Faculty Bibliography

Pancreatic cancer has the worst prognosis of any major malignancy, with an annual death rate that approximates the annual incidence rate. Delayed diagnosis, relative chemotherapy and radiation resistance and an intrinsic biologic aggressiveness all contribute to the abysmal prognosis associated with pancreatic cancer. Answers to the frustrating effort to find effective therapies for pancreatic cancer may be gained through a renewed perspective on tumorigenesis as a process governed by a select population of cells, termed cancer stem cells (CSCs). Cancer stem cells, like their normal counterparts, have the properties of self-renewal and multilineage differentiation and possess inherently heightened DNA damage response and repair mechanisms that make them difficult to eradicate. Initially discovered in leukemias, researchers have identified CSCs in several solid-organ malignancies including breast, brain, prostate, and colon cancers. We have recently identified a CSC population in human pancreatic cancers. These pancreatic CSC represent 0.5% to 1.0% of all pancreatic cancer cells and express the cell surface markers CD44, CD24, and epithelial-specific antigen. Pancreatic CSCs have been shown to be resistant to standard chemotherapy and radiation, and devising specific therapies to target this distinct cell population is likely needed to identify effective therapies to treat this dismal disease.

Major advances in cancer control will be greatly aided by early detection for diagnosing and treating cancer in its preinvasive state before metastasis. Unfortunately, for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, effective early detection and screening are currently not available and tumors are typically diagnosed at a late stage, frequently after metastasis. Partly because of low sensitivity/specificity, existing biomarkers such as CA19-9 are not adequate as early detection markers of pancreatic cancer. Thus, a great need exists for new biomarkers for pancreatic cancer. This article focuses on recent developments in the identification of new serum protein biomarkers that are useful in the early detection of PDAC.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, one of the leading causes of cancer death in the United States, has a five-year survival rate of only 4%. Present detection methods do not provide accurate diagnosis in the disease's early stages. To investigate whether optical spectroscopy could potentially aid in early diagnosis and improve survival rates, reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopies were employed for the first time in a limited pilot study to probe freshly excised human pancreatic tissues (normal, pancreatitis, and adenocarcinoma) and in vivo human pancreatic cancer xenografts in nude mice. In human pancreatic tissues, measurements were associated with endogenous fluorophores NAD(P)H and collagen, as well as tissue optical properties, with larger relative collagen content detected in adenocarcinoma and pancreatitis than normal. Good correspondence was observed between spectra from adenocarcinoma and cancer xenograft tissues. Reflectance data indicated that adenocarcinoma had higher reflectance in the 430- to 500-nm range compared to normal and pancreatitis tissues. The observed significant differences between the fluorescence and reflectance properties of normal, pancreatitis, and adenocarcinoma tissues present an opportunity for future statistical validation on a larger patient pool and indicate a potential application of multimodal optical spectroscopy to differentiate between diseased and normal pancreatic tissue states.

PURPOSE: To determine a biweekly dose of oxaliplatin for combination with full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) in pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15, and oxaliplatin days 1 and 15, repeated at 28-day intervals. RT (27 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) was administered during cycle 1. Dose escalation was guided using the time-to-event continuous reassessment method. Dose levels 1 to 4 included gemcitabine 1 g/m2 intravenously (IV) during 30 minutes and oxaliplatin 40, 55, 70, or 85 mg/m2 IV during 90 minutes, respectively; for dose levels 5 and 6, oxaliplatin dose remained 85 mg/m2 but infusion time for gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was increased to 65 or 100 minutes, respectively. The trial objective was to determine the dose level associated with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) through cycle 2 in < or = 20% of patients. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 64 years; 27 men, 17 women) with resectable (n = 12), unresectable (n = 29), and metastatic (n = 3) pancreatic cancer. Ten DLTs occurred in nine patients, including grade 4 platelets (n = 4), decline in performance status (n = 2), GI bleeding (n = 2), and GI toxicity (n = 2). The estimated probability of DLT for dose level 3 was .21 (90% posterior probability interval [PI], .12 to .33); for dose level 4, the estimated probability was .24 (90% PI, .14 to .36). CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 to full-dose gemcitabine and radiation therapy was well tolerated. On the basis of these results, a multi-institutional neoadjuvant phase II study in resectable pancreatic cancer is planned.

Major advances in cancer control depend upon early detection, early diagnosis and efficacious treatment modalities. Current existing markers of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, generally incurable by available treatment modalities, are inadequate for early diagnosis or for distinguishing between pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis. We have used a proteomic approach to identify proteins that are differentially expressed in sera from pancreatic cancer patients, as compared to control. Normal, chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer serum samples were depleted of high molecular weight proteins by acetonitrile precipitation. Each sample was separated by chromatofocusing, and then further resolved by reversed-phase (RP)-HPLC. Effluent from the RP-HPLC column was split into two streams with one directly interfaced to an electrospray time-of-flight (ESI-TOF) mass spectrometer for molecular weight (MW) determination of the intact proteins. The remainder went through a UV detector with the corresponding peaks collected with a fraction collector, subsequently used for MS/MS analysis. The ion intensities of proteins with the same MW obtained from ESI-TOF-MS analysis were compared, with the differentially expressed proteins determined. An 8915 Da protein was found to be up-regulated while a 9422 Da protein was down-regulated in the pancreatic cancer sera. Both proteins were identified by MS and MS/MS as proapolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein C-III(1), respectively. The MS/MS data of proapolipoprotein C-II was searched using "semi-trypsin" as the search enzyme, thus confirming that the protein at 8915 Da was proapolipoprotein C-II. In order to confirm the identity of the protein at 9422 Da, we initially identified a protein of 8765 Da with a similar mass spectral pattern. Based on MS and MS/MS, its intact molecular weight and "semi-trypsin" database search, the protein at 8765 Da was identified as apolipoprotein C-III(0). The MS and MS/MS data of the proteins at 8765 Da and 942 Da were similar, thus confirming the protein at 9422 Da as being apolipoprotein C-III(1). The detection of differentially expressed proapolipoprotein C-II and apolipoprotein C-III(1) in the sera of pancreatic cancer patients may have utility for detection of this deadly malignancy.

