Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE. To determine the response rate to 26-h continuous infusion cyclosporine A (CSA) combined with a fixed dose level of carboplatin (CBDCA) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, and to determine the effect of CSA on the pharmacokinetics of CBDCA. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN. To examine the effect of duration of CSA exposure on reversal of CBDCA resistance, clonogenic assays were performed in vitro in platinum-resistant A2780 cells. CBDCA (AUC 4) with CSA repeated every 3 weeks was then administered to patients on this phase II study. Pharmacokinetics of CSA and CBDCA were determined in a subset of patients. RESULTS. Preincubation of platinum-resistant A2780 cells with CSA reversed CBDCA resistance in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent manner. A group of 23 patients received 58 courses of CBDCA/CSA therapy. One partial response was observed. Eight patients achieved disease stabilization. Toxicity was similar to that observed in our previous phase I study and consisted of myelosuppression, nausea, vomiting, and headache. The mean+/-SD end-of-infusion CSA level (HPLC assay) was 1253+/-400 microg/ml. The pharmacokinetic studies suggest that CSA does not increase CBDCA AUC. CONCLUSIONS. Steady-state levels of >1 microg/ml CSA (HPLC assay) are achievable in vivo. Modest partial reversal of platinum resistance (in one patient with an objective response and in eight patients with stable disease noted) is achievable in vivo in patients pretreated with CSA. This phenomenon is not explained by alterations in CBDCA pharmacokinetics

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550 administered as a 1-h i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were premedicated and treated with escalating doses of BMS-247550. Blood sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BMS-247550. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated at six dose levels ranging from 7.4 to 59.2 mg/m(2). At 50 mg/m(2), 4 of 9 patients (44.4%) had dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia, abdominal pain/nausea). At 40 mg/m(2) (the recommended Phase II dose), 2 of 12 patients (16.7%) had dose-limiting neutropenia. Overall, the most common nonhematological toxicity was fatigue/generalized weakness (grade 3-4 seen in 9.0% of patients), followed by neurosensory deficits manifested as peripheral neuropathy and by gastrointestinal discomfort. At 40 mg/m(2), the incidence of grade 3 fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and neuropathy was 7.7%. Grade 1-2 neuropathy was observed in all patients enrolled and treated at 40 mg/m(2). Two patients with paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer, one patient with taxane-naive breast cancer, and another patient with docetaxel-refractory breast cancer had objective partial responses (lasting 6.0, 5.3, 3.0, and 4.5 months, respectively). The mean pharmacokinetic parameter values during course 1 for clearance, volume of distribution, and apparent terminal elimination half-life at the 40 mg/m(2) (recommended Phase II dose) dose level were 21 liters/h/m(2), 826 liters/m(2), and 35 h (excluding one outlier of 516 h), respectively. Values during course 1 and course 2 were similar. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for Phase II evaluation of BMS-247550 is 40 mg/m(2), although more long-term observations are needed. BMS-247550 has advantages over taxanes in relation to drug resistance and warrants further study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the combination of cisplatin and irinotecan as first-line treatment of patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. METHODS: Patients with no prior treatment for metastatic disease, presence of measurable tumors, performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic functions were potentially eligible for this trial. Cisplatin and irinotecan were given weekly at starting doses of 25 and 65 mg/m(2), respectively, for three consecutive weeks. Cycles were to be repeated every 28 days with dose adjustments as required. Patient accrual was based on a two-stage design with at least seven responses out of 28 patients in the first stage required to proceed to a second stage of accrual seeking a response rate of 40% or better. RESULTS: Of 34 patients entered onto the study, 31 were eligible and 27 were evaluable for response. Ten had received prior chemoradiation containing cisplatin. Among the five (two complete and three partial) observed responses, two were in the subset of patients who had received prior chemoradiation. This level of activity was deemed insufficient to warrant a second stage of accrual. Predominant toxicities were myelosuppression and gastrointestinal symptoms, although six patients experienced none of these adverse effects. CONCLUSION: At these doses, weekly cisplatin and irinotecan failed to demonstrate sufficient activity to undertake a phase III study. Although not apparent in this study, prior chemoradiation may affect response to platinum-based combinations and its impact should be considered in the design of future trials

