Faculty Bibliography

INTRODUCTION: It is believed that men diagnosed with prostate cancer and a low baseline serum testosterone (BST) may have more aggressive disease, and it is frequently recommended they forego testosterone replacement therapy. We used two large Phase III trials involving androgen deprivation therapy and external beam radiation therapy to assess the significance of a BST. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients with a BST and complete data (n = 2,478) were included in this analysis and divided into four categories: 'Very Low BST' (VLBST) </=16.5th percentile of BST (</=248 ng/dL; n = 408); 'Low BST' (LBST) >16.5th percentile and </=33rd percentile (>248 ng/dL but </=314 ng/dL; n = 415); 'Average BST' (ABST) >33rd percentile and </=67th percentile (314-437 ng/dL; n = 845); and 'High BST' (HBST) >67th percentile (>437 ng/dL; n = 810). Outcomes included overall survival, distant metastasis, biochemical failure, and cause-specific survival. All outcomes were adjusted for the following covariates: treatment arm, BST, age (<70 vs. >/=70), prostate-specific antigen (PSA; <10 vs. 10 </= PSA <20 vs. 20 </=), Gleason score (2-6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10); T stage (T1-T2 vs. T3-T4), and Karnofsky Performance Status (60-90 vs. 100). RESULTS: On multivariable analysis age, Gleason score, and PSA were independently associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure, distant metastasis and a reduced cause-specific and overall survival (p < 0.05), but BST was not. CONCLUSIONS: BST does not affect outcomes in men treated with external beam radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Prior to the description of the anatomic nerve sparing radical prostatectomy, most men were rendered impotent following radical perineal or retropubic prostatectomies. The fact that these 'erection' nerves were localized outside the prostate suggested the feasibility of totally eradicating localized prostate cancer with preservation of erectile function in selected cases. All of these studies collectively suggest that unilateral excision of neurovascular bundles will compromise potency rates in between 15% to 20% of cases. It seems logical to report the risk of extracapsular extension independently for the two sides of the prostate, especially since independent decisions are made relative to the nerve sparing status of the different sides. Extracapsular extension is a risk factor for positive surgical margins. Positive surgical margins represent an independent risk factor for biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The surgeon is left with the dilemma of whether to maximize potency at the risk of compromising cancer control. In cases with a 30% risk of side specific extracapsular extension, using the above assumption, the risk of developing a positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence is only 4.7% and 2%, respectively

Open radical prostatectomy (ORP) is the reference standard for the surgical management of localized prostate cancer. With wider availability of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy techniques, there is a debate regarding the standard treatment of the management of localized prostate cancer. Therefore, we reviewed the current status of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) as compared with ORP. Because no prospective, randomized trials comparing the different techniques have been performed, outcomes must be assessed from published series by centers that focus on ORP, LRP, and RALRP. Aside from reducing the amount of blood loss, current data suggest that the most significant outcomes (cure, continence, and potency) are no better with LRP or RALRP than with conventional ORP. Therefore, in experienced hands, ORP remains the gold standard procedure. However, there is a trend toward consistently better outcomes following RALRP in comparison with LRP. In the end, individual patient outcomes can be maximized by choosing the best modality based on the patient's comorbid medical conditions, cancer characteristics, and surgeon experience. Future studies are needed to further investigate long-term cancer control as well as functional outcomes for RALRP series

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard of the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In recent years there has been a significant shift in the treatment of BPH and guidelines emphasize minimally invasive surgery as a new treatment option. Minimal invasive technologies (MITs), such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), laser ablations, transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) have emerged as an alternative to the TURP. OBJECTIVES: To assess the retreatment rates of the most commonly used minimal invasive techniques. SEARCH STRATEGY: Durability articles were selected by using defined search terms using PubMed as search engine. RESULTS: Comparing to the overall retreatment rates of MITs the results show that TUMT, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and contact laser vaporization (CLV) are among the treatments with the lowest retreatment rates. Studies show no significant differences in retreatment rates between TUMT and TURP. CONCLUSION: A review of the current literature, long term results and retreatment rates of MITs shows large variability in outcomes and retreatment rates. The true definition of a MIT remains unclear. High energy TUMT deserves reconsideration in clinical practices, due to low retreatment rates and the low need of anesthetics

In order to determine the effects of therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of silodosin on QT interval, healthy men (N = 186; aged 18-45 years) were randomized to receive silodosin (8 or 24 mg) or placebo for 5 days or moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control, known to prolong QT) once on day 5. At baseline and on day 5, five ECGs were recorded 0.25 h before dosing and 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 23.5 h after dosing. Adjusted mean differences (analysis of covariance) between silodosin and placebo in the change in individual heart rate-corrected QTc (QTcI) from baseline to day 5 were <5 ms at all times (all 90% confidence interval (CI) upper limits <10 ms). The QTcI difference for moxifloxacin compared with placebo often exceeded 5 ms, establishing assay sensitivity. For silodosin, no statistically or clinically significant correlation was seen between plasma concentration and QTcI, and no clinically important effects on heart rate, PR segment, QRS complex, or morphologic ECG data were observed