Recent observations indicate that, in several types of human cancer, only a phenotypic subset of cancer cells within each tumor is capable of initiating tumor growth. This functional subset of cancer cells is operationally defined as the "cancer stem cell" (CSC) subset. Here we developed a CSC model for the study of human colorectal cancer (CRC). Solid CRC tissues, either primary tissues collected from surgical specimens or xenografts established in nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficient (NOD/SCID) mice, were disaggregated into single-cell suspensions and analyzed by flow cytometry. Surface markers that displayed intratumor heterogeneous expression among epithelial cancer cells were selected for cell sorting and tumorigenicity experiments. Individual phenotypic cancer cell subsets were purified, and their tumor-initiating properties were investigated by injection in NOD/SCID mice. Our observations indicate that, in six of six human CRC tested, the ability to engraft in vivo in immunodeficient mice was restricted to a minority subpopulation of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)(high)/CD44+ epithelial cells. Tumors originated from EpCAM(high)/CD44+ cells maintained a differentiated phenotype and reproduced the full morphologic and phenotypic heterogeneity of their parental lesions. Analysis of the surface molecule repertoire of EpCAM(high)/CD44+ cells led to the identification of CD166 as an additional differentially expressed marker, useful for CSC isolation in three of three CRC tested. These results validate the stem cell working model in human CRC and provide a highly robust surface marker profile for CRC stem cell isolation.

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 4%. Effective early detection and screening are currently not available, and tumors are typically diagnosed at a late stage, frequently after metastasis. Existing clinical markers of pancreatic cancer lack specificity, as they are also found in inflammatory diseases of the pancreas and biliary tract. In the work described here, naturally occurring glycoproteins were enriched by using lectin affinity chromatography and then further resolved by nonporous reversed-phase chromatography. Glycoprotein microarrays were then printed and probed with a variety of lectins to screen glycosylation patterns in sera from normal, chronic pancreatitis, and pancreatic cancer patients. Ten normal, 8 chronic pancreatitis, and 6 pancreatic cancer sera were investigated. Data from the glycoprotein microarrays were analyzed using bioinformatics approaches including principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical clustering (HC). Both normal and chronic pancreatitis sera were found to cluster close together, although in two distinct groups, whereas pancreatic cancer sera were significantly different from the other two groups. Both sialylation and fucosylation increased as a function of cancer on several proteins including Hemopexin, Kininogen-1, Antithrombin-III, and Haptoglobin-related protein, whereas decreased sialylation was detected on plasma protease C1 inhibitor. Target alterations on glycosylations were verified by lectin blotting experiments and peptide mapping experiments using microLC-ESI-TOF. These altered glycan structures may have utility for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis and identify critical differences between biological samples from patients with different clinical conditions.

OBJECTIVES: Serum biomarkers for early diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are not currently available. We recently observed elevated expression of CEACAM1 in pancreatic adenocarcinomas and sought to determine whether serum CEACAM1 levels were elevated in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS: CEACAM1 messenger RNA levels were measured in pancreatic tissue samples using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. CEACAM1 was localized by immunohistochemistry in adenocarcinomas and in pancreatic intraductal neoplasia lesions. CEACAM1 serum levels were assessed by a double determinant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and compared with serum levels of CA19-9. RESULTS: CEACAM1 had higher expression levels in pancreatic adenocarcinomas compared with noncancerous pancreas (P < 0.0001) and was localized to neoplastic cells (95% (45/47) of adenocarcinomas and 85% (17/20) of pancreatic intraductal neoplasia 3 lesions. CEACAM1 was expressed in the sera of 91% (74/81) of pancreatic cancer patients, 24% (15/61) of normal patients, and 66% (35/53) of patients with chronic pancreatitis, with a sensitivity and specificity superior to CA19-9. The combination of CEACAM1 and CA19-9 had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than CA19-9. CONCLUSIONS: CEACAM1 is expressed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and serum levels of CEACAM1 serve as a useful indicator for the presence of pancreatic cancer. Additional validation studies on the use of serum CEACAM1 as a diagnostic marker in pancreatic cancer are warranted.

Carbohydrate post-translational modifications on proteins are important determinants of protein function in both normal and disease biology. We have developed a method to allow the efficient, multiplexed study of glycans on individual proteins from complex mixtures, using antibody microarray capture of multiple proteins followed by detection with lectins or glycan-binding antibodies. Chemical derivatization of the glycans on the spotted antibodies prevented lectin binding to those glycans. Multiple lectins could be used as detection probes, each targeting different glycan groups, to build up lectin binding profiles of captured proteins. By profiling both protein and glycan variation in multiple samples using parallel sandwich and glycan-detection assays, we found cancer-associated glycan alteration on the proteins MUC1 and CEA in the serum of pancreatic cancer patients. Antibody arrays for glycan detection are highly effective for profiling variation in specific glycans on multiple proteins and should be useful in diverse areas of glycobiology research.