Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:loebs01

Total Results:

524


Tweet this: how advocacy for breast and prostate cancers stacks up on social media [Letter]

Loeb, Stacy; Stork, Brian; Gold, Heather T; Stout, Natasha K; Makarov, Danil V; Weight, Christopher J; Borgmann, Hendrik
PMID: 28471484
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 2594232

Qualitative study on decision-making by prostate cancer physicians during active surveillance

Loeb, Stacy; Curnyn, Caitlin; Fagerlin, Angela; Braithwaite, Ronald Scott; Schwartz, Mark D; Lepor, Herbert; Carter, Herbert Ballentine; Sedlander, Erica
OBJECTIVE: To explore and identify factors that influence physicians' decisions while monitoring patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify physicians treating prostate cancer from diverse clinical backgrounds and geographic areas across the USA. We conducted 24 in-depth interviews from July to December 2015, until thematic saturation was reached. The Applied Thematic Analysis framework was used to guide data collection and analysis. Interview transcripts were reviewed and coded independently by two researchers. Matrix analysis and NVivo software were used for organization and further analysis. RESULTS: Eight key themes emerged to explain variation in AS monitoring: (i) physician comfort with AS; (ii) protocol selection; (iii) beliefs about the utility and quality of testing; (iv) years of experience and exposure to AS during training; (v) concerns about inflicting 'harm'; (vi) patient characteristics; (vii) patient preferences; and (viii) financial incentives. CONCLUSION: These qualitative data reveal which factors influence physicians who manage patients on AS. There is tension between providing standardized care while also considering individual patients' needs and health status. Additional education on AS is needed during urology training and continuing medical education. Future research is needed to empirically understand whether any specific protocol is superior to tailored, individualized care.
PMCID:5555310
PMID: 27611479
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 2593252

Newsworthiness vs scientific impact: are the most highly cited urology papers the most widely disseminated in the media?

O'Connor, Eabhann M; Nason, Gregory J; O'Kelly, Fardod; Manecksha, Rustom P; Loeb, Stacy
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a correlation exists between newsworthiness (Altmetric score) and scientific impact markers, such as citation analysis, impact factors, and levels of evidence. METHODS: The top five most cited articles for the year 2014 and 2015 from the top 10 ranking urology journals (Scientific Impact Group) were identified. The top 50 articles each in 2014 and 2015 were identified from Altmetric support based on media activity (Media Impact Group). We determined the number of citations that these articles received in the scientific literature, and calculated correlations between citations with Altmetric scores. RESULTS: In the Scientific Impact Group, the mean number of citations per article was 37.6, and the most highly cited articles were oncology guidelines. The mean Altmetric score in these articles was 14.8. There was a weak positive correlation between citations and Altmetric score (rs = 0.35, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.52, P < 0.001). In the Media Impact Group, the mean Altmetric score was 121.1 and most widely shared articles all related to sexual medicine. In this group, the mean number of citations was 9.7 and there was a weak negative correlation between Altmetric score and citations (rs = -0.20, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: The top articles based on Altmetric scores were not highly cited, suggesting that publications receiving the most media attention may not be the most scientifically rigorous, or that this audience places greater value on different subjects than the scientific community.
PMID: 28418091
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 2563172

Novel use of Twitter to disseminate and evaluate adherence to clinical guidelines by the European Association of Urology [Letter]

Loeb, Stacy; Roupret, Morgan; Van Oort, Inge; N'dow, James; van Gurp, Marc; Bloemberg, Jarka; Darraugh, Julie; Ribal, Maria J
PMID: 28170154
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 2489672

Prostate Cancer on the Web-Expedient Tool for Patients' Decision-Making?

