Faculty Bibliography

The nucleus accumbens, as part of the mesolimbic dopaminergic reward pathway, mediates both addiction to and withdrawal from substances of abuse. In addition, activity of substances of abuse such as opioids in the nucleus accumbens has been implicated in pain modulation. Because nucleus accumbens nicotinic receptors are important in nicotine addiction and because nicotinic activity can interact with opioid action, we investigated the contribution of nucleus accumbens nicotinic receptors to opioid-mediated analgesia/antinociception. The response of the nociceptive jaw-opening reflex to opioids was studied in the rat, both before and during chronic nicotine exposure. In nicotine-naive rats, intra-accumbens injection of the nicotinic receptor antagonist mecamylamine blocked antinociception produced by either systemic morphine, intra-accumbens co-administration of a mu- and a delta-opioid receptor agonist, or noxious stimulation (i.e., subdermal capsaicin in the hindpaw); intra-accumbens mecamylamine alone had no effect. The antinociceptive effect of either morphine or noxious stimulation was unchanged during nicotine tolerance; however, intra-accumbens mecamylamine lost its ability to block antinociception produced by either treatment. Intra-accumbens mecamylamine by itself precipitated significant hyperalgesia in nicotine-tolerant rats which could be suppressed by noxious stimulation as well as by morphine. These results indicate that nucleus accumbens nicotinic receptors play an important role in both opioid- and noxious stimulus-induced antinociception in nicotine-naive rats. This role was attenuated in the nicotine-dependent state. The suppression of withdrawal hyperalgesia by noxious stimulation suggests that pain can ameliorate the symptoms of withdrawal, thus suggesting a possible mechanism for pain-seeking behavior

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of mandibular fracture treatment by closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation (CRF) with open reduction and rigid internal fixation (ORIF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 85 patients admitted to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service at San Francisco General Hospital and treated for mandibular fractures from January 1 to December 31, 1993. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) those treated with CRF and 2) those treated with ORIF. The outcome variables were length of hospital stay, duration of anesthesia, and time in operating room. The charge for primary fracture treatment included the fees for the operation and hospitalization without any complications. Within the group of 85 patients treated for mandibular fractures in 1993, 10 patients treated with CRF and 10 patients treated with ORIF were randomly selected, and hospital billing statements were used to estimate the average charge of primary treatment. The average charge to manage a major postoperative infection also was estimated based on the billing statements of 10 randomly selected patients treated in 1992 (5 treated with CRF, 5 with ORIF) who required hospital admission for the management of a complication. The average total charge was computed by using the average charge for primary treatment plus the incidence of postoperative infection multiplied by the average charge for management of that complication. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included in the study. The average charge for primary treatment was $10,100 for the CRF group and $28,362 for the ORIF group. The average charge for the inpatient management of a major postoperative infection was $26,671 for the CRF group and $39,213 for the ORIF group. The average total charge for management of a mandible fracture with CRF was $10,927; the total charge for the ORIF group was $34,636. CONCLUSION: The results of this retrospective study suggest that the use of CRF in the management of mandibular fractures at our institution provides considerable savings over treatment by using ORIF. The use of ORIF should be reserved for patients and fracture types with specific indications

OBJECTIVE:The purposes of this investigation were to study the feasibility of placing endosseous implants in children and adolescents with ectodermal dysplasia and to assess the position and stability of such implants during growth. This article reports on 6 subjects with long-term follow-up. Study design. A prospective study was commenced in 1991. Patients with hereditary ectodermal dysplasia who were over the age of 5 years and who presented to the University of California San Francisco Ectodermal Dysplasia Clinic for dental treatment were included and maintained in the study. In each case, clinical and radiographic records were obtained before treatment, immediately after implant placement, at delivery of the prosthesis, and subsequently at yearly intervals. Six subjects are reported, 4 as members of the prospective study group and 2 who had been treated before the study began. RESULTS:A total of 41 implants (19 maxillary, 22 mandibular) were placed. The average follow-up after implant placement was 7.8 years (range, 6-11 years), and the average time since restoration was 6 years (range, 5-10 years). Forty implants successfully integrated and have been restored. There was no evidence that implant placement or prosthetic rehabilitation resulted in restriction of transverse or sagittal growth. One mandibular implant, placed in a partially dentate 5-year-old, became submerged because of adjacent alveolar development and required placement of a longer abutment. Four maxillary implants placed in a partially dentate 7-year-old also became submerged and required prosthetic revision and the placement of longer abutments. CONCLUSIONS:This preliminary report suggests that endosseous implants can be successfully placed and can provide support for prosthetic restoration in patients with hereditary ectodermal dysplasia. However, vertical dentoalveolar growth results in submergence of the implant relative to the adjacent natural dentition when implants are placed adjacent to erupting permanent teeth.

OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this cadaver dissection study was to investigate the anatomy of the nasolabial fold with a view to explaining the problems of surgical softening or elimination of the fold. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS:Ten formalin-fixed cadavers and 6 fresh-frozen cadavers were used for this study. In 12 cadavers (8 formalin-fixed, 4 fresh-frozen), the nasolabial fold was sectioned at right angles to the fold for histologic examination, and in 4 cadavers (2 formalin-fixed, 2 fresh-frozen) the epithelium was dissected off the fold to allow for more detailed gross examination of the underlying musculature. RESULTS:The fold was clearly identified on 14 of the cadavers but was indistinct on 2 on gross examination. Beneath the fold were 2 muscle bundles. The more superficial muscle runs parallel to the fold whereas a deeper muscle runs at right angles to it. The buccal fat pad lies above the fold and appears to be retained by horizontal septae in the fat pad and also by the musculature of the fold. Cadavers showing a poorly defined nasolabial fold had fewer muscle bundles to support the fat and fewer fibrous septae running through the fat. CONCLUSIONS:The nasolabial fold is defined by structures that support the buccal fat pad and hold it above the fold. This appears to be a combination of muscle bundles that run both across and parallel to the fold and also by fibrous septae supporting the fat pad. This has implications for the development of surgical procedures to soften or eliminate the fold, which must separate the muscles from the dermis of the fold and allow the fat to descend and soften the fold.

