Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: EUS-guided FNA of the left and right adrenals has been described, but data are very limited. OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to determine the impact of the diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA of adrenal glands on patient management. Our secondary objective was to determine predictors of malignant adrenal involvement. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients with enlarged adrenal(s) on abdominal imaging underwent EUS-guided FNA. The left adrenal (n = 54) was sampled via the transgastric approach and the right adrenal (n = 5) via a transduodenal approach. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (63% men, median age 65 years) were evaluated. The median adrenal gland size was 25 x 17 mm. Adrenal tissue adequate for interpretation was obtained in all of the patients. EUS-guided FNA confirmed malignancy in 22 (37%) patients. Based on size (> or =30 mm) alone, EUS had an accuracy of 68%. Patients with malignant cytology had higher standard uptake value scores on positron-emission tomography compared with patients with benign adrenal masses (P < .001). Malignant masses were more likely to have an altered adrenal gland shape compared with benign masses (crude odds ratio [OR] 12.0; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, altered adrenal gland shape was a significant predictor of malignancy (adjusted OR 7.94; P = .015), whereas a size of 30 mm or larger (adjusted OR 1.30; P = .774) and hypoechoic nature (adjusted OR 12.05; P = .148) were not. All patients except 2 with malignant cytology were treated with systemic therapy without the need for additional invasive biopsies or surgery. No immediate complications were encountered. LIMITATIONS: Lack of surgical criterion standard; 1 experienced endosonographer. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-guided FNA of the adrenal glands is a minimally invasive and safe approach that documents or excludes malignant involvement. EUS-guided FNA should be the first next test to evaluate enlarged adrenal glands because it directs therapy and affects patient management.

Prolonged pulmonary parenchymal air leaks are an important clinical problem. Standard treatment of prolonged air leaks include continued chest tube drainage, pleural sclerosis, or surgery. Approaches that are less invasive than bedside sclerosis or surgery are desirable but bronchoscopy approaches tried over the years have had limited success. In 2001, an American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) consensus statement concluded there was no role for bronchoscopy for the treatment of prolonged air leaks. The development of bronchial valves for treatment of emphysema allowed the use of these devices for air leaks under compassionate use regulations. Multiple reports of successful bronchial valve treatments, along with the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) humanitarian use approval of a bronchial valve for certain postsurgical air leaks, provide new evidence that there is likely a role for endobronchial treatment of prolonged air leaks in selected patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects millions of people and has limited treatment options. Surgical treatments for severe COPD with emphysema are effective for highly selected patients. A minimally invasive method for treating emphysema could decrease morbidity and increase acceptance by patients. OBJECTIVE: To study the safety and effectiveness of the IBV(R) Valve for the treatment of severe emphysema. METHODS: A multicenter study treated 91 patients with severe obstruction, hyperinflation and upper lobe (UL)-predominant emphysema with 609 bronchial valves placed bilaterally into ULs. RESULTS: Valves were placed in desired airways with 99.7% technical success and no migration or erosion. There were no procedure-related deaths and 30-day morbidity and mortality were 5.5 and 1.1%, respectively. Pneumothorax was the most frequent serious device-related complication and primarily occurred when all segments of a lobe, especially the left UL, were occluded. Highly significant health-related quality of life (HRQL) improvement (-8.2 +/- 16.2, mean +/- SD change at 6 months) was observed. HRQL improvement was associated with a decreased volume (mean -294 +/- 427 ml, p = 0.007) in the treated lobes without visible atelectasis. FEV(1), exercise tests, and total lung volume were not changed but there was a proportional shift, a redirection of inspired volume to the untreated lobes. Combined with perfusion scan changes, this suggests that there is improved ventilation and perfusion matching in non-UL lung parenchyma. CONCLUSION: Bronchial valve treatment of emphysema has multiple mechanisms of action and acceptable safety, and significantly improves quality of life for the majority of patients.

This article covers the risk factors, diagnostic tools, staging methods/modalities and treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Also presented is the new 7th edition American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) TNM classification for staging of NSCLC and a recommended treatment algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy increases the risk of pulmonary resection. Changes in specific pulmonary function tests may be predictive. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, had pulmonary function tests performed both before and after therapy, and then underwent elective pulmonary resection was performed. Final values and change in the pulmonary function tests before and after treatment were entered as independent variables into a multivariate model in which the dependent variable was major or respiratory morbidity. RESULTS: There were 132 patients. The mean duration between pretherapy and posttherapy pulmonary function tests was 4.1 months. The mean change in the percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second, in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume was +1.0, -6.4%, and -6.6%, respectively. Fifty-five patients (42%) experienced a postoperative complication, and 39 of those patients experienced a major or respiratory complication. There were 7 (5.3%) operative mortalities (5 were respiratory related). On multivariate analysis the change in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume was the only factor associated with major or respiratory morbidity (p = 0.028). When the posttherapy percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume fell by 8% or more, there was an increased likelihood of major morbidity (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in the percent diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide corrected for the alveolar volume after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy may predict increased risk for pulmonary resection, especially if the decrease is 8% or greater. These results should be considered in the preoperative risk assessment of patients who are to undergo pulmonary resection after induction therapy.