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor activity of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor 9-aminocamptothecin (9-AC) given over 72 hours every 2 weeks in patients with ovarian carcinoma previously treated with one platinum-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ovarian carcinoma who received one prior platinum-containing regimen were eligible. Patients were stratified based on whether their disease was measurable, or nonmeasurable but assessable. 9-AC 35 microg/m(2)/h was administered by continuous infusion for 72 hours every 2 weeks via ambulatory pump. RESULTS: Sixty patients were entered, 32 with measurable and 28 with nonmeasurable but assessable disease. Ten (16.7%) of 60 patients responded (95% CI, 7.2% to 26.1%), with four complete responses and six partial remissions. The response rate for patients with measurable and nonmeasurable but assessable disease was 22% (95% CI, 7.6% to 36.2%) and 10.7% (95% CI, 2.3% to 28.2%), respectively. None of the responders were platinum-resistant. Nineteen patients (32%) had stable disease. The major toxicities were hematologic, with 25% of patients having grade 3 and 35% having grade 4 neutropenia, including five episodes of febrile neutropenia, 17% having grade 3 to 4 thrombocytopenia, and 27% having grade 3 to 4 anemia. Nonhematologic toxicity included grade 3 to 4 nausea (27%) and grade 3 to 4 vomiting (12%). CONCLUSION: This phase II multicenter trial of biweekly 72 hour 9-AC infusion as second-line therapy for ovarian cancer demonstrates comparable activity to standard approved agents in patients with both measurable and nonmeasurable but assessable disease. Toxicity consists mainly of moderate but controllable myelosuppression. Further studies combining 9-AC with other agents active in ovarian cancer for use as second-line therapy are warranted

PURPOSE: Vinorelbine is being explored by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) for its possible use in advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The objective of this Phase II trial was to evaluate a days 1 and 8 every-21-days schedule and determine its activity in patients who had failed standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with measurable disease and satisfactory baseline bone marrow, liver, and kidney functions were treated with vinorelbine 30 mg/m(2) given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. A two-stage sampling design was used, proceeding to a second stage accrual if sufficient activity was documented in the first 25 patients. RESULTS: The study did proceed to the second stage and accrued 44 patients. There were six objective responses (one complete, five partial) for a response rate of 13.7% (95% confidence interval: 5.2-27.4%). There were three patients with response in extra-pelvic sites (including the complete response) and three with response in the pelvis. The overall frequency of grades 3 and 4 neutropenia was 41%, whereas neuropathy was reported in 27% and was severe in three. Treatment-related pain, very severe in two instances, was also reported in 27%. CONCLUSION: Vinorelbine has moderate activity in a pretreated population with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Accordingly, vinorelbine in this days 1 and 8 schedule is being studied further in combination with cisplatin by the GOG

OBJECTIVES: Bryostatin-1 is a macrocyclic lactone that has been shown to regulate protein kinase C (PKC) activity and thereby potentially inhibit tumor invasion, angiogenesis, cell adhesion, and multidrug resistance. In preclinical experiments, bryostatin-1 induces tumor growth inhibition and enhances cytotoxicity when combined with other agents including cisplatin in cervical cancer cells. It was therefore anticipated that combination bryostatin-1-cisplatin therapy would be effective in patients with cervical cancer. The current study was conducted to evaluate this therapeutic approach in patients with recurrent or advanced-stage cervical carcinoma. METHODS: An IRB-approved New York Gynecologic Oncology Group (NYGOG) trial was activated for patients with a histological diagnosis of metastatic cervical cancer or in patients with recurrent disease not eligible for surgery or radiation. Enrolled patients received bryostatin-1 (50-65 microg/m(2)) as a 1-h infusion followed by cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)). The combined treatment was administered every 21 days. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were enrolled. The majority of patients had squamous cell carcinoma. Ten out of fourteen patients had recurrent disease. Fifty percent of the patients received bryostatin at 50 microg/m(2) and 50% received bryostatin at 65 microg/m(2). Seventy-one percent completed two cycles of treatment. The most common grade II-III toxicities were myalgia, anemia, and nausea or vomiting. One patient developed a hypersensitivity reaction and one developed grade III nephrotoxicity. Seventy-one percent (10/14) of patients were evaluated for tumor response. Eight out of ten (80%) of patients had progressive disease and 2/10 (20%) had stable disease. There were no treatment responses. CONCLUSIONS: Despite promising preclinical data, this clinical trial indicates that the combination of cisplatin and bryostatin-1 at the doses and schedule used is not effective in patients with advanced-stage or recurrent cervical cancer. There is even the possibility of therapeutic antagonism. The development of a serum assay for bryostatin-1 and additional mechanistic studies would be useful for future bryostatin clinical trials

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, liposomal lurtotecan, in patients with topotecan resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS: The trial was an open-label phase II study for patients stratified by resistance to either single agent topotecan or to a prior topotecan-containing regimen. Liposomal lurtotecan was delivered at a dose of 2.4 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalations and reductions were allowed based on hematologic toxicity. Patients were evaluated every two cycles for response to liposomal lurtotecan. RESULTS: Twenty-two women were accrued, with 16 women resistant to single agent topotecan and 6 women resistant to topotecan given in combination with a second chemotherapy agent. Hematologic toxicity consisted of mild to moderate thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia with mild to moderate gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue. There were no responses, although eight patients had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal lurtotecan at this schedule demonstrates moderate hematologic toxicity and no evidence of clinical activity in a group of heavily pretreated women previously exposed to the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan. The study of this agent in alternative patient populations or with alternative schedules is ongoing