Thin Silastic sheet alloplasts (Dow Corning, Midland, MI, U.S.A) are commonly used to reconstruct posttraumatic orbital floor defects. Complications associated with orbital Silastic implantation include infection, migration, and extrusion. The authors report an unusual case of an intraorbital, squamous, epithelial-lined cyst appearing as progressive vertical globe dystopia and proptosis occurring after Silastic reconstruction of a traumatic orbital floor defect

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this cadaver dissection was to study the position of the auriculotemporal nerve in relation to the mandibular condyle, capsular tissues, articular fossa, and lateral pterygoid muscle and to evaluate the anatomic possibility of nerve impingement or irritation by the surrounding structures. STUDY DESIGN: Eight cadaveric heads (16 sides) were dissected. The auriculotemporal nerve was identified by following its course around the middle meningeal artery. The course of the nerve trunk was dissected from the middle meningeal artery to the terminal branches within the temporomandibular disk. The horizontal distance between the auriculotemporal nerve and the medial portion of the condyle/condylar neck was measured. The vertical distance from the most superior portion of the articular condyle to the superior border of the auriculotemporal nerve was measured. RESULTS: The auriculotemporal nerve was identified on each side, and a single trunk was evident along the medial aspect of the condylar neck. At the posterior border of the lateral pterygoid muscle, the nerve trunk was in direct contact with the condylar neck in every specimen. The average vertical distance between the superior condyle and the nerve was 7.06 mm (+/- 3.21 mm); the range was 0 to 13 mm. The vertical distance between the nerve and the superior condyle on one side of the specimen did not correlate with the distance on the contralateral side. CONCLUSION: The auriculotemporal nerve trunk has a close anatomic relationship with the condyle and the temporomandibular joint capsular region, and there is evidence of a possible mechanism for sensory disturbances in the temporomandibular joint region. In all cases, the nerve was in direct contact with the medial aspect of the capsule or condylar neck. Because there is no correlation between the positions of the nerves on the right and left sides, only one side may be affected. The nerve was also observed to course in direct apposition to the lateral pterygoid muscle. The findings support the hypothesis that the anatomic and clinical relationship of the auriculotemporal nerve to the condyle, articular fossa, and lateral pterygoid muscle may be causally related to compression or irritation of the nerve, producing numbness or pain, or both, in the temporomandibular joint region

PURPOSE: This study is a retrospective chart review designed to evaluate the incidence and reasons for removal of plates and screws after Le Fort I osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of patients who underwent Le Fort I osteotomy at the University of California, San Francisco, and Northwestern University in Chicago between December 1985 and December 1994. All patients in the study were treated with internal fixation using 2.0-mm plates and screws. All data were obtained from medical records and operative reports. The following intraoperative variables were evaluated: hardware material, plate size and shape, plate location, screw size, graft material, and intraoperative complications. For patients requiring removal of hardware, the number, location and type of plates and screws removed were recorded, as well as the reasons for removal. RESULTS: A total of 738 plates were placed in 190 patients. Twenty-one of the 190 patients (11.1%) had at least a portion of the hardware removed because they either requested removal or required removal secondary to complications related to the plate or screw. This represented 70 of 738 plates (9.5%). The percentage of titanium plates removed was greater than the percentage of Vitallium plates removed. The reasons for removal included pain, palpation by the patient, sinusitis, temperature sensitivity, infection, and patient request. CONCLUSION: Only a small number of patients (10.6%) develop complications from plates or screws that required their removal. In each case, prompt removal constituted adequate management

SPECIFIC AIM. To evaluate the take of skin grafts on conventionally prepared beds and on beds prepared by a carbon dioxide laser, with and without abrasion of the bed. SIGNIFICANCE. Graft take is dependent on hemostasis, immobility, and nutrition of the graft. Scalpel excision of the skin graft can be associated with hemostatic difficulties and laser treatment of the skin graft bed can provide hemostasis. Abrasion of the bed after laser treatment may then be a means of opening small lymphatic and blood vessels to maintain the graft. Laser treatment followed by abrasion of the bed may provide an ideal graft base before suturing of the skin graft. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Full-thickness skin grafts were taken with a scalpel at three sites on the dorsal skin of 24 guinea pigs. The three beds were prepared with pressure alone to provide hemostasis, laser vaporization followed by abrasion with gauze to produce pinpoint bleeding, and laser vaporization alone. The original skin from each of the sites was then sutured back in place. At postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 10, 21, and 35 the graft sites were assessed clinically for 'take.' Laser Doppler measurements were also made to evaluate blood flow. Histologic sections of the three sites were prepared. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed to evaluate cell proliferation and angiogenesis. RESULTS. For the animals sacrificed through day 10 the rate of take for the sites that were not lased was 100%. For the sites that were lased alone and lased and abraded the rate of take was 71% with no difference between the two techniques. The lased sites demonstrated increased inflammatory response and graft necrosis. Immunohistochemical analysis showed increased cellular proliferation and angiogenesis in the bed. DISCUSSION. Grafts take best on a scalpel-prepared bed. Laser preparation of the bed, with or without abrasion, demonstrates decreased 'take.' Therefore the carbon dioxide laser is not a recommended means to take a graft or prepare the graft bed