Borgmann, Hendrik; Wolm, Jan-Henning; Vallo, Stefan; Mager, Rene; Huber, Johannes; Breyer, Johannes; Salem, Johannes; Loeb, Stacy; Haferkamp, Axel; Tsaur, Igor
Many patients diagnosed with cancer search for health information on the Web. We aimed to assess the quality and reliability of online health information on prostate cancer. Google, Yahoo, and Bing were searched for the term "prostate cancer." After selecting the most frequented websites, quality was measured by DISCERN score, JAMA benchmark criteria, and presence of HONcode certification. Popularity was assessed by Alexa tool, while accessibility, usability, and reliability were investigated by LIDA tool. Readability was analyzed by Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level and Automated Readability Index. All 13 selected websites were rated as being of high quality according to the DISCERN instrument (76.5 +/- 2.6 out of 80 points). JAMA benchmark criteria were fulfilled by 87 % of websites, whereas only 37 % were certified by the HONcode. Median Alexa Traffic Rank was 2718 ranging from 7 to 679,038. Websites received 2.3 +/- 0.5 daily pageviews per visitor and users spent an average of 2 min 58 s +/- 39 sec on the website. Accessibility (92 +/- 5 %) and usability (92 +/- 3 %) scores were high and reliability (88 +/- 8 %) moderate according to the LIDA tool. Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level was 7.9 +/- 2.2, and Automated Readability Index was 7.5 +/- 2.4, rating the websites as fairly difficult to read. In conclusion, quality, accessibility, and usability of websites on prostate cancer provided a high rating in the current analysis. These findings are encouraging in view of the growing frequency of patients' access of health information online.
PMID: 26234650
ISSN: 1543-0154
CID: 2434882

Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012

Danneman, Daniela; Drevin, Linda; Delahunt, Brett; Samaratunga, Hemamali; Robinson, David; Bratt, Ola; Loeb, Stacy; Stattin, Par; Egevad, Lars
OBJECTIVES: To investigate how well the Gleason score in diagnostic needle biopsies predicted the Gleason score in a subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen before and after the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revision of Gleason grading, and if the recently proposed ISUP grades 1-5 (corresponding to Gleason scores 6, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 8 and 9-10) better predict the RP grade. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All prostate cancers diagnosed in Sweden are reported to the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR). We analysed the Gleason scores and ISUP grades from the diagnostic biopsies and the RP specimens in 15 598 men in the NPCR who: were diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 with clinical stage T1-2 M0/X prostate cancer on needle biopsy; were aged
PMID: 26918298
ISSN: 1464-410X
CID: 2370412

Prostate Health Index (phi) Improves Multivariable Risk Prediction of Aggressive Prostate Cancer

Loeb, Stacy; Shin, Sanghyuk S; Broyles, Dennis L; Wei, John T; Sanda, Martin; Klee, George; Partin, Alan W; Sokoll, Lori; Chan, Daniel W; Bangma, Chris H; van Schaik, Ron H N; Slawin, Kevin M; Marks, Leonard S; Catalona, William J
OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Prostate Health Index (phi)* as a continuous variable in multivariable risk assessment for aggressive prostate cancer in a large multicenter US study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 728 men with PSA levels of 2-10 ng/mL and negative digital rectal examination enrolled in a prospective, multi-site early detection trial. The primary endpoint was aggressive prostate cancer, defined as biopsy Gleason score >/=7. First, we evaluated whether the addition of phi improves the performance of currently available risk calculators (PCPT and ERSPC). We also designed and internally validated a new phi-based multivariable predictive model, and created a nomogram. RESULTS: Of 728 men undergoing biopsy, 118 (16.2%) had aggressive prostate cancer. Phi predicted the risk of aggressive prostate cancer across the spectrum of values. Adding phi significantly improved the predictive accuracy of the PCPT and ERSPC risk calculators for aggressive disease. A new model was created using age, prior biopsy, prostate volume, PSA, and phi with an AUC of 0.746. The bootstrap-corrected model showed good calibration with observed risk for aggressive prostate cancer and had net benefit on decision curve analysis. CONCLUSION: Using phi as part of multivariable risk assessment leads to a significant improvement in the detection of aggressive prostate cancer, potentially reducing harms from unnecessary prostate biopsy and overdiagnosis
PMCID:5392379
PMID: 27743489
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 2278662

