Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Three suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior instruments were used to assess the prevalence of lifetime and recent suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior in patients with frequent treatment-resistant focal seizures who would be eligible for randomized clinical trials. This was done to determine which instrument was optimal for use in epilepsy. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, we compared lifetime and recent suicidal ideation and suicide attempt on the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), and Interactive Voice Response System CSSRS (E-CSSRS). A safety algorithm determined treatment referral. Coordinators and participants evaluated experiences with the C-SSRS. The proportion of participants that baseline assessment would exclude from clinical trial enrollment was determined. KEY FINDINGS: Among 208 participants, 1.6-3.9% had recent high risk suicidal ideation and 1.0-4.7% had a recent suicide attempt across all instruments. Lifetime high-risk suicidal ideation occurred in 12.1-14.1%. Lifetime suicide attempt occurred in 10.2-13.1% of participants. Of those with recent suicide attempt, 31.1% required referral to a health professional, and 3.9% needed urgent referral. Lifetime suicidal behavior (including aborted suicide attempt, interrupted suicide attempt, suicide attempt, preparatory acts or behavior, and nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior) was found in 21.1% on the E-CSSRS and 15.5% on the C-SSRS. Agreement (Kappa) was good to excellent for comparisons of all instruments. Fifty-two percent of subjects preferred either the CSSRS or E-CSSRS, whereas the rest had no preference; of those having a preference, 87.5% favored the CSSRS. Of the 18.9% of participants who might have been excluded from trials based on suicidal ideation and suicide attempt, the CSSRS identified high-risk suicidal ideation or suicide attempt in the preceding 2 years in only 4.4%. SIGNIFICANCE: Suicidality screening is feasible in people with epilepsy. Slightly more suicidal behavior is reported with the E-CSSRS than C-SSRS, suggesting the E-CSSRS may be optimal. The proportion of patients who may be excluded from clinical trials based on worrisome suicidal ideation or suicide attempt is small, suggesting that it is possible to enroll most eligible individuals.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Preclinical research in epileptology has been very successful in producing effective drugs. Unfortunately, however, seizures are still not adequately controlled in a third of the affected individuals, and comorbidities still impose a major burden on the quality of life. New preclinical and clinical drug development strategies are needed to identify drugs that target these unmet medical needs. RECENT FINDINGS: Even in recent years, the antiseizure approach based on screenings has contributed to the identification of new drugs. Thus, it should not be abandoned. However, we propose that a radically new approach, specifically designed to tackle the existing gaps in care, should be developed to complement the traditional screening. This new approach will require integrated strategies for preclinical screening and experimental trial design. In this review, we will attempt to address some of the issues that must be resolved to engage this effort. Are there suitable models to tackle the unmet therapeutic needs in epilepsy? Are there ways to de-risk the transition from preclinical to clinical studies? Are there ways to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and to design ad hoc trials for the unmet therapeutic needs? SUMMARY: Development and validation of a new, integrated strategy for antiepilepsy drug development is needed to identify truly innovative drugs.

OBJECTIVES: To describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with hospital-onset seizure (HOS) and to explore current practices in their management. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care, private (New York University Langone Medical Center) and municipal (Bellevue Hospital Center) medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients aged at least 18 years with HOS from January 1 through December 31, 2007. Patients admitted for evaluation of seizures or epilepsy were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital-onset seizure patterns, medication use, and outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 218 patients with HOS; 139 (64%) had no history of seizure. Hospital-onset seizures were recurrent in 134 patients (61%) during the inpatient stay and were more likely to recur in those with new-onset seizure vs those with a history of seizure (43% vs 32%, P = .09). The most commonly described HOS in patients with a history of seizure and patients with new-onset seizure was a generalized tonic-clonic seizure (72 [33%]). Metabolic derangements were the most common identifiable cause of HOS (43 of 218 [20%]) and new-onset seizures (35 of 139 [25%]) and were more likely to recur. Phenytoin was the most common antiepileptic drug prescribed de novo (61%). Death during hospitalization or discharge to hospice was more common in patients with new-onset seizures compared with those with a history of seizure (19% vs 5%, P = .004). Among surviving patients discharged with a prescription of antiepileptic drugs, phenytoin and levetiracetam were prescribed most often. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-onset seizures commonly occur as new-onset seizures, are typically recurrent, and are associated with a high mortality. Older antiepileptic drugs are often prescribed at seizure presentation and at discharge.

Rationale: Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is a multisystem autosomal dominant disease caused by inactivating mutations in TSC1 or TSC2 genes. The most common neurological symptoms in TSC include treatment-resistant epilepsy, mental retardation and autism. There is now accumulating evidence that pro-inflammatory cytokines, produced and released mainly by reactive astrocytes and activated microglia, are implicated in a wide range of chronic neurological disorders, including refractory epilepsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree of inflammation in TSC brain lesions in human, with the hypothesis that activated glial cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines will be increased in both cortical tubers and peri-tuberal brain (PTB), possibly contributing to widespread network dysfunction. Methods: Human TSC specimens (n=10; ages 0-7 years) were prospectively collected following epilepsy surgery at NYULMC. Region-matched control autopsy brain samples from cases with normal neurological history were obtained from the Maryland Brain and Tissue Bank (n=7; ages 0-8 years). Tissue samples were collected and handled in accordance with the NYULMC Institutional Review Board. Fresh frozen specimens were used to prepare protein extracts for Western blotting. Blots were probed with the astrocytic and microglial markers GFAP and Iba1, as well as with the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin 1beta (IL-1beta) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). To determine statistical significance (p<0.05), oneway ANOVA followed by Student's t-test were used. Results: GFAP and Iba1 levels were significantly elevated in both tubers (343+/-115% of control, n=5; p<0.05 for GFAP, and 346+/-35% of control, n=5; p<0.0001 for Iba1) and PTB (225+/-37% of control, n=5; p<0.001 for GFAP, and 247+/-37% of control, n=5; p<0.001 for Iba1). The inactive pro-IL-1beta was highly upregulated in tubers (319+/-114% of control, n=6; p<0.05) and in PTB (228+/-70% of control, n=4; p<0.001), and this was accompanied by a commensur!

