Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the duplex results of endovenous laser ablation in the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) and small saphenous veins (SSV) with at least 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective registry was entered by 11 centers from Europe and America, organized by the International Endovenous Laser Working Group. Data concerning 1,020 limbs in patients with incompetence of the GSV and/or SSV, treated with the Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) procedure, were collected. EVLA failures were defined on duplex imaging as reflux confined to the saphenofemoral or saphenopopliteal junction, reflux confined to the main saphenous trunk, or reflux of both junction and main trunk (totally patent saphenous vein) were analyzed at one or more years postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 54 +/- 5 years (range: 18-91 years). The average body mass index was 25. There was a paucity of severe complications: One case of third-degree skin burn, six patients with postsurgical deep vein thrombosis (0.6%), and 27 cases of sensory nerve damage (2.7%). At 1-year, the rate of complete occlusion of the saphenous trunk was 93.1%. There were 79 cases of treatment failures as evidenced by duplex: 22 isolated junction failures (2.2%), 44 isolated trunk failures (4.4%), and 13 totally patent veins (1.3%). Two-year duplex results were reported for 329 limbs with the identification of 19 new cases of failure. No new cases of failure were reported at 3-year follow-up of 130 limbs. Cumulative failure rates estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 7.7% at 1-year and 13.1% at 2- and 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a duplex scan performed at least 1-year post-treatment, this multicenter registry confirms the safety and efficacy of the EVLA procedure in the treatment of GSV and SSV reflux. Considering the continued failure rate documented in the present study, an annual follow-up by duplex is recommended to 2 years after EVLA

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains a viable option for treating carotid artery lesions in high surgical risk patients. We retrospectively reviewed our experience in performing CAS in patients with complex aortic arch anatomy. The ''coronary technique'' uses an AL1 guiding catheter to engage the origin of the common carotid artery permitting delivery of protection device and stent. In total, 12 patients had complex arch anatomy which precluded access using the standard technique as determined on preoperative imaging. A total of 8 patients with such anatomy underwent femoral artery catheterization with placement of an Amplatz AL1 guide catheter into the common carotid artery. All were able to be successfully treated, with no dissection, neurovascular deficit, or other major complication. Based on this case series, we describe the coronary technique as a safe and viable method for CAS in the setting of complex anatomy which might otherwise preclude CAS

OBJECTIVE: With the decline of diagnostic angiography, clinicians increasingly rely upon duplex scan criteria to select appropriate asymptomatic candidates for carotid intervention. Some recent trials have enrolled patients for intervention based upon end diastolic velocities (EDVs) as low as 100 cm/second, and peak systolic velocities (PSVs) as low as 230 cm/second. In as much as we have used more selective duplex scan criteria, we reviewed the course of asymptomatic patients who had EDVs from 100 to 124 cm/second. METHODS: Of the patients evaluated in our Intersocietal Commission for the Accreditation of Vascular Laboratories (ICAVL) accredited laboratory from 2002 to 2007, 144 patients had an EDV 100 to 124 cm/second. Of these, 47 patients underwent initial carotid intervention for concomitant symptoms (10), contralateral occlusion (3), or other imaging findings felt to warrant intervention. The remaining 97 asymptomatic patients were followed. One patient had both arteries fall within this EDV range. The mean follow-up for the 98 arteries was 29.1 months (range, 2-116 months). RESULTS: Five patients (5.2%) developed ipsilateral symptoms consisting of one stroke and four transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), at a mean time of 35.3 months (range, 12-58 months). Twenty-six patients (26.8%), including 3 who also developed ipsilateral symptoms, progressed to having an EDV of >/= 125 cm/second at a mean time of 24 months (range, 2-58). Two of these (2.1%) progressed directly to occlusion without symptoms and with no documented interim worsening of stenosis. CONCLUSION: For asymptomatic individuals with an initial EDV of 100 to 124 cm/second, the risk of ipsilateral stroke is small and, therefore, medical management is appropriate in most cases. However, the risk of progression to a more severe degree of stenosis, often warranting carotid intervention, is clinically meaningful. Yearly duplex scan follow-up is necessary to assess disease progression in this patient cohort

OBJECTIVE: The utilization of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in suitable patients has resulted in decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality. Octogenarians as a subgroup have been more readily offered EVAR, as it is less invasive, and therefore presumably better tolerated than conventional open aortic repair. The purpose of this study is to investigate periprocedural and late EVAR outcomes in octogenarians compared with patients less than 80 years of age. METHODS: From January 2003 to May 2008, 322 patients underwent EVAR. A total of 117 octogenarians were compared with 205 patients less than 80 years of age. A retrospective review of the demographic data, aneurysm details, perioperative morbidity, mortality, and late outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Octogenarians were significantly more likely to have a history of diabetes mellitus (51% vs 23%; P < .001), coronary artery disease (45% vs 32%; P = .0165), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (44% vs 30%; P = .0113), and renal insufficiency (57% vs 31%; P < .0001). There were no significant differences in the rates of perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, death, intestinal, or arterial ischemic complications between the two groups. Octogenarians had a significant higher rate of pulmonary complications (5.1% vs 1%; P < .03) and access-site hematomas (12% vs 2.4%; P = .001) than younger patients. When all significant perioperative morbidity was combined, octogenarians were twice as likely to develop complications following EVAR than younger patients (27.4% vs 11.7%; P = .001). At 5-year follow-up, younger patients were twice as likely to develop type II endoleaks. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR can be performed safely and effectively in octogenarians, and the incidence of major complications including myocardial infarction, stroke, and death is unchanged compared with younger patients. However, there is a significantly increased rate of access-site hematomas, pulmonary, and perioperative complications in octogenarians as a whole. Our findings suggest EVAR remains a suitable form of therapy in the elderly group provided there is an appropriate preoperative evaluation and perioperative monitoring following repair