Complications After Systematic, Random, and Image-guided Prostate Biopsy

Borghesi, Marco; Ahmed, Hashim; Nam, Robert; Schaeffer, Edward; Schiavina, Riccardo; Taneja, Samir; Weidner, Wolfgang; Loeb, Stacy
CONTEXT: Prostate biopsy (PB) represents the gold standard method to confirm the presence of cancer. In addition to traditional random or systematic approaches, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided technique has been introduced recently. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of complications after transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided, transperineal, and MRI-guided PB. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a systematic literature search of Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases up to October 2015, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Complications and mortality following random, systematic, and image-guided PBs were reviewed. Eighty-five references were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The most frequent complication after PB was minor and self-limiting bleeding (hematuria and hematospermia), regardless of the biopsy approach. Occurrence of rectal bleeding was comparable for traditional TRUS-guided and image-guided PBs. Almost 25% of patients experienced lower urinary tract symptoms, but only a few had urinary retention, with higher rates after a transperineal approach. Temporary erectile dysfunction was not negligible, with a return to baseline after 1-6 mo. The incidence of infective complications is increasing, with higher rates among men with medical comorbidities and older age. Transperineal and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy may reduce the risk of severe infectious complications. Mortality after PB is uncommon, regardless of biopsy technique. CONCLUSIONS: Complications after PB are frequent but often self-limiting. The incidence of hospitalization due to severe infections is continuously increasing. The patient's general health status, risk factors, and likelihood of antimicrobial resistance should be carefully appraised before scheduling a PB. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the variety and incidence of complications after prostate biopsy. Even if frequent, complications seldom represent a problem for the patient. The most troublesome complications are infections. To minimize this risk, the patient's medical condition should be carefully evaluated before biopsy.
PMID: 27543165
ISSN: 1873-7560
CID: 2219482

Postoperative mortality 90 days after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based study

Björklund, Johan; Folkvaljon, Yasin; Cole, Alexander; Carlsson, Stefan; Robinson, David; Loeb, Stacy; Stattin, Pär; Akre, Olof
OBJECTIVE:To assess 90-day postoperative mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) using nationwide population-based registry data. PATIENTS AND METHODS:We conducted a cohort study using the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, including 22 344 men with localized prostate cancer of clinical stage T1-T3, whose prostate-specific antigen levels were <50 μg/mL and who had undergone primary radical prostatectomy in the period 1998-2012. Vital status was ascertained through the Total Population Register. The rates for 90-day postoperative mortality were analysed using logistic regression analysis, and comparisons of 90-day mortality with the background population were made using standardized mortality ratios (SMRs). RESULTS:Of the 14 820 men who underwent RRP, 29 (0.20%) died, and of the 7 524 men who underwent RARP, 10 (0.13%) died. Mortality in the cohort during the 90-day postoperative period was lower than in an age-matched background population: SMR 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.75). There was no statistically significant difference in 90-day mortality according to surgical method: RARP vs RRP odds ratio (OR) 1.14; 95% CI 0.46-2.81. Postoperative 90-day mortality decreased over time: 2008-2012 vs 1998-2007 OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.95, mainly because of lower mortality after RARP. CONCLUSION:The 90-day postoperative mortality rates were low after RARP and RRP and there was no statistically significant difference between the methods. Given the long life expectancy among men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, very low postoperative mortality is a prerequisite for RP, which was fulfilled by both RRP and RARP. The selection of healthy men for RP is highlighted by the lower 90-day mortality after RP compared with the background population.
PMCID:4942403
PMID: 26762928
ISSN: 1464-410x
CID: 3540842

Evidence-Based Versus Personalized Prostate Cancer Screening: Using Baseline Prostate-Specific Antigen Measurements to Individualize Screening [Comment]

Loeb, Stacy
PMID: 27325846
ISSN: 1527-7755
CID: 3540892