Gleason pattern of 4 or 5. Extracapsular extension (pT3a disease) was observed in 7.8%-10.9% of cases. A total of 28.8%-32.2% of cases had an estimated percentage of cancer volume in the surgical specimen exceeding 20%. The 5-year biochemical-free survival was estimated to be 83.2%-92.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our pathologic findings and risk of biochemical recurrence after open radical prostatectomy questions the wisdom of active surveillance in men with low-risk disease who have 'long' life expectancies

INTRODUCTION: It is believed that men diagnosed with prostate cancer and a low baseline serum testosterone (BST) may have more aggressive disease, and it is frequently recommended they forego testosterone replacement therapy. We used two large Phase III trials involving androgen deprivation therapy and external beam radiation therapy to assess the significance of a BST. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients with a BST and complete data (n = 2,478) were included in this analysis and divided into four categories: 'Very Low BST' (VLBST) </=16.5th percentile of BST (</=248 ng/dL; n = 408); 'Low BST' (LBST) >16.5th percentile and </=33rd percentile (>248 ng/dL but </=314 ng/dL; n = 415); 'Average BST' (ABST) >33rd percentile and </=67th percentile (314-437 ng/dL; n = 845); and 'High BST' (HBST) >67th percentile (>437 ng/dL; n = 810). Outcomes included overall survival, distant metastasis, biochemical failure, and cause-specific survival. All outcomes were adjusted for the following covariates: treatment arm, BST, age (<70 vs. >/=70), prostate-specific antigen (PSA; <10 vs. 10 </= PSA <20 vs. 20 </=), Gleason score (2-6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10); T stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4), and Karnofsky Performance Status (60-90 vs. 100). RESULTS: On multivariable analysis age, Gleason score, and PSA were independently associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure, distant metastasis and a reduced cause-specific and overall survival (p < 0.05), but BST was not. CONCLUSIONS: BST does not affect outcomes in men treated with external beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Prior to the description of the anatomic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, most men were rendered impotent following radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomies. The fact that these 'erection' nerves were localized outside the prostate suggested the feasibility of totally eradicating localized prostate cancer with preservation of erectile function in selected cases. All of these studies collectively suggest that unilateral excision of neurovascular bundles will compromise potency rates in between 15% to 20% of cases. It seems logical to report the risk of extracapsular extension independently for the two sides of the prostate, especially since independent decisions are made relative to the nerve sparing status of the different sides. Extracapsular extension is a risk factor for positive surgical margins. Positive surgical margins represent an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The surgeon is left with the dilemma of whether to maximize potency at the risk of compromising cancer control. In cases with a 30% risk of side specific extracapsular extension, using the above assumption, the risk of developing a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence is only 4.7% and 2%, respectively