Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to identify characteristic patterns of syndesmotic screw (SS) failure, and any effects on clinical outcome. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective study was performed using a consecutive series of patients treated with open reduction and internal fixation with trans-syndesmotic screws for unstable ankle fractures with syndesmotic injury between 2015 and 2017. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics and classification, rates and patterns of trans-syndesmotic screw breakage, and backout were analyzed. Functional outcome was assessed using passive range of motion (ROM) and Maryland Foot Score (MFS). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:> .07). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Syndesmotic screw breakage was common in younger, male patients. Despite similarities in ankle range of motion and clinical outcome scores to patients with intact screws, there was a trend towards more frequent screw removal. This information can be used to counsel patients pre- and postoperatively regarding the potential for screw failure and subsequent implant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/UNASSIGNED:Level III, retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Students seek gap years to enhance knowledge and improve chances of professional success. Although many institutions offer research opportunities, no studies have examined outcomes after these experiences. This study evaluates a dedicated year of orthopaedic research on a cohort's ultimate orthopaedic surgery match rate. METHODS:From 2001 to 2018, 129 learners spent a year with our Department of Orthopedic Surgery at a major academic medical center. The students were either completing a gap year after college, during or after medical school, or after an unsuccessful match. Participants were asked to respond to a survey, which included demographics, educational information, and metrics related to the program. For the subcohort of students who ranked orthopaedic surgery, the match rate was compared with the mean for the US orthopaedic surgery match rates from 2006 to 2018 using a chi-square analysis. In addition, a Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the number of publications before and after the year. RESULTS:One hundred three students (80%) returned completed questionnaires. Of all learners who applied to and ranked orthopaedic surgery, 91% matched into an orthopaedic surgery residency program. These results compared favorably with the US orthopaedic match from 2006 to 2018 (67.9%; P < 0.001), despite a 4-point lower United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score for the research cohort. Finally, the research cohort had a greater percentage of women (23%) and minorities (40%) than the proportion of woman and minority practicing orthopaedic surgeons. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Students who completed a gap year in research matched into orthopaedics at a higher rate than the national average, despite a lower Step score. Mentors may also target traditionally underrepresented groups to help increase the pool of diverse applicants.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to combine a validated middle-age and geriatric trauma risk assessment tool (STTGMA) with a novel cost-prediction tool to create an objective triage tool for elderly hip fractures that would guide value-based care initiatives. METHODS:From October 2014 to January 2018, all patients aged ≥55 years who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture to a single level 1 trauma center were enrolled. Upon evaluation in the emergency department, demographics, injury severity, and functional status were recorded to calculate the trauma triage score (STTGMARisk). A model to predict high-cost hip fracture patients was created using similar variables (STTGMACost). RESULTS:Three hundred sixty-one consecutive operative hip fracture patients were enrolled. Inpatient mortalities were skewed toward STTGMARisk3 with 21.4% of patients in this high-risk group ultimately expiring during their hospitalization. High-cost patients were correctly skewed to the STTGMACost2 and STTGMACost3 groups with 88.9% of all high-cost operatively treated hip fracture correctly triaged to these cohorts. Statistically significant variations were found in cost within each STTGMARisk group. CONCLUSIONS:A simple risk score calculated upon admission (STTGMARisk and STTGMACost) was able to be used as a triage tool not only to differentiate increased mortality risk but also to predict high-cost patients based on resource utilization in hip fracture patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic, level II.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare narcotic use in the 90-day postoperative period across orthopaedic trauma, spine, and adult reconstruction patients and examine whether patient-reported pain scores at discharge correlate with narcotic use during the 90-day postoperative period. METHODS:Electronic medical record query was done between 2012 and 2015 using diagnosis-related groups for spine, adult reconstruction, and trauma procedures. Demographics, length of stay (LOS), visual analog scale pain scores during hospitalization, and narcotics prescribed in the 90-day postoperative period were collected. Multivariate analysis and linear regression were done. RESULTS:Five thousand thirty patients were analyzed. Spine patients had the longest LOS, highest mean pain during LOS, and were prescribed the most morphine in the 90-day postoperative period. Linear regression revealed that pain scores at discharge markedly influence the quantity of narcotics prescribed in the 90-day postoperative period. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patient-reported pain at hospital discharge was associated with increased narcotic use in the 90-day postoperative period.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study is to determine if the radiographic humerus union measurement (RHUM) is predictive of union in humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively. METHODS:All patients with long bone fracture nonunion presenting to a single surgeon were enrolled in a prospective registry. This registry was queried to identify patients with humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively and developed nonunion. The nonunion cohort was matched to a three to one gender- and age-matched control group that were treated nonoperatively for a humeral shaft fracture and achieved union. Two fellowship-trained orthopedic traumatologists blinded to eventual union scored radiographs obtained 12 weeks after injury using the RHUM. A binomial logistic regression determined the effect of the RHUM on the likelihood of developing union. RESULTS:Nine patients with humeral shaft fractures treated nonoperatively with radiographs 12 weeks after injury that developed nonunion were identified. These patients were matched to 27 controls. Logistic regression demonstrated the RHUM was a significant predictor of healing 12 weeks after humeral shaft fracture treated nonoperatively (p = 0.014, odds ratio 9.434, 95% CI for OR 1.586-56.098). All patients with RHUM below 7 went on to nonunion. All patients with RHUM above 8 healed. Three of seven patients (43%) with RHUM of 7 or 8 healed. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The RHUM demonstrated an increased likelihood of achieving union 12 weeks after injury. Orthopedic surgeons can counsel patients that fractures with RHUM scores of 6 or below are in danger of developing nonunion and can target interventions appropriately.

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes of diabetic patients who were treated for a fracture nonunion against matched controls. Sixty-one diabetic patients (type 1 or type 2) were identified from a prospective database. This cohort was paired with matched controls and univariate analysis was performed to evaluate for differences in complication rates, time to bony union and functional outcomes at 3, 6, 12, and greater than 24 months post-operatively.The diabetic group was composed of 29 females and 32 males, with an average age of 58 years, and 17 upper extremity nonunions and 43 lower extremity nonunions. Time to bony union, complication rate or functional outcomes at any follow-up time point did not significantly differ between groups. The comorbidity of diabetes mellitus does not lead to worse functional outcomes or increased complications following surgical treatment for a fracture nonunion.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To develop a tool that can be used preoperatively to identify patients at risk of poor functional outcome following operative repair of fracture nonunion. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING/METHODS:Academic medical center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:Three hundred twenty-eight patients who underwent operative repair of a fracture nonunion were prospectively followed for a minimum of 12 months post-operatively. INTERVENTION/METHODS:After randomization, 223 (68%) patients comprised an experimental cohort and 105 (32%) patients comprised a separate validation cohort. Within the experimental cohort, forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression was applied to 17 independent variables to generate a predictive model identifying patients at risk of having a poor functional outcome [Predicting Risk of Function in Trauma-Nonunion (PRoFiT-NU) Score]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Functional outcomes were assessed using the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA). Poor outcome was defined as an SMFA function index greater than 10 points above the mean at 12 months post-operatively. RESULTS:Significant predictors of poor outcome were lower extremity nonunion [odds ratio (OR) = 3.082; P = 0.021], tobacco use (OR = 2.994; P = 0.009), worker's compensation insurance (OR = 3.986; P = 0.005), radiographic bone loss (OR = 2.397; P = 0.040), and preoperative SMFA function index (OR = 1.027; P = 0.001). The PRoFiT-NU model was significant and a good predictor of poor functional outcome (χ(5) = 51.98, P < 0.0005; area under the receiver operating curve = 0.79). Within the separate validation cohort, 16% of patients had a poor outcome at a PRoFiT-NU score below 25% (low risk), 39% of patients had a poor outcome at a PRoFiT-NU score between 25% and 50% (intermediate risk), and 63% of patients had a poor outcome at a PRoFiT-NU score above 50% (high risk). CONCLUSIONS:The PRoFiT-NU score is an accurate predictor of poor functional outcome following fracture nonunion repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence description of levels of evidence.

CASE/METHODS:Two patients who developed radial nerve palsy at least 6 weeks after injury during nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. This complication was associated with external bracing, progressive varus angulation during treatment, and excess callus formation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Delayed radial nerve palsy may develop during nonoperative treatment of humeral shaft fractures when functional bracing fails to maintain alignment and stability at the fracture site.