Background: There is a paucity of literature regarding thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) in women. We report our institutional experience with TEVAR. Methods: Retrospective chart review was performed from 2004 to 2008. TEVAR was performed in 59 patients; 29 (49%) were female. Results: Mean age was 73.5 years. Mean thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) diameter was larger for women (5.9 cm vs 4.7 cm). A trend toward an increase in paraplegia was noted in women, 10.3% vs 4.8%. This may be related to increase in length of aortic coverage in women, 18.2 cm vs 15.2 cm (P < .05). Conclusion: TEVAR in women is safe and effective. The length of aortic coverage is greater in women, which may be related to larger aneurysms and more diffuse disease. This may be associated with a concerning increase in postoperative paraplegia. Women undergoing TEVAR should be considered for prophylactic maneuvers to prevent spinal cord ischemia (SCI), including minimizing length of coverage

Despite randomized controlled trials demonstrating the superiority of carotid endarterectomy over medical management in the prevention of stroke in asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis, considerable controversy remains with regard to selecting the appropriate asymptomatic patient for carotid intervention. Adding to the complexity of this issue is the fact that the extensive existing literature on this topic is heterogeneous, with trials having used varying definitions of high-grade stenosis, inclusion criteria for patients, and outcome measurements. The current article will review the existing randomized controlled trials on this topic, data regarding the risk of stroke in asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis, data regarding subsets of asymptomatic patients that may be at a higher-than-average risk of future stroke, and data regarding the efficacy of current medical therapy on the risk of stroke in asymptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. Ultimately, the challenge for clinicians is to ensure that asymptomatic patients with the highest risk of future stroke are offered carotid revascularization and that the intervention is performed with the lowest possible complication rate, in order to maintain the benefit of prophylactic treatment

OBJECTIVES: Inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during attempted central venous access is a well-known complication. Historically, these patients are managed with an open operative approach and repair under direct vision via an infraclavicular and/or supraclavicular incision. We describe our experience and technique for endovascular management of these injuries. METHODS: Twenty patients were identified with inadvertent iatrogenic subclavian artery cannulation. All cases were managed via an endovascular technique under local anesthesia. After correcting any coagulopathy, a 4-French glide catheter was percutaneously inserted into the ipsilateral brachial artery and placed in the proximal subclavian artery. Following an arteriogram and localization of the subclavian arterial insertion site, the subclavian catheter was removed and bimanual compression was performed on both sides of the clavicle around the puncture site for 20min. A second angiogram was performed, and if there was any extravasation, pressure was held for an additional 20min. If hemostasis was still not obtained, a stent graft was placed via the brachial access site to repair the arterial defect and control the bleeding. RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients required a stent graft for continued bleeding after compression. Both patients were well excluded after endovascular graft placement. Hemostasis was successfully obtained with bimanual compression over the puncture site in the remaining 18 patients. There were no resultant complications at either the subclavian or the brachial puncture site. DISCUSSION: This minimally invasive endovascular approach to iatrogenic subclavian artery injury is a safe alternative to blind removal with manual compression or direct open repair

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous dissection of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) is exceedingly rare. Treatment options range from observation to anticoagulation to open surgery or endovascular repair. We present our experience to date in the management of isolated SMA dissections. METHODS: A retrospective review of the vascular surgery and radiology databases from 1998 to 2008 was performed. In general, incidental radiologic findings of a dissection were managed expectantly. The decision to intervene was based on anatomic suitability, patient comorbidities and symptoms, and physician preference. Endovascular stents were placed using a brachial approach, with the choice of stent determined by physician preference. Patients who underwent endovascular stent placement (ESP) were maintained on antiplatelet therapy for 6 months postoperatively. Follow-up consisted of yearly office visits and adjunctive computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when clinically indicated. RESULTS: CT or MRI imaging identified nine patients (7 men, 2 women) with an isolated SMA dissection. One patient also had a concomitant celiac artery dissection. Median age was 70 years (range, 46-73 years). Median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 13.8-62.5 months). Presentations included an incidental radiologic finding in three patients and acute onset abdominal pain in six. Treatment included expectant management in four patients, anticoagulation in two, and ESP in three. ESP was performed primarily in two patients and in a third patient after initial management with anticoagulation failed. The reduction in the diameter of the true lumen was significantly greater in patients treated with ESP vs patients who were successfully managed expectantly or with anticoagulation (F = 15.59, P < .005). No procedural complications were associated with ESP. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated SMA dissection is a rare entity that may be managed successfully in a variety of ways based on clinical presentation. Endovascular stenting can be performed with good results and may be the preferred treatment in patients with symptomatic isolated SMA dissections