Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cancer detection rates (CDR) for men undergoing 12 core systematic prostate biopsy with negative prebiopsy mpMRI (NegMR). MATERIALS & METHODS: Clinical data from consecutive men undergoing prostate biopsy with prebiopsy 3T mpMRI from December 2011 to August 2014 were reviewed from an IRB approved prospective database. Prebiopsy mpMRI was read by a single radiologist and men with NegMR prior to biopsy were identified for this analysis. Clinical features, CDR, and NPV rates were summarized. RESULTS: Seventy five men underwent SPB with a NegMRI during the study period. For the entire cohort, men with no prior biopsy, men with prior negative biopsy, and men enrolled in active surveillance protocols, overall CDR was 18.7%, 13.8%, 8.0% and 38.1%, respectively, and detection of Gleason sum >/= 7 (GS>/=7) cancer was 1.3%, 0%, 4.0% and 0%, respectively. The NPV for all cancers was 81.3%, 86.2%, 92.0%, and 61.9%, and for GS>/=7 cancer was 98.7%, 100%, 96.0% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Negative prebiopsy mpMRI confers an overall NPV of 82% on 12 core biopsy for all cancer and 98% for GS>/=7. Based upon biopsy indication, these findings assist in prebiopsy risk stratification for detection of high risk disease and may provide guidance in the decision to pursue biopsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We review recent developments in prostate MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Large series have strengthened the case for the use of MRI prior to subsequent biopsy to maximize the detection of clinically significant disease, and reduce the detection of clinically insignificant disease. This has effectively moved the discussion on from whether MRI is useful in prostate cancer detection to how best to use it, and at which time point. The Prostate Imaging- Reporting And Data System (PIRADS) group have published a second version of the PIRADS criteria for prostate MRI, covering acquisition, interpretation, and reporting both for clinical practice and data collection for research.There is debate about the commonly used and more prescriptive PIRADS system versus the less prescriptive systems based on overall clinical impression of clinically significant disease (e.g. Likert or simplified quantum scoring). Studies suggest that the Likert or simplified quantum scoring approach may outperform PIRADSv2. Published data are conflicting on whether software-assisted fusion of MRI lesions to ultrasound used at biopsy is more effective than visual registration by a trained operator. SUMMARY: The use of prostate MRI is increasing worldwide, and the debate now focuses on how best to use it to optimize the detection of clinically significant disease.