The purpose of this report was to update the 2006 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) report and identify the level of evidence for long-term efficacy or effectiveness for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as initial monotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed or untreated epilepsy. All applicable articles from July 2005 until March 2012 were identified, evaluated, and combined with the previous analysis (Glauser et al., 2006) to provide a comprehensive update. The prior analysis methodology was utilized with three modifications: (1) the detectable noninferiority boundary approach was dropped and both failed superiority studies and prespecified noninferiority studies were analyzed using a noninferiority approach, (2) the definition of an adequate comparator was clarified and now includes an absolute minimum point estimate for efficacy/effectiveness, and (3) the relationship table between clinical trial ratings, level of evidence, and conclusions no longer includes a recommendation column to reinforce that this review of efficacy/evidence for specific seizure types does not imply treatment recommendations. This evidence review contains one clarification: The commission has determined that class I superiority studies can be designed to detect up to a 20% absolute (rather than relative) difference in the point estimate of efficacy/effectiveness between study treatment and comparator using an intent-to-treat analysis. Since July, 2005, three class I randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 11 class III RCTs have been published. The combined analysis (1940-2012) now includes a total of 64 RCTs (7 with class I evidence, 2 with class II evidence) and 11 meta-analyses. New efficacy/effectiveness findings include the following: levetiracetam and zonisamide have level A evidence in adults with partial onset seizures and both ethosuximide and valproic acid have level A evidence in children with childhood absence epilepsy. There are no major changes in the level of evidence for any other subgroup. Levetiracetam and zonisamide join carbamazepine and phenytoin with level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for adults with partial onset seizures. Although ethosuximide and valproic acid now have level A efficacy/effectiveness evidence as initial monotherapy for children with absence seizures, there continues to be an alarming lack of well designed, properly conducted epilepsy RCTs for patients with generalized seizures/epilepsies and in children in general. These findings reinforce the need for multicenter, multinational efforts to design, conduct, and analyze future clinically relevant adequately designed RCTs. When selecting a patient's AED, all relevant variables and not just efficacy and effectiveness should be considered.

Rationale: The Generalized Tonic-Clonic Convulsion (GTCC) has been described as a stereotyped seizure consisting of a symmetric tonic posture, followed by vibratory and clonic phases - defined as movements at a frequency of >5 Hz and <5 Hz respectively. We examined how frequently the classic GTCC occurs in a population and what factors, if any, contributed to deviations from this pattern. Methods: We reviewed the video EEG of 100 consecutive inpatients of the NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center that had bilateral limb movements as part of their seizure semiology. Each seizure was reviewed by 2 reviewers; any records in which the patient was obscured on the video were excluded from further analysis. Any seizure with bilateral symmetric tonic, vibratory and clonic phases in that order was categorized as "typical GTCC" (tGTCC), if one phase was absent, asymmetric or in the wrong order of progression it was considered "atypical GTCC" (aGTCC), if two phases were absent it was not a GTCC (nGTCC). All aGTCC were reviewed by at least 3 reviewers. Results: 104 seizures (41 from women) from 100 patients were reviewed, 2 patients were excluded due to obscured video. 45 had a tGTCC while 15 were aGTCC, and 42 were nGT

Rationale: The Generalized Tonic-Clonic Convulsion (GTCC) is often associated with post-ictal electrographic slowing, and at times suppression. The mechanism of post-ictal EEG suppression is not known but may reflect involvement of bilateral subcortical networks. We examined the electrographic activity occurring after seizures with bilateral movement to determine if there are post-ictal features unique to the GTCC. Methods: We reviewed the video EEG of 100 consecutive inpatients of the NYU Comprehensive Epilepsy Center that had bilateral movement as part of their seizure semiology. Each seizure was reviewed by 2 reviewers; any records in which the patient was obscured on the video were excluded from further analysis. Any seizure with bilateral symmetric tonic, vibratory and clonic phases (defined as bilateral movement > and < 5 Hz respectively) in that order was categorized as "typical GTCC" (tGTCC). If one phase was absent, asymmetric or the progression was different, it was considered an "atypical GTCC" (aGTCC). If two phases were absent it was not a GTCC (nGTCC). All aGTCC were reviewed by at least 3 reviewers. The post-ictal EEG was categorized as: "suppression", defined as background voltage <10uV; "slowing" defined as decreased amplitude and/or frequency compared to baseline while still >10uV; or "no change from baseline." Results: 104 seizures from 100 patients were reviewed, 5 patients were excluded due to obscured video or EEG, leaving 97 seizures reviewed. 41 were tGTCC, 14 were aGTCC and 42 were nGT