Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:zelefm01

Total Results:

489


A comparative dosimetric analysis of virtual stereotactic body radiotherapy to high-dose-rate monotherapy for intermediate-risk prostate cancer

Spratt, Daniel E; Scala, Lawrence M; Folkert, Michael; Voros, Laszlo; Cohen, Gil'ad N; Happersett, Laura; Katsoulakis, Evangelia; Zelefsky, Michael J; Kollmeier, Marisa A; Yamada, Yoshiya
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is being used with increasing frequency as definitive treatment of early stage prostate cancer. Much of the justification for its adoption was derived from earlier clinical results using high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. We determine whether HDR's dosimetry can be achieved by virtual SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer on a prospective trial evaluating the efficacy of HDR monotherapy treated to dose of 9.5Gy×4 fractions were used for this study. A total of 5 patients were used in this analysis. Virtual SBRT plans were developed to reproduce the planning target volume (PTV) HDR dose distributions. Both normal tissue- and PTV-prioritized plans were generated. RESULTS:From the normal tissue-prioritized plan, HDR and virtual SBRT achieved similar PTV V100 (93.8% vs. 93.1%, p=0.20) and V150 (40.3% vs. 42.9%, p=0.69) coverage. However, the PTV V200 was not attainable with SBRT (15.2% vs. 0.0%, p<0.001). The rectal Dmax was significantly lower with HDR (94.2% vs. 99.42%, p=0.05). The rectal D2 cc was also lower (60.8% vs. 71.1%, p=0.07). Difference in D1 cc urethral dose was not significantly different (87.7% vs. 75.2%, p=0.33). Comparing the PTV-prioritized plans, the rectal Dmax (94.2% vs. 111.1%, p=0.05) and mean dose (27.1% vs. 33.3%, p=0.03) were significantly higher using SBRT, and the rectal D2 cc was higher using SBRT (60.8% vs. 81.8%, p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS:HDR achieves significantly higher intraprostatic doses while achieving a lower maximum rectal dose compared with our virtual SBRT treatment planning. Future studies should compare clinical outcomes and toxicity between these modalities.
PMID: 23622710
ISSN: 1873-1449
CID: 5528732

Rebuttal to Dr. Stone [Comment]

Spratt, Daniel E; Zelefsky, Michael J
PMID: 23988508
ISSN: 1873-1449
CID: 5528772

Point: There is a need for supplemental XRT with brachytherapy in the treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients

Spratt, Daniel E; Zelefsky, Michael J
PMID: 23988506
ISSN: 1873-1449
CID: 5528762

High-dose-rate intraoperative brachytherapy and radical surgical resection in the management of recurrent head-and-neck cancer

Teckie, Sewit; Scala, L Matthew; Ho, Felix; Wolden, Suzanne; Chiu, Johnny; Cohen, Gil'ad N; Wong, Richard; Ganly, Ian; Zelefsky, Michael J; Lee, Nancy Y
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To report long-term outcomes of high-dose-rate (HDR) intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) at the time of radical resection for recurrent head-and-neck cancer and determine potential prognostic factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS/METHODS:Between 7/1998 and 11/2011, 57 patients with recurrent head-and-neck cancer underwent radical resection with curative intent and single-fraction IORT to 59 sites using a Harrison-Anderson-Mick applicator with remotely after-loaded (192)Ir HDR brachytherapy. RESULTS:One- and 3-year in-field progression-free survival (IFPFS) was 67% and 57%, respectively. In a multivariate model, IORT dose >15Gy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.11; p = 0.02), and prerecurrence disease-free interval >12 months (HR = 0.29; p = 0.04) independently predicted for superior IFPFS; nodal extracapsular extension (HR = 4.62; p = 0.003) predicted for inferior IFPFS. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 50% vs. 32% in those achieving in-field control vs. those not achieving in-field control (p = 0.04). Grade 3+ toxicity occurred in 37% and was unrelated to IORT dose. CONCLUSIONS:HDR-IORT combined with radical surgical resection is associated with durable IFPFS and long-term overall survival in select patients with acceptable treatment-related morbidity. IORT dose >15Gy should be used to increase the likelihood of disease control. The ability to achieve in-field local control in this poor prognostic cohort was associated with improved survival outcomes.
PMID: 23466361
ISSN: 1873-1449
CID: 5376202

Dosimetric Outcome of LDR Brachytherapy and Influence on Long-term Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes in Patients Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer [Meeting Abstract]

Ashamalla, M.; Kollmeier, M.; Cohen, G. N.; Pei, X.; Zelefsky, M. J.
ISI:000324503601384
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5530852

Predictors of Post-Radiation Therapy Hip-Related Toxicity After Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer [Meeting Abstract]

Zelefsky, M. J.; Gorshein, E.; Pei, X.; Schecter, M.; Kollmeier, M.
ISI:000324503601378
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5530842

High-Dose-Rate Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Sarcoma: Outcomes, Toxicity, and Practice Recommendations [Meeting Abstract]

Tong, W.; Folkert, M. R.; LaQuaglia, M. P.; Wexler, L. H.; Meyers, P. A.; Zelefsky, M. J.; Wolden, S. L.
ISI:000324503600171
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5530792

Use of Anticoagulants Predict Late Rectal Bleeding Following Definitive External Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer [Meeting Abstract]

Kollmeier, M. A.; Soni, P.; Pei, X.; Zelefsky, M. J.
ISI:000324503600223
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5530802

Comparison of High-Dose IMRT (86.4 Gy) to Combined Brachytherapy Plus IMRT for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer [Meeting Abstract]

Spratt, D. E.; Kollmeier, M.; Zumsteg, Z.; Pirus, G.; Yamada, Y.; Cohen, G.; Polkinghorn, W.; Pei, X.; Zelefsky, M. J.
ISI:000324503600312
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5530812

Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Doubling Time at Time of PSA Relapse Is an Independent Predictor for Distant Metastasis and Survival After External Beam Radiation Therapy [Meeting Abstract]

Romesser, P. B.; Spratt, D. E.; Zumsteg, Z. S.; Pei, X.; Kollmeier, M. A.; Polkinghorn, W. R.; Zelefsky, M. J.
ISI:000324503600380
ISSN: 0360-3016
CID: 5530822